adolescents bring forth unique ways of knowing, doing, and being that provide them with particular ways of framing, approaching, and solving engineering problems. Dr. Mejia’s primary research interests lie at the intersection of engineering education and social justice. He is particularly interested in the integration of Chicanx Cultural Studies frameworks and pedagogies in engineering education, and critical consciousness in engineering through social justice.Dr. Vitaliy Popov, University of San Diego Vitaliy Popov is an Assistant Professor of Learning Health Sciences at the University of Michigan Medical School. His research focuses on understanding, designing, and evaluating learning technologies and environments that
Gathering Storm: Energizingand Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future.19 The report criticizes the loss of U.S.advantages in the marketplace in science and technology. They called for coordinated efforts torestore U.S. pre-eminence in science technology engineering mathematics (STEM) inventions,businesses, and work. The scientists, businessmen, educators and policy-makers that made up thecommittee that produced the report were responding to what they considered were abysmalperformances by American students on international comparisons. Results from the TrendsInternational Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and the Program for International StudentAssessment (PISA) found American students behind other industrialized nations.20
Paper ID #35151The Development of a Texas A&M University Faculty of EngineeringEducationDr. Tracy Anne Hammond PhD, Texas A&M University Dr. Hammond is Director of the Institute for Engineering Education & Innovation and also the chair of the Engineering Education Faculty. She is also Director of the Sketch Recognition Lab and Professor in the Department of Computer Science & Engineering. She is a member of the Center for Population and Aging, the Center for Remote Health Technologies & Systems as well as the Institute for Data Science. Hammond is a PI for over 13 million in funded research, from NSF
Pre-College Engineering Education for Building a STEM Pipeline – Work in ProgressIntroductionEngineering education programs prepare graduates to meet the required workforce needs invarious disciplines and develop the next generation of experts to advance technology for solvingreal-world problems. Emphasis over the last several decades has been to prepare adequatequalified engineers to meet the demand in the workforce. Most of the tech-related industriesfocused on creating a STEM pipeline by raising awareness in K-12 students and supportingmotivation and education efforts for this purpose. Higher education institutions supported thisinitiative by engaging engineering students as mentors and role models for K-12
University. A Master’s of Science in Education with an emphasis on occupational training and development from Eastern Kentucky University, and a Doctorate in Educational Technology and Leadership from Morehead State University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022Welcome guests. It is good to have everyone here today. I am Dr. Natasha Watts, and this isDr. Glenda Scales. We both currently work at Virginia Tech in the College of Engineering.We are going to start by telling you a bit about ourselves. 1Dr. Glenda R. Scales has spent over 20 years working in global education
Station. He received the B.S. degree in mathematics from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. He was an Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a Na- tional Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized innovative
Paper ID #11420What have we learned from a systematic review of literature on Hispanictransfer students in engineering?Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd is a TEES Research Professor in the Office of Engineering Academic and Student Affairs at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received the B.S. degree in mathematics from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. He was an Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman
and Technology (NIST), which produced revolutionary changes in many of FDNY’s long-established tac- tics. The new firefighting procedures developed through this research have been implemented by FDNY in several real-life fires in New York City. This research was featured on the cover page of ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineering) Magazine. He also led the research that developed an innovative training methodology to disseminate firefighter safety research and to educate firefighters in a most effective manner. This training has been used by more than 80,000 firefighters from all 50 U.S. states and officially adopted by more than 1000 fire departments nationwide. He has been featured on more than 1000
online textbook. They were given the MPE again at the end of the program. Ifthey increased their scores to meet the cut score of 22 out 33 correct, they were permitted toenroll in engineering calculus I. This study examines their responses to the surveys during thebridge program and their grades, including any correlations that exist among the variables.IntroductionAs technology advances continue to grow rapidly, there remains a need for a diverse engineeringworkforce throughout the world. Most engineering majors rely on a strong mathematicsfoundation. Specifically, being successful on college calculus courses has been crucial to earn anengineering degree [1]. However, most engineering freshmen entered college without havingnecessary
. Since 2000, countries haveinvested billions of dollars in research/development and education to advance nanoscale science,engineering, and technology. Despite these efforts, nanotechnology and nanoscience programsexist in a handful universities around the world.At the University of North Dakota (UND), a mid-size research institution in the Midwest and oneof two research universities located in the state of North Dakota, there were no regularly designatedcourses to educate undergraduate students in nanoscience and nanotechnology until 2014. Thispaper will describe an NSF-funded project to establish a nanoscience and nanotechnology programat UND with the goal of generating new interest in nanoscience and nanotechnology among STEMstudents and
are to provide a brief overview of the ecological validationmodel, which is the framework of PASS approach, and how that was used to guide departmentstudent success strategies.Overview of DepartmentOur department has three undergraduate degree programs. Biological Systems Engineering (BE)and Agricultural Engineering (AE) are offered through the College of Engineering and theAgricultural Systems Technology (AST) is offered through the College of Agricultural Sciencesand Natural Resources. Table 1 provides information on enrollment, and percentage of studentsthat would be considered at-promise students. It is worth noting that there are additionalcategories of at-promise students, but our institutional processes currently do not
Engineering Schoolindicated that there was an overall increase in students' interest in STEM content and STEMfields as a career, and that students found hands-on sessions fun and engaging [10]. Compared to boys, attitudes towards STEM subjects for middle-school girls arebecoming more negative between the seventh and ninth grades and are declining at a faster pace[11]. The current gender gap in girls' attitudes and interests most likely affects their performancein the STEM study and their lifestyle choices associated with important life phases [12]. In termsof career participation, women are less interested in STEM subjects and occupations than men[13]. Post a 2017 five-day all girls STEM camp at West Virginia Institute of Technology, 81%(26/32
curriculum and models. Prior to becoming focused on student success and retention, her research interests included regulation of intracranial pressure and transport across the blood-brain barrier in addition to various ocular-cellular responses to fluid forces and the resulting implications in ocular pathologies.Kerry Dixon, The Ohio State University Kerry Dixon is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Teaching and Learning within the College of Education and Human Ecology at The Ohio State University. She is a specialist in interdisciplinary ed- ucation, with particular focus on integrating visual art into science, technology, engineering and math. Formerly a member of the curatorial staff at the San Francisco Museum
specific interests in human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, assistive-technology, and accessibility.Prof. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Global En- gineering Program, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology
development and program assessment, the Committee identifiedthree guiding principles. According to these recommendations2 engineering education should 1)emphasize engineering design; 2) incorporate important and developmentally appropriatemathematics, science, and technology knowledge and skills; and 3) promote engineering “habitsof mind.”The majority of research studies focus on measureable outcomes of K-12 engineering educationprograms. Some have focused on enhanced engineering career awareness.3,4 Others havefocused on increased understanding of engineering design principles.5,6 Yet others have focusedon increased awareness of the ways engineers apply science and mathematics functions andprocedures.7 In all, these assessments of children’s
. Lucena, will culminate in Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice (Wiley-IEEE Press, 2017).Dr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Juan Lucena is Professor and Director of Humanitarian Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). Juan obtained a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech and a MS in STS and BS in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). His books include Defending the Nation: U.S. Policymaking to Create Scientists and Engineers from Sputnik to the ’War Against Terrorism’ (University Press of America, 2005), Engineering and Sustainable Community Development (Morgan &Claypool, 2010), and
Solid and Hazardous Waste Technologies. COL Starke has published several peer reviewed research articles and has presented his research at national and international conferences. He maintains a focus on the scholarship of teaching and learning in en- gineering education. COL Starke is a registered Professional Engineer (Delaware), member of several professional associations, and is a member of the National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Sur- veyors (NCEES).Major Richard Francis Rogers III, United States Army Major Rogers is a Logistics officer with operational experience in movement control units. He is a former member of the faculty of the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering at the United
Electronics to Electrical Engineering StudentsAbstractWestern Carolina University is the only educational institution that offers engineering andtechnology degrees in the western part of the state which is home to major national andinternational engineering-related companies. As the power industry has a significant shareamong these companies and is becoming one of the major recruiters of our graduates in theDepartment of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University, developing anemphasis in electric power engineering plays a vital role in educating the next generation of theregion’s power industry workforce.To that end, a curriculum development effort was planned and is projected to train, prepare forresearch, and
Reservation and 5th Grade Native 10 (White) rural American Students 2 Holly (White) Rural (Small town) 4th Grade White 15 2 Jennifer (White) Rural (Small town) 5th Grade White 9Data Collection and AnalysisTo address our first research question, we used two survey instruments: 1) the EngineeringIdentity Development Scale (EIDS) [13]; and 2) the Engineering & Technology subscale ofthe Student Attitudes toward STEM (S-STEM) survey [14]. We used the EIDS to comparestudents’ pre and post scores in their perceptions regarding their Academic Identity,Occupational Identity, and Engineering Aspirations. We used the S-STEM survey to examinestudents' pre and post survey
anentrepreneurial mindset and up-to-date tools used by industry in all the participants (i.e., futureworkforce). Through this pathway, students are enabled to keep up with the changing demandsof industry in the 21st century.On the other hand, the Digital Manufacturing pathway introduces K-12 students to basic designskills by means of The Engineering Design Process through 3D additive manufacturing.Specifically, participants learn Computer-Aided Design in SolidWorks while gaining hands-onand practical skills in realizing their design using the 3D printing rapid prototyping machines. Inaddition, students work in groups to gain teamwork skills, collaborate on interdisciplinaryprojects such assistive technology, and communicate their ideas in visual (e.g
quantitative metric for measuring or assessingBroader Impacts statements PIs propose in their NSF awarded grants. This study is an exploratoryattempt to unpack what is currently being funded using awarded Project Summaries and outlinetensions around addressing Broader Impacts by proposing a possible quantitative metric formeasuring Broader Impacts activities.BackgroundThe National Science Foundation (NSF) from its inception in 19501, has remained, to date, theFederal government’s principle steward for research and education in science and engineering(S&E) fields. NSF is recognized as “the Nation’s premier agency supporting basic research andeducation in mathematics, science, engineering, and technology”2 (p. 3). The agency helps providethe
-optics, including plasmonics, nanofabrication, computational modeling, photonic crystals, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: An optimization model for assigning students to multidisciplinary teams by considering preferences and skillsAbstractProject-based learning has become popular and prevalent across higher education. Additionally,the Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology also emphasizes the ability to function inmultidisciplinary teams. These educational practices have resulted in the implementation ofteam-based projects throughout engineering curriculums. Team formation, however, is not atrivial process and occasionally
seminarsinfluenced a student’s study skills or their use of library technology. The answer was not verymuch – in fact, they found that 22% of first year engineering students had never used the library[7]. Engineering graduate students' needs tend to be quite different from their undergraduatecounterparts. Many graduate programs assume students enter the program with foundationalinformation literacy knowledge obtained during their undergraduate programs. However, this isat odds with our understanding of theory-heavy undergraduate programs. Previous research ongraduate student populations indicates that confidence in their information literacy skills is high,but this confidence may not translate into practical skills [8]. A survey of Electrical
Paper ID #37132Cultivating Sustainable Infrastructure Project Delivery throughIntegrated Design and Envision-Rating System within ConstructionEducationMiss Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University Rubaya Rahat grew up in Bangladesh, where she pursued her Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering at the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). After graduating she worked for two years in a construction management company in Dhaka, Bangladesh. She was involved in various residential and infrastructure projects. At present, Rubaya is a Ph.D. candidate at Department of Civil and Environmental
Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She has a Ms. degree in Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech, and Bs. in Mechatronics Engineering from Kocaeli University, Turkey. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work-In-Progress: Exploring Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Research Skill Development in Long-term ProjectsAbstract: In this work-in-progress paper, we examine the skill development of students from a variety ofdisciplines in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) following their extendedinvolvement in an interdisciplinary undergraduate research experience. Undergraduate research in STEMis an important step in student learning and has
Paper ID #37701Measuring Systems Thinking Using Stealth AssessmentIng. Andrea Ramirez-Salgado, University of Florida Andrea is a doctoral student at the University of Florida specializing in Educational Technology within the Curriculum and Instruction program. She has a master’s degree in Education and ICT and a bachelor’s degree in Software Systems Engineering. Andrea has been teaching undergraduate and graduate courses for the past thirteen years covering topics such as algorithms, process engineering, instructional design, and applications of technology in education. Her research interests include understanding the
and criteria for success.Grand Challenges of Engineering in Addressing Air Quality:Air quality is a critical issue facing the world today, with numerous sources of pollutioncontributing to poor air quality in many regions. This problem affects human health, theenvironment, and the economy, and it requires a comprehensive and interdisciplinary approach tobe addressed effectively.1,2,3,4 Engineering has a key role to play in addressing air quality, asengineers are involved in the design, development, and implementation of technologies andsystems to improve air quality23. The grand challenges of engineering24 in addressing air quality,including the need for new technologies to measure and monitor air quality, the development ofeffective
during the pandemic. In addition, the interviewees noted uncertain prospect of the industry as one of the crises theywere facing. Industrial transformation and technological upgrading that threaten traditionalindustries, as well as the slowing down economy due to the Covid pandemic, caused anxietiesamong early career engineers about their job security.Crises resulted from personal strugglesThis dimension mainly illustrates the incompatibility with work that resulted from early careerengineers’ own physical and psychological reactions, including physical repulsion, grievance, andself-confusion. First, some early career engineers noted their physical repulsion at the work environment. Forexample, a process development engineer said
actual engineering practice, and scores were based on individual performances of this student.Measures used were tested and validated to ensure that they measure knowledge, skills, and abilities(KSAs) as used in the professional world. In short, validated measures were used by capable instructorswho judged performances of individual students under authentic professional experiences—yieldingcredible scores.Capstone design courses are common sites of student assessment, but most assessment is focused onABET (formerly, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) accreditation and awardinggrades. Current practices in capstone courses often prevent sound assessment of individual student
was a postdoctoral fellow at Advanced Technologies and Regenerative Medicine, LLC. She received her doctoral degree in Biomedical Engineering from Tufts University, M.S. degree from Syracuse University, and B.S. degree from Cornell University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Promoting Equitable Team Dynamics in a Senior Biomedical Engineering Design CourseIntroductionTeam-based engineering design projects are common mechanisms to promote hands-onengagement with the engineering design process. Team-based projects are often implemented inboth introductory and senior level courses in the undergraduate engineering curriculum.Navigating the complex team