as missing in colleges that are part ofthis project:C.1. Ability to apply mathematical and natural science principles into the product design process;C.2. Ability to apply fundamental engineering principles for effective solution of practical problems in the product realization process;C.3. Ability to analyze and develop intelligent electromechanical systems;C.4. Application relevant technology tools within the product realization environment;C.5. Development of awareness of the professional and ethical responsibilities for sustainable design, in order to ascertain the impacts of the engineering solution on the global society and environment;C.6. Ability to work within a multi-disciplinary collaborative product
researchexperience can provide quick and valuable information for faculty mentors. Faculty mentors canuse this feedback to address with participants issues that may be influencing their learning ortheir thinking about future educational or career goals, and make adjustments to improve thelearning environment before the end of the experience.References 1. Willis, D. A., Krueger, P. S., and Kendrick, A.(2013). The influence of a research experiences for undergraduates program on student perceptions and desire to attend graduate school. Journal of STEM Education, 14(2), 21-28. 2. Zydney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., and Bauer, K. W. (2002). Impact of undergraduate research in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91
such as printing orientation, infill density, and infill pattern on the mechanicalproperties of the commonly used polylactide (PLA) and its Tough version. Figure 1 PCE Vertical Test Stand (left) and Tinus Olsen Charpy Machine (right).MethodsTwo ET senior design students were assigned to work on this project. The senior design classesare capstone courses where students utilize their cumulative engineering knowledge towards areal-life project through research and experimentation. They come in a sequence of two 3-creditclasses in 2 competitive semesters (Senior Design I & Senior Design II). ASTM standards werefirst researched to determine specimen size and dimensions for the tests performed. Tensile andCharpy impact tests were
implemented multiple interactive Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Mixed Reality (MR) modules and platforms. These modules have been effectively utilized in mechanical design, training, remote operation, and engineering education. Israa has received recognition for her contributions, including the best poster and presentation awards for her work, the 2024 Bravo Award for Employee Recognition, and induction into the Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi, placing her among the top 10% of Purdue Graduate students. Her academic journey reflects a commitment to advancing knowledge and contributing to technological innovation in XR control systems. Her professional aspirations include applying for an Assistant Professor
of personal engagementswith citizens of the country. This system understanding enabled the student’s ability to assessand update system complexity as research and engagements were conducted. It exemplifies theadult learning, or andragogical [12] approach needed to understand a complex system and itassists the student and faculty mentor in shared understanding of how best to apply ideationtechniques and EM methods in follow on efforts. (Figure 2: Example Systems Diagram for an Engineering/Technical Problem on Green Energy)Framing the problem for evaluation of design alternatives is enabled through detailed functionaldecomposition and value modeling. Figure 3 is one example of a larger value model treeconducted by a student studying informal
include incorporating hands-on learningactivities, staying up to date with industry trends, using interdisciplinary approaches, and teachingsecure software practices throughout the software development lifecycle 3 . Professors from SaintGeorge University of Beirut and Applied Science Private University developed a framework foracademia focused on cybersecurity awareness across various academic fields. The frameworkoutlines required cybersecurity topics, best practices at the institutional level, and the use oflearning management systems (LMS) to organize and deploy training modules for students 4 .Similarly, professors at the University of Helsinki designed guidelines for creating a cybersecuritycurriculum for university-level programs, focusing
teaches a wide array of courses that includes statics, reinforced concrete design, structural analysis, and materials engineering. Dr. Brake actively integrates project based and peer assisted learning pedagogies into his courses.Dr. James C. Curry Dr. James Curry is an Associate Professor in the Lamar Industrial Engineering department. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The impact of one-credit introductory engineering courses on engineering self-efficacy: seminar v. project-basedAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper presents the results of two different one-credit introductoryengineering courses: i) a project based and peer assisted learning introductory
Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student professional development and training. In addition, she is developing methodologies around hidden curriculum, academic emotions and physiology, and en- gineering makerspaces. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Understanding Industry’s Expectations of Engineering Communication
Engineers) for several years and has served as interim advisor of SWE (Society of Women Engineers). She has been an active participant and supporter of SMILE (Science and Math Investigative Learning Experiences) for the past eleven years: SMILE is a program designed for in-state, minority, underrepresented and low-income students in grades 4 to 12. She has also co-directed a summer bridge camp for entering, female, engineering students.Karen Wishner, University of Rhode Island Karen Wishner is a Professor of Oceanography at the University of Rhode Island. She received her B.A. from the University of Chicago and her Ph.D. from Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Her research interests are in marine
and several others offered by other departments. Of the 102students in Systems Engineering graduating class of 2008, 40 of them took the emergingtechnologies course or the honors equivalent. Our exist survey asked students to pick theirfavorite elective course, and emerging technologies ranked second overall, with a total of 17.3%of the votes (first place was Mobile Robot Design at 30%). Thus, slightly less than half of thestudents who took emerging technologies considered it the best of the five elective courses thatthey took. For a non-traditional course such as this to outshine all of the other electives in themajor is a strong testament to the impact of this different way of looking at technology and the
of their activities and faculty advisor to their chapters.Juliet J. Trail, UVA Center for Diversity in Engineering Juliet J. Trail is a research assistant in the University of Virginia Center for Diversity in Engineering (CDE). In this capacity she serves as program coordinator for the Research Experience for Teachers (PI Carolyn Vallas), which includes both a summer experience and an annual INNOVATION: Teaching Nanotechnology workshop for K-12 teachers. Ongoing activities with the CDE also include numerous academic year and summer programs designed to inspire and sustain student interest at the K-12, un- dergraduate, and graduate levels in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Prior to serving
graduates from thetwo programs were considered by industry to be essentially equivalent and therefore theperception of professionalism was essentially equivalent as well. As the emphasis onengineering research science grew, the applied content was frequently moved to technologyinstitutes and programs. This did not diminish the relevance of the applied skills. The appliedtechnology skills were valued by industry as being important to the design success.It is important for technology administrators and educators to understand the negative impact ofengineering education’s inability to reconcile their roles and desires. By pursuing a perceptionof professionalism, engineering programs removed the education of many of the skills whichmade engineering
occupations engaged in developing sustainable communities,mostly in their role of creating practical solutions that enable communities to thrive.Nevertheless, research in the mid-2000s identified a need to address inadequacies in the technicaland generic skills of engineers needed to deliver sustainable communities. Generic engineeringcompetencies in this context are defined as attributes, competencies, or skills that are importantto graduates across all engineering disciplines. Communication and social skills are examples [3-4], but more broadly, the identified inadequacies represent gaps in project management andleadership skills needed to create and get buy-in for a community vision [5].Our work-in-progress explores how engineers develop awareness
, courses tailored to enhancing pedagogical skills in such areasbecome valuable. As such, teacher professional development programs and courses that focus onteaching engineering with real-world problems emerge as catalysts for transformative teachingpractices. In the context of this study, we delve into a 3-hour graduate course entitledNanoEnvironmental Engineering for Teachers (NEET) offered free of cost at Rice University,Arizona State University, Yale University, and the University of Texas at El Paso under theNanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment(NEWT). The NEET class is designed for AP Environmental Science, Environmental Systems,Biology or Life Sciences, and K-12 STEM teachers to learn about water
Technology 7/ Western Carolina University 8 AbstractThis is the fourth paper in the special panel session focusing on issues driving reform of faculty rewardsystems to advance professional engineering education for creative engineering practice and leadership oftechnological innovation to enhance U.S. competitiveness. This paper explores the conceptual beginningsof a template for improved faculty reward systems that better reflect the practice of engineering for full-time, tenure track professionally oriented faculty in schools of engineering and technology.1. Background and HistoryThe United States has built an excellent system of research-oriented graduate education that is second tonone for the
Consul- tants, a group of students who provide peer-to-peer library research help.Nora Allred, Michigan Technological University Nora Allred is Scholarly Communications and Copyright Librarian at the J. Robert Van Pelt and Opie Library at Michigan Technological University. She provides copyright and fair use awareness to the campus community through the library’s webpage, presentations, instruction sessions, and one-on-one consultations. As Co-PI on the NSF ethics education project, she lead the learning module on copyright and fair use for graduate students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Developing a Comprehensive, Assessment-based
size and content delivery on these outcomes. A similarstudy examining the long-term benefits for faculty, including their growth in course design andteaching, would be valuable. Additionally, comparing these findings to faculty benefits observedin CUREs within the natural sciences would provide further insights. Future work such as thiswill offer evidence, best practices, and future training modules to promote the widerimplementation of CUREs in engineering education. 10References[1] J. R. Ward, H. D. Clarke, and J. L. Horton, “Effects of a research-infused botanical curriculum on undergraduates’ content knowledge, STEM competencies, and attitudes
of resources from many areas within andperhaps outside the organization to meet a deadline. In this case a tight schedule is needed toreduce cycle time for product development. Although the three approaches differ in thetechniques employed, they are all after the same goal. The solution for any organization will besome combination of these three approaches, one that best fits their unique situation.Reduced cycle time is crucial for the success of organizations engaged in a highly competitiveglobal market. The quest for speed in design, development, and introduction of new products iscontinual for organizations seeking a competitive advantage. In the long term, organizationssurvive by beating their competitors to market with better and
, sustainability, and diversity, equity and inclusion.Mrs. Sally Sue Richmond, Penn State Great Valley Sally Sue Richmond is a Lecturer in Information Science at the School of Graduate Professional Studies, Penn State Great Valley. Richmond has a B.A. in Art and an M.S. in Information Science from The Pennsylvania State University. She has 20+ years industry experience in IT. Her research interests are problem-solving, team processes, and mentoring. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Student Mentors and the Engineering Design Process Experience for First Year StudentsIntroductionIn this Work in Progress, we describe the mentoring program
communities of practice (CoP) facilitated through theEngineering Collaboration for Online and Remote Education (E-CORE) initiative, forums andconferences organized through both the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) andthe American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and conversations at the BCCATEngineering Articulation Committee annual meeting. These forums focused on sharing best practicesacross the post-secondary sector to mitigating the impact of COVID-19 on students and instructors.This paper focuses on the adjustments made to the first-year design courses due to COVID-19, asoffered at a primarily open-access, teaching intensive university with class sizes of between 30 and 60students with no teaching assistant support
engineering and development of an interest in STEM topics in K-12 students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Assessing the Impact of Educational Factors on Conceptual Understanding of Geotechnical Engineering TopicsIntroductionA commonly accepted assessment instrument used for both diagnostic and formative purposes isthe concept inventory [1], [2], which refers to any kind of research-based assessment techniquethat measures conceptual understanding [1], [3]. The usage of concept inventories helpsinstructors measure the effectiveness of their teaching [1], [3] and determines if students have thecorrect understanding of important concepts on a topic. When the same set of questions is
AC 2011-1565: FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF TERMINOLOGY ON ENGI-NEERING EXAMINATIONSChirag Variawa, University of Toronto Chirag Variawa is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto. His research interests include maximizing inclusivity, accessibility and usability of engineering education via universal instructional design and innovative instructional methods. He is an active Canadian member of the SCC division of ASEE, co-chair of the Leaders of Tomorrow (Graduate) program and teaching assistant in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering. He received his B.A.Sc. (2009) from the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of
aspects. • Design and produce sound castings by using the principles and best practices in metal casting. • Use casting simulation software to perform the detail design of a casting feeding system that provides tranquil filling and minimizes defects. • Identify, evaluate, discuss, and propose recommendations to metal casting problems.The milestone-based PBL was first introduced in the Foundry and Heat Treatment course in theFall 2020 semester and again in the Fall 2021 semester with minor changes to account forlessons learned during the first implementation. The motivation for implementing a PBLmethodology in this course stemmed from the instructor’s (who is also the first author of thisstudy) experience teaching this
(NHERI) – NetworkCoordination Office (NCO) is a National Science Foundation funded collaborative grant thataims to coordinate research and outreach activities for the multi-disciplinary natural hazardsengineering research. As part of the NHERI-NCO, the Education and Community Outreachinitiatives include opportunities for undergraduate students to conduct research to mitigate theeffects of natural hazards. The Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) has been well-researched as a best practice for preparing college students for graduate studies (Willis, Krueger,& Kendrick, 2013), especially underrepresented students in engineering (Labrador & Perez,2006). Curriculum was developed specifically for the NHERI REU program to
a project that ultimately resulted in a publication [7]. The otherproject led to a start-up company, formed by a May 2009 Rowan graduate; which is continuingthe product development that began in the Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic.VII. References1. L.R. Latucca, P.E. Terenzini and J. F. Volkwein, “Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000,”ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD 2006.2. K. D. Dahm and J. A. Newell, “Baseball Stadium Design: Teaching Engineering Economics and TechnicalCommunication in a Multi-Disciplinary Setting,” Journal of SMET Education: Innovations and Research, 2, 1(2001).3. W. Riddell, P. Jansson, K. Dahm, H. Benavidez, J. Haynes, D. Schowalter, “Conservation of Energy for CampusBuildings: Design, Communication and
AC 2012-2991: DESIGN OF A ZERO ENERGY HOME AS A FIRST-YEARDESIGN PROJECTProf. Andrew Lau, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Andrew (Andy) S. Lau is Associate Professor of engineering and Coordinator of first-year seminars for the Penn State College of Engineering. Lau is a 1977 graduate of Penn State with a B.S.M.E. and was a Research Fellow and 1983 graduate of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, with an M.S.M.E. He has worked since 1977 as an engineer in the areas of solar energy applications in buildings, simulation of building energy use, and general consulting in the energy field. Most recently, his work has involved green buildings, engineering ethics, and sustainable design. He is a licensed
University to assessthe impact of the Collaborative Engineering Program on its cohort of students.1.1 Research QuestionsThe long-term goal of this research is to improve understanding of how students become proficient atinterdisciplinary design for the purpose of creating better curricula to develop graduates with those skills.To facilitate this goal, the primary research method used was to observe engineering students from boththe Collaborative Engineering Program and not in the program working on interdisciplinary design teamson an engineering design activity. It uses a mixed-methods approach to address two main objectives,interdisciplinary collaboration and engineering design, by addressing two high level research questions.Research Question 1
failure rate that is 75% lower than those who do not, see Table 1 [1].Research also shows that project management regularly ranks high on the list of essential skillsthat experienced practitioners say new engineering graduates need [2]. Fundamental technical content takes up the bulk of the typical undergraduate engineeringcurriculum, leaving little room for a course that would focus on both the hard and soft skills ofproject management. However, the importance of developing engineering students’ projectmanagement skills should not be discounted. Standard practice is to include a one or twosemester design project for senior engineering students, often referred to as the capstone course.Such courses are an ideal forum for providing project
-bedside” to improve health outcomes. M4 has a diverseportfolio of medical products supporting clients in a wide spectrum of healthcare markets includingclinical models, simulations, surgical tools, electromechanical devices, wound care, diagnostic testing,and therapeutic devices.The Program Management (PM) Division at CDME serves a pivotal role in alleviating the administrativeintricacies associated with overseeing translational research endeavors. Through a dedicated andproficient team, they extend support across all facets of contract administration, encompassing costanalysis, adept scheduling, project delivery, and finalization. Their operational approach is aligned withestablished industry standards and exemplifies best practices that facilitate
AC 2012-3782: COMPETITIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER-ING CAPSTONE DESIGN PROJECTS: STUDENT PREFERENCES ANDLEARNING OUTCOMESDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt, Ph.D., P.E., is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder (CU). She was attracted into environ- mental engineering as a high school student participating in a summer research program at Iowa State University. While at CU, she has mentored more than 30 undergraduate student research projects. Page 25.336.1