capabilities are rooted in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics… For a variety of reasons, concerns have arisen over the future of both the military and civilian contingents of the Air Force’s STEM workforce. Emerging mission areas, particularly in the space and cyber domains, are expanding the need for new technical skills and expertise… A growing percentage of science and engineering graduates in the United States are foreign citizens and thus ineligible for the security clearances that many jobs in the Air Force and in the aerospace industry require. The existing STEM workforce is aging, with many individuals nearing retirement. Women and minorities are underrepresented in most S&E
Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2004.[3] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020, National Academy Press, Washington , DC, 2005.[4] G.E. Downey, J.C., Lucena, B.M. Moskal, R. Parkhurst, T. Bigley, C. hays, B.K. Jesiek, L. Kelly, J. Miller, S. Ruff, J.L. Lehr, A. Nichols-Belo, ”The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People who Define Problems Differently”, Journal of Engineering Ed. Vol. 95, No. 2, pp.107-122.[5] National Academy of Engineering, Global Technology: Changes and Implications, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2011.[6] National Academy of Engineering, Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education, National Academy Press
. ARC. n.d.; Available from: http://www.arc.gov/index.asp. Page 23.429.1316. Sarnoff, S., Central Appalachia--Still the Other America. Journal of Poverty, 2003. 7(1/2): p. 123.17. Whisnant, D.E. Hillbilly Highway: Appalachia and America. 1997; Available from: http://www.unc.edu/~whisnant/appal/.18. Tang, M. and K. Russ, Understanding and Facilitating Career Development of People of Appalachian Culture: An Integrated Approach. Career Development Quarterly, 2007. 56(1): p. 34-46.19. Cooper, C.A., H.G. Knotts, and K.L. Elders, A Geography of Appalachian Identity. Southeastern Geographer, 2011. 51(3): p. 457
. Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan22. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 647-671.23. Huettel, L.G., Brown, A.S., Coonley, K.D., Gustafson, M.R., Kim, J., Ybarra, G.A., and Collins, L.M. (2007). Fundamentals of ECE: A Rigorous, Integrated Introduction to Electrical and Computer Engineering. IEEE Trans. Education, 50(3), 174-181
press release (2012), “President Obama Announces New Plan to Create STEM Master Teaching Corps”, http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/07/18/president-obama-announces-new-plan- create-stem-master-teaching-corps , July 2012. URL retrieved on 4/5/2012 4. Committee on Understanding and Improving K-12 Engineering Education in the United States, National Research Council (2009): Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. National Academies Press. 2009, ISBN 0309137780. Page 23.87.14 5. Crawley, E. Malmquist, J., Ostlund, S, Brodeur. D. (2007): Rethinking Engineering
of Engineering Education, Vol. 92, No. 1, 2003, pp. 7-25.12. S. Sudevalayam and P. Kulkarni, “Energy Harvesting Sensor Nodes: Survey and Implications,” IEEE Commun. Page 23.101.12Surveys Tuts., 2011.13. Z. A. Eu, H.-P. Tan, and W. K. G. Seah, “Wireless Sensor Networks Powered by Ambient Energy Harvesting:An Empirical Characterization,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2010.14. F. Simjee and P. H. Chou, "Everlast: long-life, super-capacitor-operated wireless sensor node," in ISLPED '06:Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on Low power electronics and design, (New York, NY, USA), pp.197-202, ACM
Page 23.142.9Introduction20. Ample motivation for the experiment stated 20A. Yours 20B. Whirlwind's21. Sufficient information to orient reader to the substance of experiment22. Sufficient information to excite reader23. Sections to follow mentionedGeneral Lab Observations and Results guidelines (specifics follow)Equations: 24. Equations are numbered 25. Punctuation with equations (: with follow/s/ing only) 26. Equations have spaceFigures/Tables: 27. Figure/Table labels correct. (Figure 1. Title) 28. Figures oriented correctly, clearly labeled and referencedLab ObservationsAnalysis29. Mathematical model used to predict system behavior presented with ample explanation and lead in.Experimental
Page 23.158.11Planner / Leader(s) (2-4)The planners are the key to the successful creation, development and execution of a leadershipweekend summit. Between two and four extreme leaders who have completed their LTPexperiences volunteer their time, thoughts and personal visions to create a weekend summitretreat. They spend between six and twelve months creating a theme, developing a programstructure, soliciting a cadre of volunteers to assist in the development and execution phases of theprogram and leading the four day/three night experiential leadership event for up to ninetyvolunteer participants, coaches, session champions and group coaches.The efforts are similar to serving as a program manager who has won a project, must select andlead a
. Huettel, “A dsp hardware-based laboratory for signals and systems,” in IEEE 12th Digital SignalProcessing Workshop and 4th Signal Processing Education Workshop, Moose, WY, United States, 2006, pp. 456 –459.[6] J. Ma and J.V. Nickerson, “Hands-On, Simulated, and Remote Laboratories: A Comparative LiteratureReview”, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 38, No. 3, Article 7, September 2006.[7] J.E. Corter, J.V. Nickerson, S.K. Esche, C. Chassapis, S. Im, and J. Ma, “Constructing Reality: A Study ofRemote, Hands-On, and Simulated Laboratories”, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 14,No. 2, Article 7, August 2007. [8] K. E. Wage, J. R. Buck, T. B. Welch, and C. H. Wright, “The continuous-time signals and systems conceptinventory
with the opportunity to think about the larger social issuesassociated with the service project. The objectives of structured reflection are to develop asensitivity in the students to the impact of professional decisions on society and the environmentand to provide the students with an opportunity to think about concepts of ethics and soundprofessional practice 3. Since the 1980’s, service-learning has been formally and successfully implemented in thesocial sciences and in disciplines in which clinical experiences are required 2, 5, 7. In 1985,Campus Compact was established to provide support for both service-learning and volunteerismat universities and colleges. Since then, Campus Compact has been able to gain support forservice
. Based on these reviews and on recommended pedagogical practice, complete Section I of the course design template and assessment form and prepare the student survey instrument as described in Section II (prior to the first class meeting). Clearly communicate to the students the intended learning outcome(s) for # this course, the course design to achieve the outcomes (including the mastery learning* procedures that will be used to ensure that all students Date who pass the course have met the tollgate outcomes at the required level), and their important role in the outcomes evaluation process. Provide the
it comes to applying the scientific content they have studied. But how do engineeringeducators develop this necessary common sense in their students? Since the 1970’s, capstone “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 8.324.1 Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”engineering design courses, where students are provided the opportunity to practice using theircommon sense as they apply physical principles towards real-world design applications, havebecome an accepted part of many engineering programs. But why wait until their
any additional questions that have not been answered during the study time. Afterwards, everyone can make a copy of the questions and ask their professors in the next class.In addition, this lesson teaches the team manager and team recorder how to be facilitators andhow to help the study team members stay focused and maximize their study time. They also helptheir study team avoid the following common pitfalls [10]: • Hero trap—the team relies on one person to answer all of the questions. • Social trap—the team discusses everything related to life EXCEPT the math or physics subject matter. • Freeloader trap—under-prepared teammate(s) who rely on others to “give” them the answers.In the second week
research in the formof customer interviews, concept testing surveys, and conjoint analyses are encouraged. Finallythe students develop a strategy for reaching their market segment(s) and provide a riskassessment. Students submit a 20-page (maximum) report on their findings.Grade Assessment. Grade assessments are based on: class attendance and participation; essayassignments on the cases; in-class quizzes on the cases and related readings; problem sets; andthe abovementioned term project. Attendance and classroom participation comprise 30% of thefinal grade. Essay assignments, quizzes and problem sets comprise 40%. The term projectcomprises 30%. Attendance is usually not a problem with this popular class. Nevertheless,students understand that any
: President's ViewROBERT J. VOIGTCaptain Robert J. Voigt USN is the chair of Electrical Engineering Department at the U. S. Naval Academy inAnnapolis Maryland. His research interests include real time, fault tolerant computer architecture and networking,particularly hierarchical multicast. He graduated from the Naval Academy in 1979 and received his MSEE in 1986and his Ph.D. in 1996 both from the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California.ROBERT W. IVESRobert W. Ives received the B.S. degree (mathematics) from the US Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD in 1982, theM.S. degree in electrical engineering from the US Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA in 1990, and the Ph.D.degree in electrical engineering from the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
. Effective Communication Skills for Scientific and Technical Professionals.Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing, 2001, 73-84.[3] Jones, John E. and J.William Pfeiffer, Editors. The 1979 Annual Handbook for Group Facilitators. LaJolla, California: University Associates, Inc., 1979.[4] Hammersby, Ph.D., Charles. “Parks and Recreation Administration and Finance.” 426, NorthernArizona University. Module 9 Lesson. Hermann, Ned. “Creative? Innovative? Are they different? Dowe need both?” 2001.[5] The 1999 Annual: Volume 2, Consulting. San Francisco, California: Josse-Bass/Pfeiffer, 1999.[6] Kindler, Herbert S. “Risk Taking for Leaders” In The 1999 Annual: Volume 1, Training. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer. San Francisco, California, 1999.[7] Pfeiffer, J
Problem Solving Summer Applications of Engineering andResidency on Analysis and with Computers Residency on Statistics QualityUW-Madison Management 3 credits UW-Madison 3 credits ManagementCampus 3 credits Campus 3 creditsNetwork Skills Technical Communicating Independent International Engineering and1 credit Project Technical Reading and Engineering Business Data Management Information Research in Strategies and Communication 3 credits 3 credits Applied Operations s and the Virtual
. Bereiter, Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2002.11. S. Ellis, Talk to Me. 2010. available on-line at http://www.talk2mebook.com.12. Talk to Me Website (2010), available on-line at http://www.talk2mebook.com.13. L.R. McAuliffe, G.W. Ellis, S.K. Ellis, I. Huff, B. McGinnis-Cavanaugh, Mysteries and Heroes: Using Imaginative Education to Engage Middle School Learners in Engineering, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, June 26-29, 2011.14. D.C. Dennett, Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981.15. A. Turing, Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind, 59
. Oneconsequence of this is that in terms of chronology, formal education in engineering at theundergraduate level came into being before the profession was well-organized in the UnitedStates. As the just quoted phrase “mechanic arts” suggests, the term “mechanical engineer” was Page 25.537.3still somewhat uncommon in the 1860’s. Terms such as electrical engineer or chemical engineeror industrial engineer were coined during the just described fifty year period in which academicdisciplines were being created and defined. The long term effect on engineering education ofthis is that while most professions such as medicine and law are taught in separate
. (1999). Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior, Proceedings of the 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan de Puerto Rico.20. Adams, R.S., and Atman, C.J. (2000). Characterizing Engineering Student Design Processes: An Illustration of Iteration, Proceedings from American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition, St. Louis, MO.21. De Bono, Edward. (1972). Children Solve Problems. Penguin Books. Page 25.549.1422. Thornton, S. (1995) Children Solving Problems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.23. Engel, Susan. (2005). The narrative worlds of what is and what if
, Mohammad-Zamry J. and Nor-Farida H. (2011a). “Cooperative Problem-Based Learning (CPBL): A Practical PBL Model for a Typical Course”, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, Vol. 6, Issue 3, Sept 2011, pp 12-20. Page 25.557.162. Ariffin A. H., Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Mohd. Kamaruddin A. H., Mimi Haryani H., Azila A. A., and S Syed Helmi Syed Hassan (2004). A review and survey of Problem-Based Learning Application in Engineering Education, accepted for Conference on Engineering Education, Kuala Lumpur, 14-15 Dis. 2004.3. Syed Helmi Syed Hassan, Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Mohd Salleh Abu, Shahrin Mohammad (2011
2011.11. http://cindyking.biz/cross-cultural-skills/12. Language Corps, Jed Willard. Global Competency. Accessed online www.LanguageCorps.com Dec 11 2010.13. Hovland, K. Global Learning: aligning Student Learning Outcomes with Study Abroad. Association of American Colleges and Universities, NAFSA May 2010. Accessed online http://dev.nafsa.org/uploadedFiles/NAFSA_Home/Resource_Library_Assets/Networks/CCB/AligningLearni ngOutcomes.pdf Dec. 10 2011.14. Cutler, S. Borrego, M.. Developing Global Competence in Graduate Engineering and Science Students through an IGERT International Internship Program. Proceedings of the 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington DC, October 27-30 2010
programming assignments showed that the majority of first-yearstudents in programming courses do not meet the expectations of instructors at the end of theirfirst course in computing [2]. Engineering students are no different in this regard. One potentialreason for this discrepancy between the learning outcomes desired by instructors and studentperformance is that the instructional methods used as well as the course content do not matchwell with the learning styles of most engineering students.The idea of learning styles has been around since the early 1980’s [4] and there are manylearning style models and assessments. The most commonly used within engineering is theFelder-Silverman learning styles model [5], with its associated assessment, the Index
semester were:ECS Core Competencies in Teaching, Academic Integrity Update, and Innovation andCreativity in the Classroom.Seminar 1 – ECS Core Competencies in TeachingThe overall seminar series had four primary objectives: to intentionally refocus on one ofthe ECS’s Core Competencies, excellence in undergraduate teaching; to foster cross-disciplinary discussions within the School of ECS; and to promote the development of “bestpractices” in teaching. This first seminar was aimed at getting the faculty to identify whatcore competencies in teaching should be important for the School of ECS. Teachingexcellence is consistent with Baylor University 's Christian commitment, to do “…whateveryou do, you must do all for the glory of God.” (I Cor 10:31) or
States were down 2.8%, thebiggest annual drop since the 1980s [1]. The Smart Grid enables grid operators to see further into thesystem and allows them the flexibility to better manage the intermittency of RES. This in turn surmountsa significant barrier, enabling wind and solar to be deployed rapidly – and in larger percentages to havea green Smart Grid.Going Green through the use of RES and make the planet sustainable and by so doing improve the airquality and environment. US government has required that by the year 2030 that 20% of the electricalenergy generated in the U S will be from RES. There are many different types of RES such ashydroelectric, biomass, wind, solar, wave, tidal and geothermal. The key to the usage of renewableresources is
; Giles, C.L. CiteSeerx: an architecture and web service design for an academic document search engine. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web 883–884 (2006).17. Uren, V., Buckingham Shum, S., Bachler, M. & Li, G. Sensemaking tools for understanding research literatures: Design, implementation and user evaluation. International journal of human-computer studies 64, 420–445 (2006).18. Chau, D.H., Kittur, A., Hong, J.I. & Faloutsos, C. Apolo: making sense of large network data by combining rich user interaction and machine learning. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems 167–176 (2011).19. Cairns, P. & Cox, A.L. Research Methods for Human-Computer
experiment. The learning mode of Beta studentstends to stay “passive” in traditional learning. During the direct observation, additional comments on group kinetics including Alpha vs.Beta Student interactions were recorded to further understand student response to the virtualmodules by capturing followings; i) Ratio of Alpha- vs. Beta-students in the group, i.e., 2 Alpha and 4 Beta, etc. ii) Level of interaction/discussion between Alpha- vs. Alpha-, Alpha- vs. Beta-, and Beta- vs. Beta-students, i.e., do Beta-students point out/correct procedural mistake(s) made by Alpha-student? iii) Gradual change, if there is any, in Alpha- vs. Beta-students ratio in the group at the later
is sponsored by NSF, Grant #0737130.Reference[1] H. Guo and J. Dong, “Enhance Computer Network Curriculum using Collaborative Project-based Learning”, inProceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference, 2011[2] Hamid A. Hadim and Sven K. Esche, “Enhancing Engineering Curriculum Through Project-based Learning”, inProceedings of 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov. 2002[3] A. Martinez-Mones, E. Gomes-Sanchez at el, “Multiple Case Studies to Enhance Project-based Learning in aComputer Architecture Course”, IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 48, No. 3, August, 2005[4] K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson, “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,”Journal of Engineering