to allow greater studentparticipation. Although, some scholars say that such a method puts forth a completely differentapproach to college education compared to a traditional lecture format (Midgley, 2002). Therefore, it is important to assess the students’ learning capabilities and not just his/hermemory (Brown & Cooper, 1976). In other words, assessment of learning is not a third-partyresearch project or someone’s questionnaire; it must be viewed as a community effort or nothing,driven by a faculty's own commitment to reflect, judge, and improve (Marchese, 1991 & 1997). Hawkins and Winter’s ACORN model also helps to document ideas and providesguidelines to conquering and mastering change (Hawkins and Winter, 1997
theproblem, the approach taken in this project, the resulting data, our lessons learned, and strategiesbeing considered to scale-up the intervention in subsequent semesters to include all first-semesterengineering students.Introduction: The goal of this study was to understand the effects of intervention onengineering students who struggle in their first calculus course. We were mindful in conductingthe study that, as it relates to students, ... “... retention is not then the goal; retention is the result or by-product of improved programs and services in our classrooms and elsewhere on campus that contribute to student success.” 1As such, in understanding factors that influence student success in calculus (and their curricula)we hope to provide the
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring Engineering Faculty Views on Their Role in Broadening Participation in EngineeringAbstractBroadening participation in STEM is an initiative of critical importance within the United States.In order to maintain its global prominence in STEM fields, as well as maintain national securityand other technological advances, the US must produce over one million more STEMprofessionals than what is currently projected. Broadening participation is a term used todescribe increasing the participation of underrepresented groups in STEM fields. This includesproviding STEM exposure, access, and opportunities for individuals from underrepresentedgroups. According to the
at the state and local level for over 35 years. He is the Evaluation Consultant for the Rochester Institute of Technology Women in Engineering Project and for the Rochester Area Colleges Center for Excellence in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM). He also provides evaluation services for school districts for a variety of special programs including 21st Century Learning Center programs, after-school mentoring programs and environmental education programs. Mr. Lillis has served as the evaluator for numerous community substance abuse prevention and intervention programs and has conducted outcome studies for the Yes Pa Foundation, character education program.Betsy Khol, Women in EngineeringRobert D. Garrick
majority of undergraduate degrees in certain STEM-related disciplines.4However, there is evidence that what are known as leaky pipeline and glass-ceiling effectsremain especially strong in STEM fields.5 Psychologists and educational policy researchers areurged to turn attention to the later stages of career development where women’s careeraspirations often plummet and where women get stuck or drop out of STEM all together.6 Thispaper presents the preliminary results of a qualitative research project, with an analysis thatfocused particularly on isolating aspects that these female STEM doctoral students experiencedduring one academic year.The graduate school period along the academic science and engineering career pathway hasreceived little
education. A second set of challenges has interrogated the contents of the engineering sciences and engineering design. Social philosophers have long mapped engineers as technological intelligentsia whose success depends upon a wide range of social, ethical, and epistemological criteria (Goldman 1984; Lenk 1984; Davis 1996). Micro-‐ethicists have made visible contrasts between formal codes and actual practices (Baum and Flores 1982; Martin and Schinzinger 1983). More recently, macro-‐ethicists make visible a range of broader material projects that engineering formation and engineering work could serve or, in some cases, does serve (Herkert 2009
(Fleming, Garcia, & Morning, 1995). Through a NASA-sponsored program called Project Reserve, a two year initiative, theauthors Fleming, Garcia, and Morning (1995) studied 31 correlates, such as social class, aptitude,and critical thinking skills. They used three instruments, with a sample of African American andLatino students majoring in engineering at Xavier University in Louisiana, California StateUniversity, Northridge (CSUN), and City College of New York (CCNY). These students(N=79) came from predominantly White engineering schools where they failed in their first yearand were invited to participate in Project Reserve. Project Reserve was designed to retain thesestudents in the engineering pipeline by providing them with academic
Technology contains a variety of resources that support the differentproblems students have in the doing of and learning about design through experience. Throughthe Design Learning Simulator research, we have been exploring issues about what resources toprovide to students and how to make them available. In the Spring, 1996 quarter, the DesignLearning Simulator was implemented in a Web-based platform and included model designreports, electronic versions of class documents, resources to support team formation, resources tonegotiate project requirements, and an on-line parts catalog. During this period, we receivedgenerally positive feedback from the students through survey questions, exit interviews, andtestimonials. In this paper, we explore a
classroom designed for 72 students sitting at eight largeround tables. Dual computer projection screens and multiple white boards are available. Thearchitecture enables and encourages peer instruction and collaboration. Students are assigned tocertain tables and reassignments occur after each major test. We try to have more than onestudent within any underrepresented group assigned to any given table. We make assignmentsso as to include a range of GPRs and class performance levels at each table. We have at leastone or two undergraduate learning assistants who move through the room along with theinstructor providing assistance and guidance during the in-class learning activities. The roomcan become wonderfully noisy during their in-class work and it
AC 2010-441: "IT KIND OF CHOSE ME": AGENCY AND INFLUENCE INWOMEN'S DECISION TO MAJOR IN ENGINEERINGEleanor M. Jaffee, Smith College Eleanor M. Jaffee is a Research Associate with the Liberative Pedagogies Project at Smith College, and a doctoral candidate in Social Welfare at the University at Albany.Donna Riley, Smith College Donna Riley is Associate Professor of Engineering at Smith College. Page 15.2.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 “It kind of chose me”: Agency and Influence in Women’s Decisions to Major in EngineeringIntroductionMuch of the research regarding
includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teach- ing practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering.Dr. Matthew Arnold Boynton PE P.E., Virginia Tech Matthew Boynton recently finished his Ph.D in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He also holds a B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from Tennessee Tech and an Ed.S in Instructional Leadership. Matthew has experience in industry as well as teaching. Previously, Matthew taught Project Lead the Way Engineering courses in two rural high schools in
a sample scenarioabout modern challenges in managing electronic waste. Feedback from project advisory boardmembers are integrated in this discussion.BackgroundEngineering programs have an explicit need to define, teach and measure professional skillssince their introduction by ABET evaluation criteria for engineering programs in 2000. Theseskills include ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (3d), understanding of professionaland ethical responsibility (3f), ability to communicate effectively (3g), understanding of theimpact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and cultural/societalcontexts (3h), recognition of and ability to engage in life-long learning (3i), and knowledge ofcontemporary issues (3j). A well
engineeringproject for implementation in their high school classroom.Although the E3 program is not a research project, the E3 program’s goal and core objectives canbe linked to anticipated outcomes. As part of the program’s formative and summativeevaluation, anonymous online surveys were administered to participants in two E3 summerprograms using the pre- and post-program survey format, and participants were asked to respondto survey statements using a Likert-type scale of responses. The E3 leadership team notedinconsistencies in some of the survey results with the teachers’ written (and verbal) comments;therefore the team investigated the apparent contradictions. Possible explanations included (a)pre-program survey response overestimation and concomitant
runs the Feminist Research in Engineering Education (FREE, formerly RIFE) group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at the website http://feministengineering.org/. She can be contacted by email at apawley@purdue.edu.Dr. Adam R Carberry, Arizona State University Adam R. Carberry, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor at Arizona State University in the Fulton Schools of Engineering. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. Dr. Carberry has been a member of PEER since the first workshop held in 2011.Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West LafayetteMaria
M.S. in Counseling with an emphasis in Student Development in Higher Education from California State University, Long Beach. For the past nine years at both two and four- year institutions, he has served students interested in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). As the Assistant Director of Advising for the Engineering Student Success Center at San Jos´e State University, he supports students with personal, academic and professional growth.Ms. Eva Schiorring Eva Schiorring is Senior Researcher for the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges. Since joining the RP Group in 2000, she has served as project director for ten major projects, including a statewide, multi-year
the questions on the final exam wouldbe based on the material that they posted. The expectation was that students would not only postcontent but edit each other’s posts and engage in collaborative learning. Cole reports that afterfive weeks (halfway through the course), there had been no posts to the wiki! Volunteer groupinterviews with the students elicited such reasons as lack of time or pressure of other work, etc.Leung and Chu 34 report on the results of the use of a wiki for collaborative learning in an un-dergraduate course on knowledge management. The class had 21 students in it, divided into fourgroups, each with a group leader who was responsible for coordinating the group’s work. Eachgroup had to use a wiki to work on its project
been used by researchers to understand how teaching andlearning occur in classrooms [22]-[27]. In the context of engineering education, classroomobservations have become more common to conduct research related to curricular practices [28].As our research questions centered on how engineering practices were taught and understandinghow classroom time was utilized, classroom observations served as an ideal method throughwhich to collect data.To guide the data collection, the project leadership team (EM, LL, JLM, and SD) developed anditerated an observation protocol. The observation protocol consisted of 35 practices, which weredrawn from literature on engineering competencies [1], [5], insights from student interviewsprobing the emphasized skills
engineering interest. However, programs offered in museums, hobbyclubs, citizen science projects primarily serve urban or suburban community members [3]. Weargue that rural libraries—often the only public institution that provides free access to learningresources—can address this challenge by positioning them as hubs to broaden engineeringparticipation. One particularly effective yet unexplored way to facilitate engineering learning inrural libraries is through online learning. While existing endeavors have shown promise inbroadening STEM participation at public libraries [4], the research that leverages the onlinespace to strengthen public libraries’ outreach programming is rarely examined. Considering thattime constraints and lack of transportation
bombarded withextracurricular options—from research projects to social events—navigating these opportunities becomesa challenge, especially for first-year students.To counteract this and promote engagement with sustainability initiatives, we have developed theComplementary Field Activities (CFAs) framework. The CFA module empowers students with astructured, yet flexible, choice-based system that allows them to tailor their learning experiencesaccording to their interests. By giving students autonomy to select from a curated set ofsustainability-focused activities, CFAs provide a balance between guided learning and personalexploration, ensuring that students can engage with impactful educational experiences without feelingoverwhelmed.CFAs are
Paper ID #46896Embodied Sensors and Digital Twins as an Introduction to MicroprocessorProgramming for Middle and High School Non-CS MajorsMs. Leslie Bondaryk, The Concord Consortium Leslie Bondaryk received the B.S. degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the M.S. degree from the University of California, Santa Barbara, both in electrical engineering. She is currently the Chief Technology Officer with the Concord Consortium, Concord, MA, USA. Over her career, Ms. Bondaryk has introduced new technologies to educational research and publishing projects across computer science, mathematics, engineering, and
,including a hypothesis to test, equipment to use, and data that they propose to collect. GraduateTeaching Assistants (TAs) and the laboratory manager review the proposals and either approve themor require further development. Once their proposal is approved, students use the remaining weeksto complete their study and write a full technical report, which they submit using an assignedpseudonym. The project finishes with each student conducting a single-blind Peer Review of astudent’s work from another lab section. Grading is based on the TA’s assessment of the report andthe Peer Evaluation.Pre- and post-surveys of the students measure their self-efficacy, among other aspects of theirexperience with the course, to evaluate the effectiveness of this
modified organisms, and human subjects research. In senior design, studentsworkshop key concepts and values, such as professional responsibility, sustainability, andfairness, and apply them to their projects. The team is currently building out additional materialsfor senior design that will likely address intellectual property and generative artificialintelligence. Each ethics module is thoughtfully designed to align with the technical material thestudents are learning.One example from the introductory course is an ethics module that complements the course’sintroduction to biomedical devices and technical training with Adobe Illustrator software. Whiledetailed lesson plans are published in Biomedical Engineering Education, this section explainshow
FIE, ICER, and ASEE, and brings years of teaching experience in software engineering and foundational computing courses.Dr. Mohsen M Dorodchi, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. Dorodchi has been teaching in the field of computing for over 35 years of which 25 years as an educator. He has taught the majority of the courses in the computer science and engineering curriculum over the past 25 years such as introductory programming, data structures, databases, software engineering, system programming, etc. He has been involved in a number of National Science Foundation supported grant projects including Scholarship for STEM students (S-STEM), Researcher Practitioner Partnership (RPP), IUSE, and EAGER
gives students the verbal communicationskills which heighten their integration and interaction with their work teams. In this example, thestudent wrote a detailed explanation in which she described the different elements that affectsuch performance and the measurements used in her project. Her essay shows that the technicalvocabulary was necessary for her verbal communication skills. SPA2_A7 wrote, I did not know many of the words that I used in the previous paragraph [in this paragraph she explained the internship project she conducted at CEIT, a study of the efficiency of electric boat motors] before starting my internship. It is important to learn and understand the terminology used in an office in case your
toinform students and educators on the hiring process and how to prepare for technical interviews.Moreover, this research serves to provide industry with evidence of the problems inherent withthe existing hiring system. Analysis of these results will be used to offer suggestions andguidelines that will enable a hiring process that can still achieve its target of finding qualifiedapplicants, but that does so in a manner more justly to all job seekers.1 IntroductionJobs in computing are expected to experience 11% growth over the next decade, which is agreater rise than the projected averages for other fields [1]. Although these positions may begaining momentum globally, unemployment remains a real concern for new graduates, asindustry adds barriers
stories as a group. The thematicanalysis section of the paper is useful when considering the larger implications of this research.For example, by examining how all participants reflect on their graduate school experience andwhat they wish would have been different, we can provide insight to current graduate studentsand their advisors. Graduate students might feel empowered to pursue a teaching opportunitydespite it taking away time from research, and advisors might consider different ways ofsupporting their graduate students to achieve their career goals.Six new engineering assistant professors, two females and four males, were interviewed as partof a larger research project exploring the pathway to and current experiences of faculty membersat
- tudes and beliefs teachers hold about cultural diversity and teaching culturally diverse students. Past and current projects include designing and teaching undergraduate and graduate-level coursework intended to help teachers develop effective science teaching practices and culturally relevant pedagogy for their classrooms, mentoring pre-service science teachers, working with in-service science teachers to develop and implement integrated STEM curricula, leading STEM integration professional development for in- service science teachers, working with administration and teachers to develop STEM programming in their schools, and developing a K-12 STEM observation protocol that can be used in a variety of educa- tional
STEM education. In her dissertation work, she developed and validated a new interdisci- plinary assessment in the context of carbon cycling for high school and college students using Item Re- sponse Theory. She is also interested in developing robotics-embedded curricula and teaching practices in a reform-oriented approach. Currently, a primary focus of her work at New York University is to guide the development of new lessons and instructional practices for a professional development program under a DR K-12 research project funded by NSF.Sonia Mary Chacko, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Sonia Mary Chacko received her B.Tech. degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Mahatma Gandhi University
department of systems engineer- ing at Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Colombia since 2005 and is currently on a leave of absence. There he taught systems thinking and coordinated the professional internships, the social internships and the graduation project. He worked as Software Engineer in different companies for seven years before transitioning to academia.Mariana Tafur, Purdue University, West Lafayette Mariana Tafur is a Ph.D. candidate and a graduate assistant in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She has a M.S., in Education at Los Andes University, Bogota, Colombia; and a B.S., in Electrical Engineering at Los Andes University, Bogota, Colombia. She is a 2010 Fulbright Fellow. Her
engineering shortcutsnecessary to accomplish miracles in engineering productivity. Then, in an engineeringrite of passage, they would graduate to handling their own projects and become a fullpartner in the engineering brotherhood. In time, their experience would transform theminto the older, more-experienced engineers that had mentored them, and they would inturn pass their wisdom on to the next generation of new college graduates.Unfortunately, in today’s embedded microcontroller job market, this ancient andbeneficent brotherhood of engineering is long gone. Engineers seldom spend more than3-5 years with a single company, so employers are reluctant to invest a year’s salary inmentoring. The older, more-experienced engineers that once would have been