gone from zero EOP outcomes addressed to twenty addressed andseven assessed across multiple years. The next phase will be to carefully review where the gapsare in the curriculum and determine what targeted efforts can be made to increase adoption andintegration of the framework.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by a grant from The Lemelson Foundation.References [1] M. Robinson and K. Sutterer, “Integrating sustainability into civil engineering curricula” Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference, Nashville, TN, USA, June 22- 25, 2003, https://peer.asee.org/12190. [2] S. Burian, “Teaching sustainability and sustainable engineering practice in the civil engineering curriculum,” Proceedings of the Annual
., Reed, T., Imbrie, P., & Reid, K. (2014). Research-Informed Policy Change: ARetrospective on Engineering Admissions. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 274-301.Jacob, B. A., Lefgren, L. (2004). Remedial education and student achievement: A regression-discontinuity analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 226–244Lagerlof, J.N.M., and A. J. Seltzer. (2007). “The Effects of Remedial Mathematics on theLearning of Economics: A Natural Experiment.” Working Paper.Legewie, J. & DiPrete, T.A. (2014). The high school environment and the gender gap in scienceand engineering. Sociology of Education, 1-22.Lord, S., Ohland, M. W., Layton, R. A., & Camacho, M. M. (2019). Beyond pipeline andpathways: Ecosystem metrics. Journal of
Approach to MeetingSustainable Development Goals. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education,2022References [1] Oded Berger-Tal and Jose´ J. Lahoz-Monfort. Conservation technology: The next generation. Conservation Letters, 11(6):e12458, 2018. [2] Gerardo Ceballos, Paul R. Ehrlich, Anthony D. Barnosky, Andre´s Garc´ıa, Robert M. Pringle, and Todd M. Palmer. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 1(5):e1400253, 2015. [3] Jenna Mueller, Mary Dotson, Jennifer Dietzel, Jenna Peters, Gabriela Asturias, Amelia Cheatham, Marlee Krieger, Baishakhi Taylor, Sherryl Broverman, and Nirmala Ramanujam. Using human-centered design to connect engineering
Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Paper No. AC 2010-925 7ASEE 2022 Paper, Minneapolis, MN, June 22, 2022 (Submission 22; April 10, 2022)[4] C. Carroll, S. A. Sell, and M. B. Sabick, “Introduction to Entrepreneurial-minded Learningfor Faculty of Foundational STEM Courses Using the KEEN Framework”, 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Paper #18279[5] https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/618AppendixIn this appendix, the tasks of each module are briefly introduced and student video samples areused to illustrate how each module works in the following sections.Module 1 Tasks: Atomic structure of engineering
an Innovating Curriculum with an EntrepreneurialMindset workshop organized by KEEN. The feedback and support provided by workshop facilitatorsAndy Gerhart, Glenn Gaudette, and Brad Dennis, and the ongoing coaching of Heather Dillon wasinstrumental to this work. The current version of this project was developed with funding from anEngineering Unleashed Fellowship from KEEN.References[1] Hart Research Association, “Falling short? College learning and career success,” 2015.[2] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. Jossey- Bass, 2016.[3] R. Marra, D. Jonassen, B. Palmer, and S. Luft, “Why Problem-Based Learning Works: Theoretical Foundations.,” J. Excell. Coll. Teach., 2014.[4] M. Besterfield-Sacre
of information. He is often preoccupied with issues of surveillance and newlimits on privacy due to technology.References[1] C. E. Harris Jr., M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins, “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 93–96, 1996, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00216.x.[2] B. Newberry, “The dilemma of ethics in engineering education,” SCI ENG ETHICS, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 343–351, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0030-8.[3] C. Fiesler, N. Garrett, and N. Beard, “What Do We Teach When We Teach Tech Ethics?: A Syllabi Analysis,” in Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Portland OR USA, Feb. 2020, pp. 289–295. doi
Oct. 23, 2021).[6] D. A. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2013.[7] M. Thüring and S. Mahlke, “Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction,” International Journal of Psychology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 253–264, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1080/00207590701396674.[8] T. de Jong, M. C. Linn, and Z. C. Zacharia, “Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education,” Science, vol. 340, no. 6130, pp. 305–308, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1126/science.1230579.[9] D. May, “Cross Reality Spaces in Engineering Education – Online Laboratories for Supporting International Student Collaboration in Merging Realities,” International Journal of Online and
., Walters, R., Fernández-Frey, M., Ramírez, M.,Rosado Casanova, B., Heemstra, J., Marshall, A.-M., & Rodríguez, L. F. (2022). Compound[ing]Disasters in Puerto Rico: Pathways for Virtual Transdisciplinary Collaboration to EnhanceCommunity Resilience, manuscript in review Global Environmental ChangeWarnick, G., et al. 2008. Globalization: A new frontier for capstone courses. Proceedings of the2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Pittsburg, PA: ASEE.McKim CA. The Value of Mixed Methods Research: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of MixedMethods Research. 2017;11(2):202-222. doi:10.1177/1558689815607096Paschal, C. B., & Crist, I. S., & Rowe, C. J. (2017, June), Strategies for Successfully IncreasingEngineering Study Abroad
through food and cooking,” Matter, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 2578–2581, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.06.005.[4] E. A. Nevenglosky, C. Cale, and S. P. Aguilar, “Barriers to Effective Curriculum Implementation,” Res. High. Educ. J., vol. 36, p. 31, Jan. 2019.[5] National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Design, Selection, and Implementation of Instructional Materials for the Next Generation Science Standards: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018. doi: 10.17226/25001.Appendix A – Pre-COVID Materials OutreachPre-COVID Materials OutreachFor “off-campus” outreach, we worked with local teachers to understand the topics they werecovering and how our efforts could complement
-07052016000400017.[10] F. Kri, F. Gil, M. González, & C. Lamatta, “Ranking de Notas como predictor de éxito en la educación superior. Caso de estudio USACH,” Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Tech Memo. Consejo Nacional de Educación CNED, dec. 2013.[11] D. Contreras, S. Gallegos, & F. Meneses, “Determinantes de desempeño universitario: ¿importa la habilidad relativa?”, Cal Edu, n.o 30, p. 18, apr. 2009, doi: 10.31619/caledu.n30.172.[12] F. Gil, R. Paredes & I. Sánchez, “El ranking de las notas: inclusión con excelencia”, Centro de políticas públicas de la UC, vol. 8, nº 60, pp. 1-19, may. 2013.[13] C. Pérez, L. Ortiz & P. Parra, “Prueba de Selección Universitaria, rendimiento en
and J. A. Dantzler, “Mathematical problem solving forengineering students,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2005.[3] J. A. Livingston, “Metacognition: An Overview,” ERIC Institute of Education Sciences,2003. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED474273. [Accessed Feb. 5, 2022].[4] S. J. Grigg and L. C. Benson, “A coding scheme for analyzing problem-solving processes offirst-year engineering students,” European Journal of Engineering Educations, vol. 39-6, pp.617-635, Mar. 2014.[5] F. Anseel, F. Lievens and E. Schollaert. “Reflection as a strategy to enhance taskperformance after feedback,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.110-1, pp. 23-35
back the first cohort, COVID moved both introductory courses online in their firstiterations. Cohorts of students taking introduction to data science, for example, were learningonline in a pandemic, and although we didn’t study COVID-19's impact expressly, it would beeasy to see how outcomes and experiences of students would be much different in on campuslearning environments. Additionally, we struggled to recruit students into the data science micro-credential, and although we have a number of plans to address this difficulty, the effects of thepandemic on students’ willingness to adopt new lines of study is assumed.Recruitment of Students & Finding Room in CurriculumDue to COVID-19, student recruitment was through virtual informational
the civilian rotary-wing industry. This program and others like itwill be vital to meet the needs of the nation’s civilian helicopter workforce.References:[1] B. Champ, "What’s Causing the Pilot Shortage and How to Solve It," 23 August 2022.[Online]. Available: https://www.driveresearch.com/market-research-company- blog/solving-pilot-shortage/. [Accessed 9 February 2023].[2] T. Rucinski, "U.S. Airlines Tap Army Helicopter Pilots to Ease Shortage," Reuters, 23January 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-aviation- shortage-insight/u-s-airlines-tap-army-helicopter-pilots-to-ease-shortage- idUSKCN1PH0CO. [Accessed 10February 2023].[3] M. Buczyner, "Pilot shortage Leads to Grounding of Second Palm Beach
doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4-33.Sheets, D. E. (2016). Transformative Initiatives: How iFoundry reimagines STEM education for the 21st century. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress (Eds.), Transforming institutions: undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century (pp. 235-244). Purdue University Press.The Boyer 2030 Commission (2022). The equity excellence imperative: A 2030 blueprint for undergraduate education at U.S. research universities. The Association for Undergraduate Education at Research Universities.Thorne, S., Strimel, G. J., Mentzer, N., & Sears, D. (2022) The facilitator model: Investigating a novel
., Foreman, C., Alpay, E. (2020). 3D Printers in EngineeringEducation. In: Gravett, K., Yakovchuk, N., Kinchin, I. (eds) Enhancing Student-CentredTeaching in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35396-4_7[7] F. Akasheh, M. Ndoye, D. Shannon, R. Pippins, E. Thompson, A. Carter, S. Baker, and B.Guiseppi. "Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Modular Drone Design Development byMultidisciplinary Engineering Student Team." In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.2022, Paper ID #38111[8] Drone market outlook in 2023: industry growth trends, market stats and forecast. BusinessInsider. https://www.businessinsider.com/drone-industry-analysis-market-trends-growth-forecasts.[9] Bronz, Murat, Ezra Tal, Federico Favalli
allows the researchers to assess thefeasibility of the work and to understand the ease in which participants were able to answer thequestions generated for the survey. Additionally, with the initial examination of qualitativeresponses, researchers will be able to ascertain whether students’ perspectives could lead to alarger conversation about familiarity and feelings towards the terms and the usage by variousgroups of people.Using Yin’s [15] definition of a case, the exploration of a phenomenon in its contemporary,real-life context, in which researcher(s) have little to no control of, this study enables theunderstanding of the how and why of engineering students’ perceptions of the language they useto describe and identify themselves [16
Champaign 2019 - presentUniversity of Denver Engineering (General) BS 1997- 2007 (Discontinued?)Loyola University Maryland Engineering Science(s) BS 1989 - 2010 Engineering BSE 2011 - presentLoyola University Chicago Engineering Science BS 2018 - 2021 Engineering BS, 2021 - presentSouthern Utah University Integrated Engineering BS 2003 - 2011 Engineering BS 2011 - presentA new movement is emerging around the name Integrated Engineering with sessions held at theAmerican Society for Engineering Education and Frontiers in Education conferences [20], [21].Southern Utah University offered an Integrated Engineering degree [22], [23] from 2003
D. Patel, Tom O’Callaghan, and Scott Reeves. "The use ofvirtual communities of practice to improve interprofessional collaboration and education:findings from an integrated review." Journal of interprofessional care 32, no. 2 (2018): 136-142.[2] Barnett, Stephen, Sandra C. Jones, Sue Bennett, Don Iverson, and Andrew Bonney. "Generalpractice training and virtual communities of practice-a review of the literature." BMC familypractice 13, no. 1 (2012): 1-12.[3] Ting, Daniel K., Brent Thoma, S. Luckett‐Gatopoulos, Adam Thomas, Shahbaz Syed,Michael Bravo, Fareen Zaver, Eve Purdy, Edmund SH Kwok, and Teresa M. Chan. "Canadi EM:accessing a virtual community of practice to create a Canadian national medical educationinstitution." AEM education and
technology 51, 7 (2009), pp. 1110–1122.[16] Henry Kautz, Bart Selman, and Mehul Shah. “Referral Web: combining social networks andcollaborative filtering”. Communications. ACM 40, 3 (1997), pp. 63–65.[17] Ching-Yung Lin, Kate Ehrlich, Vicky Griffiths-Fisher, and Christopher Desforges.“Smallblue: People mining for expertise search”. IEEE MultiMedia 15, 1 (2008), pp. 78–84.[18] Julia M Mayer, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, and Quentin Jones. “Making social matching context-aware: Design concepts and open challenges”. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACMConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2015. pp. 545–554.[19] David W McDonald and Mark S Ackerman. “Expertise recommender: a flexiblerecommendation system and architecture”. In Proceedings of the
four yes votes, was cell C6. (Note that theRevolution Wind project is being planned for installation in cell C6 [15], while the location ofthe existing Block Island Wind Farm is the middle of Cell D3.)Table 3: Final site proposals and voting results. Three groups came together to propose the same final site. The stakeholders then agreed, by vote, to locate the proposed wind farm in cell C6. Final Stakeholder Group(s) Site Yes No Proposal Public: Anti Wind Farm (PA) None 1: PA 5: CF, D&E, PP, R&T, TR Public: Pro Wind Farm (PP) B5 2: D&E, PP 4: PA, R&T
mastery isn’t a bad thing with the 80%s needed but the exams on the same day is a lot of pressure. Maybe a different way of retakes.Additional Survey Comments from students who did not have to retake any exams: 1) The structure felt perfect for this class. 2) Retakes are good minimum passing grade is too black and white in terms of students grasping the content 3) I think a pass/fail system is ok if the threshold is lower. 80% is a bit too high, at least on exams where one single mistake can mean a failing grade. 4) Use Canvas!! Pass/fail on quizzes makes no sense since one wrong is a fail. 5) Only down side (to me) is that Canvas doesn’t reflect actual grade. 6) Trying to understand the grading was brutal. It took a
,” Procedia Engineering, 2017. 196, 1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.066[9] I. Choudhury, "The Effect of Watching Video Clips on Student Performance in a Construction Science Course at an Undergraduate Level," In 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011. pp. 22-1450.[10] J. M. Burgett, “Can ‘Flipping the Classroom’ Improve the Educational Experience in Construction Management Courses: A Case Study in Teaching,” HVAC Psychrometrics, 2014. 8. http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2014/paper/CEUE127002014.pdf[11] N. Lee, T. Salama, and S. J. Kim, “Using the Flipped Classroom Model to Improve Construction Engineering and Management Education,” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference &
. Christopher, ‘Self-Study as a Method for Engaging STEM Faculty in Transformative Change to Improve Teaching’, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 195–213, 2019.[2] E. Elliott, R. Reason, C. Coffman, E. Gangloff, J. Raker, J. Powell-Coffman, and C. Ogilvie, “Improved Student Learning through a Faculty Learning Community: How Faculty Collaboration Transformed a Large-Enrollment Course from Lecture to Student Centered,” CBE Life Sci Edu., vol. 15, pp. 1-14, March 2016.[3] S. Pulford, N. Ruzycki, C. Finelli, L. Hahn, and D. Thorsen, “Making value for faculty: Learning communities in engineering faculty development,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conf. &
learning.References:[1] P.D. Rogers and C.C. Martin, C.D. (2019). “Using an inverted classroom approach to promote active learning in construction management and engineering courses,” 55th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings. 2019, Associated Schools of Construction 2019.[2] M.J. Lage, G.J. Platt, and M. Treglia, M., “Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment,” The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. 2000.[3] S. McCallum, J. Schultz, K. Sellke, and J. Spartz, “An examination of the flipped classroom approach on college academic involvement
overview,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 902, pp. 437–447, 2014.[4] R. W. Deters, B. Terwilliger, S. Kleinke, R. K. Coppola, and J. Coppola, “Ten years of the real world design challenge,” in AIAA SciTech Forum, 2018, AIAA Paper 2018-0050.
choice, and three of those six must be in a non-engineering department.This means an aerospace engineering student has only 2-3 courses in which they can specializein an area of their interest, assuming a course in the area of interest to the student is offered in thesemester(s) they take their electives.It is worth noting that the maximum number of credits a student can take without “overloading”is 18, so the maximum number of courses a student could take is about 48, allowing potential formore specialized coursework. Further, some students come into the institution with credits thatcan be applied to some required classes or electives, resulting in more potential for specializedcoursework. It may be worth quantifying in future research how many
Technical Communications in a Introductory Design Course through Interventions from the University’s Writing Center,” submitted to the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition of the ASEE, June 12-15, 2005, Portland, OR.5. See especially The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row, 1976; Madness And Civilization: A History Of Insanity In The Age Of Reason. London, Routledge, 2001; and Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage, 1995.6. Faigley, Lester. The Brief Penguin Handbook. New York: Longman, 2002.7. Ferguson, Eugene S. Engineering and the Mind’s Eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1992.8. Finkelstein, Leo. Pocket Book of Technical Writing for Engineers and Scientists. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2005.9
’, Educational research review, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 130–144, 2007.[4] R. Butler and M. Nisan, ‘Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance’, Journal of educational psychology, vol. 78, no. 3, p. 210, 1986.[5] J. Feldman, Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin Press, 2018.[6] J. P. Moore and J. Ranalli, ‘A mastery learning approach to engineering homework assignments’, in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26–64.[7] A. R. Carberry, M. Siniawski, S. A. Atwood, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, ‘Best practices for using standards-based grading in engineering courses’, in 2016 ASEE Annual