Conference Session

Technological Literacy II

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Steven VanderLeest

Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics,v 7, 2002, p 420-425.17 Langan-Fox, J; Wirth, A.; Code, S.; Langfield-Smith, K.; Wirth, A., “Analyzing shared and team mentalmodels,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, v 28, n 2, 2001, p 99-112.18 Carlson , W. Bernard, “Toward a Philosophy of Engineering: The Role of Representation,” Proceedings of the2003 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, June, 2003.19 Thatcher, Andrew, Greyling, Mike, “Mental models of the Internet,” International Journal of IndustrialErgonomics, v 22, n 4-5, Nov, 1998, p 299-305.20 Thatcher and Greyling, p. 300.21 Thatcher and Greyling, p. 300.22 Pacey, p. 13.23 Busby, J. A. and Lloyd, P. A., “Influences on

Conference Session

Course and Program Assessment

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Abi Aghayere

6 5 4 3 2 1 0 n ip ce s t

Conference Session

Assessment in BME Education

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Peter Mente; Marian McCord; Joni Spurlin; H. Troy Nagle; Susan Blanchard

N Are BME Curriculum Committee Review PEOs with PEOs (faculty, students, alum(s)) BME Advisory Board and appropriate? revises PEOs other constituent groups in fall of even years Y BME Curr. Com. develops outcomes for each PEO Outcomes N are assessable and measurable? Y Y

Conference Session

Building Cross-Disciplinary Partnerships

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Todd A. Watkins; Drew Snyder; John Ochs

faculty participants To develop a § Run pilot freshman courses o Faculty/students feedback freshman pr ojects § Refine material s based on on adapted curriculum course to introduce feedback o Document implementation new students to § Determine scalability process technical § Develop sustai nable

Conference Session

Mechanical ET Design & Capstone

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Francis Di Bella

ofthese Case Studies taken from the author’s Instructional Lecture Notes, keep in mind thegeneral common features that are intended to attract the attention of the reader (thestudent engineer):1. The attempt to seamless integrate (some would say “sneak up on the student”) theengineering problem or life situation into a cultural setting,2. The clear references to names and dates in a readable style that is done in a writingstyle that is less of the sterile engineering that is often found in technical papers and textsand more of a common language.3. The action item(s) at the end of the Case Study presentation that attempts to have thestudent study or at least appreciate the human or social content of the situation as well asengineering content.4

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Frontiers

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Phillip Rosenkrantz

, Guan S. Examining the range of student needs in the design and development of aweb-based course. In: Abbey B, ed. Instructional and cognitive impacts of web-based education. Hershey, PA: IdeaGroup Publishing; 2000. 7. Rogers PL. Layers of navigation for hypermedia environments: designing instructional web sites.In: Abbey B, ed. Instructional and cognitive impacts of web based education. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing;2000.BiographyDR. PHILLIP R. ROSENKRANTZProfessor at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona since 1982. IE and IE supervisor for General Motorsfor 9 years prior to entering academia. He holds a doctorate in organizational leadership from PepperdineUniversity; MS in Statistics from UC Riverside; MS in

Conference Session

The Computer, the Web, and the ChE

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

William Baratuci; Angela Linse

Technology in the Introductory Chemical Engineering Course, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 2000.4 - Regan, M., Sheppard, S. (1996). Interactive Multimedia Courseware and the Hands-on Learning Experience: An Assessment Study, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, no. 2, pp.123-131.5 – Williamson, C., Bernhard, J., Chamberlin, K. (2000). Perspectives on an Internet-based Synchronous Learning Experience, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 89, no. 1, pp.53-61.6 - Crynes, B., Lai, Y., Chung, W. (19??). Chemical Engineering Fundamentals – Better Learning Through Computer-Based Delivery, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings 19??.7 - Dutton, J., Dutton, M., Perry, J. (2001). Do Online Students perform as Well as Lecture Students

Conference Session

Issues of Concern to New Faculty

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Craig Quadrato

with each class, I’m not sure I could say Ilooked forward to the students’ final evaluations. But since I planned, prepared, performed eachclass and received interim feedback from my students, peers and senior instructors, I feel Isignificantly improved my skills as an instructor in a short amount of time. And, perhaps moreimportantly, I have implemented a personal teaching model that will continue to help methroughout my career.Bibliography1. Lowman, Joseph. Mastering the Techniques of Teaching (2 nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1995. Page 7.1005.112. Oreovicz, Frank S. and Phillip C Wankat. Teaching Engineering (reprinted by ASCE

Conference Session

Projects to promote eng.; teamwork,K-12

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Anant Kukreti

in Figures 6(a) and 6(b) are actually idealized as aspring-mass system model shown in Figure 6(c) for mathematical analysis. In all the threemodels shown in Figure 6, the mass M has one degree-of-freedom and can vibrate horizontally.The stiffness K represents the stiffness of the column(s), which can be experimentally ortheoretically determined from the following formula: K = 12EI/L3, if the top end of the columndoes not rotate, and 3EI/L3, if the top end of the column does rotate. In these formulae E =modulus of elasticity of the column material, I = moment of inertia of the column cross-section,and L = clear height of the column. If perfect similitude rules can be developed for scaling boththe geometric dimensions and material properties

Conference Session

Trends in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Washington Braga

, M. G., "In search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms",ASCD Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Virginia, 1993[5] Braga, W. "Online Heat Transfer Course," available at http://venus.rdc.puc -rio.br/wbraga/tc.htm, inportuguese, 2000[6] Bloom, B.S., "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Class ification of Educational Goals, Handbook I:Cognitive Domain," David McKay Company, New York, 1956[7] Zahorian, S.A., Lakdawala, V.K., González, O.R., Starsman S. & Leathrum Jr, J.F., "Question Model forIntelligent Questioning Systems in Engineering Educ ation", Proceedings of 2001 Frontiers in EducationConference, FIE 2001, Reno, Nevada, 2001[8] Shulze, K,. Shelby, R., Treacy, D., &

Conference Session

Outreach: Future Women in Engineering

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Donna Whiting; Marion Usselman

America’s schools shortchange girls. New York: Page 7.586.12 Charles Scribners’s Sons. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã 2002, American Society for Engineering Education3 Through NSF grant HRD#97-11046—SummerScape: Gender Equitable Science for Students and Teachers4 Through NSF grant HRD#94-53106—InGEAR: Integrating Gender Equity and Reform5 Crawford, S. H. (1996). Beyond dolls and guns: 101 ways to help children avoid gender bias. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.6 Sandler, B.R. and Hoffman, E. (1992) Teaching faculty members to

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Graphics

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

David Forsman; Kathryn Holliday-Darr; Michael Lobaugh

Institute Handbook. Pacific Crest Inc. Corvallis, Oregon. Page 7.943.13 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2002, American Society for Education Education 6. Johnson, S. (1988). “Who Moved My Cheese? An Amazing Way to Deal with Change in Your Work & in Your Life”. Penguin Putnam Inc, New York, New York.DAVID R. FORSMANDavid R. Forsman is an Instructor of Engineering at Penn State Erie. He received his B.S. in EngineeringTechnology from the Pennsylvania State University and his M.E. in Manufacturing

Conference Session

K-20 Activities in Materials Science

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

William Jordan; Bill Elmore

and Exposition, Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”20. Sivertsen. M. (1993). State of the art: Transforming ideas for teaching and learning science. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Education, OERI Education Information.Biographical InformationWILLIAM JORDAN is Professor and Program Chair of Mechanical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. Hehas B.S. and M.S. degrees in Metallurgical Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines. He has an M.A. degreefrom Denver Seminary. His Ph.D. was in mechanics and materials engineering from Texas A & M University. Heteaches materials oriented courses and his main research area deals with the mechanical behavior of compositematerials. He is a registered

Conference Session

Issues in Computer Education

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Eck Doerry

internet education: a progress report. Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. Volume 34, Issue 1. Page 8.260.14Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2003, American Society for Engineering EducationGreenbaum, J. and M. Kyng (1991). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, New Jersey.Prupis, S. (1998). Introduction to creating online courses. Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services, October 1998

Conference Session

Statistics in the CHE Curriculum

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Milo Koretsky

werehypothetically selected from this process, with mean x and standard deviation, s, how manyindependent readings would it represent? This approach leads to control limits plotted on theb In fact, the failure of this algorithmic approach led to resistance at Digital towards Page 8.595.9implementing SPC, and motivated the solution reported in this case study.Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Session

Conference Session

Teaching Design Through Projects

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Theodore Pavlic; Prabal Dutta; Michael Hoffmann; Jeffrey Radigan; James Beams; Erik Justen; John Demel; Richard Freuler

levels. Each team will be supplied with one IR receiver and may purchase additional IR receivers capable of detecting the beacon(s). UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE MAY A ROBOT EMIT AN IR SIGNAL at either of the two possible marker beacon frequencies of 100 Hertz or 125 Hertz. A robot may emit an IR signal as a result of using an approved sensor that incorporates an IR light emitting diode. Examples of such permitted sensors include shaft encoders, optosensors, and the Sharp Model GP2D12 IR ranging device. Budgetary – Each team will have a discretionary budget of $150. Each team will also be loaned a programmable controller board and issued a set of basic sensors. The actual cost of purchasing parts

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Ron Earley; Dave Lennig; Dave Campbell; Suguna Bommaraju

of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education3. Ferren A S, Margolin C, “Review of Liberal education at Miami University”, April 25, 20004. Mark Van Doren; “Liberal Education”, New York, 19435. No Author; Board approved statement on Liberal learning, published by AAC&U6. No Author, The ASME guide in FIRST and Universities.7. Douglass E. Oppliger, “University-Pre College Interaction through FIRST Robotics competition”. August 6- 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway.8. V. Wilczynski, T. W. Kowenehoven / M. Giblin, “FIRST: An industry-University-High school partnership to excite our next generation of engineers”, presented at the 1995

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Elizabeth Godfrey

participation, membership of the Engineering StudentSociety, the Women in Engineering Network, separate engineering departments….Several T shirts epitomized values and attitudes that students might have around theirengineering education. One of the most memorable, and repeated over several years withminor variations, was the ‘Super E’ T shirt. Modelled on the Superman logo, in the samecolors, the Big S was replaced by a big E. To me this design reflected the pride, superiorityand sense of belonging that engineering students had. This T shirt was worn any day or anytime, but particularly when groups of students wished to be identified as engineers such aswhen they visited a school, or had an organised water fight against the business students.In recent

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Narayanan Komerath

. Ambrose, S.A., Amon, C.H., “Systematic Design of a First-year Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie Mellon University”. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.86, No.2, April 1997, p. 173 181.9. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Atman, C.J., Shuman, L.J., “Characteristics of Freshman Engineering Students: Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering”. Journal of Engineering. Education, Vol.86, No.2, July 1997, p. 139-150.10. Demetry, C., Groccia, J.E., “A Comparative Assessment of Students’ Experiences in Two Instructional Formats of an Introductory Materials Science Course”. Journal of Engineering. Education, Vol.86, No.3, July 1997, p. 203-210.11. Richards, L.G., Carlson-Skalak, S., “Faculty Reactions to

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Alan Gomez

Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2001, American Society for Engineering Educationrelated to materials science and technology3.VII. Details of Materials Science InstructionStudents in the materials science class have many different topics and experiments to go throughin the one-year class. Historical developments and manufacturing processes are major parts ofeach unit. The Pacific Northwest Laboratory in Richland, WA and Batelle Institute developed thiscurriculum initially in the late 1980’s under support from the U.S. Department of Energy. Areasdiscussed include metals, ceramics, polymers and composites.In the metals unit, students explore the many

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Jeffrey L. Newcomer

, DC, 19987. McGourty, J., “Four Strategies to Integrate Assessment into the Engineering Educational Environment”, Journalof Engineering Education, Vol. 88, No. 4, October 1999, pp. 391-3958. Tener, R. K., “Outcomes Assessment and Faculty Culture: Conflict or Congruence?”, Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol. 88, No. 1, January 1999, pp. 65-71 Page 5.520.129. Gabriele, Gary A., “Employing Reverse Engineering Projects in a Capstone Design Course,” Proceedings of the1994 Advances in Capstone Education: Fostering Industrial Partnerships Conference, S. P. Mableby and C. D.Sorensen, Eds., Provo, UT, 1994, pp. 171-17610. Newcomer, J

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Kenneth Kelly; Etienne Khayat; Fouad T. Mrad

to 1382 ±2.2°C or ±0.75%E 0 to 900 32 to 1652 ±1.7°C or ±0.5%K 0 to 1250 32 to 2282 ±2.2°C or ±0.75%R or S 0 to 1450 32 to 2642 ±1.5°C or ±0.25%B 800 to 1700 1472 to 3092 ±0.5% Sub-Zero RangeT -200 to 0 -328 to 32 ±1.0°C or ±1.5%E -200 to 0 -328 to 32 ±1.7°C or ±1.0%K -200 to 0 -328 to 32 ±2.2°C or ±2.0% Table 2

Conference Session

Engrng Edu;An International Perspective

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Hamid Khan

Conference Session

Educational Trends in Engineering

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Steven Mickelson

. (2000). Retention of freshman agricultural engineering students through an experiential lab course. Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, St. Louis, MO, Session 2608.9. McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher., S. (1997). Research in education. New York: Longman10. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGEPATRICIA C. HARMSPatricia C. Harms is Director for the Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning withTechnology at the Texas Tech University School of Pharmacy. She recently completed her doctoraldissertation which explores the effects of linked courses on engineering students’ developing written andvisual literacy. Dr

Conference Session

Projects to promote eng.; teamwork,K-12

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Philip Henning

; Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society of Engineering Education” Fuel Cell - http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/j/a/jab470/nsf1.htm Lego Flywheel Car - http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/s/k/skw121/The undergraduate fellows were given the following guidelines for their “kit” designs: · Low or minimal cost per kit, with simple but effective learning · Safety · Exposure to the fundamental science, chemistry or mechanics of an HEV technology · Curriculum and assembly instructions in easy-to-use format for teachers, as done in the NSF-supported Teaching Science with Toys books1) · Support for at least three Pennsylvania Department of Education Science and Technology

Conference Session

New Programs and Textbooks in BME

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Robin Adams; Mary Lidstrom; Kjell Nelson; Jeffrey Bonadio; David Stahl; Cynthia Atman

/291/5507/1224 www.nap.edu/books/0309073197/html/index.html www.cellsalive.com www.cbs.dtu.dk/dave/DNA_CenDog.html http://campus.northpark.edu/biology/cell/basiccell.html[9] Atman, C. J., R. S. Adams, et al. (2000). Using Multiple Methods to Evaluate a FreshmanDesign Course. 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Kansas City, MO.[10] McGourty, J. (1999). “Four Strategies to Integrate Assessment into the EngineeringEducational Environment.” Journal of Engineering Education 88(4): 391-395.[11] Turns, J., Atman, C.J., & Adams, R., “Concept maps

Conference Session

Collaborations with Engineering Technology

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Albert Koller

kinds.The purpose of this paper is to describe existing and future programmatic needs foreducational activities and the approaches being developed to utilize partnerships withbusiness and industry, NASA and DOD facilities, educational institutions, andgovernment organizations such as state spaceport authorities for aerospace programactivities that will link K-12, community college, and university systems to sustain aqualified and technically competent workforce.The Case for PartnershipsSince at least the early 1980’s, perhaps in conjunction with the management movementsof Total Quality Management and Continuous Quality Improvement, partnerships haveincreasingly occupied strategic planning activities and deployment strategies of majororganizations

Conference Session

International Engineering Education

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Bahadur Khan Khpolwak; Mohammad Saleh Keshawarz

joint efforts of theRoyal Government of Afghanistan and the United States Government. United States Agency forDevelopment provided the funds for the infrastructure and faculty development.During the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the early parts of 1980’s, the college wasstamped as an American institution and was targeted for elimination and was finally was shutdown in 1984. By that time, a large number of the professors had migrated to foreign countries.In 1984, a small group of these professors through funds provided by USAID, established aconstruction-related program in Peshawar, Pakistan, which lasted until USAID funds dried up in1994.Coordination of Humanitarian Assistance, CHA an Afghan non-governmental organization(NGO), with

Conference Session

International Engineering Education II

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Waddah Akili

© 2002, American Society for Engineering Education · a common year of engineering science presented to all majors during the second year, covering in an integrated way: mechanics, materials, circuits and electronics, energy and its manifestations, fluid flow and thermodynamics; · field-specific introductory and follow up courses (for each major)embodying: analysis, design, synthesis, and computer applications; offered largely during third year; and · electives and capstone courses properly integrated with design project(s) commensurate with students’ interests; offered during fourth year.The specialized, discipline-specific courses, during the latter years, must be

Conference Session

Multi-disciplinary Design

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Byron Newberry

in the freshman course). Students are then assigned, individually, to produce and submit a specified engineering drawing (practice drawing unrelated to projects). · Phase 1 Concept Description: This document requires CAD assembly drawing(s) of the proposed design concept. · Phase 2 Conceptual Design Proposal: This document requires CAD assembly drawing of the proposed design concept. In addition, the implementation plan requires graphical documents such as Gantt charts and organization flow charts, about which instruction is provided. · Phase 2 Preliminary Design Progress Report: In addition to the types of graphical documents contained in the conceptual design proposal, this report would