best practices from the scholarship of teaching and learning. Outside of course development, his primary re- search interests are in biomechanics, rehabilitation, prosthetics, and robotics. His current research projects include robotic methods modeling and predicting human motion, the functional evaluation of a variety of prosthetic devices, and the creating of low-cost virtual reality systems for stroke rehabilitation. His goals are to offer the best possible education to his students and to increase the mobility and manipulability of persons with disabilities.Dr. Robert James O’Neill, Florida Gulf Coast University Dr. ROBERT (BOB) J. O’NEILL is Professor and Chair of the Department of Environmental and Civil
Paper ID #13115How Misconceptions Might be Repaired through Inquiry Based ActivitiesMs. Gina Cristina Adam, University of California, Santa Barbara Gina C. Adam is pursuing her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and a M.A. in Teaching and Learning at University of California, Santa Barbara. Her main research interest is conceptual understanding in engi- neering education. Additionally, she helped as a graduate student researcher in two large scale engineering education projects, one related to developing a taxonomy for the field supervised by Dr. Cynthia Finelli at University of Michigan and one on pioneers in
). We found no significant relationshipbetween the students’ performance and mastery scores for their favorite course (r = .01, p> .05)but did find a significant relationship when they considered their least favorite course (r = .34,p< .01). Our analysis also revealed a significant negative correlation between courseachievement (grade), and mastery learning in the students’ least favorite course (r = -.29, p< .01)and for their performance scores (r = -.48, p< .01). We found no significant relationshipbetween course achievement and the scores on either form of motivation.Discussion and ImplicationsOur goal with this project was to determine how engineering student motivation shifts due totheir favoritism for their courses and the
that application ofthe principles is a bottleneck to many students’ learning experience in fundamental engineeringcourses.While engineering design has been widely used to improve students’ skills in applications,students have limited opportunities to learn from projects in fundamental engineering coursesdue to broad spectrum of content, strict schedule, relatively large enrollment, limited budget, andstudents’ design skills. This study selected engineering dynamics course as an example toimprove students’ capability in applying the principles in dynamics into problem solving throughreflective learning practices.Engineering dynamics is a high-enrollment engineering core course; while one of the mostdifficult courses to teach and learn in
Paper ID #12870A ”Trick and Think” Approach to a Second-Order Circuit LabDr. Ilan Grav´e, Elizabethtown College Ilan Grav´e received B.Sc. in Physics and Electrical Engineering and M.Sc. in Physics from Tel-Aviv University in Israel, and a PhD in Applied Physics from Caltech, in Pasadena, California (1993). In the past he has lead high-tech R&D avionics projects at the Israeli Aircraft Industries; has been a se- nior researcher and adviser at the Fondazione Ugo Bordoni, in the Ministry of Post and Communications in Rome, Italy; and has been on the faculty of the Department of Electrical Engineering at the Univer- sity
Competition. He has worked for United Technologies (Hamilton Sundstrand) and General Dynamics on numerous projects including International Space Station Life Support, Joint Strike Fighter Propulsion Control Systems and U.S. Army Biodefense. He received his B.S. from Vanderbilt University and his M.S. and Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Connecticut. Dr. Browne serves as the Chair of the Engineering Technology Division of the Southeastern Section of ASEE; he also does extensive volunteer work for the FIRST Foundation (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology).Mr. David George Vutetakis Jr, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Mr. Vutetakis is a graduate student at The University of
workers, is one of the central concerns of engineering education research. While manycurrent K-12 programs focus on engineering thinking and design (e.g. Project Lead theWay, Engineering is Elementary, Design Squad), there is still a need to promoteaspiration and understanding of engineering as an occupation, especially in out-of-schoolenvironments where children spend a majority of their time.1Career aspirations and expectations of children have already started to develop prior toentering formal schooling.2,3 During this critical development period, parents serve as themajor source of career information coupled with media (television, print, etc.) and othersocial experiences. While the significance of parents’ role in the development of
is covered by the cone of the wind augmentation apparatus as shown in Figure1. Therefore first and second year engineering students experienced a hands-on project thatchallenged their goal: to come up with a design that could improve power output on small-scalewind turbines. Page 26.447.2 Figure 1. Cross sectional of Wind Tunnel Attachment (WTA). (Modified from Dakeev, & Mazumder, 2014) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) reported that today’s world is thrivingon the idea of renewable energy 7. Scarcity of nonrenewable resources necessitated increasingdemand for energy sources that are naturally occurring
teaching experi- ence, he also has performed extensive research and published numerous technical papers. He has secured more than $1 million in the form of both internal and external grants and research funding. Foroudastan is the faculty advisor, coordinator, and primary fundraiser for EVP teams entering national research project competitions such as the Formula SAE Collegiate Competition, the Baja SAE Race, the SolarBike Rayce, the Great Moonbuggy Race, and the Solar Boat Collegiate Competition. For his concern for and ded- ication to his students, Foroudastan received MTSU awards such as the 2002-03 Outstanding Teaching Award, the 2005-06 Outstanding Public Service Award, and the 2007 Faculty Advisor of the Year
programming, weexcluded them from the analysis. This resulted in a total of 29 freshmen in the control group and22 students in the test group. Table 2. Summary of schedules Week Control group (C only) Treatment group (CFL + C) 1 Intro to Computers, Prep for laboratory Intro to Computers, CFL basics, (incl. Linux and vim) operations, I/O 2 Beginning C programming CFL conditional, for loop 3 Integers and I/O CFL arrays, functions and recursion 4 conditionals CFL graphics and game project 5 while/for loops Linux and vim, Integers
: first-year seminars and experiences,7-12 writing intensive courses,13collaborative assignments and projects,14, 15 undergraduate research,16, 17 diversity/globallearning,18, 19 and learning communities.20-22 In additions to these practices, some authors havereported other interventions designed to improve retention, including peer and facultymentoring,23, 24 bridge or college preparatory programs,24-26 and mandatory math tutoring.27In this study we explore the effectiveness of a variation of a learning community – namely aliving-learning community (LLC) of first-year engineering students that was started at ouruniversity in the fall of 2013 and is now in its second year. Loosely defined, an LLC is a groupof students who live together in a dorm
certificate of completion, sometimes for a small fee.2The large size and online nature of MOOCs have produced a lot of data on user habits anddemographics. The MOOC Project tracks many MOOCs and found that there is strong negativecorrelation between enrollment size and completion rate.3 Recently the University ofPennsylvania released two studies examining the MOOCs it offered during 2012-2013. Perna etal. (2013) analyzed data from about one million users enrolled in 17 MOOCs and found the Page 26.1168.2completion rate was only 4% on average.4 Christiansen et al. (2013) looked at survey data fromover 34,000 participants in 32 MOOCs and found that
present two broader implications that are based on results from the firstphase of the study that investigated the identity development of seniors as they transitioned to theengineering workplace.One early finding from this study suggests that engineering students do not completely realizehow their work affects others until after they graduate (see the first theme of each gender). Thisfinding indicates that engineering educators can better foster a sense of social responsibility instudents by letting them practice such responsibility in college. Such practice might come fromcourses that allow engineering students to design projects to benefit real people in thecommunity – that is, service-learning. In general, if better understanding how engineers
Figure 2: Bloom's Taxonomy4 Bloom’s Taxonomy was originally theorized by Benjamin Bloom around the 1950s. Thelevels of the model describe a higher level of learning with each ascending level.3 Once all levelsof the taxonomy are completed; the model implies that the student has mastery of the subject.The levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy, in order, are: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application,Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. Primarily, educators use lower level questions andexamples for assignments and teaching as they are easier to understand and grade. It is tedious tograde higher level questions as they have many more possibilities for correct answers. This maybe problems such as projects, papers, and oral reports that require rubrics for
Paper ID #12714Theorizing can contribute to marginalized students’ agency in engineeringpersistence.Mr. Stephen Douglas Secules, University of Maryland, College Park Stephen is an Education PhD student at UMCP, researching engineering education. He has a prior aca- demic and professional background in engineering, having worked as an engineer and project manager in building acoustics consulting firms for 5 years prior to becoming an educational researcher. His research interests include socio-cultural dimensions of engineering classrooms.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Research
,medicine, or a joint-engineering degree in language studies or the social sciences(including project-based studies). While these changes in content of education allowstudents to better grasp the connection between politics, large technological projectsand societal effects, the issue remains how to pedagogically introduce students toassessing information and thinking analytically and critically. Thereby, onemotivation of the study is to analyze and discuss the potential of tools that couldachieve this in a practical way by introducing course activities of analytical thinking,critical reflections, and web-based peer feedback of the student‟s work.Between SweSoc‟s initiation in 2004 and its present design in 2015, the course hasundergone major
students mostinterested in MSE had a better understanding of the field.44The 2014 ASEE conference had several additional papers presented that are tangentiallyrelated to the research project currently underway at the University of Arkansas. Theyrepresent the various types of research being done on students’ perceptions ofengineering and science related careers. Nadelson and colleagues used surveys to assessthe undergraduate understanding of several engineering career options. The only taskspecific idea used in this survey was that engineers solved problems.45A paper by Rito does address student perceptions of industrial engineers. One of the fewpapers found that focuses on this engineering discipline. However, the question askedwere about
Page 26.1277.8 Learning in Engineering. Int J Eng Educ. 2010;26(5):1097-1110.7. Beichner R, Saul J, Abbot D, et al. Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) project. In: Redish E, Cooney P, eds. Research-Based Reform of University Physics. College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers.8. Jonassen DH. Learning to Solve Problems. San Fransisco, CA: Pfeiffer; 2004.9. Pearson Higher Education. http://www.pearsonmylabandmastering.com/northamerica/myengineeringlab/.10. Grigg S, VanDyken J, Morkos B, Benson L. Process Analysis as a Feedback Tool for Development of Engineering Problem Solving Skills. In: ASEE Annual Conference. Atlanta, Ga; 2013
obtained a four-year college degree40. From the statistics cited above, first-generation college students are more likely to be of Latino/a origin. This group of first-generation college students, historically, has not had as high educational attainment as majoritygroups have. As the population of Latino/as continues to grow it can be projected that this groupwill experience significant growth and supersede other populations in college enrollment23.One study investigated the effects of whether American universities cultural norms (i.e., normsof independence) serve as a disadvantage for first-generation college students35. The studyrevealed a cultural mismatch among first-generation college students due to their tendency topossess norms of
appreciation of the values we bring to that understanding.[...] Its contribution to liberal education would be to give an insight into the way of thinking of engineers in order to enable judgments to be made about the value of projects and the risks associated with them. 2This definition is problematic, though, in that it fails to produce an actual definition. Instead, itprovides researchers with some ideas as to how to identify and assess engineering literacy,explicating what the research “requires that we understand.”Engineering literacy works to describe an informed citizenry, wherein the person functionseffectively in a society that values engineering, as separate from technology. The NationalAssessment
sensorcalibration. Each of these exercises resulted in a formal lab report, which was either individualor group-based, depending on the lab exercise. The series of experiments was followed by threetwo-week projects, which were intended to introduce the practical concept of experimentaldesign to students. Typical laboratory objectives were:(i) Determine the effect of condenser pressure on the coefficient of performance of a vapor compression refrigeration cycle;(ii) Compare/contrast measured mass flow rates and meter coefficients determined by the venturi flow meter with mass flow rates and meter coefficients determined by using an orifice plate as a function of pressure tap location and orifice geometry, and(iii) Use the MTS
engineering education research projects, with a focus how faculty can best facilitate student learning.Dr. Nanette M Veilleux, Simmons College Nanette Veilleux is a Professor and Director of the Computer Science and Informatics Program at Sim- mons College, Boston, MA. Her research interests include pedagogy in STEM disciplines, particularly with respect to women students and computational linguistics where she investigates the use of intonation in human speech. Page 26.1383.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Sometimes, Faculty Matter
ablended format and was the first semester in the MS program for all of the students. This limitedtheir prior knowledge and expectations for the blended class structure. All of the other classes inthe students’ degree program were in a traditional face-to-face format.The class used for this educational research project is a required course in operationsmanagement in the Engineering Management Master’s Degree at Missouri University of Scienceand Technology (Missouri S&T). The class is typically taught multiple times a year, both face-to-face and live streaming over the Internet for distance students. The Engineering ManagementMaster’s Degree is a “broadening” degree. Students enter the program with a BS degree inalmost any engineering and
. Page 26.314.7Conclusions and Future WorkA portable and affordable kit was created for under $130. Based on the fall 2014 semester data,the kit looks to be as effective as the existing equipment for this course. Data collection andfurther analysis of the data are still on going. Future work includes adding attachments to create aFuruta inverted pendulum for use in more advanced courses. Use of the kit beyond the traditionallaboratory space will also be explored including pedagogies that take advantage of the size andcost will be explored, such as studio learning, project based learning, or additions to an onlinecourse or MOOC.AcknowledgmentsThis work is supported by the Grants for Advancement of Teaching in Engineering from theAcademy for
highly beneficial to thestudents, but it is also beneficial to the instructor and teaching assistants. The instructors need todo much less hands on work during the lab sessions, and can instead guide, suggest, and answerconceptual questions. Since it is virtually impossible to break the apparatus, short of dropping iton the floor, it is possible to let even large numbers of students touch and explore the equipment.An added unexpected benefit was the increase in the number of students who asked to borrowthe strain gauge indicator boxes for capstone design projects and student competition teams.Prior to the new experiment, very few capstone design students incorporated strain gauges intotheir design. Despite having taken the Measurements course
, Figure 6, to investigate higher level issues. The myRIO is programmed in LabVIEW(which the students also learn in this class) to control a set of iRobots to simulate a trafficmanagement system. Individual robots play the role of vehicles that interact with smart trafficsignals (also controlled by myRIO) via sensors and equipped with video cameras. No datamessages are passed, rather the robots and traffic light communicate visually and with othersensorsThe specs of the project were simple: a set of robots would behave autonomously, stay in theirlanes, maintain a safe following distance and obey traffic lights. No communication with orbetween vehicles was permitted. Each vehicle had to “see” the color of the traffic light, “sense”the lines on the
Paper ID #12718Career Advancement through Academic Commercialization: Acknowledg-ing and Reducing Barriers for Women Engineering FacultyAri Turrentine, VentureWell Ari is in charge of survey administration for internal program evaluation on the research and evaluation team at VentureWell. Her duties also include survey creation, qualitative and quantitative data analysis, program logic model development, and evaluation coordination across various stakeholder groups. Most recently Ari held positions in Austin, Texas at OneStar Foundation as a Fellow on the Texas Connector project and at the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health
analytics and user modeling. She is currently a Research Assistant at the Institute for Software Integrated Systems and works on a NSF-funded project for teaching middle school students science and computational thinking simultaneously in curricular settings.Dr. John S Kinnebrew, Vanderbilt UniversityMr. Shashank Shekhar, Vanderbilt UniversityMr. Faruk CaglarMr. Tazrian Haider Rafi, Vanderbilt University Tazrian Haider Rafi is an undergraduate student studying computer science at Vanderbilt University.Dr. Gautam Biswas, Vanderbilt University Gautam Biswas is a Professor of Computer Science, Computer Engineering, and Engineering Manage- ment in the EECS Department and a Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Software
becomeinsinuated into the practices of institutions like State U., encoded or “naturalized,” to useBowker & Star’s term, into the institutional infrastructure through such artifacts ascurriculum flowcharts.One way to see this naturalization is to examine the role of math courses on the one hand,and projects courses on the other. First, notice the centrality of math and science courses.This can be seen by examining the dependency trees for courses with pre-requisites. Allof these dependency trees include math and science courses. Now, compare this with thetwo “projects courses” that are part of the first and fourth year. As shown, these coursesare widely separated and generally disconnected from the rest of the curriculum. Withinmath and science
Paper ID #16011The Prototype for X (PFX) Framework: Assessing Its Impact on Students’Prototyping AwarenessMs. Jessica Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Jessica Menold is a third-year graduate student interested in entrepreneurship and the design process. She is currently conducting her graduate research with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow and Dr. Timothy Simpson on a project devoted to understanding how prototyping processes affect product design. Jessica is interested in exploring how a structured prototyping methodology, Prototype for X, could increase the end design’s desirability, feasibility, and