Summer 2021 program in an online or hybrid environment, we will summarizelessons learned from the 2020 experience.Cohort 1 Student OutcomesEighteen rising sophomores participated in the first cohort of the Engineering Fast-ForwardProgram in 2017. All eighteen students have been retained in a STEM degree program (100%STEM retention). Fifteen of the eighteen graduated in Spring 2017, fourteen with undergraduateengineering degrees and one with a mathematics degree (83% 4-yr graduation). The threeremaining Cohort 1 students are on-track to complete their degrees during the next year, two inengineering and one in biology. Both engineering majors have intentionally chosen a five-yeardegree plan to enrich their education: one is in the process of
-person to Online Remote transition of an Engineering Statics courseContinuing education amidst the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has been one of the most dauntingexperiences for most students. As the virus continued to spread across the country, various school districtsand localities faced mounting pressures to close school facilities. College students were asked to leavecampus and finish the semester remotely, placing them in an unfamiliar learning situation. When severalcampuses reopened in the fall 2020, outbreaks raced through dorms and infected thousands of studentsand employees. More than 120,000 cases have been linked to American colleges and universities sinceJanuary 1, 2021, and more than 530,000 cases have been reported since the
, there was a learning curve when itcame to using these online tools, as well as technical difficulties such as connectivity issues andprinting and scanning [5].The concept of “change readiness” [1] was especially important during the emergency transition,as many faculty members were unfamiliar with online teaching. Change readiness is definedas someone’s “beliefs regarding the appropriateness of, support for, and value of a change” [1].If unprepared for a sudden change, students and faculty could face negative feelings towardsmotivation and focus, which some researchers observed to occur at their institutions during theemergency transition period [4]. Some researchers noticed that motivation was directly linked tostructure, which many students
the following goals for this 3-yearcycle: (1) Excite, empower, and educate 30 undergraduate participants in traditional/advancedmetrology and NDI, (2) for the undergraduate participants to experience an immersive research-training through a related transformative project, (3) to mold the undergraduate participants asboth independent/collaborative researchers capable of effective communication, (4) for theundergraduate participants to learn to ask the right questions, formulate plans, pragmaticallyinterpret data, and (5) inspire and enable the undergraduate participants to pursue advanced studyand related STEM careers. This site was a direct response to a recurring concern raised byindustry partners and technical workforce recruiters about the
the computer science department. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Summer Coding Camp: Curriculum, Experiences, and Evaluation Paea LePendu* 1 , Cecilia Cheung2 , Mariam Salloum1 , Pamela Sheffler2 , and Kelly Downey1 1 Department of Computer Science & Engineering, UC Riverside 2 Department of Psychology, UC RiversideAbstractMany education-related organizations in the U.S., from the National Science Foundation down tolocal districts, have been pushing to introduce computer science concepts
learning and motivation.However, in our goal to create inclusive classrooms, we realized that students’ experiences inteams were a space with enormous potential for harm [e.g., 1]. Studies of teamwork find gendereffects on teamwork satisfaction [2], talk time and conversational roles in teams [3, 4],perceptions of voice safety [5,6] and task allocation [7-10]. We are aware of fewer studiesinvestigating how race/ethnicity affects student team experiences in undergraduate engineering,but Cross and Paretti [11] find African American men report feeling hypervisible on their teams,needing to disprove negative stereotypes, and feeling less likely to develop close friendships withteammates. Cohen and Garcia [12] note that African American students are at
development opportunities for faculty and staff at their institutions. Additionalinformation on metacognition and specific interventions can be found here: https://skillful-learning.org/ .Metacognition, knowing about and regulating our thinking processes, is a key skill for learningmore effectively and efficiently, in academia, as a professional, and throughout life [1]. It can bedeveloped with focused instruction, practice, and feedback [2]. Few engineering educators havetraining or expertise in pedagogy [3], let alone facilitating students’ metacognitive growth, i.e.,the development of their learning skills. However, understanding learning processes and helpingothers become more skillful learners require development of new knowledge and abilities
developchallenges that are meaningful and relevant for middle school students in ways that promotedesign, engineering, and computational thinking. The shift to remote learning has been especiallychallenging for activities that require students to physically engage with the materials.This paper describes 1) the research context including certain modifications made due to theCOVID-19 pandemic, 2) the implementation experience of five middle school teachers whoenacted a curricular unit using programmable sensor technologies (called the sensor immersionunit) in the Fall of 2020, when their schools were engaged in synchronous remote instruction dueto the COVID-19 pandemic, 3) the adaptations researchers and teachers made to the instructionalunit to address
learning. Learning is a socialprocess where students interact with each other for the exchange of knowledge and for building acommunity of inquiry [1-3]. Social learning is also an important part of the college experiencefor many students where informal learning happens among students in their courses and studentorganizations. Since March 2020, the students have been experiencing a loss of interaction withtheir instructors and with other students which has impacted their ability to learn in onlinecourses [4-6]. Previously, the lack of social interaction has been reported as a weakness for manyonline courses which prevents students from learning effectively in an online environment [7-8].Further, both the student-instructor and the student-student
structure between the two departments yieldsinteresting observations and areas for potential leveraging of advancements within the twodisciplines.Introduction “Education is the most powerful path to sustainability. Economic and technological solutions, political regulations or financial incentives are not enough. We need a fundamental change in the way we think and act.” Irina Bokova, Director - General of UNESCO [1]Sustainability awareness and action are of growing importance for the care and protection ofpeople, societies and cultures; profit, economic feasibility and responsibility; and for theenvironment and life preservation. Engineers have profound impacts on sustainability and itsdevelopment or lack thereof. And thus, it is
sustainableworld. When one looks at the ethics of responsibility [1] - [2], one must consider both theintentions of an act as well as its consequences. One common practice in which some companiesare failing to be ethically responsible for the impact they are having concerns unsustainablepackaging [3] - [7].According to the EPA, packaging creates “77.9 tons of municipal solid waste per year,” almost30% of the total amount of waste [8]. Packaging makes up 65% of all household trash [9],contributing to landfills. Landfills are reaching capacity and releasing toxic gases into theenvironment. Landfills, hazardous waste sites, other industrial facilities are most often located incommunities of color. In the U.S., people of color are close to twice as likely as
, University Park 31. Table 1 shows the demographiccharacteristics of the Cohort 5 participants. Seventy-three percent are male. Forty-seven percentare racially underrepresented. Thirty-seven percent of the bridge students are first-generationcollege students.Table 1. Background Characteristics for Cohort 5 Bridge Students Bridge Students Variables N % Gender Male 61 73 Female 23 27 Ethnicity African American 19 23 Asian 11 13
describes the development of class project modules inthe Industrial, Manufacturing, and Systems Engineering (IMSE) department at The University ofTexas at El Paso. The primary focus of these modules is to introduce the student to the concept ofgreen design and LCA in the evaluation of the environmental impact of the manufacturing process.This enables a high interdisciplinary platform for research and class modules suitable to be usedin the academic environment for hands-on student training. The modules are developed bythoroughly analyzing the skillsets required by the industrial needs. The module includes: 1)Introduction and theory of sustainable design; 2) Product design and development using CADsoftware; 3) sustainability analysis of the 3-D soft
laboratories in higher educationRecent innovations in online education and the need for lab exercises as part of competencedevelopment in STEM education have led to the development of online laboratory solutions -termed online labs. Those tools include remote–physically real existing equipment used overdistance, augmented reality (real existing labs with VR add-ons), and virtual labs–a software-based fully virtual lab, often through simulation [1-7]. Online laboratories have gainedprominence because they have the potential to overcome some drawbacks of classical, hands-on labs such as equipment, time, capacity, or infrastructure constraints [7, 8]. Furthermore, ifused in addition to and not as a substitute for hands-on labs, online laboratory
wasadministered to help improve this learning modality, and a second survey near the end looked toquantify any said benefits of improved student outcomes. Student feedback and their measuredperformances on each technical writing assignment is presented herein.I. IntroductionAs the Covid-19 pandemic abruptly ended in-person classes, the transition to teaching fullyonline offered both new possibilities and challenges. On one hand, interactive software such asZoom allowed for unique and dynamic lectures which could be recorded and later reviewed bystudents. On the other hand, engaging collaborative projects such as designing and fabricating anelectric ceiling hoist [1] are no longer possible. At Chico State, Mechanical Engineering Design,or MECH 340, is a
improveSTEM education at the University of South Florida, a large, public university. The STEERproject, funded by NSF-IUSE, seeks to achieve this improvement by (1) advocating andincentivizing the adoption of Evidenced Based Teaching (EBT) methods in STEM courses and(2) facilitating change to a culture in which student-centered learning is valued within research-driven STEM departments. A number of synergistic thrusts have been implemented to supportthese efforts and include:(1) Facilitating and Incentivizing Adoption of EBT Methods: Faculty can apply fordevelopment grants to incorporate EBT methods into their course. They can apply for travelgrants to learn more about adopting EBT within their discipline. A peer observation programplaces STEM
NetLogo (https://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/) which is an open-source software which allows for simulation development using button and drag and drop components paired with coded scriptsEducation Modules Module 1: Tumor* Growth Module 2: Virus* Prevention Simulation & Model Limitations Simulation & Model Inputs • Biologically- observe the progression • Biologically- examine population and treatment of a disease from a dynamics and viral spread cellular level • Computationally- research and test • Computationally- gain experience in the effect of input parameters on a using a model to test predictions as
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Systems Thinking Assessments: Approaches That Examine Engagement in Systems ThinkingWhile systems engineers rely on systems thinking skills in their work [1], given the increasingcomplexity of modern engineering problems, engineers across disciplines need to be able toengage in systems thinking [2], [3], including what we term comprehensive systems thinking.Comprehensive systems thinking is a holistic problem-solving approach wherein connections andinteractions between constituent parts of the problem and the immediate work, stakeholderneeds, broader contextual aspects (e.g., social and political) and possible impacts over time areidentified and included
[1] emphasizes this need for engineers to engage in “socially-embedded solutions” when dealingwith complex issues such as climate change, which has strong ties to agriculture. This skillset,often described as being able to “think outside the box,” includes systems thinking.A system can be generalized as a group of elements that interact to perform a function. Arnoldand Wade [2] define systems thinking as itself a system for thinking about systems with “a set ofsynergistic analytic skills used to improve the capability of identifying and understandingsystems, predicting their behaviors, and devising modifications to them in order to producedesired effects.” Thus, the set of analytic skills in this definition are the system’s elements
real-worldexamples ultimately used in the tool are reflective of the engineering concentrations of the capstoneteam. The biomedical track used an example of controlling the glucose level within a human body;and the mechanical track used an example of controlling car speed. Figure 1. Screen capture of the track selection page 4The material covered is identical between the two tracks, and students can also easily flip betweentracks for maximum flexibility and to understand the same topics with different examples.There were many other areas of flexibility that the capstone team wanted to ensure. The curriculumitself was divided into 6 main modules based on the most prominent
identify what someone needs to know in order to solve problems or carry out tasks in a domain and then to use the results of the task analysis to guide the construction of teaching and training materi- als/environments. Catrambone has served on the Cognitive Science Society governing board from 2011-2016 and was chair of the Society in 2015. He was co-chair of the Cognitive Science Conference in 2010. He has served as a consulting editor for the Journal of Educational Psychology (1/2008 - 12/2011), the Journal of Experimen- tal Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition (6/2000 - 12/2001 and 1/2009 - 12/2009), the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied (1/2001 - 12/2007), and the Journal of Experimental Psychology
review mainideas or common misconceptions about engineering.Activity Description: Each student will be provided stickers/sticky notes (if you want to doresearch with this activity put a number on them), and will be prompted to individually thinkabout up to 7 prompts about engineering. Students will place their sticker on a line somewherebetween strongly disagree and strongly agree to correspond with their response to the prompt.Intended Age: Upper elementary - lower high school Time Needed: 30 minutes - 1 hourActivity Steps: Prompts: 1. Provide students with stickers or 1. Engineering is in every community and sticky note(s) for the activity. makes a
funds of knowledge into their teaching without sometimes beingaware of it. However, there were certain institutional barriers that prevented its fullimplementation in the curriculum. These results indicate that although teachers see thesignificance of funds of knowledge in engineering, the teachers and teaching practices are stillembedded in a deficit-oriented educational structure that may prevent some of these changesfrom occurring.IntroductionWith the emergence of the Next Generation Science Standards [1], middle school teachershave been called to integrate engineering into their classes. However, there has been littlediscussion on how middle school teachers can be supported to effectively adopt instructionalpractices that combine both asset
areinvolved in.The students are taught the basic function of the Autodesk Inventor program and carried outseveral activities to expound the students' understanding of Autodesk Inventor. Among theprojects, the students researched and designed tool holders for standard household tools. Theyalso designed and virtually assembled a weathervane prototype. Several projects have beenperformed, including 1) designing and 3D printing tools holder; 2) designing safe childrenplayground equipment.To have a better understanding of Additive Manufacturing, students watched various videoson several 3D printing technologies. Also, students researched various concepts surroundingAdditive Manufacturing. As advanced topics, stress analysis, the use of 3D-scanner
COVID19, this foundation aided the University’s pivot to remote learning in Spring 2020, as well as helped faculty prepare for the transition of 300+ courses to various instructional delivery modes with TLC’s design and delivery of an institution wide faculty training initiative called RISE: Reframing Instruction for Success Everywhere in Summer 2020. These and other efforts led to a successful restart of class instruction for the Fall 2020 term. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021AbstractClarkson University’s BR200 is a highly interactive and well-subscribed (~50 students per term)face-to-face entry-level biomedical engineering class.1 Its title is
-learning experience, let alone the experience of having laboratory sessions attheir homes. In this article, the experience of two lab instructors with transforming four lab coursesto remote format is presented. The specifics of the labs’ setup procedures are discussed, along withthe pros and cons of the applied methods. A survey-based study is included to reveal the students’opinions about the remote labs, and their suggestions for improving the process. The viability ofremote labs replacing traditional in-person labs will be debated.1. IntroductionAs all schools around the world reverted to remote learning early in 2020, most STEM programshave suffered greatly. These programs flourish, and are made distinct, by the ability to conductlaboratory
environmental racism, as well as students whohave been involved in climate activism in their non-academic lives, in the delivery of the coursematerials. Collaboratively, the 4-student, 1-instructor cogen team co-developed course contentrelating to the role of chemical engineers in advancing awareness of environmental injustice andits local, national, and global impacts on public health, economic security, racist violence, mentalhealth, and more. By starting an in-class dialogue about the responsibilities of the members of our discipline,we hope to engage students in broader issues such as diversity, equity, and inclusion of Black,Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) individuals within STEM fields as well as the disparitiesin access to housing
. The end-of-semester research paper and presentation also differ from the first approach inthat assigned teams collaborate on a theme—for example, engineering disasters that led toairplane failures—with each team member responsible for incorporating a unique case study tosupport the overall theme and analyzing the case from a technical and ethical perspective.This paper discusses both approaches in detail and evaluates differences in students’ applicationsof ethical frameworks to their case studies based on the approach followed.The development and evolution of engineering codes of ethicsThe history of ethical codes in engineering reveals an evolving definition of engineering as aprofession and its role in society. Mitcham [1] defines three
concepts of First Order Differential Equations through the use of intuitive and example-based approaches as they relate primarily to electrical engineering. This paper seeks to simplify theintroduction to the topic of First Order Differential Equations into something that is clear and easy tocomprehend. To accomplish this, the paper starts with a visual background of first order systems and anexplanation of exponential growth vs. exponential decay. It then moves into (1) electrical examples,including the charging rate of cell phones and the idea of transient response in electrical systems such asRC and RL circuits, (2) electromechanical examples, including DC motors and heat transfer rates ofdifferent types of stoves, (3) various topics from other
the cap on total credits. Due to the limited time for covering GD&T, weproposed an approach for teaching GD&T fundamentals in an existing course, in which we willfocus on dimension tolerances and types of fits. Because of the complexity of geometrictolerance, we will only explain basic definitions of geometric tolerances and then explainGD&T’s Rule 1, which describes the relationship between dimension tolerances and geometrictolerancing. We chose the course MECH3000-Design of Machine Elements to implement thisapproach because students can directly utilize GD&T fundamentals in their design projects. Theobjectives or the key topics of teaching the GD&T fundamentals in this approach are:• Have a basic understanding of the