Chair for Undergraduate Studies. His research areas are in the fields of dynamics, controls, vibrations, and acoustics. He is also active in course and curriculum development. He is a Fellow of the ASME. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Optimizing Efficiency and Effectiveness in a Mechanical Engineering Laboratory Using Focused ModulesIntroductionLaboratory experiments are a mainstay of undergraduate engineering education. Instructionallaboratories are used to satisfy a number of learning objectives, and they are often used as avehicle for assessing ABET student outcomes for design of experiments, solving engineeringproblems, and using modern tools of engineering
includingunderstanding of class content through the laboratory module, course impact on their attitudes,and integrating their learning. The students were also asked to identify the best thing about thelaboratory, how to improve it, and reasons for which they would recommend/not-recommendthis module to a friend. Of the 32 students, 94% stated they had developed a moderate to greatgain in collection of test data and analysis plus modeling of system behavior. In addition, 88%of the participants indicated a moderate to great gain in their confidence of materialunderstanding. The students’ written responses reported that they enjoyed the opportunity to gooutside while using their personal laptops to collect field data, perform signal processing inMATLAB, and use FEA
everything an instructor needs for implementation: a summaryof learning objectives and module activities, lecture slides and notes, recommended readings, andan assignment for students.FALL 2017 3 ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Utilizing Civil Engineering Senior Design Capstone Projects to Evaluate Students’ Sustainability Education across Engineering Curriculum The current state-of-the-practice for senior design focuses on the design elements from the primaryCEE sub-disciplines: Construction, Steel & Concrete Structures, Water Management and Infrastructure.The
U.S. GDP is attributable to advancements in science and technology. This despite the fact that less than 5 percent of the U.S. workforce is composed of scientists and engineers, thereby suggesting that each one percent of the workforce engaged in those professions accounts for something like 15 percent of the growth in GDP. A truly remarkable multiplier.” - Norm Augustine (Augustine, 2013)In Spring 2015 a workshop was held at the National Academy of Engineering designed to buildcapacity for the engineering education research community to better communicate with a broadspectrum of policy makers. The underlying hypothesis is that despite the impact how engineersare educated has on national priorities, researchers in
, mentored and have productively conducted research, theywill choose faculty careers. Conversely, they found scientists, no matter their background,reported less interest in faculty careers (particularly for those at research-intensive universities),and increased interest in careers outside of research over time in graduate school.25Reflecting on the work of these programs and the resulting improvements in completion of PhDsand steps forward in institutional change, a faculty career model that better defines what ishappening in best practice situations and that better speaks to the PhDs who are choosing non-academic careers is clearly needed. An improved model can be used by policy makers indeveloping funding solicitations as well as by institutions
, Golnaz’s research focused on modeling and measuring connected design learningin engineering digital learning environments using discourse network analytics. Her current researchexamines the intersection of STEM practices and computational thinking. Naomi C. Chesler is Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison with courtesy appointments in Pedi- atrics, Medicine, Mechanical Engineering and Educational Psychology. She graduated with a BS in general engineering from Swarthmore Col- lege and then obtained an MS in mechanical engineering from MIT and a PhD
Paper ID #20359Lessons Learned in Teaching Science using an Integrative Approach that usedthe Engineering Design ProcessDr. John M. Mativo, University of Georgia Dr. John Mativo is Associate Professor at the University of Georgia. His research interest lies in two fields. The first is research focusing on best and effective ways to teaching and learning in STEM K- 16. He is currently researching on best practices in learning Dynamics, a sophomore engineering core course. The second research focus of Dr. Mativo is energy harvesting in particular the design and use of flexible thermoelectric generators. His investigation
, including objects, artifacts, tools, books, andthe communities of which they are a part” (Greeno, Collins, & Resnick, 1996); knowledge issocially reproduced and learning occurs through participation in meaningful activities that arepart of a community of practice (Lave, 1991). From this angle, knowledge of engineering designis constructed under specific social context, and teamwork is essential for designers to completedesign task.Cognitive Process: The information-processing approach is one of the main approaches incontemporary cognitive research field. This approach attempts to explain the process of people’sthoughts and reasoning processes by comparing them to the operating principle of computersystem. Both of which have a process including
experience abroad, and mentoring new staff. Isabelle collaborates with faculty from the Vanderbilt School of Engineering to provide study abroad opportuni- ties for Engineering students. As a result of their joint efforts, Vanderbilt has increased the number of Engineering students studying abroad, which now exceeds the national average.Dr. Christopher J. Rowe, Vanderbilt University Dr. Christopher J. Rowe, M.Eng., Ed.D., is associate professor of the practice of engineering management and director of the division of general engineering at Vanderbilt University. He holds degrees in biomed- ical engineering, management of technology, and higher education leadership and policy. His research and teaching interests in
microelectronics on several defense satellite programs. In 2009 she left industry to pursue a PhD in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado, where her research focused on the development of novel biomaterials for cardiovascular tissue engineering. At the GWW School of Mechanical Engineering, Kathryn teaches the junior level Machine Design and se- nior level Capstone Design courses, as well as advises the BSMS students. In October 2016 she will release a Machine Design MOOC on the Coursera platform, focusing on static and fatigue failure analysis techniques.Dr. Robert Kadel, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Rob Kadel is Assistant Director for Research in Education Innovation with the Center for 21st Century
Paper ID #18809Perceptions of Academic Integrity of Students in a First-Year EngineeringProgramIrene B. Mena, University of Pittsburgh Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Her research interests include first-year engineering and graduate student professional development.Dr. David V.P. Sanchez, University of Pittsburgh David Sanchez is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and the Assistant Director for the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation. He directs the Sustainable Design Labs that is currently focused on
Scholars Program” Award # 1153281AbstractThe National Science Foundation awarded the University of Southern Maine with a grant forSTEM Opportunities for Academically Capable and Financially Needy Students entitled the“University of Southern Maine STEM Scholars Program,” Award # 1153281. At the completionof our fifth year, this poster presentation provides an opportunity to present data on the successof our S-STEM program, as well as share some of the best practices learned and applied. TheUSM STEM Scholars Bridge Program has been a model for blending the elements ofrecruitment, retention, and placement into an integrated, comprehensive but non-intrusiveprogram that promotes student success in transitioning from high schools and communitycolleges
grant from the National ScienceFoundation and later supported by a grant from the US Department of Education. JEP, which hasgrown to include 27 community college across California, promotes partnership by aligningcurriculum, sharing teaching resources and best practices, and helping students to access requiredengineering courses, often via online offerings at partner institutions. Leveraging these efforts,three of the JEP colleges, Cañada College, College of Marin, and Monterey Peninsula Collegecollaborated to develop and obtain NSF support for Creating Alternative Learning Strategies forTransfer Engineering Programs (CALSTEP). The goal of this program is the development andcontinuous improvement of a range of alternative delivery models that
construction projects with an aim to quantify their impact. He has published over fifteen articles in peer-reviewed conferences and journals. Dr. Panthi has worked in heavy civil and commercial construction projects in the past. He was involved in the design team of many hydro-power construction projects. He successfully oversaw the construction of a small hydro-power project as a project manager. He also worked as a contracts administrator for Bovis Lend Lease in Phuket, Thailand where he was responsible for managing contracts for over 50 sub-contractors working for the CM at various times in the construction of a resort project. As a faculty member at East Carolina University he has taught in the areas of Construction
graduate level mechatronic design [10, 11].As a member school in the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), Lawrence Techdefines the entrepreneurial mindset in terms of the KEEN framework. The KEEN frameworkbegins with the “three Cs”: Curiosity, Connections, and Creating Value [12]. Each of the three Csis supported by example student behaviors. For instance, Curiosity is demonstrated by “explore acontrarian view of accepted solutions” and Creating Value is demonstrated by “identifyunexpected opportunities to create extraordinary value”. The framework continues from the threeCs to Engineering Thought and Action, Collaboration, Communication, and Character. As withthe three Cs, each concept is supported by example student behaviors. As
-friendly workforce development on-line classroom tailored to specific opportunities forstudent improvement.The consulting team began by interviewing graduating seniors who had recently taken theWorkKeys assessment. They expressed their frustrations with finding specific lessons buriedamongst thousands of pages across nearly two-dozen PDFs with no indices or tables of contents.This required the students to open each PDF in order and scroll through every page until finallyidentifying the desired lesson. This was an extremely time-consuming process for the studentsespecially those without high-speed internet access at home.Rather than immediately seeking a solution, the team was instructed to first conductbenchmarking research of best practices in
sociotechnical issues in the context of engineering practice. • They were conducted by researchers whose primary or core expertise was not in the disciplines that contribute most directly to the professional skills, more specifically, almost exclusively by people with advanced engineering degrees. Their engagement with the professional skill-related outcomes is an example of the expansion of horizons and concerns that EC2000 sought to promote. Nonetheless, it limited the depth with which they could articulate their evaluation criteria. As the outline for a scenario designed to assess understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (reproduced below from McCormack et al. 2014, table 6
that have been attempted over the past two decades at asummer science camp for high school students. The most successful designs are showcasedalong with the teaching methodology that produced them. The project was designed to teachstudents about engineering research, teamwork, and electrical engineering principles. To assessthe outcomes, the journal papers written by the teams of high school students and feedback fromformer students who are now engineers were analyzed. The student’s papers show that everyyear the project resulted in a circuit that could at least produce sound. The students surveyedoverwhelmingly considered the project an influentially positive experience. Former studentsconsistently reported that the greatest impact was not
Engagement and Service Learning as a Pedagogical Practice in EngineeringDr. Donna M. Riley, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Donna Riley is Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Dr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is Lead for the Connecting Us Team of the Board Strategic Doing Ini- tiative; a candidate for PIC III Chair; past chair of
well as influencing students to pursue engineeringcareers after graduation.12,13 Some of the hesitation for pursuing out-of-class activities forengineering students include lack of time and motivation to participate in these activities.14By understanding students' perceived benefits and motivations for pursuing out-of-classactivities, we can begin to understand how these activities bolster student engagement in andoutside of the classroom. In turn, this can inform policies and practices that may lead toincreased retention rates of underrepresented groups in engineering. This case study wasdeveloped as a follow-up to a focus group that was part of a larger study designed to understandengineering undergraduate students’ motivations for pursuing
. Since graduating, he works as a mechanical engineer in the area of space surveillance, expanding from his previous work experience in fabrication and design. While at Georgia Tech he participated in the VIP team on Hands-On Learning for 4 semesters.Mr. Kevin Peter Ferri, Georgia Institute of Technoloy Kevin Ferri is a student at Georgia Tech, pursuing a BS degree in Electrical Engineering. He expects to graduate in May of 2018. At Georgia Tech, he has been involved as a lab technician and a teaching assistant for a prototying class. He participated in the VIP team on Hands-On Learning for 4 semesters.Zachary Crawford, Georgia Institute of Technology Zachary Crawford is pursuing his bachelors in mechanical engineering
acknowledged and discussed throughout.Intersectional theory discusses how multiple identities—such as race, class, gender, amongothers—intersect to create a new identity whose experience is different from the sum of its parts(Crenshaw, 1991). The Year of ACTION in Diversity has positioned underrepresented groups(i.e., women and minorities) at the forefront of recent studies in engineering education. Thedistinct challenges faced by these groups point to the need for more comprehensive studies thatcan lead to identifying best practices in engineering education. Intersectionality provides a basisfor our research (Crenshaw, 1991), emphasizing the need to critically analyze how scholarshipfrom ASEE positions multiple aspects of diversity. Because
techniques. To support the abbreviated fielding cycles often associated with arctic research andpublic safety missions, ACUASI requires a practical means of creating UAS components for rotary-wing and fixed-wing platforms. While rapid prototyping is commonly used in making components forwidely popular rotary-wing UAS, much of this same technology may be harnessed and brought to bearon the design and fabrication of more complicated fixed-wing aircraft in order to satisfy a broader setof mission flight envelopes and payload requirements.Motivation.The desire for UAF to develop an organic fixed-wing UAS capability is motivated by several factors.From an academic perspective, students learn and develop best by doing. Students are most motivatedwhen
American (7.7%), Hispanic (15.2%), Asian (17.6%), Female (20.7%), LSES (14.6%). Supplemental Instruction can now be counted as one of the many programs that successfullydecreases the academic performance gap between ethnic minority students and Caucasians. Thisgap was decreased to within 3% of course averages for all groups excluding African Americans.One of the most surprising things about these findings is that the SI program was not designed togive additional benefit to minority, female, or low-socioeconomic students. Through activelearning and inclusion, the SI program at LSU has shown to have a substantial impact on allpopulations of students7 References[1] E. Brothers, B. Knox, “Best Practices in Retention of Underrepresented
inaccurate portraits of andperpetuate misconceptions about engineering but also how these misconceptions create barriersto participation for those who might not identify with those stereotypical, albeit false,perceptions of the profession.Changing the ConversationTrevelyan calls for a re-conceptualization of engineering in ways that position it as “a muchbroader human social performance than traditional narratives that focus just on design andtechnical problem-solving” (Trevelyan, 2010, p. 175). Given what we understand about the kindsof work engineers do and the skills needed to solve modern engineering problems, engineersneed to understand the broader scope of their practice as well as its impacts within a largersociety. In changing the
Practice in the School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Sys- tems at Northern Arizona University and is primarily focused on the NAU/CQUPT dual degree program. He completed his Ph.D in Material Science and Engineering in 2014 at Norfolk State University in Vir- ginia. Dr. Zhou’s research interests are in semiconductors and electronics. He also possesses several years of industry experience as a device engineer in a leading semiconductor company in Shanghai, China. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The NAU/CQUPT 3+1 Program in Electrical EngineeringNorthern Arizona University (NAU) in the United States of America and Chongqing Universityof Posts and Telecommunications
system, the impacts are obvious. Similar to yesteryear’s informationrevolution which saw computers and cellphones move from a technical curiosity to a disruptivetechnology, and eventually to a mandate for participation in business and everyday life, there isnow a growing expectation for students to possess some level of exposure to or awareness ofUAS platforms, capabilities, and applications. Students understand this and they want on board.Courses ImplementedTo provide students with a foundational exposure to UAS/aerospace design principles whileoperating within the fiscal realities of a small developing program, UAF has instituted an initialmodest 2-course sequence. These courses provide an opportunity for graduate and undergraduatestudents to
particular, physical therapy students are often subject to skills checks, where theymust demonstrate competency in standard techniques for physical therapy practice. Thisapproach was adapted to an introductory circuit theory lab, in which students were given regularskills checks to test competency with hardware and software standard in circuit theory courses.Data were collected for three years by asking students to complete anonymous Likert scalesurveys designed to allow students to self-assess their achievement of the laboratory learningoutcomes. The first year was a control group in which performance-based assessment was notused, while year two and three were separate experimental groups which were subject to skillschecks. As a result of the
and Scandinavian Consortium for Organisational Research as a Fulbright Finland - Technology Industries of Finland Centennial Foundation and Tutkijat Maailmalle - KAUTE Foundation grantee.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers
Paper ID #19090The Case for Epistemologically-Conscious Computer-Based Learning Envi-ronmentsMr. Petr Johanes, Stanford University Petr Johanes is currently a PhD candidate in Learning Sciences and Technology Design (LSTD) at the Stanford University Graduate School of Education. He holds a B.S. and M.S. from the Department of Materials Science at Stanford University and has experience teaching engineering courses as well as researching engineering education, especially in the context of online learning. Currently, Petr is building data-driven digital environments to investigate the role of epistemic cognition in learning