wellthey perform in their first-year college courses. It was found that students tend to stick with theirmajor if their grades are high in first-year introductory courses [2]. A statistical report from theNational Center for Education Statistics in 2013 [3] shows that nearly one-third of STEMstudents change their majors and based on cultural belonging [4], [5]. A study on the cognition ofthe human mind and specifically the conation; or the students’ willingness, drive, anddetermination; reports that an introductory engineering course has the potential to activatestudents’ conation, but that there is no significant evidence that such a course impacts students’conation [6].The orientation course discussed here was designed to achieve several goals
engineering sub-disciplines, most commonly inmechanical and civil engineering courses. Courses available to multiple course levels werecounted for each applicable level. We found that CUREs were more frequently implemented injunior or senior level courses, or in courses available to multiple levels including juniors andseniors. 3 Figure 2. Research Domain by Course Level: Which research domains each CURE course implemented by course level.Analysis of code-counts revealed three prevailing topics on faculty’s minds as they reflected ontheir experience: Course Operations Details, Course Content Delivery, and Grading (Figure 3).Respectively
Paper ID #48540From Good Pedagogy to Racial Equity: Experimenting with what works inEngineering ClassroomsDr. Atota Halkiyo, Florida International University Dr. Halkiyo is a Postdoctoral Associate at the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education at Florida International University. Dr. Halkiyo graduated in Education Policy and Evaluation from Arizona State University and uses mixed methods but largely qualitative inquiry to study his primary research interest: enhancing higher education equity for all students, particularly those from international and/or underrepresented backgrounds (e.g
a pragmatic and theoretical approach to finding the best approach for that study. Myadvisors encouraged the rule breaking pragmatism, they didn’t mind me forging new groundmethodologically or theoretically and would give me sufficient critical feedback to progress thework towards their satisfaction and appropriate scholarly justification. I skipped my ownrecommended research methods class, asking instead to take an anthropology class and a criticalqualitative methods class instead. I wanted to learn to think differently, to hone a particular set ofmethodological and theoretical skills.My first experience with engineering education methodological norms was through reading andeven more through writing to the ASEE conference and Journal of
Paper ID #45194Think-Aloud Insights: Exploring QuantCrit Challenges and Diverse SurveyResponses Among Undergraduate Engineering StudentsMs. Sheila Kathryn Castro, University of Florida Sheila Castro is a doctoral student in Science Education at the University of Florida’s School of Teaching and Learning. Her research focuses on Latina’s STEM identity, family support, and influences on the experiences of undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Bruce Frederick Carroll, University of Florida Dr. Carroll is an Associate Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Florida. He holds an affiliate
shortcuts, and the criticality of a projected timeline is lost.3. The marble machine project3.1 Project overviewThe Marble Machine project was successfully implemented for three semesters (Fall 2023 -Summer 2024) at the Junior level mechanical engineering curriculum. The project parameterswere designed with the following general goals in mind:• The project should be reasonably complex and manufacturing quality-sensitive, but in a compact size suitable for most college manufacturing facilities and budgetary concerns.• The final solution should result in a physical device that is primary mechanical in nature.• The project should impart critical lessons regarding the importance of tolerancing, prototyping, and conducting a thorough failure
Paper ID #46642Engaging Engineering Students in Experiential Learning through Robot Droidsand K-12 OutreachDr. Joshua Montgomery, THE Ohio State University & Southern State Community College Dr. Joshua Montgomery is a Computer Science Professor at Southern State Community College, a Senior Lecturer at The Ohio State University, and an AI instructor at Southern New Hampshire University. With over a decade of experience as a professor and 13 years as the Technology Director for Chillicothe City Schools, Montgomery has been deeply involved in education and technology leadership. He serves as Co-Director of the Ohio Code
ethics case studies or modifyingour virtue-of-the-week modules to incorporate more decision-making opportunities for students.Additionally, we are in the process of developing more rigorous assessments to quantifyimprovements in students’ understanding of virtues, engineering ethics, and ethicaldecision-making. Furthermore, we plan to collaborate with other engineering faculty toimplement these teaching modules in their courses as well.References [1] C. S. Nair, A. Patil, and P. Mertova, “Re-engineering graduate skills–a case study,” European journal of engineering education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 131–139, 2009. [2] R. E. McGinn, ““mind the gaps”: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997–2001,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol
electrochemical, optical, and MEMS devices. A champion of diversity and equity in engineering education, Dr. Yung has designed innovative curricula that integrate project-based learning, hands-on activities, and peer collaboration. He is a strong advocate for incorporating disability perspectives in biomedical engineering, aiming to train a generation of engineers who are equipped to tackle accessibility challenges in healthcare technology. Dr. Yung’s commitment to STEM outreach is evidenced by his extensive work with underrepresented K-12 students in Central New York. Through various programs, including those at La Casita Cultural Center and local schools, he has fostered a love for science and engineering in young minds
Paper ID #46618BOARD #129: AI as a Teaching Assistant: Aiding Engineering StudentsBeyond Office HoursMr. Ernest Wang, University of California, Davis Ernest Wang is a current undergraduate student in Electrical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of California, Davis. He is interested in the application of commercially available LLM models in helping engineering undergraduates with their studies. His other research interests include microfluidics and bioelectronics.Harry Zhang, University of California, Davis Harry contributed to this research through the practical development and testing of the AI Teaching
Paper ID #46560BOARD # 360: EDU Core—Engineering Systems Change for Equity: AFocus on Change ProcessesSandra Laursen, University of Colorado Boulder Sandra Laursen is senior research associate and director of Ethnography & Evaluation Research (E&ER), where she leads research and evaluation studies focusing on education and career paths in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. She has studied ADVANCE projects for 25 years as an evaluator and researcher, and has published articles, books and online resources on strategies for institutional change to advance equity and inclusion for faculty
working inuncertain environments and having adaptable decision-making [7]. Engineers are known forbeing methodical and analytical, so an entrepreneurial mindset allows for full use of those skillsin entrepreneurial-minded ways [6]. One way to add entrepreneurship into education is by addingcourses, but incorporating practical courses may be difficult with the current curriculum.Entrepreneurship can also be integrated into existing engineering courses through adding moreprojects, bringing real-world examples into the classroom, and lecturing less [8].Many components of the entrepreneurial mindset have been identified through the years, butengineering educators have emphasized three main components: curiosity, connections, andcreating value (3Cs
limitations of knowledge acquisition,” Child Dev, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 477–493, 2016, doi: 10.1111/cdev.12469.[9] L. Vygotsky and M. Cole, “Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes,” 1978.[10] H. J. Passow, “Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work?,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 95–118, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00043.x.[11] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2025 – 2026,” 2025.[12] S. A. Kalaian, R. M. Kasim, and J. K. Nims, “Effectiveness of small-group learning pedagogies in engineering and technology education: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Technology Education
[16]D. Grasso and M. Berkins,Holistic Engineering Education: Beyond Technology. 2010. [17]A. Van den Beemt, M. MacLeod, A. Van de Ven, S. van Baalen, R. Klaassen, and B. Mieke, “Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support. Journal of engineering education, 109(3), 508-555.,” vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 508–555, 2020. [18]C. Hoadley, “Methodological Alignment in Design-Based Research,”Educ. Psychol., 2004. [19]L. S. Vygotsky,Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge
readings that students completed during the seminar course also helpedstudents contemplate their own education as engineers and their own role in the learning process.For example, advocating for more community-centered approaches to engineering work, Casperreflected:1 Pseudonyms were assigned to each student. If engineers want to work in the humanitarian space, they need to keep the community in mind, whether its people or resources…. I don’t think that shift in mindset would be any more difficult for an engineer to adjust to, the difficult part would be building the expertise in the various considerations…if these concepts were added more into school then it wouldn’t be as difficult to socialize later.It is
Paper ID #48021Using student-led case studies in engineering to build cultural awareness,self-knowledge, and ethical engagementKelsey McLendon, University of Michigan Kelsey McLendon is a Lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. Her research interests are technical writing, social and emotional learning, and DEIJ in engineering education.Dr. Katie Snyder, University of Michigan Dr. Snyder is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She teaches writing and presentation strategies to students in the College of
. Schmelzenbach, "Integrating ChatGPT in an Introductory Engineering Undergraduate Course as a Tool for Feedback," in American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Portland, 2024.[20] A. AlRabah, S. Yang and A. Alawini, "Optimizing Database Query Learning: A Generative AIApproach for Semantic Error Feedback," in American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Portland, 2024.[21] L. Floridi and M. Chiriatti, "GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences," Minds & Machines, vol. 30, p. 681–694, 2020.[22] M. Z. Li, "Using Prompt Engineering to Enhance STEM Education," in IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) , New Jersey, 2024.[23] H. Kyul Kim, A. Roknaldin, S. Prakash Nayak and X. Zhang, "ChatGPT
teachers develop teaching efficacy and identity as STEM educators. Through her research, Dr. Hammack aims to advance understanding of how to enhance STEM education in rural schools and communities, providing opportunities to meet the unique needs of rural students.Julie Robinson, University of North Dakota Dr. Julie Robinson is an Assistant Professor at the University of North Dakota and the Director of UND’s Center for Engineering Education Research. Her research explores strategies for broadening access and participation in STEM, focusing on culturally relevant pedagogy in science and engineering. She also investigates strategies for increasing representation in STEM through teacher professional learning opportunities
productivity,leading to better outcomes in client experiences. If engineering education is to prepare ourstudents for future careers, our students need to be mindful of how human-centered values areessential for real-world success. This leads to the question: how can we proactively make ourdesigns and solutions more inclusive while upholding justice and maintaining ethicalobligations? Our approach aims to parallelly equip students to apply their technical skills toaddress real-world problems and foster a mindset considering a broad range of humanexperiences in their decisions. This focus aligns with ABET accreditation requirements, whichinclude producing solutions that account for public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global,cultural, social
Paper ID #46486Complementary and Contrasting Perspectives: Collaborative Teaching acrossEngineering, Computer Science, and the Liberal ArtsDr. Carolyn M Rodak, Union CollegeDr. Luke Dosiek, Union CollegeAndrew Burkett, Union CollegeChristine Henseler, Union CollegeChristopher Chandler, Union CollegeDr. Nick Webb, Union College ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Complementary and Contrasting Perspectives: Collaborative Teaching across Engineering, Computer Science, and the Liberal ArtsAbstractThe global challenges of today require creative interdisciplinary solutions that span engineering,science, social
Paper ID #46495Student Flow State in VR/AR Module for First-Year Architectural Engineering& ConstructionC. Elizabeth George, University of Notre Dame C. Elizabeth George is a rising senior at the University of Notre Dame studying Chemical Engineering with a minor in Engineering Corporate Practice. In the summer of 2024, she participated in the Engineering Education Research Experience for Undergraduates (NSF REU Site) program at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln (UNL). There, she worked with Dr. Heidi Diefes-Dux, Dr. Erica Ryherd, and Euclides Brandao Maluf to research flow state in VR/AR modules for first-year
Paper ID #46557Best Practices for Developing Virtual Reality Education SimulationsMollie Johnson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Mollie Johnson is a graduate researcher in the Engineering Systems Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She received her BS in aerospace engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and is furthering her education as a Masters’ student in AeroAstro at MIT.Dr. Olivier Ladislas de Weck, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Olivier de Weck is a Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems at MIT. His research focuses on the technological
Paper ID #47409Integrating Reflective and Technical Competencies in Engineering Design: ACognitive Approach to Project-Based Course RedesignL’Nard E.T. Tufts II, Stanford University L’Nard Tufts is a Ph.D. candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University and a member of the Graduate School of Education’s IDEAL Research Lab. Drawing on cognitive psychology and the learning sciences, his research advances integrated design education in engineering and maker-centered learning environments. He holds an M.S. in Design from Stanford, where he helped teach introductory engineering design through the Product Realization
Paper ID #48600Exploring Threshold Concepts in Interdisciplinary Engineering Education:A Delphi Study in Cyber-Physical SystemsYunmeng Han, University of Cincinnati Yunmeng Han is a PhD student in Engineering Education at the University of Cincinnati. She holds a Master’s degree in Computer Science from Northeastern University and serves as a reviewer for prominent engineering education conferences, including ASEE 2025. Yunmeng has been actively involved in NSF-funded research projects and is experienced in applying both quantitative and mixed-method research designs.Dr. David Reeping, University of Cincinnati Dr. David
diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) offers multiple benefits to the academic world.There are many approaches to advancing DEI, one of which is through mindful use of language.Thoughtful language can help foster inclusivity, contributing to the broader goal of creating aninclusive and equitable academic environment. In particular, the American PsychologicalAssociation (APA) has published a language use guideline that provides instruction on languageusage that offers practical suggestions and highlights examples of biased language commonlyfound in academic writing. In this academic atmosphere, the engineering education community isincreasingly recognizing that language use is one of the essential components of creating aninclusive and equitable
Paper ID #45501Case Study of Integrating Standards, Codes, and Specifications into EngineeringCurricula: Various Pathways to Professional ReadinessDr. Shenghua Wu, University of South Alabama Dr. Shenghua Wu is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Coastal, and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Alabama. His research areas include civil engineering materials characterization, pavement performance evaluation and modeling, design, and maintenance, multidisciplinary approach to address complex engineering issues, as well as STEM education. He holds multiple leadership roles, including the Director
Paper ID #47372Development of a Pre-College Curriculum for Nuclear Science and Engineering(Fundamental)Daniel Alejandro Gonzalez, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteBrandon Costelloe-Kuehn, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Science and Technology Studies Brandon Costelloe-Kuehn is an anthropologically-oriented scholar working in the interdisciplinary field of science and technology studies (STS). His research lies at the intersection of community engagement, design research and pedagogy, and environmental justice. His scholarly work on the contexts that enable effective collaboration, communication, and engagement
and co-curricular activities on campus.One way in which our program supports hands-on learning is through teaching skill-buildingworkshops. These workshops focus on creating a space that empowers students to apply newlylearned technical skills in their hands-on engineering courses. A team of engineers,manufacturing specialists, and student staff offer approximately 1,000 skill-building workshopson 20+ topics each year to over 7,000 participants. Students take these workshops for ● required components of their coursework, ● general engineering skill building, and/or ● personal interest in the topic.These workshops are designed with flexibility in mind, allowing faculty to integrate them intotheir courses as replacements or supplements
Paper ID #47476Using Generative AI Prompts for Summative and Formative Feedback onEngineering Writing AssignmentsDr. Stephany Coffman-Wolph, Ohio Northern University Dr. Stephany Coffman-Wolph is an Assistant Professor at Ohio Northern University in the Department of Electrical, Computer Engineering, and Computer Science (ECCS). Previously, she worked at The University of Texas at Austin and West Virginia University Institute of Technology (WVU Tech). She is actively involved in community outreach with a goal of increasing the number of women in STEM and creating effective methods for introducing young children to CS
students'responses to the active learning exercises and present recommendations for engineering facultydevelopment.Asok et al.[6] demonstrated the strategies to achieve higher order thinking skills (HOTS) throughvarious ALE strategies like Role Play, Jigsaw, Brainstorming, debate, Mind map etc for ConceptUnderstanding and Group assignments, combined mini projects, Discussion on Topics, Quiz, andPuzzles for Concept Applying. They applied various learning strategies and assessed the studentoutcomes. They reported that HOTS is achieved by developing applications or products, withimproved interpersonal skills and lifelong learning skills. The evidence for the effectiveness ofactive learning environments among engineering students is shown by great improvement