achieve a given goal in an efficient and expeditious manner” [1, p.7]- are criticallyimportant for any STEM career. These skills frequently are expected of those who seek careersin industry. Undergraduate students may be introduced to these skills if they major inengineering or have internship experiences in industry; however, these skills are rarely taught atthe graduate level. Graduate education primarily focuses on developing skills required for theacademy (i.e., research, grant writing) and often overlook other skills that are more critical tosuccess in professions in the industry. Over the past decades, students have increasingly beenseeking positions outside the academy, opting, instead, to work in the industry [2]. STEMemployers seek
questions on homework assignmentsFigure 4: Weight of each type of question used in a typical homework assignment, based onaveragesProjects and reportsAs shown in Table 2, 50% of faculty indicated they used group projects or papers and 27%individual projects or papers in their courses. Faculty reported that roughly a quarter of the gradefor these deliverables was based on writing, formatting, mechanics, style, etc. The other threequarters of the grade was based on the technical content. There was no significant difference inthis breakdown between individual vs. group assignments.Exams and quizzesThe survey asked several questions about exams and quizzes. Among respondents, 5% reportednot using any exams or quizzes and instead used alternative
]. Likewise, through the use of course modulescovering topics on self-directed learning [9]-[10]; problem-based curricula [11]-[12];engineering projects [13]; journaling [14]; and reflective writing [15], instructors have monitoredand assessed changes in students’ SDL skills. These approaches were described in studies suchas Fellows et al. [3] that entailed a range of classroom and project activities designed accordingto the Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Model [16]. During the activities, students’SDL ability was assessed in Four stages - Dependent (stage 1), Involved, Interested, and Self-Directed (stage 4). Ulseth [17] explored the experiences of students taught using Problem-BasedLearning (PBL) to gain in-depth understanding of the
improve the retentionof all undergraduate students.Several changes were made to improve retention, both in terms of retaining students inengineering and, failing that, at least retaining them as students at the college. These include theimplementation of a math placement exam, a modification of the engineering curriculum basedon best practices used at other engineering programs for improving retention, and the intentionalgrouping of first-year engineering students in a college success course that was led by anEngineering faculty member and a peer mentor who was a returning engineering student.All of these engineering-focused efforts were coupled with college-wide efforts at improvingretention which included an increase in staffing for the
instructional guides and textbooks. However, it is difficult tomeasure effectiveness. For example, Professor Masahiko Yamazaki from Nihon University inJapan created his own textbook and hands-on exercises. Having accessible material with ways totrack progress would be beneficial for faculty and for students.Furthermore, engineering professors are eager to see how their peers at other colleges anduniversities are progressing and how other engineering departments have implemented newerteaching approaches. Figure 6: Desired resources [8]Evaluation of Autodesk ProjectsRegarding how the interviewees view Autodesk projects, the feedback was extremely positive.All ten professors stated that they would like access to Autodesk
Students; Engineering1 IntroductionStudents undergo various experiences during their college years that influence and shape theiridentities. Negative interactions within those experiences can affect the mental functioning andwellbeing of the students. These negative experiences result in high levels of distress that maynot be clearly visible to peers or faculty but can have significant impacts within their collegiatechoices. Available research indicates that approximately 50% of students display alarming levelsof stress, anxiety, and depression [1], [2]. This statistic is an indicator of a mental health crisisthat could be ravaging higher education institutions. Recent engineering education research(EER
(1996). His area of research includes engineering education, advanced composite materials, and nondestructive evaluation. He is a fellow of American Society of Mechanical Engineers. His work has been funded by NSF, NASA, DoD, ONR, ARO and AFRL. He has over 350 peer reviewed publications. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Augmenting Introductory Engineering Courses to Include a Collaborative Learning by Design Project: Assessment of OutcomesIntroductionThis Complete Research paper examines the efficacy of a new introductory level course added todegree programs in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, a HispanicServing Institution (HSI). The new course
faculty member (14%).Instead, it is more common for a group of faculty to grade (64%) with the most common group approachbeing to average the scoring. According to some capstone literature [16,19], these trends do not align tomore civil and mechanical focused capstones. a) Technical items that are assessed b) Methods to assess technical Figure 14: Assessment of Technical Work Next in grading is a students’ writing ability. According to the survey, four types of assignmentsare leveraged by programs (Fig 15a): meeting minutes (@14%), short design narratives (28%), technicalreports (100%) and lastly, students providing peer-to-peer review summaries (28%). The documented lowresults for meeting
Paper ID #41456Board 137: Interdisciplinary Convergence in Robotics and Autonomous SystemsDr. Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University Prof. Prashanta Dutta received his PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University in 2001. He is a Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Washington State University and the Director of the NSF NRT-LEAD (Next Generation Robotics – Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Adaptive Design) program. He is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Dr. Dutta has published his research in more than 200 peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings and delivered
importance of peer support throughout struggles students may face inacademia or the workplace. As a result, they saw team-building as a valuable way to strengthen acommunity. One instructor elaborated, “I started to do that, like actually trying to get them towork together more, because I want, because there’s so few, there’s so few women, and there’s sofew, like you, African Americans, and Latinos.”Communication was cited as critical in the job interview process and more broadly. Several of theeducators described the need for students to be able to clearly present ideas to a range ofaudiences and how practice could be beneficial. They found distinctive ways to make this part oftheir lessons. For example, as one participant mentioned: I also
advance linguistic equity by creating space for more multilingual andmultimodal activities in elementary school classrooms.IntroductionThe number of elementary school students designated as English learners has increased and willcontinue to increase in U.S. schools. In schools emergent bilingual students are often subjectedto low-level content and lower expectations than their monolingual English-speaking peers. Forexample, school leaders may believe that multilingual children need to learn basic Englishlanguage skills first before they can engage in science inquiry and engineering design. Incontrast, other approaches position multilingual and emergent bilingual students in light of theirassets [1]. Our project, thus, views multilingual learners
; Eshun, P. (2023) Work in Progress: Can In-Class Peer Reviews of Written Assignments Improve Problem Solving and Scientific Writing in a Standard-Based, Sophomore Laboratory Course? ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. 10.18260/1-2—44182[8]. Lynch, P. C., Kimpel, J. F; Bursic, K.M. (2016). Developing Essential Business and Engineering Skills through Case Competitions. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.[9]. Li, Z., & Edwards, S. H. (2020), Integrating Role-playing Gamification into Programming Activities to Increase Student Engagement. ASEE Virtual Annual Conference 10.18260/1-2—34847[10]. T. A/L Rajendran, and P.M. Shah, “Students
storage device and other Intelligent ElectronicDevices (relays, meters, etc.). Students also create communication logic in Function BlockDiagram and write data across networked M580 systems.Lab 6: Human Machine Interface (HMI) for Microgrid SystemStudents simulate a microgrid system with multiple energy sources and loads by utilizing andconfiguring the HMI module. HMI touch screen programming is used for setpoints andmonitoring system status. Students implement several functions including remote I/O diagnosticand status, diagnostic functional blocks, and HMI alarm event viewer/time stamp screen.Lab 7: Cybersecurity in Industrial AutomationStudents configure security options in the M580, to learn Cybersecurity concerns and attacks inIndustrial
, active learning days took on a variety of formats including bothindividual and group work. Some examples of activities are detailed in Table 2. Activity Name Activity Description Group or Individual? Kahoot Quiz Game Students work through Options for both team and problems and submit answers individual play via their phones or other devices and compete with their classmates on a leaderboard Gallery Walk Students work through Group problems in a small group and write out their
identified as an important time in forming self-efficacy and identity which willaffect career choices made in high school and college [3]. Other work [4] suggests that open- © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conferenceended STEM exploration in a group collaborative setting is conducive to positive STEM identitydevelopment, due to the identity formation that occurs in the context of relationship-buildingwith peers during STEM activities.The University of Nebraska-Lincoln is a large, public land-grant university in the Midwest,located in Lincoln, Nebraska, which contains a sizeable public school district, servingapproximately 40,000 students. A significant
incorporating inclusive design ideas into theengineering curriculum, educators may prepare students to create technically sound, sociallyresponsible, and globally beneficial solutions. In line with engineering's practicality and solution-oriented approach, this integration directly addresses DEIBJ values. This work-in-progress paperdescribes a multi-week activity on DEIBJ and ID in a 100-level multidisciplinary engineeringdesign course. Our course introduces basic engineering principles and methods through lecturesand labs. Coursework includes computer-aided design, MATLAB programming, andtransdisciplinary project creation through hands-on projects. The course uses technical writing,oral presentations, and team-based problem-solving. These strategies
professionals to maintain the countries’ relevance in these fields, thus anannual increase in the number of students who graduate with a STEM degree is required to meetthis demand. These calls also emphasize the need to increase graduation rates for studentsbelonging to groups that are underrepresented in STEM, as they currently leave STEM majors athigher rates than their represented peers. Undergraduate research experiences are frequentlyimplicated as a means for increasing interest in STEM fields and STEM graduate programs, andare correlated to students persisting to graduation. While research experiences can positivelyinfluence persistence in STEM fields, there are inequities in who gets to participate in theseexperiences. The limited number of
with little to noprior data science, computing, or math background. Courses use both synchronous andasynchronous delivery methods to maximize learner flexibility while providing opportunities toengage in real time with instructors and peers. All courses emphasize projects to provideopportunities for learners to apply courses concepts to real-world problems. A terminal 2-semester capstone course incorporates all three disciplines into a final culminating team project.This paper will focus on the conceptualization of the computer science (CS) portion of thecurriculum. As an applied master’s program, much of the CS curriculum takes inspiration fromindustry frameworks such as CRISP-DM and Agile project management to contextualizeconcepts. The
-curricular and extra-curricular activities. The knowledge provided byspeakers will contribute to students making informed decisions when they decide on the fieldthey pursue.II.1.B. The Professional Skills dimension infuses career-based skills to ensure professionalsuccess and increased employability. The National Soft Skills Association study found that only15% of job success is based on technical skills, and the rest are based on soft skills [21]. TheESS students learned career and professional skills as early as their first semester at communitycollege. Skills, including oral and written communication, critical thinking, problem-solving, andteamwork are incorporated into the curriculum and assessed through resume writing, mockinterviews, and
, to serve as a lecturer in the department of Materials Science and Engineering. Here, she is responsible for teaching the junior labs as well as providing instruction on writing in engineering.Prof. Caroline Cvetkovic, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Caroline Cvetkovic is a Teaching Assistant Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where she instructs courses in quantitative physiology, biofabrication, and transport. She earned her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She then completed a postdoctoral fellowship in the Center for Neuroregeneration and Department of Neurosurgery at the Houston Methodist Research
dynamics,which bolsters understanding through the exchange of shared ideas. Meanwhile, Hadfield-Menellet al. [17] study on cooperative inverse reinforcement learning concentrated on theoreticalaspects, lacking practical, real-world validation. Additionally, Vliet et al. [19] explored theeffects of flipped-class pedagogy on student motivation and learning strategies, notingimprovements in critical thinking and peer learning. However, the observed benefits wereshort-lived, suggesting the necessity for continuous application.In the Computer Architecture curriculum, teaching the challenging topics of single cycle andpipelined datapath design to senior students requires an innovative approach beyond traditionaltextbook methods. This paper introduces a
spaces of the mathematicalfunctions, students are asked to write rules to communicate the utility of the models to otherstakeholders including healthcare professionals or basic biomedical scientists.In summary, we have created a unique BME focused text for differential equations and linearalgebra that encourages students to harness their knowledge of physics, biology, physiology,engineering, and mathematics to formulate dynamic models of physiological systems. Our overallaim is to enhance students’ ability to apply and foster a deep appreciation of the power ofmathematics in addressing real-world BME challenges.Background:Ordinary differential equations are ubiquitous for understanding various topics and systemsstudied as part of the
outcomes will be addressed in a separate manuscript, as thescope of this paper primarily focuses on the conceptualization, design, and integration of theescape room as an educational tool within the field of chemical engineering.By combining the proven benefits of educational escape rooms with a novel virtual approach,our study aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on innovative teaching methodsin chemical engineering education. We seek to demonstrate how technology can be leveraged tocreate relatively simple, engaging, cost-effective, and scalable educational experiences that fosterthe development of crucial engineering skills.MethodsLiterature Review: • Conducted a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed articles on educational
Studies. She has served as Chair of her department and Associate Dean for Equity, Inclusion, and Faculty. Dr. Peele-Eady’s research examines African American students’ learning and identity formation and, more broadly, the social, cultural, and linguistic contexts of teaching and learning. Her publications appear in several peer-reviewed journals and edited books, including the International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, the Anthropology and Education Quarterly, and the Handbook of the Cultural Foundations of Learning.Prof. Tahira Reid, Penn State University Dr. Tahira Reid Smith (publishes under ”Reid”) is a Professor at Pennsylvania State University in Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design
, deliverables four and five focused on instructor and peer feedback basedon the teams' oral presentations and written technical reports.Table 1. Design project deliverables. Expected No. Main Tasks Representations • Look for literature on the design of bulk fuel facilities. • Written language • Identify the project stakeholders. 1 • List legal, technical, and social/environmental requirements. • Identify potential trade-offs for the requirements. • Write a problem statement
time to add new ideas or projects [8]. Theyfound that fewer than 25% of the sampled classroom-specific resources could be completed inone class period or less. There appears to be a need in the engineering education community forshorter EML activities that enhance students' abilities to learn and engage with technical content.Active learning is described in different ways, and some of them include: a) “..anything thatinvolves students in doing things and thinking about the things they are doing”, b) “involvesproviding opportunities for students to meaningfully talk and listen, write, read and reflect on thecontent ideas, issues and concerns of an academic subject”, c) “increasing of studentparticipation or ‘interactivity’, for the purpose of
adaptedintervention rather than a researcher. In delivering the intervention, instructors also engage withstudents about their struggles and challenges while supporting peer discussion around overcomingadversity.The ecological intervention establishes a classroom norm for a) adversity in the course as commonand normal and b) struggles with adversity in the course tend to be surmountable with time andappropriate effort. Instructors deliver the intervention in five parts in one class period: 1)instructors verbally normalize adversity in college, surmountability of adversity, and adversityspecific to the course; 2) students reflect and write down challenges they experience in college andhow they change with time; 3) instructors present first-person narratives
themodeling and analyses at the university research lab. Also, since she was not officially enrolled atthe university, she had to be given special access to the engineering lab and university computers.All these accommodations were made to give this student an opportunity to learn well beyondwhat her peers learned at her school.Advantages:Despite all the challenges, the student performed well. She was able to complete the design andanalysis of ALICE over the span of two semesters. As a result of getting involved in research andworking on this project, she learned how to perform research starting with literature review. Shelearned how to review and critique other research papers. She learned how to look up, review andanalyze the COTS components
are encouraged to draw out the situation when problemsolving rather than hold all the details mentally or in writing. Additionally, having applied theknowledge students learned during lectures and independent study, their observed self-efficacywill be set appropriately. This refers to an individual’s belief in their ability to learn or perform aspecific task and is an important indicator of motivation. Students with higher self-efficacy aremore willing to engage in learning actively, and thus have a higher chance of success. As for the latter point, according to Bandura’s social cognitive theory, learning happensbest as a social activity where information is more readily retained with other individualspresent.3,4 The reason for this is
different. Without showing these documents, we then asked faculty to work ingroups of three or four to write down answers to the following prompt: “Without reference tothose documents, what are the main things in your own professional code of conduct governingteaching and/advising?” We encouraged them to frame their own codes in positive terms, that is,what they would do, rather than what they would not do. They wrote these down on post-its forlater reference, and we collected these at the end of the session.Before reporting out on their own codes, we discussed faculty responsibilities as given in • The AAUP Statement on Professional Ethics (www.aaup.org/report/statement- professional-ethics), • Our own university’s 53 page Faculty