Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Helen Choi, University of Southern California

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

mechanisms designed to address harms of the technology. Impact as measured byhuman and planetary well-being is also included.The student component of the framework concerns students' interactions with the technology athand. Instructors first consider the suitability of the technology in terms of its efficacy in helpingstudents reach learning goals; they then examine whether their students have equal and sufficientaccess and proficiency to use the technology. Instructors also consider whether the use of thetechnology promotes students' well-being and dignity, as well the sense of community in theclassroom.The self-reflection component of the framework asks instructors to consider whether thetechnology suits their teaching objectives and methods and

Collection

2024 South East Section Meeting

Authors

Gafar Abbas Elamin P.E., The Citadel; Nathan John Washuta P.E., The Citadel; James Righter, The Citadel; Kevin Skenes, The Citadel

students who workedacross a variety of disciplines and collected efficient and systematic data from posters. Theyreported that the students’ feedback provided informed reflective instructional practice toenhance the capstone project teaching and assessment process.The Course Grading SchemeAt the Citadel, the senior capstone project takes the form of a two-semester course sequence. Thefirst phase is offered during the Fall semester and the second during the Spring semester. Eachcourse is graded separately and contributes three credit hours to the fulfillment of the mechanicalengineering degree. During the first phase of the project students identify, define, select conceptdesign, perform engineering analysis, prototype, finalize their detailed

Conference Session

Track 3: Technical Session 2: Using a Collective Impact Approach to Establish a Center for Equity in Engineering Focused on Graduate Education: Lessons Learned from Phase I

Collection

2024 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Teirra K Holloman, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Natali Huggins; Julia Machele Brisbane, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Michelle D Klopfer, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Tremayne O'Brian Waller, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jeremi S London, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity

faculty and graduate students. 12 [Discuss the center team, their roles at the university and how they contribute to the center]We have spent the last year or so working to translate the collective impactapproach to this particular context.Phase 1 Activities❏ Team Meetings❏ Audit Trails❏ Backbone Activities❏ Reflection Activities❏ Advisory Board Meeting❏ Mini Projects 13 This is a list of the different types of activities we have engaged in to establish the center’s infrastructure and learn from our initial efforts.Example Activities ★ Audit Plan

Collection

2024 South East Section Meeting

Authors

Hoda Ghassab, Tennessee Technological University; Priyanka Mahajan, Tennessee Technological University; Pedro E. Arce, Tennessee Technological University; Andrea Arce-Trigatti, Tallahassee Community College

by the kinematics of fluid flow that works as the “microscopic” levelof the application to the learning topic (please see Figure 1). More details about the learningprocess and how it works are presented in the sections below.A Dual Level Learning Approach through a Practitioner’s LensResearch FrameworkThis work adopts a practitioner research methodology that reflects a praxis-based approach thatidentifies challenges in the classroom and leverages effective practices to enhance studentlearning.1 Manfra and colleagues1 indicate that, “Practitioner research is grounded in notions ofreflective inquiry and experiential education…(and) reflection-in-action” (p. 6). Specifically, thiswork is inspired by practitioner reflections and observations of

Collection

2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Zina Ebrahim; Abdelrahman Awawdeh; Marc Maguire

strategies isstated in this paper. The effects of this redesign were measured through course evaluation andstudent feedback. This paper's goals are to a) provide a formwork to redesign undergraduate STEMcourses using backward design and active learning pedagogy b) reflect on the obstacles hinderingthe future application of these methods. Student feedback shows that the application of activelearning strategies for formative assessment increases students' engagement, improvescommunication, and provides the students with an opportunity to reflect on their understanding.Implementing the backward design method provides students with clear communication ofexpectations and what they are expected to learn throughout the course.KeywordsActive-learning

Conference Session

Equity in Engineering: Uncovering Challenges and Championing Change in STEM Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noelle K Comolli, Villanova University; David Jamison, Villanova University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

decision was made by this group that the incorporation ofdialogue was critical to students reflecting on their own identity and learning to communicateacross different identities effectively. Therefore, dialogue experts were hired and help co-facilitatethese courses, which are known as Race, Justice and Dialogue courses (RJDC).The aim of the RJDC is to expand and deepen students’ critical consciousness of power anddifference using an antiracist lens, and to promote student antiracist action in the service of socialjustice. Put differently, this course aims to expand students’ antiracist literacy and advocacy inhopes of making Villanova, and beyond, more inclusive, equitable, and just for all.The College of Engineering decided that this antiracist

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Bosman, Purdue University; Katey Shirey, EduKatey; Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University; Rhea Dutta, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

, completion,and placement rates [9]. Study PurposeIn response, the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Accelerator program (a newengineering faculty professional development program) was created, implemented, and assessed;funding was provided by the Kern Family Foundation and Arizona State University Mentorship360 Program. The SoTL Accelerator program had two core parts (Figure 1): (1) New CurriculumDevelopment, Implementation, and Assessment, and (2) Reflection and Dissemination ofFindings. The SoTL Accelerator program was delivered in a virtual, structured, cohort manner topromote accessibility, accountability, and a sense of belonging. The purpose of this paper is toprovide an overview, results, and lessons learned from 30

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 5

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haley Briel, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Deesha Chadha; Chris Dakes, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Erica Jean Hagen, University of Wisconsin, Madison; James Iain Campbell, Imperial College London; Umang Vinubhai Shah

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

) recruitment and incentives for engagement in TA training. Bysharing these models, readers will be able to intentionally reflect on their own training programs,consider components of our practices that could be incorporated into their own contexts, andultimately serve future faculty in other institutions.1. Institutional ContextTraining teaching assistants is a relatively new practice in higher education, and the catalyst forprograms differs in the US and UK. In the US, there are no standardized guidelines at the federallevel for teacher preparedness in higher education whereas the training that Imperial CollegeLondon conducts in the UK is largely informed by national government mandate. The DearingReport of 1997 [5] provided a formal blueprint for

Conference Session

Innovations in Experiments and Modeling

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Clint Guymon, Brigham Young University; Joseph R Tuft

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

students subsequently analyze thetransient CO2 response to determine the rate of CO2 uptake by the terrarium plants given the rateof CO2 production by the soil bacteria and the diffusion rate of CO2 from the terrarium. As partof the assignment, the students are also asked to reflect on the similarities between the terrariumand the earth's atmosphere. This multifaceted project not only emphasizes fundamental chemicalengineering principles but also explores the broader context of environmental sustainability andclimate change. This activity is part of a recent curriculum change in the chemical engineeringdepartment with a greater emphasis on a larger quantity of focused laboratory activities in placeof fewer and longer unit operation experiments

Conference Session

Principal Skinner's Secrets: Cultivating STEM in Remote Locations, Steamed Hams!

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Frank Bowman, University of North Dakota; Bethany Jean Klemetsrud P.E., University of North Dakota; Emine Ozturk, North Carolina State University; Julie Robinson, University of North Dakota; Erin Lacina

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

within and across school districts. PD sessions includedtime for teachers to develop lesson plans, explore resources, and reflect on their learning.We used a mixed methods research design to investigate the impact of the PD program onteacher self-efficacy and classroom pedagogy with a focus on cultural relevance and engineeringdesign. Quantitative pre/post data was collected using three survey instruments: TeachingEngineering Self-Efficacy Scale (TESS), Culturally Responsive Teaching Self-Efficacy Scale(CRTSE), and Culturally Congruent Instruction Survey (CCIS). Qualitative data includedvideotaped classroom observations, individual teacher interviews after each design task, andteacher focus groups and written reflections during the summer and

Conference Session

Breaking barriers, building futures: Narratives of equity and inclusion in STEM education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bailey Bond-Trittipo, Florida International University; Stephen Secules, Florida International University; Jocelyn Garcia; Maria Oralia Tinoco Alegre, Florida International University; Malak Elaouinate, Florida International University; Andrew Green, Florida International University; Andres TREMANTE

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

, SaP can also support STEM students’ engagement in DEI efforts. For example, in2015, Bunnell et al. [26] developed a course titled “Being Human in STEM (HSTEM)” atAmherst College, which engages students in action research projects on topics related todiversity and inclusion in STEM. In personal reflections, HSTEM course alumni noted that theirparticipation in the course supported them in making sense of their own and other students’experiences of marginalization, combatting feelings of isolation, and feeling empowered aschange agents within the Amherst STEM community [26].3. FrameworksThe design of the JEDI was guided by notions of liberative pedagogy [27]-[28]. From a Freireanperspective, liberative education facilitates conscientização, or

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan; Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan; Sabrina Olson, University of Michigan; Ricardo Elias, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #43067Board 240: Developing Critically Conscious Aerospace Engineers throughMacroethics Curricula: Year 1Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson (he/him) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. His lab’s design-based research focuses on how to re-contextualize engineering science engineering courses to better reflect and prepare students for the reality of ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. Their current projects include studying and designing

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jing Yan, Tennessee State University; Lin Li P.E., Tennessee State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

mathematics) knowledge and skills that educated graduates possess are vital to a significant21 part of the US workforce and contribute to the national economic competitiveness and22 innovation [1]. A study made by Livinstone and Bovil [2] found that American students23 are digital-centered, tend to learn visually and socially, and enjoy interaction and24 connectivity with others and expect to learn in the virtual context. AFL (Active Flipped25 Learning) is a customer-tailored design attempting to take students’ characteristics into26 account, reflecting the embodiment of active learning so that STEM students were27 immensely motivated to reflect, evaluate, create, and make connections between ideas28 [3][4]. The positive influence of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chika Winnifred Agha, Colorado State University; Amir Hedayati Mehdiabadi, University of New Mexico; Rebecca A Atadero, Colorado State University; Pinar Omur-Ozbek, Colorado State University; Carlotta Duenninger

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

perspectives within theengineering profession. Participant demographics are summarized in Table 1. Thirteen (13)early-career engineers, comprising 9 males and 4 females, volunteered to participate in thisstudy. The participants were within the specified experience range of 0-10 years, with apredominant majority having between 0-5 years of professional experience. The interviewsconducted delved into their experiences, reflections, thoughts, and perceptions concerning ethics,equity, and inclusion in their professional practices as early-career engineers, providing valuableinsights into the challenges and opportunities in the engineering field. The data sources includedonline pre-interview surveys and interviews. These interviews were conducted in an

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jung Won Hur, Auburn University; Cassandra Thomas, Tuskegee University; Li Huang, Tuskegee University; Xiao Chang, Tuskegee University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

reflected on their engagement in research oracademic activities during the semester, shared plans for the upcoming semester, and reported anysupport needed from the department. Additionally, surveys assessing various factors such asparticipants’ STEM identity, sense of belonging, and intention to complete CS were administeredto gather comprehensive insights into the program’s impact.ResultsThe results indicate that the scholars benefited from continuous support and a diverse range oflearning, teaching, and research opportunities. Activities provided enhanced scholars’ overallcollege experiences, contributing to their pursuit of studying CS. In this section, we demonstratedthe program’s impact using three key criteria: retention rate, survey

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lynne A Slivovsky, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Lizabeth L Thompson P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Jane L. Lehr, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Bridget Benson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Andrew Danowitz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; John Y Oliver, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

duringchange processes, these differences are often implicit and unexamined. Our project willmake these differences a visible component of critical reflection and generative dialogue,in service to both educational research and practice, and aligned with capacity building forcritical awareness and action.As our project is only in its first of five years and focuses on individual capacity building anddepartment culture transformation, we currently have limited qualitative and quantitativeresults to report. Therefore, this paper focuses primarily on our project’s motivation,proposed scope of work, and early research steps. This paper also discusses our model forchange, Critical Collaborative Educational Change, which is an iterative reinforcing

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 24

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimia Moozeh, Queen's University ; Paul Cameron Hungler P.Eng.

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

in a multimediaenvironment. Considerable cognitive processing is required for a meaningful learning experiencespecifically in a multimedia environment, which can exceed the limited capacity of workingmemory [25]. Thus, multimedia design principles have been proposed for combining texts,pictures, audio and animations, as well as other guidelines such as providing opportunities forfeedback, reflection and controlling the pace of the presented material [25], [26]. Theseguidelines can help design XR environments to prevent cognitive overload for students.Experiential learning considers learning by doing. According to Kolb [27], learning involves fourstages of concrete experience, reflective thinking, abstract conceptualization and

Conference Session

DSA Technical Session 4

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Duncan Davis, Northeastern University; Nicole Alexandra Batrouny, Northeastern Univeristy; Adetoun Yeaman, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Data Science & Analytics Constituent Committee (DSA), Diversity

Table 1 (the full codebook can be found in Appendix A). We also generated acount of each code based on the full data set, shown in Figure 2.Table 1: Codes for survey responses with short definitions. The definitions represent the stancetaken by the student in their response. The full codebook including further clarification on thedefinition and representative examples for each code can be found in Appendix A. Code Short Definition (tool) AI is a useful tool for students. (crutch) AI has the potential to replace learning. (tutor) AI can be used to learn a specific concept. (reflect) AI can help or hinder learning depending on who uses it and how. (speed) AI can

Collection

2022 CIEC

Authors

Joseph Parlier

for Engineering Education ETD 315At the post-secondary level, a meta-analysis of 225 studies of undergraduate STEM courses,comparing student performance in traditional lecture and active learning courses, students intraditional lecture courses were 1.5 times more likely to fail the courses than their peers in activelearning courses [2].When designing instruction, the active learning model [3] of experiential learning includes fourkey components: 1) engaging students in a concrete experience based on the content beingtaught, 2) providing students with the opportunity to make observations and reflect on theseobservations, 3) allowing students to analyze

Collection

2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference

Authors

Andrew James Goodling, Grand Valley State University; Erik Fredericks, Grand Valley State University; Sara Jo Alsum-Wassenaar, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

student interest and development in science,technology, engineering, art, and mathematics (STEAM). This paper introduces Walk andDraw, a collaborative effort between the disciplines of Computing, Arts, and Interactive Mediato support students as they navigate the STEAM disciplines. The Walk and Draw applicationenables students to experience nature while documenting their findings. We have built anopen-source prototype system that supports students in conducting and documenting theirexperiences in varying environments, thereby providing the opportunities for self-reflection andsharing their experiences with their peers. Ideally, Walk and Draw will support students intheir lifelong goals of communication, exploration, and creativity. Walk and Draw

Collection

2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Sanjay Tewari

American companies expand their footprintbeyond borders. In many cases, it presents an opportunity to understand worldwideenvironmental issues from different perspectives. When journaling and reflection is added to thestudy aborad program, students perform best in a new and rigorous learning setting whenadjustment to new learning styles is included as stated learning objectives, when guidingquestions are used to help students navigate from core knowledge into reflection, when a scoringrubric is applied that provided flexible space for students to explore new concepts, and whenstudents are required to acknowledge understanding of the rubric prior to the start of the course[9]. © American Society for Engineering Education

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division WIPS 2: Students and Peer Mentors

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Atheer Almasri, West Virginia University; Todd R. Hamrick, West Virginia University; Carter Hulcher, West Virginia University; Akua B. Oppong-Anane, West Virginia University; Xinyu Zhang, Purdue University ; Lizzie Santiago, West Virginia University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

techniques and statistics trended downward over the years. Researchers believethis reflects the relative use of these skills by upperclassmen.Figure 5: Importance of Technical Skills by Self-Reported YearStudents were asked to evaluate the importance of various non-technical skills via the sameLikert scale. Figure 6 shows how students evaluated these non-technical skills. The highestscoring skill was time management, followed by teamwork. It is unsurprising that timemanagement and effective teams are valued by busy engineering students who often work inteams. It is of interest that these skills scored above all other technical skills, indicating thatstudents found them of greater importance, even more than mathematical problem solving.Figure 6

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 7

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashley R Taylor, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Josh Iorio; Kelly Scarff, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Angelo Biviano, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Christine Burgoyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Caroline Finlay Branscome, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kathleen Carper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Sara L Arena, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

, Paretti et. al (2014) challenge the1engineering education community to fill a gap in the literature by “expand[ing] our understanding ofeffective context-specific and generalizable practices that foster deep learning of both professionalcommunication and engineering concepts simultaneously” (p. 623, emphasis added). To contributeto this goal, our work focuses on sharing effective strategies for embedding communication skillswithin specific engineering disciplines. By sharing our collective reflections, our goal is to supportengineering educators in drawing connections to their own research and practice.Purpose and Research QuestionsThe purpose of this paper is to explore strategies for integrating communication skills intoengineering curricula

Collection

15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE)

Authors

Mary Benjamin, Michigan Technological University; Laura Albrant, Michigan Technological University; Michelle E Jarvie-Eggart P.E., Michigan Technological University; Jon Sticklen, Michigan Technological University; Laura E Brown, Michigan Technological University; Leo C. Ureel II, Michigan Technological University

provides a simpleway for students to understand their coding practices: a green light indicates good codingpractices, a yellow light signals a warning for potential issues that may not cause immediateproblems but should be avoided, and a red light indicates critical mistakes that need to be fixedto ensure the code runs correctly [1].The Role of Code Critiquers in Programming Education:AcknowledgmentThis work was funded by the National Science Foundation award # XXXXXXX. Recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the

Collection

2024 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Annual Conference

Authors

Evalyna Bogdan; Heather Jean Murdock; Nadine Ibrahim

games have found application in educational and professional settings withinCanada, there has been an absence of a serious game that effectively simulates the types offloods and reflects the Canadian governance framework [3]. Serious games are a recognizedmethod for exploring natural resource management and policies, because these gamesencapsulate complexity, promote collaborative and reflective learning, and provide environmentsto practice conflict resolution [4], [5]. This extended abstract is a brief summary: A detailedliterature review, game description, and further findings are provided by Bogdan et al. [3].In the FRC game, participants assume the roles of various stakeholders (such as a mayor, primeminister, hydrologist, land developer

Collection

2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

William Slaton; Lin Zhang; Jesse Butler

software usage instructions at the BearCart Github repository [1] totrain and test out AI driven autopilot models. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Fig. 1 BearCart software layout 2. Ethical Reasoning and ResponsibilitiesTo develop ethical reflections regarding the responsibilities of creating and using self-drivingcars, as well as to challenge the students to generate their own informed judgements regardingthe ethical use of robotics and artificial intelligence more generally, we designed an interactiveand student-driven curriculum that began and ended with the same ethical reasoning assessmentessay prompt

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eileen Fong, Nanyang Technological University; Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University; Shamita Venkatesh, Nanyang Technological University

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)

a stratified random sampling technique to select one female and one male from eachteam. A total of 16 students (8 females, 8 males) were invited to respond to several open-endedquestions as part of a self-reflection assignment at the end of the course. Specifically, theparticipants were asked the question, “How has industrial collaboration impacted you in thiscourse? Please discuss how the industrial collaboration (a) influenced your perception towardsproblem-solving, (b) influenced your opinion on ethics, and (c) affected your confidence as anengineer, i.e., self-efficacy.”Data AnalysisWe employed a qualitative inductive approach to analyze the data. Using an open-codingtechnique, two coders created descriptive codes to ascertain emerging

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Kathleen E. Cook, Seattle University; Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington; Gregory Mason P.E., zyBooks, A Wiley Brand; Teodora Rutar Shuman, Seattle University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

received her doctorate in Social and Personality Psychology from the University of Washington, with a minor in quantitative methods and emphases in cognitiveDr. Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver; Tom Altman; Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver; Heather Lynn Johnson; Marie E. Evans, University of Colorado Denver; David C. Mays, University of Colorado Denver

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

porous media and leads the graduate track in Hydrologic, Environmental, and Sustainability Engineering (HESE). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Building Community for Inclusive Teaching: Can We Bridge the Valley of Neglect?AbstractThis work describes an effort to nudge engineering faculty toward adopting known best practicesfor inclusive teaching through a program called Engineering is Not Neutral: TransformingInstruction via Collaboration and Engagement Faculty (ENNTICE). This monthly facultylearning community (FLC) followed the three-year structure of the Colorado Equity Toolkit:Year 1 (reported in 2022) focused on self-inquiry including reflection

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremi S London, Vanderbilt University; Brianna Benedict McIntyre, National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering; Nicole Adia Jefferson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

developed programs to help high school students transition into engineering disciplines. Her experience extends to the classroom, where she has served as an Adjunct Faculty member and Technology Education Instructor, mentoring young computer scientists and engineers. These roles have allowed her to directly influence the next generation of engineers, where she emphasized the importance of inclusivity in education. Nicole aspires to influence engineering education policy and establish a consortium that prepares researchers to tackle the challenges of equity in engineering education. Her goal is to help create an academic environment where diversity is not just accepted but celebrated, reflecting the true demographic