yourself.ExplanationWe are doing a study to determine how to get more engineering professors involved in inclusivepractices. We are exploring the idea of professors using inclusive teaching methods to helpstudents succeed in ECE classes. We are defining inclusive teaching methods as initiatinginteractions with students in class or office hours intended to improve their capacity, interest, orbelongingness in engineering (as defined on the tip sheet). In other words, inclusive teachinginvolves bringing typical mentoring strategies into the classroom on a smaller scale. The tipsheet gives many examples of these strategies. • So that we can get your understanding of the definition, what are some examples that come to mind when you think of inclusive
Paper ID #29757Work-in-Progress: Novel Ethnographic Approaches for InvestigatingEngineering PracticeProf. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabo- ratory (GEEC) research group, and received an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michi- gan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D
universities included “Goal Ball Machine,” and “A’sfor April Hall.” The mascot for Braxton Tower, where the Engineering LLC is located, is a bull.Therefore, the competition was dubbed, “Running of the Bulls.” Students can see how their peersthey live with, both on their floor and on surrounding floors, are performing academically. Thispositive reinforcement will, hopefully, encourage the students to also celebrate their ownsuccess. Participation in this event is entirely voluntarily. Assessment is derived from theparticipation from each floor. Weekly updates keep the event fresh in the minds of students.Each semester, a spreadsheet is created to track grades from students, including the following:floor, first name, last name, class title and number
Paper ID #32044Addressing Global Food Security through First-Year Engineering ServiceLearning ProjectsMiss Alexa L. E. LittmanMr. Adam Joseph Malecki, Gannon UniversityMs. Elisabeth Patricia McAllisterMasen Andrew CollinsDr. Robert Michael P.E., Gannon University Robert J. Michael, Ph.D., P.E., Associate Professor in the Mechanical Department at Gannon University, obtained his B.S.M.E. degree from Akron University where he graduated summa cum laude, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical and aerospace engineering from Case Western Reserve University. He joined the faculty at Gannon University in the Fall of 2013 as an
foundations of society”And, becoming more “clear-eyed” requires greater focus and mindfulness to notions of exclusionand oppression that often cloud (i.e. influence) technological design and development decisionmaking (see Figure 2). Exclusionary practices, patterns, behaviors, and norms are beingingrained within the culture of engineering that, while unintentional, may lead to futuretechnological solutions that do more harm than good. By no means is it being suggested thatwhat is being witnessed is deliberate. Nonetheless, these factors, individually or collectively,cannot be given a “pass”; with their consequences – the disenfranchisement of segments ofhumanity- simply dismissed as collateral damage. Figure 2: The 10 Ideas
Paper ID #19600Engineering Faculty Perspectives on Student Mathematical MaturityMr. Brian E Faulkner, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Brian Faulkner is a graduate student at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. His interests include teaching of modeling, engineering mathematics, textbook design, and engineering epistemology.Dr. Geoffrey L Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Geoffrey L. Herman is a teaching assistant professor with the Deprartment of Computer Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He also has a courtesy appointment as a research assis- tant professor
practice is meant to better the world in a variety of ways.Interestingly, the design, problem solving and teamwork dimensions had the lowest amount ofoverlap with outward perspective dimension. This discovery provides an unexpected insight thatstudents do not always draw connections between learning objective outcomes as expected orplanned. Engineering design is typically conducted in a collaborative, team atmosphere; adescription that is true of the experience of the students that responded to the question analyzedfor this study. More effective teams are generally comprised of more altruistic team members; asopposed to less effective teams made up of single-minded self-motivated individuals16. Theresearchers, sharing a goal toward educating First
2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic SectionSpring Conference: Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland Apr 7 Paper ID #20832Laser Music - Authentic Engineering Product Development for a Real Cus-tomerDr. Peter Raymond Stupak, Raritan Valley Community College Peter Stupak enjoyed a 22 year career in the optical-fiber manufacturing industry living and working in 7 countries where he held a variety of hands-on technical and business-management positions. Starting as a R&D Engineer, Peter became fascinated by how a manufacturing business operates and made successive steps into engineering and manufacturing management culminating in
constraints are very important for first-year engineering students and are also emphasizedin the course. Students are taught that the design process requires an open mind, and awillingness to fail. Efficient time use is important, since usually the first design solutions, orprototypes, are not the best design options and improvements must be made. As part of this first-year engineering course, students create Gantt Charts and a project management plan. Thisassists student in staying on track in meeting the project and course goals, and in using the coursetime efficiently. Their time in lab may be the only time that the whole team can meet togetherand have access to the lab equipment. It is also important that the team works effectivelytogether. An
, Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage, 2009.[14] A. Kirn, A. Godwin, C. Cass, M. S. Ross, and J. L. Huff, “Mindful Methodology: A transparent dialogue on Adapting Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis for Engineering Education Research,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Proceedings, Columbus, OH, 2017.[15] B. Miller, M. Tsugawa-Nieves, J. N. Chestnut, H. Perkins, C. Cass, and A. Kirn, “The Influence of Perceived Identity Fit on Engineering Doctoral Student Motivation and Performance,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Proceedings, Columbus, OH, 2017.[16] M. A. Tsugawa-Nieves, H. Perkins, B
context of self-innovation student skills. In Flexibility, Adaptability, Open Mind, Agilityan initial survey of innovation and entrepreneurship skills Courage, Braverythe first thing one can notice is that most of these skills are Assertiveness, Competitiveness“soft” skills (also known as personal or general skills). This Personal Image, Positive Imageprecisely matches the category of skills needed for student Knowledge of Social Mediaself-transformation. This doesn’t mean that the technical Work Independentlyskills aren’t important, especially in the case of engineering Self-Disciplinestudents, but these are addressed daily by teachers in the Efficient, Goal Orientedclassroom. What are left out are the non
AC 2007-2504: INTRODUCING MICROFLUIDICS TO ELECTRICALENGINEERS: AN INTEGRATED PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING EXPERIENCEIan Papautsky, University of Cincinnati IAN PAPAUTSKY received his Ph.D. in bioengineering from the University of Utah in 1999. He is currently a tenured Associate Professor of in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Cincinnati. His research and teaching interests include application of MEMS and microfluidics to biology and medicine.Ali Asgar Bhagat, University of Cincinnati ALI ASGAR S. BHAGAT received his M.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2006, and is currently pursuing his Ph.D. His research interests include
learnimportant fundamental subjects in a well structured yet open minded and supportiveenvironment.Many high schools offer courses in engineering. Due to a lack of pre-requisite classes, thesecourses are usually introductory in nature and do not offer opportunities for students to studyvector and calculus based engineering mechanics1. The course coverage in GESN is the same asthat offered in a freshman or sophomore university level statics class, making it unique for a highschool curriculum. Exposing high school students to engineering before they apply to a collegeor university is beneficial since the rigorous course load of a university program makes itdifficult to complete an intended major without adding an extra year (or more) to the requiredtime.2
general education requirement by most colleges anduniversities. However, as implied by the a)-k) general ABET program outcomes, and the l)-n)outcomes specific to Mechanical Engineering programs, a solid preparation in Physics isrequired in order for students to be successful in the further study of engineering disciplines, andultimately become accomplished engineers. Thus a good direct assessment of studentachievement in physics is as important as the direct assessment in the core engineeringdisciplines. With this in mind we decided to use recent methodologies applied for directassessment of engineering courses to develop a direct assessment for calculus-based physicstaught to undergraduate mechanical engineering students.The paper describes our
AC 2008-1803: PROMOTING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT INTHERMODYNAMICS WITH ENGINEERING SCENARIOS (YEAR 2)Patrick Tebbe, Minnesota State University-MankatoStewart Ross, Minnesota State University, MankatoMichael Ostendorf, Minnesota State University-MankatoScott Cray, Minnesota State University-Mankato Page 13.1012.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Promoting Student Engagement in Thermodynamics with Engineering Scenarios (Year 2)I. IntroductionMany thermo-fluids courses are taught with traditional teaching methods and textbooks.Thermodynamics, in particular, is prone to elicit a negative impression from students "whoperceive the subject as dry
and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/inits/Math/glenn/report.pdf2. National Science Board. 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Publication NSB 04-01. (www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind04/start.htm)3. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington D.C: National Academy Press.4. Karplus, R., & Their, H.D. (1967). A new look at elementary school science. Chicago: Rand McNally. Page 13.686.9
check for their solutions. For programming, students used Octave with an ASCII editor. Fordrawing flowcharts students were encouraged to used Dia. Engineering Design required significantlymore software to be used. For understanding project management, GanntProject was used. For variousdesign stages, Dia was used for mind-mapping as well as developing function-mean trees. Finally, forthe student projects, AutoDesk Inventor was recommended to develop their models while Cura wasused to 3D print their design. In terms of course materials, course books were still available for thestudents but instructors also provided links to digital options from the publishers for students.DiscussionEffects from the transition from face-to-face to online learning
It May Be Engineering Design, but Is It Design? Richard Bannerot Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Houston AbstractCreative design is not taught in most engineering academic programs. The engineeringdesign textbooks (and presumably engineering design classes) do a good job presentinganalytical schemes for the systematic evaluation of design and linear design processes --both of which are necessary and appropriate for much of engineering design -- but theyreally have little to say about the creative, parallel processing necessary for design. It issuggested that engineering students
activity or task in mind. Pajares (1996) has suggested thatdomain-specific assessments, such as asking students to identify their confidence to learnmathematics or writing, are more explanatory and predictive than excluded measures andpreferable to general academic judgments. Thus, a growing body of research relating Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of Texas at Arlington Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationself-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes has been generated. The differing role playedby beliefs of personal skills versus self-efficacy about likely outcomes continues to be anarea of study.Self-efficacy As A Predictor of
AC 2008-2498: FIRST YEAR ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ INITIALS IDEAS FORSOLVING COMPLEX PROBLEMSSean Brophy, Purdue University Sean P. Brophy, PhD. is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Brophy is a learning scientist and engineer; his research focuses on the development of learners’ ability to solve complex problems in engineering, mathematics and science contexts. He continues to work on identifying new opportunities to use technology to support learning, formative assessment, and instruction. Page 13.613.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008
AC 2009-978: DO'S AND DON'TS FOR RECRUITING ENGINEERING ORTECHNOLOGY FACULTYJohn Gumaer, Central Washington University John A. Gumaer is an associate professor of Electronics Engineering Technology at Central Washington University. He earned a MSEE from the University of Texas at Austin and a BSEE from the University of Texas at San Antonio. He is a registered professional engineer and has worked in commercial hardware and software development. He has participated in numerous faculty searches as either a committee member or a candidate. Page 14.497.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009
Detection and Prevention of Plagiarism in Electrical Engineering EducationIntroductionIn recent times, plagiarism has attracted unprecedented attention in higher education. It isgenerally agreed that the advent of the Internet with the ease of access it provides to sources ofinformation has contributed to the proliferation of the practice of plagiarism. Plagiarism hasbecome a global problem, encouraging alliances of higher education institutions around theworld, creating incentives for the development and use of highly specialised and costly softwareplatforms in combating the phenomenon.Until recently it would have been considered inconceivable for students of electrical engineeringto resort to
AC 2009-1215: ASSESSMENT OF THE VANTH ENGINEERING RESEARCHCENTER ON GRADUATE STUDENTSJames Cawthorne, Purdue UniversityOsman Cekic, Purdue UniversityMonica Cox, Purdue UniversityMelissa Stacer, Purdue University Page 14.262.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Assessment of the VaNTH Engineering Research Center Experience on Graduate StudentsAbstract The Vanderbilt-Northwestern-Texas-Harvard/MIT (VaNTH) Engineering ResearchCenter, started in 1999, has focused on improving bioengineering education through theapplications of learning science, learning technology, and assessment and evaluation within thedomain of
try their best to overcome the obstacles suchas communication, stress management and so on. The classes also serve as research laboratoryfor creating a better understanding of the process of rapid response to customer input.Entrepreneurship driven mind and rapid response of product design are desirable skills that theprogram focuses and pursues as these are some of the qualities of the manufacturing engineer ofthis century.1. IntroductionScience and technology are essential for the development of human kind from now on andengineering has a big part on this development however Engineering that is so important issuffering with a shortage of engineers in several areas world wide. So it is necessary to promotethe formation of the best
addressinternational-level challenges by working with politicians and technical people. In short, we needa national-level technological literacy program. Our school hopes to contribute to this effort bycreating a new minor program (Engineering Studies) for nonengineering students that providestraining to create a new, more technologically informed frame of mind for future leaders.The structure of institutions of higher education has made it difficult for nonengineers to developany depth of understanding about engineering and technology. An engineering major has anelaborate curriculum, requires substantial prerequisite courses, and is difficult to pursue incombination with another field of study. Science courses emphasize knowledge of the naturalworld but
properties of materials can be measured. Amaterials laboratory should also include furnaces so that the relationship between the processing, structure,properties, and performance of engineering materials can be investigated. (This approach to teachingstudents about materials is the focus of the lecture portion of the course which uses the text by Van Vlack.G) The laboratory equipment was arranged with two principles in mind: safety and efficiency. Anefficient laboratory is arranged so that the processes which take place within it flow from one work area tothe next. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the general layout of the laboratory. The laboratory includes a 2500-sq.ft. working area, two smaller 225-sq. ft. rooms, 110V, 220V, and 440V electric
. 1College Survival Skills The college survival skills component provides an awareness of the attributes of successful college students.Previous SEEE program models introduced the college survival skills component as a “mini orientation course.”Students are “taught” such topics as time management, study skills, and test taking skills to name a few. Thesetopics are critical to student success. Our experience has shown that first-semester engineering freshmen exposedto these topics in traditional orientation style were, for the most part, not putting these skills to practice. With thisin mind, a new strategy was developed for the 1995 SEEE summer engineering orientation program. The new strategy integrated cooperative learning into
this project shows promise for replication at other institutions or within consortia. Evaluation is ongoing, however, and what remains to be seen is the extent to which these efforts are sustainable and how viable they are for replication. References 1. Bransford, J., National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning., & National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Expanded ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 2. Brent, R. and Felder, R.M. (2001). Engineering Faculty Development: Getting the Sermon Beyond the Choir, Accessed February 4, 2009 from
) ≠ Modern computingStatistical Process 6-sigma, lean ≠ Interdisciplinary/internationalControl manufacturing collaborations Page 14.693.3Traditional Rapid and virtualprototyping prototypingRepresentatives from the local industry are in unanimous agreement on exposing our studentsmore to the computer-aided working environment in the new era of engineering design andmanufacturing. They need well-rounded graduates with the “big picture” in mind and a goodbalance of
program. The challenges include securing sufficientadministrative, institutional, space, equipment, and personnel support. The opportunities lie inthe possibility to create an efficient, modern, and attractive program for engineering educationbased on proven innovative teaching methods, state of the art equipment, and a new student-centered curriculum.One of the first questions that immediately arise is “what is the best curriculum for a newprogram in Electrical and Computer Engineering?” In attempting to answer this simple question,many possibilities come to mind and a review of several expert opinions and an analysis of a fewcurricula from leading engineering schools lead to useful conclusions that are described in thispaper. Some of these lie