. This is a “hard work” project that entails a diligentreconnecting, concept by concept, of foundational STEM ideas as they are used and embedded in theengineering curriculum. The reconnection is scaffolded by the multimedia and sound pedagogy, but it iscarried out by the students themselves. The model we present blends critical and established findings inbrain and learning science with multimedia, shared screen feedback, and other digital tools tosignificantly alter what can be called the attention intensity of the course. Students are more engagedboth in and out of class time with course material, and instructors can direct attention to the particulars ofeach student’s unique concept-building journey. The TIED UP model shares, at the college
implementation of the Ideas to Innovation (i2i) Laboratory, which opened in August 2008 and houses classrooms and laboratories used by the 2000 students in Purdue’s First-Year Engineering Program. He oversaw the daily operation of the i2i lab, and was responsible for the personnel, logistics, and technology used in the classroom and labs. Eric also helped build and directed the College of Engineering sponsored Artisan and Fabrication Lab (AFL), which houses a machine shop, carpentry shop, and a prototyping lab used by all students in the College of Engineering for project work. In 2009, he received a New Employee Staff Award of Excellence from the College of Engineering for his work in launching the i2i lab. Eric has served
and Chair3 IAB Meetings Faculty, Program Director, Fall & Spring Chair and IAB members4 Senior Project Assessment Faculty, IAB Members Fall & Spring5 Senior Exit Survey Program Director and Chair Fall & Spring6 Senior Student Satisfaction University Fall & Spring Survey (SSSS)7 Alumni and Employer Chair and Program Directors Every Three Years Survey8 Program Director Meetings Program Directors and Chair Bi-Weekly9 FCAR and CAS Faculty Every Semestere. Review and Monitoring Periodic review and monitoring is an integral
Professor of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at University of California, Davis. Dr. VanderGheynst’s research focuses on next generation biofuels and bioproducts and agricultural biotechnology. Current projects examine the management of microbial communities in applications in- cluding water treatment, food and energy production, and soil treatment for the control of pests and pathogens. Dr. VanderGheynst received her BS degree from Syracuse University in Chemical Engineer- ing in 1991 and PhD degree in Agricultural and Biological Engineering from Cornell University in 1997.Kara Moloney Ph.D., University of California, Davis c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student
T. L. O’kuma, E & M TIPERs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2006.[28] G. Zavala, “The Design of Activities Based on Cognitive Scaffolding to Teach Physics,” in Upgrading Physics Education to Meet the Needs of Society, M. Pietrocola, Ed. Switzerland AG: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 169–179.[29] S. B. McKagan et al., “Developing and Researching PhET simulations for Teaching Quantum Mechanics,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 76, no. 4, p. 406, 2008.[30] R. J. Beichner et al., “The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project BT - Research-Based Reform of University Physics, Reviews in PER,” in Research-Based Reform of University Physics
relocate. The institution is near twomilitary installations and the VA Hospital is less than a mile away. However, the region isgrowing and the demand for engineers is healthy. Many employers look to the veterans for theirmilitary work experience and perhaps a current security clearance. Additionally, the veteran hasmaturity and other experiences unlike the traditional student. Advisors and program directorswho know the veteran student population can easily match them to companies who want a newteammate who is technically proficient and willing to work.Graduate School. Some student veterans do not stop at the undergraduate level. Several havecontinued or returned for a graduate degree in engineering or project management. Advisingveteran students
Pathways of Students Continuing in and Leaving Engineering,” in Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, 2010.[3] M. W. Ohland, A. G. Yuhasz, and B. L. Sill, “Identifying and removing a calculus prerequisite as a bottleneck in Clemson’s general engineering curriculum,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 253–257, 2004.[4] E. Litzler and J. T. N. Young, “Understanding the risk of attrition in undergraduate engineering: Results from the Project to Assess Climate in Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 319–345, 2012.[5] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering
systems, systems thinking and complex system exploration, system of sys- tems, virtual reality and complex systems, systems simulation, risk, reliability and vulnerability in critical infrastructures with applications to diverse fields ranging from the military to industry. His publications appeared in several ranking journals including the IEEE Systems Journal, and the Computers & Industrial Engineering Journal. His total awarded projects exceed $ 4.2 M including National Science Foundation (NSF), Department of Defense (DOD), Industry, and other Research Laboratories.Dr. Michael Andre Hamilton, Mississippi State University Dr. Michael A. Hamilton is an Associate Director at Mississippi State Institute for System
largest number of in-depth interactions took place in the lobby of Tiernan Hall where theChemistry and Environmental Science and the Chemical and Materials Engineering departmentsare located. In the Campus Center we were able to hand out many promotional tickets to peoplewalking by but not many students or faculty stopped to ask questions or talk with us. Locationsin other academic buildings were not as successful either. In the more social study areas ofdepartment buildings, students were busy working on projects with others and not interested inus. Quiet study areas were the same. The change over of classes appeared to be a good time tobe in the department buildings, however, most students were in a hurry to or from class anddidn’t have time
graduate career was the concept of reflexivity.This reflexivity was represented in my methodological coursework as a tool to be used whileconducting qualitative research. As a means of checks and balances, this tool’s purported usebecame a way to navigate through qualitative research in a manner that acknowledged therelationship between the researcher as an instrument and the processing of information over thecourse of research projects [8]. This navigation can be conceptualized in practices such as fieldtexts and reflections before, after, and during interaction with research participants as a means toshow proof of consideration of positionality, specifically for communities of color [9]. This tool,however, seemed to be accepted as a one size
, Solutioncompletion and Solution accuracy. Each item in the revised PROCESS consists of four scalinglevels ranging from 0 to 3 with zero being the minimum attainable score for each item. Anyidentification regarding group identity was removed prior to scoring and replaced with a project-assigned ID number to maintain privacy and to mask group membership from raters. All students’solutions were scored using the PROCESS rubric after the semester. Thus, PROCESS scores donot reflect or have an effect on students’ course grades.Raters’ scores for a subset of student solutions were analyzed to determine how consistently ratersmeasured student problem solving ability. Traditional statistical (Cohen’s kappa) and itemresponse measures (Rasch many facet model) of inter
builds metacognitive processes into student learning through the pedagogicalapproach to the course, videos from the Skillful Learning Project (skillful-learning.org)incorporate metacognition into the courseexplicitly. Cunningham and his colleaguesdeveloped a metacognition framework throughresearch and interventions in their own courses.They shared their videos for our use in the course.Each video explains aspects of their metacognitionframework, which is divided into two components(see Figure 2): knowledge of cognition andregulation of cognition [3]. The videos, designedfor advanced students in engineering majors, useclever animations to present the informationvisually. “Joe” and “Sue” are hypothetical studentswho exemplify archetypal challenges
Paper ID #25513Reducing Difficulty Variance in Randomized AssessmentsParas Sud, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Paras Sud led this work as his thesis project for his B.S. in Computer Science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He’s currently working in industry.Prof. Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Matthew West is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to joining Illinois he was on the faculties of the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Stanford University and the
courses. He created and co-teaches a multi-year integrated system design (ISD) project for mechanical engineering students. He is a mentor to mechanical engineering graduate teaching fellows and actively champions the adoption and use of teaching technologies.Dr. Tamara Bush, Michigan State University Dr. Tamara Reid Bush currently holds the position of Associate Professor in the Department of Mechan- ical Engineering at Michigan State University. She holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering and a MS and PhD in Engineering Mechanics. Broadly, Dr. Bush’s area of research is whole-body biomechanics. She conducts in-vivo experimentation, methods development, and modeling to better understand clinically motivated problems
engineering from Texas A&M University. His educa- tion and research interests include project management, innovation and entrepreneurship, and embedded product/system development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Study of Secondary Teachers’ Perceptions of Engineers and Conceptions of EngineeringAbstractPeople’s personal beliefs and perceptions can be explored and interpreted byinvestigating the mental images that they draw with regards to a specific subject. Withthis in mind, many researchers utilize the Draw-An-Engineer Test (DAET) instrument toevaluate students’ and teachers’ perceptions of engineers and engineering throughdrawings. Previous research shows that
. The seminar was designed to provide students with tangible examples of how coursematerial would connect with students’ future classes and profession. Activities were related to earlyengineering fundamentals courses (e.g., statics, dynamics, and mechanics of materials), as well asapplications of specific civil engineering subdisciplines (e.g., structural and transportation engineering)(Tables 3-4). The engineering faculty worked closely with course instructors to ensure that seminaractivities aligned with recent course topics. Seminar deliverables and a comprehensive project accountedfor 20% of the course grade.Table 3. Summary of activities completed in the parallel engineering applications seminar. Seminar Topic/Description
as access time, cycle time, area on chip, the totalnumber of instructions executed, total number of hits and miss-rates. The selected tools helped usto simulate cache and in depth understanding the design factors. We compared the obtained resultswith those reported in the literature. In most cases, the results were comparable, and in some casesslight improved were achieved.Bibliography1. Hill M.D, and Smith A.J. Evaluating Associativity in CPU Caches. In: IEEE Transactions on Computer, 1989.2. Arjun Malik A., Bhatia M.S, Wu P., Zhe Qi, Cache Coherency Case Study: Cache Pipeline, Multilevel, Hierarchical, Semester Project, Dept. Computer Science, BGHI, Ohio, 2017.3. Duska, B. M., Marwood D, and Feeley M. J. The Measured Access
review project.Gore and Jones [20] offer advice to library managers considering the impact systematic reviewsupport may have on their libraries. Some libraries have developed policies and guidelines thatspell out what level of librarian involvement constitutes a basis for co-authorship. It is importantthat librarians understand the substantial time commitment involved in participation in systematicreview projects, and that there is consideration in their institution of whether such support is to beroutinely offered, or whether it becomes part of a fee-for-service scheme. If they are willing toengage in this work, librarians should advocate for their inclusion in systematic review researchteams. Several agencies [21], [22] recommend the
applying OR/MS and Simulation techniques to Supply Chain & Operations Management prob- lems, and has also conducted research in the areas of Human Factors and Work Design for evaluating time and motion efficiencies of operations. Jim also holds an undergraduate IE degree and a Six Sigma Green- belt. Prior to joining the faculty at Western Michigan, Jim was an Assistant Professor for the Industrial Engineering Technology program at Purdue Polytechnic Institute.Mrs. Enas Aref, Western Michigan University An Engineering professional with 10+ years of experience in manufacturing, inventory control, procure- ment, import and export. Earned Master’s Degree in Project Management, 2015,Keller Graduate School of Management
discourage them from further pursuing CS [10]. Along these lines, the ethnographic study of anundergraduate programming course conducted by Secules et al. shows the combined impact of several“mundane and seemingly innocuous” aspects of the course, such as the seating arrangement in lecture andthe status hierarchy when an experienced student was paired with an inexperienced student for a group lab[11]. These aspects of the course all combined to create a culture that projected the implicit message thatthe focus of the study--a female student from a vocational high school--could not succeed in engineering.Lastly, studies have shown that students’ performance in CS is influenced by their learning strategies intheir introductory CS course, which are
. Robert has received over 4.4 million in external funding for educational and technical research projects. Robert’s dedication to teaching has been rewarded by receiving several educational awards including the 2006 Chester F. Carlson, 2002 Robert G. Quinn Award, 1999 Ray W. Fahien Award, 1998 Dow Outstand- ing New Faculty Award, the 2001, 1999 and 1998 Joseph J. Martin Awards, and four teaching awards. Robert is one of the founding professors of the chemical engineering program at Rowan University.Prof. Martha Grover, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky David L. Silverstein is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Kentucky. He is also the Director of
remains low despite the millions of dollarsspent on research for attracting more female students. In order to entice more female students tothese male dominated fields, we first have to understand their pathways to CS and educationalyears we are losing female students. For the purposes of this study, we utilized the data from theFlorida IT Paths (FLIT-PATH) project, an NSF funded study. Participants included approximately,1650 students from three large public universities. The survey contained 39 questions on identity,field of study, and occupational interest during middle school, high school, and college. Theresponses gathered through the Qualtrics survey system and were analyzed in R by the researchteam. The research questions that guided this
were available when I had questions: 1 2 3 417. Staff were friendly and encouraging when I had difficulty: 1 2 3 4GENERAL18. The length of the program was 1 (Too short) 2 (Just right) 3 (Too long)19. The number of speakers was 1 (Too few) 2 (Just right) 3 (Too many)20. The number of projects was 1 (Too few) 2 (Just right) 3 (Too many)21. The number of field trips was 1 (Too few) 2 (Just right) 3 (Too many)22. The number of hours spent in class was 1 (Too few) 2 (Just right) 3 (Too many)23. The program was both educational
) the removal of a two week final project. 4. In addition to having “leaders” post presentations and procedures, the requirement for analysis assistance such as MATLAB code or Excel template was made formal.Year 3 Findings. As compared to Year 1, EOG notebook scores significantly increased similar toYear 2 (Table 4) while the perceived learning stands out as particularly low (Table 3). Whilethere appeared to be a dramatic decrease in the EEG lab report scores, a few very low scoresbrought the average down. As EEG became the last lab of the semester, a few students did notcomplete the report.Unfortunately only 14% of students responded to the SALG survey so comparing any onequestion is problematic but compared to the Year 1 almost all
competence in active tasks [12]. This study presentsthe final protocol for gathering data on how purposeful sampling is traditionally performed. Thisis part of a technology literacy research project lead by Tafur Arciniegas.MethodsInstrumentThe collected data during the doctoral research of Tafur Arciniegas was provided as this study isthe extension of her work. It consists in 118 profiles built from interviews and surveys whichprovided information related to the following sections: population characteristics, familial,educational and professional background, technical and technological development of theindividual, according to the factors established by Livneh [2] and explained in the introductorysection of this document.The data was organized
engineering careers to be acontributing factor for improvement in the retention rate for both underrepresented and FGSTEM students at Wright State University [11]. Likewise, in a 3-year long longitudinal study of18 four-year universities, Pascarella et al. [3] found that only academic (research experience,project based learning, etc.) and classroom activities have positive impact on student persistence.Interestingly, per their findings, other on-campus experience such as volunteer work,employment, and participation in inter-collegiate athletic experiences had a negative effect onFG students’ success in their academic performances.Similarly, higher education literature also reports that self-efficacy level among the FG studentsis lower compared to
having a goodunderstanding of what engineering is as a major and a field. That understanding itself variesdepending on what type of engineering program the first year student is in, and what gender theyare. The majority of participants however saw engineering as cross functional, responding thatengineers work with people, machines and technology to solve problems and help society. Thismultifaceted view is a positive sign for the freshmen engineers, as they will often have to workon projects and in areas that can span several engineering and non-engineering fields. Regardlessof major, the first year students showed a grasp of the fundamentals of engineering beingproblem solving and improving.Incoming engineering students also have largely
, focuses specifically on the person: self-esteem, one’s overall regard of the selfas a person 7 ; and self-efficacy, a confidence in one’s own ability to achieve intended results 8 . Seron,Silbey, Cech, and Rubineau 9 followed cohorts of undergraduate students from four different typesof institutions (elite private college; large, public land-grant institution; engineering-only college;and single-sex college) for four years. Through diaries and interviews, they were able to tease outhow socialization, both during team-based projects in classes and in the workforce throughinternship opportunities, leads women to develop less confidence that they will ’fit’ into the cultureof engineering 9 . Results from comparing climate surveys conducted at a
Paper ID #23529A Comparison of Learning Outcomes and Learner Satisfaction in a CADDCourse with Flexible and Rigid DeadlinesDr. Joel Peterson P.E., University of Wisconsin, River Falls Dr. Peterson is a faculty member in the Agricultural Engineering Department at the University of Wis- consin - River Falls. Dr. Peterson strives to bring the real-world lessons he learned in industry to students in the classroom. He is a registered civil engineer and teaches a variety of classes ranging from to project management to fluid mechanics.Dr. Matthew Francis Digman, University of Wisconsin, River Falls Dr. Digman received
currently focuses only on en-gineering science excluding electrical circuits, and it stresses a unique system approach to apply-ing the basic conservation and accounting laws (conservation of mass, linear momentum, etc.).The evolution of this curriculum and its efficacy for student learning have been presented in pre-vious papers [3-4].Unlike many other NSF-funded projects, this curriculum has survived long past the NSF fundingand the advocacy of the original developers. In fact, none of the original developers of the cur-riculum still teach the introductory, foundational course for the SEC – Conservation and Ac-counting Principles (ES201) – and only one of them still works at Rose-Hulman. There has beensome research on barriers and drivers for