course and writingLSs facilitates their acquisition of new knowledge and enhances their ability toapply it unaided (per the ZPD) areas important to forming and planning with a team,developing concepts, and critically analyzing the design process, though for most,this transition occurs late in the DBT course. 11. Frame of ReferenceOur goal is to ‘operationalize’ educational theory in an engineering DBT course to improveassessment of students by instructors and to enable students to engage in more critical thinking oftheir work; for details see [1]. In this section, we share our motivation, the genesis of the workand present our rationale for anchoring our work
design project were piloted by co-author VanderGheynst. Asummary of the course lecture plan is provided in Table 1. The course was hugely successful interms of student engagement and viability of the learning content. Adjustments were madeduring winter 2017 implementation, particularly with the inclusion of two mid-term prototypetesting assessments in a competition-like setting (Table 2). 3Table 1. Lecture topics for ENG 3 in winter 2017 Week Communication topics Design topics Listening skills, and individual and group Engineering defined and the role of social 1 values and their importance in problem
, often within the context of activities that fall underthe maker movement [1]. Such opportunities take myriad forms, including required classprojects, optional after school clubs, and school and state level competitions. Students mayinvent alone or in groups, their choice of what to invent may be constrained or wide open, theymay share their inventions with classmates and teachers only, or with industry professionals anda wider audience outside their schools. Their inventions may be a physical product, an onlinetool or website, or something else entirely. A formal invention-focused curriculum may or maynot be used. Underlying these widely varying educational efforts is the assumption that studentsbenefit in some way by going through the
, and reinforced concrete behavior. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Peer Mentoring for All: Investigating the Feasibility of a Curricular-Embedded Peer Mentoring StructureIntroductionThe benefits of peer mentoring in undergraduate STEM courses are well documented, and theliterature suggests even more significant benefits to the mentors, compared to the mentees [1-3].The School of Engineering at the University of Kansas has developed a peer-mentoring modelcalled the Undergraduate Teaching Fellows Program, based on the Learning Assistant model [2].Students who participate as mentors in this program reported an improved understanding ofcourse content, more confidence in their academic
that motivate students to devote extra hours fortechnology study; thus leading students to successfully design products through managing a teamproject with little budget and scarce teaching resources.Workshop Objectives and General Description:The two-week camp was part of a larger program that includes research, education and outreach.Specifically, this program has multiple goals: 1) Train the students to use Inventor™ 3D CAD computer program to create engineering designs and teach them how to 3D print the designs using advanced 3D printers. 2) Improve students’ math skills 3) Introduce the students to applications of advanced manufacturing (AM) to enhance their interest in pursuing college degrees that would prepare them for
provides advancededucation to the Air Force and other military and government organizations. This case exampleprovides a structured approach that can be followed to design, evaluate, justify, and integrateelements of any new work design, such as developing and executing a faculty mentoringprogram in an unconventional educational environment.IntroductionFormal mentoring is defined as a program established by an organization that purposely matchesmentors and mentees so the employees can share their knowledge and expertise [1]. “Mentoringis traditionally a process in which an experienced person (the mentor) guides another person (thementee or protégé) in the development of his or her own ideas, learning, andpersonal/professional competence” [2
subjects. These results show that ACBSS, aninterdisciplinary computing education program, offers a promising model in providingcomputing education to more diverse students for the 21st-century digital workplace.1. IntroductionAs the technology-based economy grows, so does its demand for technology professionals. TheU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects a growth of 1.1 million American jobs in computing andinformation technology by 2024—with only 450,000 graduates available to fill them [1]. Inaddition to technology professionals, more technology-capable workers are needed in theincreasingly digitized workplace [1]. In all, the gap between the demand and supply oftechnology-educated workers slows economic growth while raising income inequality
interactions between all differentparties involved in the project into a process that collaboratively integrates the abilities andperspectives of all participants. This would ultimately lead to enhancing project results andmaximizing efficiency throughout all phases of design and construction [1]. DB, specifically, hasexperienced increasing popularity in the construction industry ultimately for its recognizedbenefits, including overall reduction of project cost and completion time, compared to traditionalDesign Bid Build (DBB) Project Delivery Methods (PDMs). The major differences between DBand DBB is that in a traditional DBB, owner first hires an architect to develop the architecturaldesign, and engineers to develop structural, electrical
include a small number of time points, a lack of a control group, minimalcollection of open-ended data, and software limitations.IntroductionThe addition of both engineering design and practices in the Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS) [1] has provided an opportunity for the development of curricula and new instructionalframeworks that integrates engineering into science classrooms. The development of suchcurricula and frameworks has been the call of many K-12 science education panels andcommittees [2], [3], including the Teachers Advisory Council, who proposed five benefits ofadding engineering in K-12 classrooms: 1) an increased learning in math and science, 2) anawareness of the work of engineers, 3) the ability to engage in engineering
. Entering the 2015-2016 academic year,program faculty envisioned a capstone design experience that would engage student teams in ayear-long, professional level design project sponsored by an industry client. The first two yearsof the capstone design program have been inarguably successful, and in this paper we identifyand reflect on the keys to our success. The intention for writing this paper is to ensure thesuccess of the program is repeatable, and to assist other programs, especially those residing insmall liberal arts universities, in starting or revising their own senior design experience.Our key factors in assembling a successful industry-sponsored capstone design program havebeen: (1) faculty buy-in and involvement, (2) engaged industry
), its first mixed-gender university [1]; its firstpublic women-only and the world's largest university for women, Princess Nora bintAbdulrahman University (PNU) [2]; and its first private women-only university, EffatUniversity [3]. In view of these initiatives, this paper serves as an extension of a previous study thathighlights the need in the kingdom for the participation of females in engineering highereducation [4]. The authors here present and justify engineering specializations where females areexpected to be most successful from both academic and career perspectives. First, an overview ispresented regarding the involvement of women in engineering higher education and the jobmarket in select countries. This is subsequently followed
understanding of NOE aspects or improved them.Keywords: NOE, engineering design process, nature of engineering, secondary science teachers,NGSS, engineering design challenge, professional development, cognitive apprenticeshipIntroductionTo meet the demand of an increasing science and engineering workforce, teachers must beprepared to integrate engineering in their instruction. There are some attempts at policies andeducational reforms aimed at changing science and engineering education to improve students’understanding of engineering and to influence more students to study those degrees [1], [2].Teacher training programs in the US do not adequately prepare secondary science teachers tointegrate engineering in their curriculum and, in turn, to increase
scope of individualengineering courses. However, there are some limitations regarding the applicability of theutilized survey instruments, thus requiring further research with larger amounts of data and amixed-methods approach to generalize the results.IntroductionTo remain competitive, today’s engineers must be equipped to produce innovative solutions.Thus, engineering educators strive to teach their students the tools and mindsets required formaking change. However, despite these efforts, there is conflicting research on whether theinnovation capabilities [1] of senior engineering students top those of undergraduate freshmen.For example, in open-ended design ideation tasks, seniors and freshmen were equally innovativewhen measured cross
have addressed various aspects of the studentlearning outcomes which are: 1. Problem Solving – Students gain experience in the design process that includes innovative problem solving skills applied to the design and implementation of global projects in developing regions of the world in the context of real needs, constraints, and opportunities. 1 2. Global Engineering – Students demonstrate an appreciation for global aspects of engineering, including social and technical constraints related to design and the importance of sustainability. 3. Teamwork and Leadership – Students demonstrate effective teamwork and leadership skills and an appreciation for other
Development (USAID) has long supported programs to build capacity in higher education in Pakistan in the areas of energy, water, and food security. Recently, the Center for Advanced Studies (CAS) program was launched by USAID and the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (HEC) to strengthen a culture of applied research in Pakistan. The CAS program set up three centers: (1) Agriculture/Food Security at University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, in partnership with University of California, Davis, (2) Water at Mehran University of Engineering and Technology (MUET), in partnership with University of Utah, and (3) Energy at National University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, and University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, in partnership with
tocover the design of a multidisciplinary mechatronics system, requiring mechanical, electrical, andcomputer engineering. A multi-disciplinary approach has been popular in capstone courses 1 .Students in the course learn fundamentals of engineering design. Projects are assigned to studentsbased on availability of equipment and facility, as well as the technical interest of students. Class Figure 1: C1 Spider crawlerprojects require planning, proposal presentation, scheduling, engineering, implementation, andwritten and oral presentations of project results. The sequential nature of these assignments in thedesign-build-test model is common for capstone-project courses at elite universities 2 . Students’abilities
[1]. A contributing factor to theirdissatisfaction was found to be the manner in which engineering courses were taught. The factthat well-qualified students are leaving engineering has raised concern, and the need for changein engineering education, to retain more students and to better prepare them to face today’sengineering challenges, has been well documented [2-5]. In acknowledgement of the need forchange in the traditional methods of teaching engineering, calls for reform have been made bythe National Academy of Engineering [ 4], the American Society of Engineering Education [5]and the National Science Foundation [ 6]. Each of these organizations has recognized that thetraditional practice of educating engineers is failing its students
Paper ID #21258Assessment of the Impact of Summer STEAM Programs on High School Par-ticipants’ Content Knowledge and Attitude Towards STEAM CareersMr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. In addition to my teaching responsibilities, I am involved in the community engagement programs and activities of the department. I am the coordinator of three outreach programs 1) the NSF-ISE project ”Scientists for Tomorrow” which goal is to promote Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) learning in community centers in the
ChulalongkornUniversity/Thailand. Cynthia holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the Uni-versity of California, Davis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Avenue-E: An Innovative Student Transfer Pathway Program Jennifer S. Curtis1, Beth Broome2, and Cynthia Murphy-Ortega3 1 College of Engineering, UC Davis, Davis, CA; 2Office of the Provost, UC Davis, Davis, CA; 3Chevron Corporation, Richmond, CAAbstractOver 68% of students in the California Community College system come from minoritybackgrounds, representing an opportunity to accelerate the diversification of STEM industries.However, according to a September 2017 report by the
faculty on developing face-to-face, hybrid, and online courses. Janie also coordinates and provides training and support for the campus Learning Management System, Moodle, and Multimedia System, Panopto. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Beyond Drag and Drop: Balancing Experience and Innovation in Online Technical Communication Course DevelopmentOnline learning is increasingly part of students’ higher education experience. Recent reports,including the New Media Consortium Horizon Report [1] and The Babson Survey of OnlineLearning [2] report an increase in hybrid, online, and multimedia learning. Redesigning coursesfor these new environments gives faculty members opportunities to
students such asthe National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) in contributing to the interlinking of personaland professional identities, and to the career pathways of African American students enrolled inPWI and HBCU, respectively.Theoretical Perspectives: Social Identity and Ecological Systems TheoriesSocial identity theory [1, 2] emphasizes the distinction between relevant and meaningful socialgroups and an individual’s commitment to and identification with specific social groups. Thetheory examines the psychological processes associated with identity negotiations based on in-group affiliation and social categorization of self and others. Specifically, social identitynegotiation is a social phenomenon that becomes subjectively meaningful by
the studentprojects for 2016 and 2017 are included in Table 1.After the mentors and projects were identified, the next step was to design the 10-week program,which included many activities and workshops offered at LSU and around the state of Louisiana(Table 2). The goal of the workshops was to provide students with training in areas besides juststandard research. To accomplish this, we developed seminars focused on laboratory safety, howto use the library, research ethics, effective communicating, how to apply to graduate school, howto apply for graduate fellowships, and a panel discussion led by current graduate students in thechemical engineering department at LSU. Each of the seminars lasted ~60 minutes and was led byvolunteers from
National Lab, 1996-1997, Chicago State, 1997-2002. Dr. Richard is a Sr. Lecturer & Research Associate in Aerospace Engineering @ Texas A&M since 1/03. His research is focused on computational plasma modeling using spectral and lattice Boltzmann methods for studying plasma turbulence and plasma jets. His research has also included fluid physics and electric propulsion using Lattice-Boltzmann methods, spectral element methods, Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory (WENO), etc. Past research includes modeling single and multi-species plasma flows through ion thruster optics and the discharge cathode assembly; computer simulations of blood flow interacting with blood vessels; modeling ocean-air inter- action
Impacts Technology Students (SKIITS)1 developed an online,asynchronous, accessible-from-anywhere course that community colleges can use as a resourceto offer spatial skills training to their students with a nominal investment of institutionalresources. The course is based on research and materials created with the support of NSF fundingthat were successfully used in face-to-face instruction in four-year universities.SKIITS focuses on three research questions:1. Can effective materials developed through earlier NSF funding to improve spatial skills be transformed into an effective set of online resources?2. Does providing spatial skills training improve the retention of low-spatial-ability students, including women in technician programs?3
students changes faculty mindsets andinstructional practices. Ongoing research into student experiences is investigating how the variedcurricula, advising, and cohort models used across the six institutions influence student retentionand sense of identity as engineering students.I. IntroductionStudents from low-income backgrounds are underrepresented in engineering programs, and thosewho do enter engineering are more likely to struggle academically [1]. In particular, suchstudents may have attended under-resourced high schools and consequently lack the preparationin science and mathematics needed to directly enter four-year engineering and computer sciencecurricula that are designed for students who are calculus-ready. Low-income students also
positiveimpact on those people. In brief the study will address; 1. What: (Multinational Student Project, Vertical Garden, Hydroponic, Smart (Digital & Automated).) 2. How: (Vertical structures, Water Tank, Irrigation System to each tank, Sensors and robots, Controlled environment) 3. Why: (Less land, Vertical), No soil (Hydroponic), Less water (Hydroponic), No pesticides (Smart), Higher food yield per crop (Smart), Year round food yield (Smart), Yield even outside of native environment (Smart), Global and Universal Applications, Faster food yield (Smart), Higher food quality (Smart).The plant growing process is digitized/made smart by incorporating multiple sensors to
extended by the inclusion of academic thought-leadership and tech-savvy students’ insights into new products, services and business models development. Having completed aseries of industry-supported hackathons and design-thinking workshops, the authors provide an explicitdescription of use-case scenarios, key success factors, and implications for applying the proposed model. Thepaper conclusion offers a list of benefits for using the model and further insights into setting up and runningacademia-business collaborations aimed at innovation design and applied research rather than skillsdevelopment. 1. IntroductionWith an apparently increasing number of natural disasters (earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanic eruptionsmass movements, floods, and storms
participated in a research training and development period, carried out six-monthparticipatory action research projects, and documented their project findings. Each participant’swork contributed to our understanding of two overarching research questions: 1. What kinds of activities or interactions do participants feel most effectively invite them to draw explicitly on their own cultural assets and diverse life experiences (or those of their peers) to inform the engineering design work they are doing, teaching, or learning about? 2. What kinds of activities or interactions do participants feel most strongly influence their perceptions of themselves as engineers, or as contributors to an engineering design
and maturation. Thestudents are highly encouraged to present their work during student and professional conferences.All this provides an intensive research environment where the students learn, by means of hands-on learning, the state-of-the-art in UAV technologies. The students also attend weekly researchseminars held at Cal Poly Pomona, and meet with their research supervisors every week.Cal Poly Pomona is currently engaged in several UAV research projects. The ongoing researchprojects include development and validation of flight dynamics models of UAVs,1 modeling andsimulation,2,3 development of obstacle and collision avoidance capabilities4,5,6, vegetation growthanalysis using UAVs,7 and search and rescue using UAVs.8 An excellent
product-safety challenges of our ever-changing, complex world.IntroductionThe National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) has in its Code of Ethics, as its firstFundamental Canon, the admonition: Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of thepublic [1]. This ideal is widely regarded as being the ethical, moral, or simply the right thing todo. It resonates with most members of society including practicing and soon-to-be-practicingengineers of all disciplines.Although the above is recognized and accepted, today’s engineering students are given littleinstruction and guidance in their formal engineering educations about designing andmanufacturing safe products or about practicing engineering ethically. Most engineeringstudents are told