since 1999, and in that time has taught multiple different courses ranging from the freshman to graduate levels. She has been active in academic program and curriculum devel- opment from the department level to the university level, where she served as co-chair of the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) committee that determined the academic course of actions to be taken over the next accreditation cycle to addresses critical issues related to enhancing student learning. She has re- ceived funding for her engineering education research from the Department of Education FIPSE program and from the National Science Foundation (NSF) CCLI program. She is co-Director of the Aggie STEM Center that provides professional
next planning meeting.Although some students exit the room with their same-major classmates, others leave with theirnewly formed design group. This represents the first step in what will be a semester-long, cross-major project that draws on the strengths and knowledge of both majors.RationaleThis article describes the successful partnering of students from an engineering design class withstudents from an early childhood social studies methods course. Students were tasked withdesigning an interactive and open-ended museum quality exhibit for children that could beinstalled in a local informal learning setting. The project, which capitalized on the contentexpertise of both groups of students, demonstrates the value of fostering
)“Barriers to success in quantitative gatekeeper courses”, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 1995, no.61, pp 5–14.George, J. M., Jones, G. R., and Sharbrough, W. C. (1996). Understanding and managing organizational behavior: Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.Jones, B., Paretti, M., Hein, S., and Knott, T. (2009). An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First-Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans. Journal of Engineering Education, 319–36.Monteiro, V., Mata, L., and Peixoto, F., (2015) “Intrinsic Motivation Inventory: Psychometric Properties in the Context of First Language and Mathematics Learning,” Psicol. Reflex. Crit., vol. 28, no. 3, pp.434-443.Nelson, K., Shell
projects thatcultivate an informal learning environment that promotes critical thinking, and interpersonal andtechnical skills4. Our underlying aim is to achieve a pedagogical transformation that empowers anew generation of engineers equipped with skills essential and relevant to the technicalworkforce. This project was funded by a generous grant from W. M. Keck Foundation. This paper highlights the motivation behind this initiative, discusses the proposed plan ofaction, and presents initial results and observations from a pilot implementation of this initiative,specifically focusing on the curricular enhancement aspect of the project. Efficacy of thisimplementation was gauged using feedback from student-surveys. Progress towards the goals
and time consuming, switching back and forth between lectures andworkshop sessions. But, from the author’s experience, with proper planning, this approach hadactually made the learning as well as the teaching process more efficient and easier. It wasobserved that the students were very enthusiastic and fully engaged during both the workshopand classroom sessions compared to the lecture only approach.Technical educators today are required to help learners acquire both soft and hard skills to meetthe industry needs and expectations. More than 50% of the students enrolled in MechanicalEngineering program were sponsored by local industries and the students are expected to bereadily employable upon graduation. Providing in-depth knowledge on the
offered concrete suggestions for improving instructionalpractices. It is noted that the instructional coach was not a workshop facilitator and had no priorrelations with these faculty members.Consequently, this study had two research objectives. The first was to determine the effects ofparticipating in the professional development. This first purpose was a planned objective fromthe outset of designing the IUSE professional development program. The second purpose was todetermine the effects of receiving coaching, in the context of ongoing professional development,on instructional practices, as measured by the RTOP. This second objective was not originallyplanned but emerged when it was noted that faculty members were requesting feedback and
situated leadership learning insights of senior engineers [52]. By privileging deeplycontextualized leadership learning narratives over more traditional career path research methods—quantitative analysis of human resource records and large-scale industry surveys—we wereable to generate a dynamic, empirical strategy to examine how engineers learn to lead over thecourse of their careers. This data collection method also provided us with a useful way to test thedual career track model.Our sampling plan involved identifying 3-4 engineers with at least 25 years of experience in eachof eight industries, deliberately diversifying by career path and demographic background. InMarch 2018, we sent invitations and project descriptions to key informants in
Approach to Teaching Design Fundamentals to Large Numbers of Students and Its Effect on Engineering Design Self-efficacy,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[9] E. P. Torrance, The search for satori & creativity. Creative Education Foundation, 1979.[10] R. M. Berger, J. P. Guilford, and P. R. Christensen, “A factor-analytic study of planning abilities,” Psychol. Monogr. Gen. Appl., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1–31, 1957.[11] K. H. Kim, “Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT),” Creat. Res. J., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2006.[12] A. R. Carberry, H.-S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, “Measuring Engineering Design Self-Efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no
Space Vehicle Mission Planning Laboratory at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore. In 2010, he joined Eastern Michigan University as an Associate Dean in the College of Technology and currently is a Professor in the School of Engineer- ing Technology. He has an extensive experience in curriculum and laboratory design and development. Dr. Eydgahi has served as a member of the Board of Directors for Tau Alpha Pi, as a member of Advi- sory and Editorial boards for many International Journals in Engineering and Technology, as a member of review panel for NASA and Department of Education, as a regional and chapter chairman of IEEE, SME, and ASEE, and as a session chair and as a member of scientific and international
Engineering Class The goal is to implement HIPs for mechanical engineering students who are still intheir early part of the core mechanical engineering program. This course would be one of thefirst mechanical engineering courses required by the university that is not considered part ofthe general education curriculum. The purpose of this study is to track the effects of HIPs withcarefully planned pedagogies that would provide numerous benefits for the students, such asoverall increased learning gains and graduation rates. There are seven HIPs characteristicsused to measure the results at the end of the semester: these are (1) interaction with faculty, (2)interaction with peers, (3) feedback from instructor, (4) quality time spent on the course
SolidWorks).As the course progresses, the students must transition from being assigned weekly deliverableswhich walk the students through the design project to being able to manage large assignmentsthat require longer term planning. Team size from 3 to 4 in the Fall increases to 6 to 8 in theSpring. In the Fall semester, the students are primarily working on gathering the requirementsand developing initial concepts, thus smaller teams of 3 to 4 are sufficient for this semester. Inthe spring semester, however, the students start prototyping, building proof of concepts andultimately fabricating the alpha and beta prototypes, thus the increase in team size in the Spring.This also allows the students to apply project management course work to the
-secondarylevel. They are usually three-year diploma program under the supervision of respective stateboard of technical education. These programs are kept outside the purview of university system.Often they are called Licentiate in Civil Engineering (LCE) or Licentiate in MechanicalEngineering (LME) or licentiate in other disciplines of engineering. A diploma course inengineering involves classes on fundamental engineering concepts. It is a professional course,planned in such a way that students may still take up jobs in the field of engineering once theyearn their diplomas. It can allow them to transfer into the second year of the B.Tech. or B.E.course. This, in effect, means the student may not have to take the eleventh and twelfth classexams. So
drawings with the assistanceof the AR models. This paper discusses the development of the models, how the models areintergraded in the class, how the new teaching method is assessed, and the future plans of theproject. This paper also discusses the development of micro credentials such as micro certificatesor digital badges in Computer Aided Design (CAD).Development of augmented reality modelsAugmented reality is a new technology that has quickly become popular in the entertainmentindustry. For example, the augmented reality game “Pokémon Go” successfully demonstratedthe utilization of the technology in the game industry. The result of this application has beenremarkable. Additionally, augmented reality is widely used in educational research. Kim
made.IntroductionSustainability is, as stated in the United Nations Report on the World Commission onEnvironment and Development [1], the consideration of impacts to and preservation of theeconomy, the environment, and social equity (often referred to as “the three ‘E’s” ofsustainability) in the execution of any plan or project. Its growth as a field of study and as astandard of practice is understandable in light of concerns about dwindling resources, populationand developmental growth, and environmental sensitivity based on global warming and othernatural phenomena. Engineering in general, and civil and construction engineering in particular,is a field uniquely well-equipped to tackle the issues of incorporating sustainability into projectexecution. Indeed, the study
national, social, and economicsecurity [4]. Adding to this growing cyber threats is a shortage of cybersecurity researchers andworkforce talent [5]–[7]. This talent shortfall is increasing as the scope of society’s cybersecurityneeds continue to expand. To close the gap, several authors [8]–[13] have recommended aneffort to grow the number of people in cybersecurity who have competencies in research. Thisfocus would result in a workforce able to identify and define problems, think critically to connectproblems with solutions, develop projects and related plans, collect and analyze data, drawconclusions, communicate effectively, and work well in teams.This study investigates the role of active team-based learning as a means of developing thisneeded
the way, was beneficial and did not hinder flexibility." "The problems that we had to answer we very open ended. There were few Open-endedness rules that would others be constraints to creativity, so I felt free to use the knowledge I had." "The aspects of this course that give me control over it are the singular deadlines for assignments. Because there is only one deadline for us to worry Choice of pacing about, we can plan out the work we need to do at the pace that
through social media platforms, Happy Hours are not a one-on-oneinteraction between a faculty member and a student, but rather they can hold the entire classroomin their virtual space. This form of virtual office hours is also held regularly twice a week, ratherthan as a form of test prep, such as those held by Patrick Lowenthal. Happy Hours are also a mixof pre-planned problems and student guided questions. Prior to the Happy Hour, the instructorsends out a set of problems to all students in the course so that students can view and startworking on the problems before the meeting. At the start of each session, however, students aregiven an opportunity to bring up any questions that they have regarding the course. After that,students are free to
proposed face to face faculty development component contained the following information: 1. Levels of Learning 2. Course Design. 3. Course Management. 4. Good Teaching. 5. New Teacher Forum. 6. Mini Learning Workshop. 7. Basics of educational research: a. Finding your hypothesis. b. Designing your experiment. c. Selecting your evaluation process. d. IRB and protection of subjects. e. Carrying out your plans. f. Homework: Identify an educational research topic.8. Activity: Discussion of Homework. Think Pair and Share to tune hypothesis, Large Group Discussion to identify potential next steps.9. How to engage students.10. Basics of accreditation. a. Accreditation
for many of us, this program was much moreinfluential than we thought it would be,” 3) “Through the tours, I became more interested inpursuing a research-oriented job,” 4) “They [my plans] did change. I want to go to grad school ina field related to UAVs,” 5) “I massively improved my coding knowledge, as well as learned theability to solve problems without relying on any advisor help,” 6) “Working with others taught mehow to work with and bring out people's strengths to apply,” 7) “This program allowed me to learna lot more about the complexity of real-world problems currently being worked on using UAVs.It also allowed me to see the real applications of the theory being taught to us,” and 8) “The bestwas flight testing. The tours were nice as
of this program, NSF funded our multi-partner project to expand and strengthen the experience, conduct research on the impact of theprogram, and conduct research on how such outreach programs might grow in sustainablemanners. Two objectives guide the research aspect of this project: 1. Evaluate SEEK’s success at influencing STEM-related academic and career identity, conceptual knowledge, and interpersonal and intrapersonal skills. 2. Generate evidence and a greater understanding of organizational contextual factors that operate to enhance, moderate, or constrain SEEK’s impact from site to site.Data Collection ApproachesIn previous publications we described our initial plans for data collection [12], [13]. This posterpresents
program, 40% of the population is comprised of women, a stark contrast to thesmall percentage of women represented in more traditional engineering programs. We felt thatinterviewing a proportionally larger number of women in a context different than traditionalengineering programs might provide insight into their construction, understanding, and valuingof knowledge(s). We acknowledge that this might risk having the male student having tokenrepresentation, and a follow-up study and analysis plans to address this gender imbalance.Data Collection: Participants were recruited from the AME capstone course and were chosenbecause the course is only taken by students approaching graduation; we felt that these studentshad ample experience with the program
with on-campus organizations that already focus on diversity and inclusivity. Thiswill help faculty become more visible allies to their students. Since the RevED research team isaccustomed to giving workshops on inclusive pedagogy, events can be planned that give facultymore tools to develop their own inclusive coursework. More conversations with the FacultyCenter, department heads, and the RevED research team will be ongoing in the 2019 Springsemester. The RevED research team is also using students to help develop another aspect ofinclusive coursework. This year students are asked to create assignments for CEE courses thatfocus on visual learning styles and using examples that are developed from personal experiencesthat students may have come
current status and fix goals accordingly to complete theproject in time, (3) mini-lessons, centers, and resources: mini-lessons, centers, andresources help promote students’ learning supporting the differentiated instructionapproach which essentially helps students to seamlessly transit from centers to resourcesto mini-lessons based on their need, (4) voice and choice in products: allows students toexpress what project they want to work on and how they plan to utilize their time, (5)differentiate through formative assessments: differentiated instructions through formativeassessments in the form of written responses, oral communication, poster or collage helpstudents move forward in the project, (6) balance teamwork and individual
orthopaedics within the next 6 years.By 2022, we expect that we will achieve 30% female in the residency population, an acceptedcritical threshold for maintaining minority populations within professions [11]. Even with worst-case assumptions for our recruitment and retention results, we would nearly achieve this criticalthreshold by 2025. Again, planning for worst-case conditions, if we were to cease all of ourprogramming efforts after 5-10 years, we would still achieve at or near 30% female for a periodof time (5-10 years) before the effects of our intervention wear off. This may be enough time forthe culture of the field to shift enough, i.e., orthopaedics seen as more “female friendly” bymedical students, to have a permanent effect on gender
assistant professor in the Department of Mining Engi- neering. He served as the Associate Dean of the College of Engineering from 1998 to 2006. He was appointed the Dean of School of Engineering at SIU Edwardsville in August 2006. Until 2000, most of Dr. Sevim’s publications were in mine systems optimization and open pit mine production planning. After 2000, in parallel with his administrative appointments, he published in engi- neering education.Mr. Phillip M Brown, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Director of Institutional Research & Studies c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A systematic approach to determine admission GPA for transfer studentsIntroductionAt
. Along with thisimage learners were presented with the following dilemma: ‘Owl has too many books and needsto get them organized and easily accessible. As a first step Owl plans to build a bridge over to asecond tree (yes, Owl can fly but flying is tough while carrying heavy books).’ And asked torespond as follows: ‘What type of bridge should Owl design? This week we’ll focus on tension;what types of bridges could Owl design that rely on tension? What design do you propose?’ Because all learners, in both A and B groups, would be contributing to the same discussion boards, Group B was
understand how technologywork and increased interest in engineering, while indicating that the activities had less of animpact on future course-taking plans or ability to be successful at school. These are consistentwith the overall goals of our effort, which was focused more on developing specific coding andelectronics skills and less specifically on developing interest in STEM careers or improving theparticipants’ performance in school. Table 2: Overall impact associated with participation in the outreach activity. Not at Slightly Moderately A Great Mean All Deal
Paper ID #15921Creating a University-Industry Advisory Board for a Joint Engineering SchoolDr. Duncan J Bremner, University of Glasgow Dr Duncan Bremner has over 30 years in the semiconductor industry and has held operational and strategic executive roles in product development and technology planning within leading organisations such as National Semiconductor and The Intel Corporation. Duncan is presently employed by the University of Glasgow’s School of Engineering working with both academic staff and industry partners to develop collaborative projects. He is also responsible for the development and delivery of the
helpimprove performance in Calculus I.Another change will be how the EBC is delivered to the students. UNC Charlotte is changingcourse management systems from Moodle to Canvas, effective fall 2017. For 2016, the programwill remain in Moodle, with plans to use Canvas for 2017. The migration from Moodle toCanvas is expected to be relatively easy based on pilot studies.In order to maintain its usefulness, the EBC is modified and updated annually to reflect changesin the campus and university policies. The Forum interaction portion of the Boot Camp has roomfor growth. For example, student workers are developing a menu of topics and questions that canbe used as prompts. These improvements, combined with better timed communications with theparticipants
science and engineering wereintegrated, how the teachers felt about the integration, what they tried that failed and/orsucceeded, and what they planned to change in the future. These interviews occurredbefore the teaching of the first unit (whether it was science or engineering) and againafter the completion of both units. Second, classroom lessons were videorecordedusing an iPad provided by the research project. Teachers focused on videorecordingtheir engineering lessons and science lessons. Third, we leveraged existing Professional Learning Community [PLC] meetings toincorporate focus group interviews with participating teachers. During these meetingsteachers discussed difficulties and successes, problems gathering materials for lessons