Paper ID #43830Evaluating the Impact of Teaching Undergraduate Engineering Students Strategiesto Become Leaders in Diverse EnvironmentsDr. Renee M. Desing, University of Washington Dr. Renee Desing is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington. Her research interests include diversity, equity, and inclusion in the engineering classrooms and workplaces. Dr. Desing graduated from Ohio State with her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, and also holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering and
AC 2010-1219: USING AN ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SUMMER CAMP FOR HIGHSCHOOL STUDENTS AS A UNIVERSITY OUTREACH PROGRAM FOR THERECRUITMENT OF FUTURE ENGINEERING STUDENTS: A TWO YEAR STUDYRobert Fletcher, Lawrence Technological University Robert W. Fletcher joined the faculty of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Lawrence Technological University in the summer of 2003, after two decades of continuous industrial research, product development and manufacturing experience. Dr. Fletcher earned his Bachelor of Science Degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Washington, in Seattle, Washington, a Master of Engineering in Manufacturing Systems from Lawrence Technological University
State University Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering design thinking. His areas of research include engineering design thinking, adult learning cognition, engineering education professional development and technical training. He has extensive international experience working on technical training and engineering educaton projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Department of Labor, USAID
videos, presentations, andadditional written materials which compose a “EM in Research 101” package. This “EM inResearch 101” package will address common questions students have about engaging in researchas well as introduce EM 101 concepts in the context of research. The series of videos will beprofessionally produced. These videos will be short, inviting, and targeted to addressing keyresearch and EM topics as well as sparking a passion for impactful work. Written materials mayinclude reflection exercises and group modules utilizing EML for giving students a sense of howand why engineers conduct research.The goal of Efficient Team Training is to make research training more efficient, fosterentrepreneurial-minded thinking through well-designed
development.The Cornerstone courses are currently offered in 5 sections of the 8 credit hour course (FullCornerstone) and 20 sections of the 2 separate 4 credit hour course (Split Cornerstone). Eachsection is populated with approximately 30 first-year students from a total first-year class sizeexceeding 700 students. Following the design process taught in the course, there has beencontinual reevaluation and redesign of the course over the past two years. This redesign has beenthose iterative steps of identifying new problems with the delivery and implementation, doingmore research, finding many creative options for improvement, working as a team to pilot andevaluate each, and repeating the process. The data used to drive this redesign has come from
has an extensive record of research in magnetic materials with a Ph.D. in Solid State Physics and a M.Sc. (Eng.) degree in Engineering Physics from Uppsala University. Presently he is chairman of the SEFI Working Group on Engineering Education Research (WG-EER) and co-ordinator for the Nordic Network for Engineering Education Research (NNEER) funded by the Nordic Council. Page 22.973.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Investigating student learning in two active learning labs- Not all “active” learning laboratories result in conceptual understanding
converging to select an application, called solution mapping [7]. Althoughsolution mapping practices are demonstrated in several fields within engineering, engineeringstudents have limited exposure and training in solution mapping as their curriculum mainlyfocuses on problem-first design processes. As a result, limited evidence-based design strategiesand tools are available to support curriculum development and training for our students.Using design strategies is important in supporting engineers to adopt evidence-based approachesto achieve design success [11]–[15]. In this study, we examined cognitive strategies used byengineering practitioners for solution mapping. Recent engineering studies have focused ondeveloping best design practices to
Paper ID #17059The Impact of STEM Experiences on Student Self-Efficacy in ComputationalThinkingJoshua Levi Weese, Kansas State University Josh Weese is a PhD candidate in the department of Computer Science at Kansas State University. Fo- cusing on education research, this experience comes from work as a graduate teaching assistant, various outreach programs, and time spent as a NSF GK-12 fellow. His downtime is spent in outreach programs aimed toward enriching local K-12 students’ experience in STEM, especially in computer science and sensor technologies.Russell Feldhausen, Kansas State UniversityMr. Nathan H. Bean
he earned his master’s degree in civil engineer- ing. He also worked as a project Analyst with AgileP3 after graduating with a Bachelor of Engineering (B.Eng) in civil engineering from Covenant University, Nigeria. Adebayo has taught courses in Trans- portation and Chemistry at Morgan State University as part of his commitment to the STEM profession. He has attended conferences across the Transportation engineering field.Dr. Steve Efe, Morgan State University Dr. Steve Efe is an Assistant Professor and the Assistant Director of the Center for Advanced Transporta- tion and Infrastructure Engineering Research. He obtained his Doctor of Engineering in Civil Engineering with a major in Structural Engineering and minDr
) on a project connected tothe faculty member’s work. Participation in REU’s is competitive and generally done through aprocess designed to pair students interested in a particular research area with faculty doing workin that area. REUs are also generally flexible in design with hosting institutions having a greatdeal of control over the organization and content of the program. These factors allow hostinguniversities to create REUs that can maximize local resources to provide unique educationalprograms to best benefit student participants.An interdisciplinary approach to summer REU programs can help address the challenge ofproviding soft-skills training within an engineering education environment (see for example [2],[3], [4]). In so doing
workspace, and others hadincreased personal finance concerns as a result of the [4].With this intensified focus on our “classrooms” during the pandemic, one must wonder: what arethe long-term impacts this has had on our teaching? In this study, we seek to identify the specificways engineering faculty at an elite university have refined their traditional face-to-face coursesbased on their experiences during the remote teaching phase of the pandemic.MethodsThe participants for this study were limited to faculty within the College of Engineering at theGeorgia Institute of Technology. To achieve a sufficiently large sample size of participants and togain initial insights to changes in teaching, a survey-based study was designed. The survey
categorizing these codesinto themes. Each member of the research team performed this coding process independently,and, following best practices principles, we discussed the results thrice and recoded to establishreliability of the codes and themes [22].We also marked a few limitations of the study as we interpreted data. The self-selection ofrespondents is one such limitation. Of the approximately 700 alumni invited to participate, 256responded to our survey instrument. We consider the question of how representative theserespondents were in the discussion of our results. Regardless, we are mindful that our datasetincludes only about a third of the eligible participants. There is also a potential for coverage biasboth because the survey was web-based
develop their own designs for simple technologicaldevices based on knowledge acquired by completion of these projects.AcknowledgementThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under award: DUE-0633277. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography 1. Our Student’s Best Work: A framework for accountability worthy of our mission, American Association of Colleges and Universities (AACU) 2nd Edition (2008). 2. Pearson G., and A.T. Young, editors, Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology, National Academies Press, (2002). 3
promotion and tenure process.Within the library, more money could be allocated to course reserves, though this is unlikely tobe the most sustainable solution. Between the library and the school of engineering, the mostequitable and long-term solution would require investing both time and money in developingopen and accessible textbooks and course materials. Overall, the focus should be on empoweringstudent’s learning, and ensuring they have access to the materials they need to meet their learningoutcomes.Future ResearchAdditional directions for research include a faculty facing survey regarding what factorsprofessors consider when choosing texts, or a study that follows the textbook expenses ofindividual engineering students and the impacts of that
-based interventions. In the United States, less than 40%of incoming engineering freshman will actually complete an engineering degree. At Cal StateLA, where more than 65% are from underrepresented groups and the vast majority is first-generation college students, the retention and graduation rates are lower than the nationalaverage. For many years, faculty and staff at the College of Engineering, Computer Science, andTechnology (ECST), Cal State LA, have implemented a number of evidence-based practices inthe summer and first-year to help students transition into college and succeed in their engineeringprogram. However, integration and systemization of these interventions have proven to bechallenging. The summer bridge program (STEP) was
• Possess a broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context • Possess a knowledge of contemporary issues • Possess a knowledge of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learningThese seven outcomes are addressed by other aspects and courses in the UT Martin program.The ENGR 317 course thus reinforces thirteen of twenty identified expected outcomes of the UTMartin engineering program.The course syllabus also describes some specific capabilities with which the course is designedto equip students, or which the course is designed to enhance for students, depending on theirprior coursework and/or experiences. They are prefaced and listed in the course syllabus as
sample size for this model was also smaller. Thoughvery much in their infancy, these models suggest that it is possible to identify those outcomesthat contribute the most to the students’ academic achievement. Clearly, the student’s academicability and achievement upon entering as measured by high school class rank and Math SATscore are the two most important predictors of graduating GPA.Estimating OutcomesEfforts were made to estimate the achievement of the 11 EC-2000 outcomes as a function ofstudents’ attitudes as obtained from the Senior Exit SurveyÓ. At best, these models onlyexplained between 9 and 36 percent of the variation in the data. Table 5 provides for outcome“k” – an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering
material is based upon work supported by the National Science FoundationGraduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-1650044. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.REFERENCES[1] B. Hartmann et al., "Reflective Physical Prototyping through Integrated Design, Test, and Analysis," in Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Montreux, Switzerland, 2006: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 299-308.[2] J. Marks and C. C. Chase, "Impact of a Prototyping Intervention on Middle School Students' Iterative Practices and Reactions
Paper ID #8779Teaching Renewable Energy System Design and Analysis with HOMERDr. Radian G Belu, Drexel University (Tech.) Dr. Radian Belu is Assistant Professor within the Engineering Technology (ET) program - Drexel Uni- versity, Philadelphia, USA. He is holding a PHD in power engineering and the other in physics. Before joining to the Drexel University Dr. Belu hold faculty and research positions at universities and re- search institutes in Romania, Canada and United States. He also worked for several years in industry as project manager, senior engineer and consultant. He has taught and developed undergraduate and
theeducation [10]. Jefferson believed that the U.S. could not become a democracy without aneducated citizenry. The framers of the land-grant bill believed that there needed to be a focus onintellectual effort for the improvement of industry and agriculture. State universities, withmodest tuitions and a mandate to educate all who could benefit from it, have produced one of thebest citizenries in the world. The support of academic research has delivered prosperity,security, and health as well as a graduate education system that is one of the most highlyregarded in the world. Higher education is the key to enhanced socioeconomic attainment,freedom and independence of individuals and hence countries.A similar trend is being seen in India lately. While the
forengineering practice. Engineering graduates must also d) be able to function onmultidisciplinary teams, f) understand "professional and ethical responsibility", g) "communicateeffectively", i) "engage in life-long learning", j) have "a knowledge of contemporary issues", andh) have "the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal and societal context." The professional component of criterion 4 moreover, requires that "Students must beprepared for the engineering practice through the curriculum culminating in a major designexperience based on the knowledge and skills acquired in earlier coursework and incorporatingengineering standards and realistic constraints that include most of the following
. What are the barriers in the pathway for the diverse range of engineers within theprofession? Do they all define “success” in the same terms? How can the management of anengineering firm impact this with the goal to yield more recruitment and retention? In short, theSE3 report looks at a way we can broaden the impact of how engineers approach engineeringmanagement to include a consideration of diversity and inclusion, not merely because it is the“right” thing to do, but because the attraction and retention of a diverse work force allows us toemploy the best engineers from all backgrounds, leading to a more robust and talentedgeneration of engineers.History behind the report In 2016, the Structural Engineers Association of Northern
Engineering and Research Associate at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Before this he was a Research Instructor and Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Massachusetts Medical School in the Radiology Department, Division of Nuclear Medicine, in the Medical Physics Group. Earlier Research Instructor and Postdoctoral Fellow work was also done at the University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT and University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington, CT.respectively.Jason A Criscuolo, Western New England College Page 22.807.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011
trends, challenges and opportunities. The key“big idea” was to empower the students to critically review non-traditional energy sources (i.e.non-fossil fuels) and develop a level of comfort in addressing not only the hard technicalimplications related to alternative energy but to also encompass the “soft” side of society’sopinions, global impact, legal aspects (codes, zoning and laws), environmental concerns andconstruction difficulties.The second “big idea” was that as each student became more knowledgeable in the area theywere researching they would present related technical, societal and legal issues for discussionwith the class promoting a dialog and better understanding of such for all. Aside from the moremainstream alternative energy
those devices used as prototypes for lab activities in subsequent years. Some projectshave also nucleated MS and PhD dissertation research 15, 16, 17 and have involved theinterdisciplinary faculty team as co-advisors or committee members. Some of this research wentbeyond campus to a DOE National Lab.The course content is delivered in five concurrent streams:Faculty led lectures – Classroom lectures are delivered by the faculty on content that includes:fabrication, relevant semiconductor fundamentals, micro-fluidics (both pressure driven andelectro hydrodynamic), diffusion, reaction and mixing in micro-flows, and mechanics of micro-scale structures.Faculty or guest led case studies – Case studies in the design and analysis of devices have
-2013), and a Postdoctoral Researcher at Clemson University (2013-2014) and the University of Florida (2014-2016). His research focuses on human-centered computing, computer science education, social computing, and broadening participation in computing. Dr. Dillon has received >$750k in research funding and awards from external agencies and non-profit organizations, including the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Maryland Pre-Service Computer Science Teacher Education Program (MCCE), and the Collaborative Research Experience for Undergraduates (CREU - CRA-WP). Dr. Dillon currently serves as a Co-PI for the STARS Computing Corps, which recently has been renewed for funding by NSF. He has also conducted a
strategies for addressing environmental impact while still meeting design and economic requirements. 3. Conduct a material selection with a goal of reducing the environmental impact of a product and/or process while simultaneously reducing material costs. 4. Use appropriate tools to evaluate the environmental impact of a manufacturing process and recommend actions for reducing this impact and minimize production costs. 5. Propose design changes to a product to enhance recycling, reuse and/or remanufacturing capability with consideration of the economics of these activities. 6. Identify and apply best practices in promoting the environment in a corporate setting.”The six topical modules were introduced and integrated with
tool to regulate engineering practice. Given the significant impact engineeringprojects can have on public safety, the primary objective of engineering licensure is to offerassurance to the public. To ensure public safety through licensure, engineers must meet theminimum competency level set by statutory regulations for their tasks. Furthermore, they mustadhere to a professional code of conduct while carrying out responsibilities [2]. Failure ofcompliance with the stipulations may result in subsequent disciplinary processes.Engineering licensure has a long history in the United States. States began to adopt engineeringlicensure statutes in the early 1900s, and it took approximately 40 years for all states to haveengineering licensure laws in
engineering students [1], ethical situations also surface inmany other settings. In our own research on engineering student perceptions of ethics and socialresponsibility, we found that many engineering interns and co-ops reported encountering ethicalissues or dilemmas in the workplace [2]. This finding counters a common perception – oftenperpetuated by the prevalence of “big disaster” case studies in engineering ethics education – thatethical issues surface relatively rarely for most technical professionals. As Kline has argued,there is a continuing need to “move beyond this concern with what might be called ‘disasterethics’ to study the ethical and social aspects of everyday engineering practice” [3, p. 14].Aligned with Kline’s recommendation, the
morelikely to implement codes into their work even when not required or enforced by law. A portionof learning to build back stronger includes educating to the IRC. Understanding the current statusand best practice for teaching students majoring in architecture, civil engineering, andconstruction science management (here in after known as “construction students”) about the IRCprovides the first step to mitigating communities in the future 6.BackgroundA literature review for teaching about the IRC produced no new publications since the early2000’s when the International Code Council (ICC) was formed and states began adoptingversions of the IRC. Prior to the ICC, research publications discussed the difficulty in codeintegration to the curricula due to