Course", ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, 2011.[4]. Bringle, R. G. and Hatcher, J. A., “A service-learning curriculum for faculty,” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, (pp. 112-122), 1995.[5]. Peterson, S. J. and Schaffer, M. J., “Service learning: A strategy to develop group collaboration and research skills,” Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 38, no. 5, (pp. 208-214), 1999.[6]. Celio, C. I., Durlak, J., and Dymnicki, A., “A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students,” Journal of Experiential Education, vol. 34, no. 2, (pp. 164-181), 2011.[7]. Gray, M. J., Ondaatje, E. H., Fricker Jr., R. D. and Geschwind, S. A., “Assessing service learning: Results from as
. References[1] K. Chandra and S. Tripathy, “RAMP 2018 Final Report,” Unpublished manuscript [Online]. Available: https://www.uml.edu/docs/RAMP2018-Final- Report_tcm18-309285.pdf[2] C. MacDonald, “Understanding participatory action research: A qualitative research methodology option,” Canadian Journal of Action Research, vol.13, no. 2, pp. 34-50, 2012.[3] A. McIntyre, Participatory Action Research, Qualitative Research Methods Series 52. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2008.[4] M.J. Amon, “Looking through the glass ceiling: A qualitative study of STEM women’s career narratives,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, no. 236, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg
Engineering, 3) and comparing these tocontent from the new study that is publicly available. An additional aim of this article is to raiseawareness of the upcoming NAE report and encourage thought-provoking discussions about it atthe ASEE 2024 Annual Conference.IntroductionEngineering has long been characterized by the benefits it imparts on society. As early as the1800’s when American engineers began to delineate professional guidelines and codes ofconduct, engineering has been associated with “societal uplift” [1, p. 2]. Current day, theforemost engineering professional societies have similar mission and vision statements such as“advancing engineering for the benefit of humanity” [2], “engineered and natural systemswork[ing] in harmony for the
copy and paste the answer without understanding the learning concept, it could be affect[ing] the way they learn. If they only want to complete an assignment to get a good grade or pass the class, it could be a bad idea. So I think it depends on the way the student use[s] it.Another student connected this reasoning to the question around continuing to allow access to AIin class: “I feel that if it was not allowed, people would use it without trying to learn from it, itbeing acknowledged encourages people to use it in a learning way.” Engineering educators mayfind this perspective comforting as they make choices about acknowledging or encouraging theuse of AI in their own classrooms.Other students talked about how one’s own
target area by facilitating collaboration between localschools, community colleges, community-based organizations and employers. Through Connect, theproject team has been able to forge connections with six local companies including Pfizer, Cummins,Kaba Ilco Corporation, LS Cable & System, Hitachi, and Poppies International, all of which hadexisting partnerships with Connect to bring STEM opportunities to K-12 students in the county.Professional representatives from those companies have collaborated on the DeSIRE project in anumber of ways, specifically (a) providing support in the development of course content and(b)serving as guest speakers in the classroom(s) and at DeSIRE events. Input from the industryrepresentatives was sought
. (9) Quantity Surveying and Budgeting. (9) Ability to perform construction checklists 2 and supervision. (12) Technical Specification Analysis, Installation coordination. (10) 3 Administrative Basis, and Blueprint Reading. (9) S-Curve Analysis, Physical and Financial Capability to execute construction 4 Progress. (8) process protocols. (10) Regulatory Analysis, Zoning Plans, and Proposal of technical solutions and 5 OGUC (General Urban Construction material selection. (7) Ordinance). (8)Personal and collaborative
another and with their mentor(s). The written charter also allows teamsto agree to a code of conduct with which they are expected to adhere and also to determine teammeeting times. A signed copy of this document is submitted to the teaching staff as a reference forthe duration of the program. (iii) Research Background Presentation. Two weeks after teams are formed and students haveample time to meet with their mentors to discuss the background and project details, they providea 5 minute presentation to the class. This presentation provides background information on theresearch project, details for what they intend to accomplish during the semester, and a briefoverview of their research plan. (iv) Final Research Poster. Teams present their
formalized as part of communitybenefit packages agreed to by advocates of proposed telescopes and representatives from thelocal community [1]. Opposition to the observatories has existed since the 1960’s when thegovernor and legislature, enthusiastic about development, set aside land for construction.Protests, demonstrations and litigation challenging previous and proposed construction of newtelescopes in Hawai‘i have focused on environmental protection and the sites selected as beingsacred to natives. For example, controversy over choosing Maunakea for the site location of anew Thirty Meter Telescope emphasizes that this is considered the most sacred mountain of theNative Hawai‘ian religion and culture. Yet a local workforce is also highly desired
equitable opportunities by allowing the students who are English learners toenvision futures for themselves as engineers. [S]tarting early allows the students to bridge the opportunity gap by having shared experiences and picturing themselves and as engineers and problem solversAffordance 7: Engineering activities provide unique opportunities for English learners to applytheir science content knowledge in meaningful ways, even if they learned that science content inanother language.Engineering activities can invite or require students to draw upon science content knowledge, inwhatever language they learned it. They can demonstrate their understandings through artifactsor multiple modes of communication. Applying the concepts in an engineering
effective in building and honing students’ leadership and teamwork skills.Finally, robotics activities were not deemed to be universally applicable for all science and mathconcepts. Additional methods that teachers used to identify the suitability of robotics lesson aresummarized in Table 3.Table 3: Methods used to identify the suitability of robotics lessons. S. No. Methods used to identify the suitability of robotics lesson Analyze various aspects of a lesson to establish if a robot can perform a role to effectively 1. contribute to the lesson’s objective. Assess and ensure that the robotics activity is appropriate for the grade level and aligns 2. with the learning
: https://aemo.com.au/-/media/files/major-publications/isp/2022/2022- documents/2022-integrated-system-plan-isp.pdf?la=en[4] C. Council, "Renewable energy jobs: Future growth in Australia," 2016.[5] C. Briggs, J. Rutovitz, E. Dominish, and K. Nagrath, "Renewable energy jobs in Australia: stage one," ed: Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, 2020.[6] J. Rutovitz et al., "E3 opportunity assessment: developing the future energy workforce: final report 2021," 2021.[7] H. Chai, J. Ravishankar, S. Krishnan, and M. Priestley, "Work-in-Progress: A Holistic Approach to Bridging the Gap between Power Engineering Education and Electric Power Industry," in 2022 IEEE Global
color, in their cohort.The research questions that will be addressed in this work are as follows: 1. What are the lived experiences (stories) of Black Doctoral engineering students in matriculating from historically Black college/university (HBCU) to a predominately white institution (PWI) for graduate studies?Background Moving from undergraduate studies to a graduate program is a difficult transition notonly due to the increase in workload and responsibility, but also changes in overall culture withinthe academic setting. Austin (2002) found that when attempting to socialize themselves ingraduate programs “[s]tudents must make sense of the academy and its values, its expectations ofthem as graduate students, [the academy’s
with scientists across different disciplines. 2.94 3.40 2.93 3.55 3.33 *(Yr2, 4 and 5 all >Yr1; Yr4 > Yr3) Received adequate IBIEM faculty support for learning goals. 2.50 3.60 3.13 3.69 3.69 *(Yr2, 3, 4 and 5 all >Yr1; Yr4 and Yr5 >Yr3) FACULTY & PEER IBIEM mentor(s)/peers actively involved in my training/learning 2.63 3.60 2.93
. Pennebaker, D. S. Berry, and J. M. Richards, “Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles,” Pers Soc Psychol Bull, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 665–675, May 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005010.[12] S. C. Kalichman and J. M. Smyth, “‘And You Don’t Like, Don’t Like the Way I Talk’: Authenticity in the Language of Bruce Springsteen,” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000402.[13] D. Monzani et al., “Emotional Tone, Analytical Thinking, and Somatosensory Processes of a Sample of Italian Tweets During the First Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, p. e29820, Oct. 2021, doi
Nathaniel E. Agharese, Andrea Banuet, Dave Beach, David L. Jaffe,Melissa Ko, Tammy Liaw, Irene Lo, Amanda Modell, Brett Newman, Jesse Streicher,Gloriana Trujillo, Jeff Wood, Sonia Martin, Ahmed Mohamed, Lawrence Domingo, AndreaCuadra, Brendon Reynante were invaluable in getting this checklist project off the ground, aswas funding from the Stanford Science and Engineering Education Fellows program. Wehope the list of contributors to this checklist will continue growing.References[1] M. K. Brown, C. Hershock, C. J. Finelli, and C. O’Neal, “Teaching for retention in science, engineering, and math disciplines: A guide for faculty,” Occasional paper, vol. 25, pp. 1–12, 2009.[2] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K
[Divergingemployment outcomes of higher education], Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Education andPsychology, University of Jyväskylä, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-7529-6.[6] I. Tanhua, Teorioita sukupuolenmukaisen segregaation syistä [Theories of gendersegregation], Research report by SEGLI project, 2018. [Online]. Available:https://www.kaikkienduuni.fi/teorioita-segregaation-syist/ [English translation of graphprovided by Tanhua to the Authors].[7] R. Hutt, “These 10 countries are closest to achieving gender equality,” World EconomicForum, 17 Dec 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/12/gender-gap-equality-women-parity-countries/.[8] S. Singh and S. Peers, “Where are the Women in the Engineering
, “Stereotyping and its threat are real.,” American Psychologist, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 680–681, 1998. 6. C. L. Walker and S. J. Rakow, “The Status of Hispanic American Students in Science: Attitudes,” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 225–245, 1985. 7. A. Meador, “Examining Recruitment and Retention Factors for Minority STEM Majors Through a Stereotype Threat Lens,” School Science and Mathematics, vol. 118, no. 1-2, pp. 61–69, 2018. 8. D. Sadegh, S. Perkins-Hall and K. Abeysekera, “Tested Strategies for Recruiting and Retention of STEM Majors” in International Association for Development of the Information Society: Proceeding of the 5th International Association for Development of the
writing,” Coll. English, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 610–617, 1979.[20] J. Colwell, J. Whittington, and C. F. Jenks, “Writing Challenges for Graduate Students in Engineering and Technology,” 2011, doi: 10.18260/1-2--18722.[21] A. Selzer King, K. R. Moore, S. Frankel, and A. Hardage Edlin, “Drawing Strategies for Communication Planning: A Rationale and Exemplar of the Geometric Page Form (GPF) Approach,” ACM'S Spec. Inte. Group on the Des. of Info., 2017.[22] A. S. King and A. H. Edlin, “Structured drawing tasks support research ideation : A mentor-mentee report on iteration, invention, and collaboration,” ACM'S Spec. Inte
ofpractices described above in which participants are asked to look through the deck (or virtualdisplay) of practices to identify the three to six practices they feel are most emphasized or valuedand an additional three to six they perceived to be emphasized or valued in a given engineeringcontext. Participants are asked a series of follow up questions after these card sorts. Afterdiscussing the practices emphasized in the engineering context(s) in which they engaged,participants are asked to sort through the deck once again to identify the top practices theypersonally deem to be most important in addressing a complex problem in their field. In addition,participants are asked to reflect on the extent to which the valued aspects of engineering work
,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2020, vol. 2020-June, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34617.[7] L. Torres, M. W. Driscoll, and A. L. Burrow, “Racial microaggressions and psychological functioning among highly achieving African-Americans: A mixed-methods approach,” J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1074–1099, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.10.1074.[8] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 282–284, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1038/nbt.4089.[9] J. K. Hyun, B. C. Quinn, T. Madon, and S. Lustig, “Graduate student mental health