technology. Traditionalengineering courses involving semiconductor technology focus on developing the in-depthtechnical knowledge needed for practitioners to design systems using semiconductor technology.However, these courses are not accessible to a more general audience of students who couldbenefit from increased technical literacy. Moreover, because these courses focus primarily ontechnical details, they often have limited coverage of the broader characteristics of Table 1 thatfocus on the interaction of technology and society. Knowledge • Recognizes the pervasiveness of technology in everyday life. • Understands basic engineering concepts and terms, such as systems, constraints, and trade-offs. • Is familiar with the nature and
Paper ID #33450Cohort-Based Supplemental Instruction Sessions as a Holistic RetentionApproach in a First-Year Engineering CourseMiss Nisha Abraham, University of Texas at Austin Nisha coordinates the Supplemental Instruction program. She received her B.S. in cell and molecular biology from The University of Texas at Austin in 2007, her M.S. in biology from Texas A&M University in 2012 and her M.A. in STEM Education from The University of Texas at Austin in 2019. Additionally, she has over five years of combined industry and science research experience, has worked as a senior bioscience associate at UT’s Austin Technology
. Muraleedharan has participated in many professional and service activities university wide. In summer 2015, she in- structed Middle school Robotics and Beyond Camp, and in 2014 served as a judge for A.H. Nickless Innovation Award at SVSU. Dr. Muraleedharan strives to promote science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education for young girls and aspire young women engineers by volunteering for MindTrekkers event, Delta College, Middle school girls camp, ISD Bay Arenac and Girls Scouts, Michi- gan yearly. Dr. Muraleedharan is a member of Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineering (SPIE), Women
President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant
Introduction to Mechatronics for which she received thDr. Kimberly Lechasseur, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kimberly LeChasseur is a researcher and evaluator with the Worcester Polytechnic Institute. She holds a dual appointment with the Center for Project-Based Learning and the Morgan Teaching and Learning Center. She holds a PhD in Educational LeadershipJennifer deWinter, Illinois Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023WIP Toward a Free-Body Diagram MobileApplicationAbstractNo skill is more important for a student of mechanics than the ability to draw a complete andaccurate free-body diagram (FBD). A good FBD facilitates proper accounting of forces whenwriting the
Outstanding Mentor Award.Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is 2022-23 ASEE President and a co- recipient of the 2022 National Academy of Engineering Bernard M. Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Engineering Technology Education for her role as a co-founder of the Grand Chal- lenges Scholars Program. Dr. Carpenter is an ABET PEV and member of the Executive Committee for the Global Engineering Deans Council and co-past chair for the Undergraduate Experience Committee of the Engineering Deans Council.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering
Student Development, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 925-942, 2016, doi: 10.1353/csd.2016.0091.[9] D. Verdin, A. Godwin, and B. Capobianco, “Systematic Review of the Funds of Knowledge Framework in STEM Education,” Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.25999.[10] D. Cole and A. Espinoza, “Examining the Academic Success of Latino Students in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Majors,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 285-300, 2008, doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0018.[11] R. Revelo, J. Mejia and I. Villanueva, “Who are we? Beyond Monolithic Perspectives of Latinxs in Engineering,” Proceedings of the 124th
, Mass.), vol. 15, (2), pp. 209, 2017.[5] N. W. Moon et al, Accommodating Students with Disabilities in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Findings from Research and Practice for Middle Gradesthrough University Education. Atlanta, GA: SciTrain: Science and Math for All, 2012.[6] T. Armstrong, "Neurodiversity: The Future of Special Education?" vol. 74, (7), pp. 10-16,2017.[7] L. Clouder et al, "Neurodiversity in higher education: a narrative synthesis," High Educ, vol.80, (4), pp. 757-778, 2020. . DOI: 10.1007/s10734-020-00513-6.[8] M. Chrysochoou, A. E. Zaghi and C. M. Syharat, "Reframing Neurodiversity in EngineeringEducation," 2022. . DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.995865.[9] M. Chrysochoou et al, "Redesigning engineering
Contextualizing Engineering Educational Culture as Masculine and Competitive,” Eng. Stud., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 196–216, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2019.1663200.[5] W. W. Wulf, “Diversity In Engineering,” Leadersh. Manag. Eng., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 31–35, Oct. 2001, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2001)1:4(31).[6] American Society for Engineering Education, “Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2019,” Washington, DC, 2020.[7] E. Godfrey and L. Parker, “Mapping the Cultural Landscape in Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01038.x.[8] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, “‘I Wish that I Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:’ Achieving
amongst oSTEM (Out in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics)participants were that GM members less often reported experiencing community (56%) andsocial networking (6%) than gender majority members did (74%; 22%). Both groups similarlyreported benefitting from professional resources, leadership skills, and academic resources. Forreducing isolation, GM students slightly more frequently reported a reduction in the isolation ofan unspecified identity (38%), though this was similarly reported amongst gender majoritystudents (29%). oSTEM was generally not reported as reducing isolation of other identities foreither group. In terms of the impact of oSTEM on participants, nearly a third of GM studentssaid it had not impacted their progress
. 1–38, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912100407[13] T. Le, and S. K. Gardner, “Understanding the doctoral experience of Asian international students in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields: An exploration of one institutional context,” Journal of College Student Development, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 252-264, 2010.[14] “Canvas by Instructure,” Instructure. [Online]. Available: https://www.instructure.com/canvas. [Accessed: 09-Feb-2023].[15] V. Braun, and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa[16] J. L. Campbell, C. Quincy, J. Osserman, and O. K
transformational resistance and identitydevelopment. Through her narrative, we see how transformational resistance can occur at anypart of the identity development process, though certain identities during these parts may not besalient or significant to the individual. This paper addresses the complexity in creating diversity,equity, and inclusion (DEI) spaces for invisible marginalized identities and offers the experiencesof the participant to question the bounds of inclusivity in these spaces.IntroductionUnderstanding the lived experiences of invisible marginalized people in STEM (Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) is paramount to well-executed diversity, equity, andinclusion (DEI) programs. While crafting programs for marginalized people
tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM),” Jo. of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 100, no., 2, pp. 255-270, 2011.[7] H. Markus and P. Nurius, “Possible selves,” American Psychologist, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 954- 969, 1986.[8] D. Oyserman, D. Bybee and K. Terry, “Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action,” Jo. of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 188-204, 2006.[9] N. Dasgupta, “Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model,” Psychological Inquiry, vol.22, pp. 231-246, 2011.[10] E. Iversen
Pract., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 2005, doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.[15] M. Denton, M. Borrego, and A. Boklage, “Community cultural wealth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: A systematic review,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 556–580, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20322.[16] D. Verdín, A. Godwin, and B. Capobianco, “Systematic review of the funds of knowledge framework in STEM education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016, vol. 2016-June, doi: 10.18260/p.25999.[17] S. M. Lord, M. M. Camacho, C. E. Brawner, J. B. Main, and C. Mobley, “Military Veteran Students’ Pathways in Engineering Education (Year 5),” in Proceedings of the
. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh and worked in industry within operations as a manager before pursuing her graduate studies.Dr. Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Brooke Coley, PhD is an Assistant Professor in Engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Dr. Coley is Principal Investigator of the Shifting Perceptions, Attitudes and Cultures in Engineering (SPACE) Lab that aspires to elevate the experiences of marginalized populations, dismantle systematic injustices, and transform the way inclusion is culti- vated in engineering through the implementation of novel technologies
heavy engineering focus, Lehigh already had LUSSI (Lehigh University Student Scholars Institute), PreLUsion, RARE (Rapidly Accelerated Research Experience) is a focused pre-admission-to-graduation STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) immersion program. The overarching goal of the program is to provide opportunities for students from backgrounds underrepresented in STEM fields to develop outstanding scientific skills in an environment that emphasizes preparation for leadership. ADVANCE IT GrantUndergraduate Enrollment Headcount in RCEAS 2011-2014 % YEAR Women % US
graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 172–208, 2011, doi: 10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2.C. D.[29] K. L. Tonso, “On the outskirts of engineering: learning identity, gender, and power via Engineering practice,” 1st ed. Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands: Sense Publishers, 2007,.[30] Allen and M. Eisenhart, “Fighting for desired versions of a future self: how young women negotiated STEM-related identities in the discursive landscape of educational opportunity,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 407–436, 2017.[31] Author, 2018.[32] Authors, 2019. 13
Paper ID #242332018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Advancing the College of Engineering Strategic Goal of Becoming a NationalModel of Inclusivity and CollaborationMichelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Dr. Padma Akkaraju, College of Engineering, Oregon State University Padma Akkaraju is the
Systems. Through this startup experience, Jack has initiated problem based learning pilot programs enabled through interdisciplinary experiences, in engineering education and entrepreneurial training (e.g. The StartUp Class). Jack is also a Co-PI for the NSF I-Corps Mid Atlantic Regional Node (DC I-Corps) and is an instructor for both the Na- tional and Regional training programs guiding technical professionals through the Lean Startup approach. Jack serves on the Executive Board for the GEM National Consortium and on the Boards of Directors for The Commonwealth Center Advanced Manufacturing (CCAM) and the Roanoke-Blacksburg Technology Center. c American Society for Engineering Education
) in the Advanced Capabilities and Systems Group. Dr. Pacheco receive the B.S., M. Eng., and PhD degrees all from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Electrical Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Impact of Professional Communications Training on Teamwork and Leadership Skills for Engineering Capstone TeamsAbstract: Experience has shown that one of the biggest challenges facing engineering capstoneteams is team members learning to work together effectively. This is compounded when theteam is comprised of students from multiple engineering disciplines.Our engineering capstone curriculum has always included training on team dynamics and teamconflict
son named Gray and a dog named Argyle.Dr. Jenefer Husman, University of Oregon Jenefer Husman received a doctoral degree in Educational Psychology from the University of Texas at Austin, in 1998. She served as an Assistant Professor at the University of Alabama from 1998 to 2002, when she moved to Arizona State University. In 2008 she was promoted by ASU to Associate Profes- sor. She is currently an Associate Professor in the Educational Studies Department at the University of Oregon. Dr. Husman served as the Director of Education for the Quantum Energy and Sustainable So- lar Technology Center - an NSF-funded Engineering Research Center from 2011-2016. Dr. Husman is an assistant editor of the Journal of
. electrical engineering, marketing, and operations decisions in the Management & Technology Program, University of Pennsylvania. Only qualitative feedback from program alumni was available for analysis. Since theproject has spanned two decades, it was difficult to find enough of the participants for ameaningful quantitative survey of the learning outcomes achieved. The student feedbackshowed all of the respondents continued on to get engineering or science degrees, and they allhad extremely positive comments about their Theremin project. These professionals have theproper education and context to review this project with hindsight and assess its impact on aformative time in their academic careers. The common theme from all of the
Humanities and the National Science Foundation. She is currently investigating the intersections between engineering and CSR on the NSF grant ”The Ethics of Extraction: Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility into Engineering Education.”Dr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Juan Lucena is Professor and Director of Humanitarian Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). Juan obtained a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech and a MS in STS and BS in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). His books include Defending the Nation: U.S. Policymaking to Create Scientists and Engineers from Sputnik to the ’War Against Terrorism’ (University
each other.The individual narratives we develop from our participants’ stories will incorporate both theindividual and structural aspects to explicitly call attention to racism within the workplace. Thus,we aim to make connections and provide example cases depicting that the ways in which racialdiscrimination → racist ideas → ignorance/hate → in/authenticity.Implications for Engineering EducationWith this paper, we aim to advance awareness and action within engineering education. Theframeworks discussed have utility for studying many aspects of engineering. For example, weare applying these frameworks within the computer and information technology industry for ourown study on engineering workplaces. While studies have examined ways Blacks cope
design, Martinez et al. [4] found no significant differencesin students’ attitudes about environmental ethics after an environmental science course; Dexteret al. [5] found no significant difference after a computer/information technology ethics course.And, in 2015, using the Engineering Professional Responsibility Assessment tool in a surveyconducted at seventeen US universities, Canney et al. [6] found that 44 percent of students(n=2200) reported no specific courses in their undergraduate engineering programs influencedtheir ways of thinking about social justice and engineering. Moreover, students reported designwork, projects, and service learning were effective, while pedagogical techniques such as casestudies were not cited at all as
engineering systems. He served as chairman of ASEE’s Ocean and Marine Engineering Division from 1997-2004, and previously served in the Civil Engineer Corps of the U. S. Navy as an ocean engineer and diving officer. Phone: 410-293-6432. E-mail: mayer@usna.edu.Cmdr. Angela Schedel, U.S. Naval Academy Naval Officer, Helicopter Pilot, 1994-2005 Instructor, U.S. Naval Academy, Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering Dept, 2007-2013, 2015-present Science & Technology Liaison, Office of Naval Research, 2013-2015 Page 26.843.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Hex-Oid
, Creativity and Cognition Press, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.Dym, C.L. (1994). Engineering: A synthesis of views. New York: Cambridge University Press.Gee, J. P. (2004). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing boarders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Glaser & Strauss, 1967.Hegedus, T. A., Carlone, H. B., & Carter, A. D. (2014). Shifts in the cultural production of “smartness” through engineering in elementary classrooms. Proceedings of the 121st American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition
college. Thus, in the absence of improved college prep programs, colleges need tobridge the gap.For minority students who achieve high school graduation, community college is often the nextstep. Packard3 concluded that community colleges often provide an entry point for firstgeneration, low income, racial/ethnic minority or non-traditional college students. Increasing thenumbers of successfully graduating minority students in Science, Technology, Engineering andMath (STEM) is known to be achieved by intentional strategies to recruit students to and retainstudents at community colleges: emphasizing dual credit classes in high school, providingopportunity for career related experiences and providing community-related support4. Otherresearch showed
Paper ID #22223Influences on Variability of Perceptions of Behavior on Student EngineeringProject TeamsEmily Miller, University of Virginia Emily Miller is a graduate student in Systems and Information Engineering at the University of Virginia. She has previously worked for the National Integrated Cyber Education and Research Center and as a researcher at the University of Virginia, Olin College of Engineering and Ohio State. Her research interests include motivation, expertise recognition, and teamwork.Prof. Reid Bailey, University of Virginia Reid Bailey is an Associate Professor in the Department of Systems and
University Dr. Nadia Kellam is Associate Professor in the Polytechnic Engineering Program at Arizona State Uni- versity. Prior to this position, she was an Associate Professor at the University of Georgia, where she was co-director of the interdisciplinary engineering education research Collaborative Lounge for Un- derstanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER). In her research, she is interested in understanding how engineering students develop their professional identity, the role of emo- tion in student learning, and synergistic learning. A recent research project uncovers the narratives of exemplary engineering faculty who have successfully transitioned to student-centered teaching