their future studies.References1. Courter, S. S., Millar, S. B. and Lyons, L. (1998), From the Students' Point of View: Experiences in a Freshman Engineering Design Course. Journal of Engineering Education, 87: 283–288. doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.1998.tb00355.x2. Dym, C. L. (1994), Teaching Design to Freshmen: Style and Content. Journal of Engineering Education, 83: 303–310. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1994.tb00123.x3. Burton, J. D. and White, D. M. (1999), Selecting a Model for Freshman Engineering Design. Journal of Engineering Education, 88: 327–332. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00454.x4. Dally, J. W. and Zhang, G. M. (1993), A Freshman Engineering Design Course. Journal of Engineering Education, 82: 83–91. doi: 10.1002/j.2168
Scholars in Engineering: Promoting Student Success through Cohort-Building and Industrial EngagementIntroductionThe National Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (S-STEM) program provides grants to institutions of higher education to supportscholarships for academically well-prepared undergraduate students with demonstrated financialneed. The goal of the program is to contribute to the number of well-prepared scientists andengineers in the workforce by increasing the number of students with financial need who enterthe STEM workforce after completing a degree program in science or engineering1,2.In spring 2012, we received an S-STEM grant to establish the “CLEAR Scholars in Engineering
Paper ID #9264Credentialing MOOCs: A Case StudyMr. S. Cory Brozina, Virginia Tech Cory Brozina is a PhD student in the Engineering Education department at Virginia Tech. His research is in educational technology and data analysis.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education David Knight is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. His research focuses on student learning outcomes in undergraduate engineering, interdisciplinary teaching and learning, organizational change in colleges and universities
m 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 xa am _0 _0 _0 _0 _0 _0 _0 _0 _0 _1 _1 _1 _1 _1 _1 _1 _1 _1 _1 E Ex ST S T ST ST ST ST S T ST ST ST ST S T ST ST ST ST S T ST ST st- e- Page 24.649.11 Po Pr Figure 10 – Main Effect Plot Illustrating the Effect of Students and
parameter sweep could be performed in any number of software packages, including Matlab or a PSPICE variant. What distinguishes Maple and MapleSim from these other programs is the ability to generate the underlying equations of the system. This is a critically important feature. MapleSim contains an “attach equation” option which populates a Maple worksheet with live interactive hooks to the MapleSim file. Three equations are created by the worksheet which describe the mathematical rules governing the system: ⎧ D _ Goff D _ off (t) ⎫ Vbatt − OutputVolt(t) − D _ s(t)⋅ ⎨ ⎬ − D _ Goff ⋅ D _VKnee = 0
study will be conducted in the future by theauthor in order to capture multiple influential factors and investigate the effectiveness of remotelaboratories more profoundly.References1. Bal, M. Virtual manufacturing laboratory experiences for distance learning course in engineering technology. Paper session presented at the meeting of 2012 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, United States, June 2012.2. Fujita, J. S. T., Cassaniga, R. F., And Fernandez, F. J. R. Remote laboratory. In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics. Rio. de Janeiro, Brazil. 1104–1106, 2003.3. Yoo, S. And Hovis, S. Technical symposium on computer science education. In Proceedings of the 35th
: Successful Collaborations to Improve High School Student Achievement” Accessed on 3/10/2014 from Los Angeles County Office of Education http://apep.gseis.ucla.edu/bestla/BEST-InsideSchlUnivPartnerships.pdf 7. Ing, M., Huang, P., LaCombe, N., Martinez-Lopez, Y., and Haberer, E. D., 2012, “Creating Opportunities for Reflection: Analyzing Middle School Student Work During a Service-Learning Course on Solar Cells”, International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Vol.7, No.1, Spring 2012 8. Bagiati, A., Yoon, S. Y., Evangelou, D., and Ngmabeki, I., 2010, “Engineering Curricula in Early Education: Describing the Landscape of Open Resources”, Journal of Early Childhood
OK, but problems with phase angles on plots in Case 5. D OK OK OK E OK, but natural frequencies Results calculated over a freq. OK listed in rad/s instead of Hz. range that differs from user input. Also, node numbering problem in the printed mode shapes. F Program is actually a separate Program is actually a separate OK script for each test case; user script for each test case; user input input is ignored
Paper ID #10294NSFREU Site on Neural Engineering: Aiming at High Research Standards(work in progress)Dr. Raquel Perez Castillejos, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Raquel Perez-Castillejos is an assistant professor of Biomedical Engineering at the New Jersey Insti- tute of Technology (NJIT). Her research (www.tissuemodels.net) focuses on the development of tools for cell and tissue biology using micro- and nanotechnologies. Raquel obtained her Ph.D. with the National Center of Microelectronics in Barcelona. She was a postdoctoral fellow at the Laboratory of Miniaturized Systems (Univ. S˜ao Paulo, Brasil) and later at
). FreeMat. Available: http://freemat.sourceforge.net/index.html#home[8] Simtk. (1-Jan-2014). OpenSim. Available: https://simtk.org/home/opensim[9] J. A. Reinbolt, A. Seth, and S. L. Delp, "Simulation of human movement: applications using OpenSim," Procedia IUTAM, vol. 2, pp. 186-198, 2011.[10] A. Seth, M. Sherman, J. A. Reinbolt, and S. L. Delp, "OpenSim: a musculoskeletal modeling and simulation framework for in silico investigations and exchange," Procedia IUTAM, vol. 2, pp. 212-232, 2011.[11] S. L. Delp, F. C. Anderson, A. S. Arnold, P. Loan, A. Habib, C. T. John, et al., "OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement," Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions
particles are fist deposited on a test section and placed in theresuspension wind tunnel. A microscope is used to take pictures of the particles on thetest section. The air velocity in the wind tunnel is gradually increased from 1 m/s toabout 15m/s in steps. After each increase of the airflow velocity, some particles areremoved, and a picture of the particles still on the test section is taken. By counting the Page 24.969.5number of particles of different sizes remaining on the test section, the critical shear 4velocity for detachment of different size particles are measured. Additional experimentalstudies
weeks), that met once a week for 2hours and 45 minutes. I. Course Objectives: In particular, having successfully completed the course, students will be able to: a) Create organized and theoretically effective syllabi b) Articulate correspondences and differences between education theory and education practice c) Perform peer reviews of other instructors and constructively discuss their performance d) Productively reflect on teaching practices to improve student learning and class environment e) Draw on classroom experiences to develop useful formative assessments f) Develop a teaching portfolio that articulates and illustrates the student´s teaching philosophy II. Syllabus: Following are the
been entered in the required cells, students enter thereference values of the sound velocity in water in the designated cells. Percentage errors willautomatically be calculated for values of sound velocity in water obtained by the studentsexperimentally. Through Transmission: Two Transducers Frequency Ref. Velocity Velocity m/s % Error Velocity m/s % Error Velocity m/s % Error Average Average in MHz m/sec 50 mm 50 mm 100 mm 100 mm 150 mm 150 mm Velocity m/sec % Error 2.25 3.5 5 Averages Figure 9. Spreadsheet for calculations of errors of the experimental data. 5. SummaryThe Excel macros as an assisting tool for
1,11,20 10 7,16,25 11 6,15,24,28,29 Table I DIRECT question number(s) corresponding to the relevant learning objective.Implementation & Results of AssessmentBeginning with the winter 2004 term and continuing through the fall 2013 term, we administeredthe DIRECT assessment to all of the second semester general physics laboratory students,(N=738) at the end of the semester. This group of students includes 284 students taking thecalculus-based physics sequence and 454 students taking the algebra-based sequence. Forpurposes of comparison, the sample size in the original publication of the DIRECT
quest. We also hope to use the work reported hereas a proof-of-concept for campus IT decision-makers, convincing them of the need for a campus-based wiki server that is under local control, has more administrative options for opening/closingediting groups, communicates our campus brand, and is without any embedded advertising.Despite these changes we are committed to keeping contents of the wiki publicly available asthis has proven to be a valuable tool for networking in the design for manufacturing community.References1. ASEE, “Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering, Phase I: Synthesizing and Integrating Industry Perspectives”, Workshop Report, May 2013.2. Odom, E., Beyerlein, S., Porter, C., Gomez, A., Gallup L., “Internet
effects of climate change on public health in my research agenda. My research also involve data mining.Dr. Ali Sanati-Mehrizy Dr. Ali Sanati-Mehrizy is a Pediatric resident physician at Rutgers University - New Jersey Medical School in Newark, NJ. He is a graduate of the Milton S. Hershey Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine. He completed his undergraduate studies in Biology from the University of Utah. His research interests are varied and involve pediatric hematology and oncology as well as higher education curricula, both with universities and medical schools.Mr. Paymon Sanati-Mehrizy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Paymon is currently a medical student at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
engineering, their teamworkand presentation skills, the modules taught, the camp schedule, and suggestions forimprovement. The possible answers to both survey questions were Strongly Agree, Agree,Neutral, Disagree, and Strongly Disagree.The pre-camp survey questions were as follows:1) I plan to go to college when I finish high school.2) I am interested in a specific college(s).3) I have a specific career goal(s).4) I am interested in a career in engineering/4-year program.5) I am interested in a career in technology/2-year program.The figure below shows students responses to the pre-camp survey. The responses illustrate thatthis was a very focused group of students, with a large majority planning to enroll in college(96%) and having very clear goals
textbook. Often staticsinstructors will intentionally encourage their students to refer to it for additional assistance.Some instructors have chosen to replace the course textbook outright with OLI’s interactivestatics content. One well executed approach by S. A. Sorby and C. R. Vilmann at MichiganTechnological University3, fully replaced the lectures with OLI resources and a weekly, one-hourquestion and answer classroom session. Papadopoulos and Roman4 have explored its potentialuse with bilingual students. OLI has proven to be a versatile learning resource for developingstatics instruction.After concluding that OLI incorporated excellent learning research and interactive features, weselected its Engineering Statics course for use within the
. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. AAUW. Washington, D.C. 3. Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where Are All the Women? Gender Differences in Participation in Physical Science and Engineering. In S. J. Ceci, W. M. Williams (Eds.) , Why aren't more women in science?: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 199-210). American Psychological Association. 4. Reichert, M., & Absher, M. (1997). Taking another look at educating African American engineers: The importance of undergraduate retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(3), 241–253. 5. Murphy, T., Gaughan, M., Hume, R., & Gordon Moore Jr., S. (2010). College graduation rates for minority students in a
sequence diagrams.The tool is available to instructors at other institutions via the web. Eventually, it should bepossible for other instructors to set up assignments using the website, but currently assignmentsmust be sent to us by email. Contact the first author at http://member.acm.org/∼hasker for helpin setting up an assignment.References [1] A. Abran, J. W. Moore, P. Bourque, and R. Dupuis, editors. Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge. IEEE Computer Society, 2004. Page 24.1157.10 [2] M. Auer, T. Tschurtschenthaler, and S. Biffl. A flyweight UML modelling tool for software development in heterogeneous
Page 24.1182.5This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grantnumber EEC-1024628.References1. Guglielmino, L. M., Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale, Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol. 38, No. 6467A, 1978.2. Hoban J. D., Lawson S. R., Mazmanian P. E., Best A. M., and Seibel H. R., “The Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale: a factor analysis study,” Med Educ, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 370–379, 2005.3. J. Barsch, Barsch Learning Style Inventory, New York: Academic Therapy Publications, 1996.4. R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman, "Learning and teaching styles in engineering education," Engr. Education, Vol. 78, No. 7
programtargeting the improvement of undergraduate engineering education. Faculty proposed large-scalerenovations of a specific undergraduate course or closely-related group of courses, with the goalof improving student engagement, learning outcomes, and faculty teaching experiences.Alternatively, faculty could propose to develop teaching technologies that would facilitate theimplementation of evidence-based teaching practices. Priority in funding was given to projectsthat would impact large numbers of students or provide critical interventions early in students’learning careers.“Live deep, not fast,” is an admonition coined in the early 1900’s by literature professor, critic,and editor Henry Seidel Canby 1. Faculty participating in SIIP were invited to
essentialto the success of this program. These include the Center for Pre-college Outreach, CorporateRelations, and the Admissions Office.7. References1 Zweben, S., Bizot, B., 2013, 2012 Taulbee Survey Strong Increases in Undergraduate CS Enrollment and Degree Production; Record Degree Production at Doctoral Level, Computing Research News, pp. 11-60.2 Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C., 2006, Gender and computer games: Exploring females’ dislikes, in Journal of Computer ‐Mediated Communication 11, 910-931.3 Colley, A., 2003, Gender differences in adolescents' perceptions of the best and worst aspects of computing at school, in Computers in Human Behavior 19, 673-682.4 Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Eccles, J. S., 2002, Pool
pattern is discovered, the next step is the generalization and abstraction of the pattern.The skill encompasses the ability to filter information to solve a problem and re-defining it ingeneral terms using variables and/or formulas so problems that are similar in nature can besolved in the same way. For the example shown above (the sequence of numbers) the patterngeneralization and abstraction step comprises taking the sequence and converting it into arecurrence relation. The formula that abstracts the sequence can be written as S(i) = S(i-1) + 3 *i where i is a positive integer and S(0) = 1.D. Algorithm DesignThe last skill in Computational Thinking is the development and/or the description of thesolution of a problem as a recipe/algorithm
: ideals and practice inresearch oriented universities, in press Higher Education Research and Development.2 Christensen, S. H., & Erno-Kjolhede, E. (2011). Academic drift in Danish professional engineering education. Page 24.594.12Myth or reality? Opportunity or threat?, European Journal of Engineering Education, 36, 3, 285-299.3 Harwood, J. (2010). Understanding Academic Drift: On the Institutional Dynamics of Higher Technical andProfessional Education, Minerva, 48, 413-427.4 Kyvik, S. (2009). The Dynamics of Change in Higher Education: Expansion and Contraction. HigherEducation Dynamics 27, Springer, Netherlands.5 Jorgensen, U
Works”, IEEE Spectrum, October 2011.[3] E. Ackerman, “CMU Develops Autonomous Car Software That’s Provably Safe”, IEEE Spectrum, July 2011.[4] Humanoid Robotics Group, http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/humanoid-robotics-group/, Last Accessed onDecember 26, 2011.[5] C. Y. Chen, P. H. Huang, “Review of an Autonomous Humanoid Robot and Its Mechanical Control”, Journal ofVibration and Control, Online, September 2011.[6] E. Guizzo, “These Humanoid Robots Could Kick Your Asimo”, IEEE Spectrum, October 2010.[7] M. Kroh, K. El-Hayek, S. Rosenblatt, B. Chand, P. Escobar, J. Kaouk, S. Chalikonda, “First Human SurgeryWith a Novel Single-Port Robotic System: Cholesystectomy using the Da-Vinci Single-Site Platform”, SurgicalEndoscopy, 25, 11, June 2011, pp
engineering education. The study will continue to assess the use of text,discussion, and class activities that occur concurrently while the GTAs are being observed inteaching. The instructor will continue to collect data on The Graduate Teaching AssistantSeminar in future semesters to make comparisons; and provide well-grounded understandingof the experience and perspective of the GTA participants22.Bibliography 1. Bandura, A., (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, pp. 191-215. 2. Prentice-Dunn, S., Pitts, G.S. (2001) “The Use of Videotape Feedback in the Training of Instructors”, in Prieto, L.R., Meyers, S.A. (Eds.) The Teaching Assistant Handbook: How to prepare TAs for
(hoped) improvements, to a revised set of SOs. To that end, some desired attributes of the SeniorProject Rubric are evaluated:RQ1 (Applicability): Does the rubric’s methodology measure attainment of all of the SOs in ameaningful way? If not all, to which SOs is it not applicable?RQ2 (Extendibility): Is the rubric methodology(s) applicable to varied SO categories, and does itlend itself to fine tuning?RQ3 (Consistency): Is there reasonable expectation that repeated application of the rubric toidentical data should yield identical metrics? When there is not, can this shortcoming beameliorated?5.2 MethodThe sources of the data for this study are 22 capstone projects completed between Fall 2010 andSpring 2012, encompassing the efforts of about 82
) related toknowledge of cognition, several of them particularly associated with procedural and conditionalknowledge, were used as a form of coaching 5, 8. PROBLEM 2Kinetics and Homogeneous Reactor Design (IQ407) Mass Transfer Unit Operations I (IQ412)Mixed flow reactor (CSTR) is used for carrying out the A binary mixture of methanol and water is to benext first order reversible reaction: separated using a conventional distillation column. The feed stream contains 40 mol/s of methanol and 60 mol/s 𝐴 𝐵 of water, introduced as a saturated liquid
engineering education.A framework for thinking about elements of reflectionReflection on experience can be framed as an intentional and dialectical thinking process wherean individual revisits features of an experience with which he/she is aware and uses one or morelenses in order to assign meaning(s) to the experience that can guide future action (and thusfuture experience). We can use pathways of reflection to delineate combinations of theseelements. In this section, we unpack the elements of this framing (i.e., experience, lens, meaning, Page 24.776.2action, intentional, and dialectical) of reflection and then illustrate the ideas through a