to measure students’ self-evaluation of their participation and potential distractions during the learning activity.Since 2017, the StRIP instrument has been completed by more than 1,000 students in US universityengineering programs. Seventeen engineering faculty have also been interviewed by researchers[14]. While many students embrace active learning and report positive learning experiences [15-17], the evidence-based results have also revealed a few reasons for their resistance. One of themajor concerns was lack of motivation. In other words, some students would not see the value inthe new learning techniques. Additionally, distraction coming from the internet or social mediasometimes negatively impacts their learning efficiency. It
-locatedmeetings among the researchers, categories were iteratively compared to identify themes relatedto the students’ perspectives, as suggested in [21]. The resulting themes were developed into acodebook [4].Quantitative Survey DevelopmentIn order to reach a broader population and gather more data, a survey was developed. Followingthe exploratory sequential study design, the qualitative findings were used to inform the contentof the survey. To first develop the survey, the authors of the paper worked independently andwrote several items pertaining to each theme in the codebook. The authors then worked togetherto edit the items and narrow it down to five items per theme, considering the best practices ofsurvey development: ensuring wording was clear
in infectious disease and epidemiology, providing crucial exposure to the broader context of engineering problems and their subsequent solutions. These diverse experiences and a growing passion for improving engineering edu- cation prompted Dr. Miskio˘glu to change her career path and become a scholar of engineering education. As an educator, she is committed to challenging her students to uncover new perspectives and dig deeper into the context of the societal problems engineering is intended to solve. As a scholar, she seeks to not only contribute original theoretical research to the field, but work to bridge the theory-to-practice gap in engineering education by serving as an ambassador for empirically driven
the course can help students to understand and gain further insightinto the theoretical lectures. According to the study [4], data communications and networkingcourses are divided into three categories: (1) The fundamental and general topics of computernetworks using some practical examples, (2) Internet protocols, and (3) A set of programming andproject assignments. The traditional approach to teaching data communications consists of lecturescovering theoretical information and mathematical basis, and of laboratory sessions where studentscan understand better the communication process and how to program a communications protocol.It is very crucial to keep up in classrooms with today's industry requirements for graduates in termsof both
feedback control. Prof. West is the recipient of the NSF CAREER award and is a University of Illinois Distinguished Teacher-Scholar and College of Engineering Education Innovation Fellow.Prof. Craig Zilles, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Craig Zilles is an Associate Professor in the Computer Science department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His research focuses on computer science education and computer architecture. His research has been recognized by two best paper awards from ASPLOS (2010 and 2013) and by se- lection for inclusion in the IEEE Micro Top Picks from the 2007 Computer Architecture Conferences. He received the IEEE Education Society’s Mac Van Valkenburg Early Career Teaching
educate the future of our Service andhave developed a Coastal Resiliency course that provides exposure into the science of climatechange, its impact on civil engineering infrastructure and on the planning and design of resilientstructures. The Coastal Resiliency course provides preparation for the real-world practice ofengineering by exposing students to the importance of risk and vulnerability assessment withinthe context of changing climatic conditions. As a sea-going service, the majority of the USCG’sassets are along the coastline. As the USCG’s primary accession point for civil engineers,ensuring future engineers are exposed to the potential challenges that will likely occur due torising sea level and other climate-related hazards is an
both qualitative and quantitative data. For example, the reportof one participating group identified electricity market prices, hydropower generation potential,impacts on local ecosystems, and stakeholder acceptance as potential forms of data. Processingand understanding these heterogeneous datasets is best facilitated through methods from data-science, including emerging techniques such as artificial intelligence. Upon identifying thechallenges related to data analysis, the group specifically designated the position of a ‘data-science researcher’ in their team. This is a common approach to address complexitiesencountered during the project experience, i.e., students seek domain knowledge throughcollaborative learning and peer education
his experiences as a consulting engineer into courses covering the practice of civil en- gineering, including a senior level capstone course which runs in parallel with a currently ongoing civil engineering project. His doctoral research was conducted on the long-term field performance of retaining structures in expansive clay.Mr. Hugh Watson Morris, University of Auckland, NZ Hugh Morris is a Senior Lecturer in Civil Engineering who had a short period in local government and consulting before joining the University 30 years ago. He has taught timber engineering design to struc- tural engineering students and introductory design to 1000 first year students from multiple engineering disciplines. He has a passion for
years. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Exploring the Future of Engineering Education: Perspectives from a Workshop onArtificial Intelligence and the Future of STEM and SocietiesAbstractThe objective of this NSF funded workshop was to explore ways that artificial intelligence (AI)is transforming the jobs landscape and in turn, the knowledge portfolio and skills that educatorsshould be imparting on their students prior to graduation. To best address these issues,engineering researchers, policy advocates, and industry leaders were convened to discuss thefuture of STEM and societies in the age of AI. From an engineering education domain, workshopparticipants were made aware of fundamental
understanding how active learning methods are usedacross the world in materials science courses. For over 25 years, we have been supportingmaterials education globally through our software GRANTA EduPack. During that time, wehave seen how teaching has evolved and the impact active learning techniques have had formaterials education. In this paper, we will be sharing how materials teaching with active learningvaries around the world and how GRANTA EduPack and its associated resources can supportthese efforts. We hope this insight gained over many years can aid those looking to adjust theirmaterials courses to include more active learning techniques.IntroductionWe as a community of educators now have an increased understanding of how people learn, andare
Murzi is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). Homero has 15 years of international experience working in industry and academia. His research focuses on contemporary and inclusive pedagogical practices, industry-driven competency development in engineering, and understanding the barriers that Latinx and Native Americans have in engineering. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence fellow, a Diversity scholar, a Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Dr. Natasha B. Watts
successful engineering managers and systems engineers. Specific methods andtechniques taught and applied are operations strategy, product design and selection, total qualitymanagement, capacity planning, facility location, facility layout, work system design, leansystems, and scheduling. This course is required for those pursuing the Engineering Managementmajor and an elective for other engineering and non-engineering majors. The students in thecourse represent a diverse academic cross-section consisting of Engineering Management to non-engineering majors, honor students academically excelling to low-GPA at-risk students, andfrom sophomores (second year) to seniors (graduating). The three-credit hour course meets for75 minutes every other day on a 1
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics from Cornell University and Bachelor degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Physics from Cedarville University. His research interests are focused on best practices for student learning and student success. He is currently developing and researching SMART assessment, a modified mastery learning pedagogy for problem based courses. He created and co-teaches a multi-year integrated system design (ISD) project for mechanical engineering students. He is a mentor to mechanical engineering graduate teaching fellows and actively champions the adoption and use of teaching technologies.Sara Roccabianca, Michigan State University Sara Roccabianca is an Assistant Professor in the Department of
” instead of “for” the community in need (Bennett and Rosner 2019). We have created a social innovation program called Ignite that uses the principles of human-centered and liberatory design to educate a global community of students on engineering conceptsthrough design thinking rooted specifically in the SDGs. The Ignite curriculum contains three keycomponents: (1) creation of a physical prototype, (2) a community-based design challenge centeredon the use and implementation of the prototype, and (3) peer-to-peer learning, which results in avirtuous cycle of learners who become leaders who generate more learners. The engineering conceptsfocus on the creation of a practical solution related to an SDG. The design solution is targeted at achallenge
design capstone course is an important experience for engineering undergraduatestudents. This course prepares students for industry by having students solve open-ended real-world problems1. In particular, the senior capstone course involves solving problems posedfrom industry and faculty rather than “made up” projects 2,3 to allow for real-world situationsexperienced post degree. These problems typically require simulations using controlled real-world situations designed to meet specific learning objectives, or prototyping in a real-worldenvironment2 in which students are exposed to real situations with open-ended projects. Thedesign problems posed to the students allow for the practical side of engineering design to betaught in the engineering
finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s engineering study (as reported in Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field). In addition, in 2011 Dr. Sheppard was named as co-PI of a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:” Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and Chrysler Corporation. At Stanford she has served a chair of the faculty senate, and recently served as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate
for FEWS. Figure 1. Project objectives mapped to components of the Traineeship under the Stewardship framework.The key components of theTraineeship are: 1) Dissertation research on a FEWS issue for the generation of new knowledge; 2) A graduate certificate in Data-Driven Food, Energy and Water Decision Making, which consists of 3.5 credits of core courses and 9 credits of electives as described in Table 1 that represents conservation of knowledge; 3) A Graduate Learning Community [3] for transformation of knowledge that includes a two-year series of monthly workshops and weekly small-group activities designed to enhance the trainees’ interdisciplinary
Learning in EngineeringDr. Patti Wojahn, New Mexico State UniversityGermain Degardin, New Mexico State UniversityMuhammad Dawood, New Mexico State UniversityMelissa Guynn, New Mexico State UniversityRachel Boren, New Mexico State UniversityIntroduction Engineering programs often struggle to optimally support and retain promising students. Toattempt to address that issue at a Southwest HSI land-grant university, our interdisciplinary teamof researchers set out to study the impacts of putting learning and success more directly into thehands of students. We began exploring what we could learn from preparing first-yearengineering students to take more control of and responsibility for their learning and their growthas learners [1]. With faculty and
barriers that Latinx and Native Americans have in engineering. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence fellow, a Diversity scholar, a Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Jazmin Jurkiewicz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Jazmin Jurkiewicz is a first-year PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds de- grees in Chemical Engineering (B.S.) and Engineering - Innovation, Sustainability, and Entrepreneurship (M.E.). Her research interests include counseling informed education, inclusive practices, and teaching teams in STEM education.Dr. Kenneth Reid, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
courses in ECS,Science, and Mathematics. The training was focused on course module development for lower-division Engineering, Mathematics, and Science courses to incorporate high impact practices.Undergraduate Research for Freshman and Sophomore Students Undergraduate research consisting of laboratory/field activities and design projectsinvolving students, peer mentors, and faculty members were implemented in the Summer of2019. These activities were intended to increase the persistence of URM students in STEMdisciplines. The objective of Summer Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE) was toincrease students’ comprehension of concepts and topics and develop skills through real-worldexperiences at a very early stage as a freshman or
Engineering Students’ Identity Development,” 2016.[20] J. Walther, “PECASE: A Quality Framework for Interpretive Engineering Education Research,” 2012.[21] A. Magana-de-Leon, “CAREER: Authentic Modeling and Simulation Practices for Enhancing Model-Based Reasoning in Engineering Education,” 2015.[22] S. Adams, “CAREER: Designing Effective Teams in the Engineering Classroom for the Enhancement of Learning,” 2003. 12
skills and decisionmaking in design problems.Students’ achievement was assessed by the project deliverables: status report, oral presentationand final report. Additionally, a survey was conducted on effectiveness of the simulation projectin developing students’ simulation skills and learning mechanical engineering concepts. I. IntroductionWhile use of advanced design tools and software is deemed imperative for engineers in bothresearch and industry settings, acquiring these skills is not typically embedded in theundergraduate curriculum. Some students may choose relevant professional electives; however,for majority, a steep learning curve is required to grasp and master the skills required forengineering career or graduate school [1]. There
manager of Materials Testing lab at Missouri S&T, teaches mechanics of materials and develops digital educational resources for the engineering students. He had the opportunity of leading several scientific and industrial research projects and mentoring graduate and undergraduate students. Over the span of his career, Dr. Libre authored and co-authored 3 chapter books, 17 peer-reviewed journal articles and over 60 conference papers. He has advised and co-advised 8 gradu- ate students and mentored over 30 undergraduate students. He has collaborated with scholars from several countries, including Iran, China, Slovenia, Canada, and the US. He also served as a reviewer for 6 journals and a committee member of 5
Education at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). Homero has 15 years of international experience working in industry and academia. His research focuses on contemporary and inclusive pedagogical practices, industry-driven competency development in engineering, and understanding the barriers that Latinx and Native Americans have in engineering. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence fellow, a Diversity scholar, a Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Ms. Maia Greene-Havas, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Maia Greene-Havas
skills. For example, NMSUcurrent and future learning. Likewise, it is of key importance to hosted this year’s Boosting Engineering Science andrecruit and retain a diverse student population. Technology (BEST) STEM competition challenge. Specifically, this year’s challenge was focused on the electric grid. HS and MS students had to design and built robots to restore and/or replace damaged conductor following a natural disaster. Photos from this competition
1993, he has taught courses and laboratories in engineering mechanics, design, and entrepreneurship. His other responsibilities include undergraduate academic advising, senior design project supervision, undergraduate research supervision, and graduate research supervision. Dr. Bucinell has advised the SAE Baja, SAE Formula, and projects related to the ASME Human Powered Vehicle project. Dr. Bucinell has directed the International Virtual Design Studio project that ran in collaboration with the Middle East Technical University in Ankara, Turkey; Altim University in Ankara, Turkey; and ESIGELEC in Rouen, France. He also founded a chapter of Engineers Without Boarders at Union College and has traveled to Boru Village
at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
in detail how the engineering design process was used to include: o Identification/description of the need being addressed, working criteria and goals/objectives o Gathering of needed information: describe results of your research including a patent search o Description of the method(s) used (Ex: brainstorming) to search for creative solutions, how the method was implemented, and what the results were o Description and preliminary design(s) of at least 2 alternative designs/ideas for your toy/game o Describe how the best solution from the alternatives was selected and include an Evaluation Matrix Include a paragraph explaining
benefit from the communitystructure by learning best practices from other mentors and lessening duplication of efforts.Further, additional resources for mentees to learn about the field of EER will promote theirdevelopment as researchers. Resources on mentoring will benefit mentors to effectively mentorengineering faculty. Ultimately, the curation and creation of training in EER fundamentals willbe beneficial to all engineering faculty by making the field of EER more accessible and willpromote increased synergies between engineering and EER, which will increase the impact ofthe field.Future WorkThe current project highlighted the benefits in developing a community for the NSF RIEFprogram and outlined specific resources and events that are desired
to practice themath of digital signal processing.3. Assessment MethodsVarious forms of assessment were conducted to determine the impact of partial flipping, including directand indirect assessment of student performance and affective assessment that involved studentperspectives on flipping and active learning.3.1. Methods: Direct Assessment of Student PerformanceSince a portion of the material in each course was flipped, it was possible to compare student performancewith the flipped versus non-flipped material within each course. Various assignments were assessed ineach course for this comparison. For ECE-1212 (Electronic Circuit Design Lab), quizzes, pre-lab exercises,and lab reports were evaluated. This evaluation was done during two