, multidisciplinaryprojects can be challenging for many reasons. Design education is often relegated to the end ofan undergraduate program, which does not allow students to learn from their mistakes becausethey are given tight deadlines and linear deliverables. In response, Fazelpour et al. argue for aholistic approach to design education throughout an undergraduate curriculum [6]. Students withdesign experiences throughout their undergraduate program will learn to work in teams earlier,better preparing them for peer collaboration and meaningful engagement with industry sponsors.That said, those who have implemented multidisciplinary capstone programs warn of potentialissues. Behdinan et al. note the potential for exacerbation of student performance issues such as
. Page 26.650.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering, Society and the Environment in the Teaching Goals and Practices of Engineering InstructorsIntroductionConsidering societal, institutional, professional and accreditation-related expectations andrequirements, and the interest from students in applying their technical skills to social andenvironmental issues, engineering undergraduate programs are expected to encourage students toconsider the impact of engineering’s work on society and the environment, explore therelationships between technology and society, and encourage students and graduates to engage incitizenship and action – defining characteristics of STSE
students in different fieldswill have different levels of wellbeing as well as perceptions of stress, competition, andachievement. This relationship is hypothesized because they would be socialized in differentcharacteristics that are deemed particular to their fields. In this exploration, we first use largegroups to identify any specific differentiation of engineering compared against the other twolarge categories considered. However, future work will involve the exploration of differencesbetween engineering and specific majors individually.MethodsDataWe used data from the Healthy Minds Study (HMS), a web-based survey administered throughthe Healthy Minds Network for Research on Adolescent and Young Adult Mental Health(HMN). The initiative was
engineeringstudents with a mentoring faculty member and, occasionally, a graduate student who is an expertin the area of “innovative design”. The collaborative team works to solve a real-world problemthrough the application of various design techniques. In addition, the collaboration can improveor even identify enhanced design techniques and processes. For example, past research effortsimproved the design method in two areas: 1) the understanding of how to develop and implementprototyping strategies which are effective and efficient [11] - [15] and 2) new methods toenhance ideation based on analogies to biological systems [16]. The sponsor organizationresearch partners take keen interest in the design methodology research; oftentimes adoptingthese techniques
, Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education.20. Grandy, J. (1994). Gender and ethnic differences among science and engineering majors: Experiences, achievements, and expectations. (RR-94-30). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.21. Morozov, A., Kilgore, D., Yasuhara, K., & Atman, C. (2008). Same courses, different outcomes? Variations in confidence, experience, and preparation in engineering design. Paper presented at the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA. https://peer.asee.org/348622. Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447-457. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1804_423. Center
NACME’s50 partner universities. We limited ourselves to a purposive sample from among the 28 thatwere “block grant” institutions, which receive substantial scholarship funding from NACME andare held accountable to specific goals in terms of retention of both NACME scholars andunderrepresented minorities. Institutions are expected to implement programming that has beenshown to improve the likelihood that students, especially minority students, are successfullyretained to graduation including but not limited to: mentoring, supplemental instruction, bridgeprogramming, tutoring, support groups, etc 21.Selection of institutions was purposeful. In order to examine the issues for MEP and WIE within
to make meaning of theselived experiences using the interview as a collaborative mechanism49,54. Roulston55(p76)describes using interviews to aid in “research for understanding” with the research questionsdriving the approach. Since we are seeking to interpret, and make meaning of, HSB from theperspective of the student in the context of an undergraduate engineering environment, this studywill be an interpretive, qualitative, interview study49,52,55,56.Semi-structured interviews allow for flexibility in question order and direction based on datafrom the participants’ responses while providing a conversational, comfortable atmosphere57–60.A preconceived question list including a suggested order of questions provides scaffolding;however, in a
Page 24.1291.2include social justice; a consideration of the distribution of advantages and disadvantages insociety.4-6. The extent to which engineering students view the profession of engineering througha lens of SR with consideration of social justice is unclear.The Association of American Colleges & Universities (AAC&U)7 includes SR among theiressential learning outcomes for all college students, noting as sub-elements within this learningoutcome ethical reasoning and action, as well as civic knowledge and engagement. They alsostate: “in a democratic society, the goal must be to extend opportunity and excellence toeveryone, and not just to a fortunate minority.” 8 Toward meeting these aims, the AAC&Usupported the initiative Core
Paper ID #33752The PEERSIST Project: Promoting Engineering Persistence Through Peer-ledStudy GroupsMs. Thien Ngoc Y Ta, Arizona State University Thien Ta is a doctoral student of Engineering Education Systems and Design at Arizona State University. She obtained her B.S., and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering. She has taught for Cao Thang technical college for seven years in Vietnam. She is currently a graduate research associate for the Entrepreneurial Mindset initiative at the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her doctoral research focuses on Entrepreneurship Education and Innovation in
engineering techniques. His recent research focuses on the effect of high-impact practices on engineering and computer science undergraduate student outcomes around academic success and persistence.Dr. Candis S. Claiborn, Washington State University Professor Emeritus Candis Claiborn has been at Washington State University since 1991. In 2016, she returned to faculty after serving for 10 years as Dean of the Voiland College of Engineering and Archi- tecture at WSU. Prior to that, she served as interim dean and as associate dean for research and graduate programs. Dr. Claiborn received her PhD in chemical engineering from North Carolina State University in 1991. Her research interests are in engineering education
different major.IntroductionThere is strong evidence of student flexibility and vacillation around career options post-graduation from college. Specifically, a single interaction or experience (such as a co-op) cansometimes mean the difference between taking a job after graduation in engineering or anotherfield.1 Further, research suggests that cooperative education and internships result in increasedsocial and cultural capital of those who participate, which can contribute to their ability to secureemployment after graduation.2 Student perceptions of the engineering field, which can be shapedby undergraduate work experiences, can also impact persistence in engineering programs.3-7While there is a growing literature examining the relationship
, Levine and Hewer34, 1983). A study by Jones and Watt31(2001) looked at 182 male and female undergraduate students, and while they found that both Page 12.295.15sexes used both moral perspectives (the justice perspective and the care perspective), womenwere found to possess a significantly higher ethic of care. Recent research has producedconsistent gender differences in moral reasoning. For example, when asked to give a personalmoral dilemma, women more often discuss family issues and interpersonal relationships thando males, and women used more care-based reasoning than did males (Golombok andFivush23, 1994).Some consider the idea that females are
., The Citadel Robert Rabb is an associate professor and the Mechanical Engineering Program Director at The Citadel. He previously taught mechanical engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student Veteran Leadership Skills in an Engineering Technical Writing CourseTechnical proficiency is a
to meet the demands of growing enrollment. This was viewed as anundesirable situation for a major research university; therefore, it was deemed necessary toreduce the large number of graduate assistants and non-tenured instructors. Of course, thisrequired major restructuring of the English Department, which phased out the technical writingcourses being offered. Since engineering relied upon these courses for all of its disciplines, thisforced a re-thinking of how students would receive this type of skill.The loss of technical writing was not met with a sense of loss of historic proportions becausethere had been many engineering faculty members who had already questioned the value of thisresource. Among the issues raised were:• Return on
, webdevelopment and network skills are the most rapidly growing sets of IT skills. Gallivan et al.(2004) also reported that soft skills were important factors with communication skills the mostoften reported, followed closely by leadership and interpersonal skills.Similar information comes from a recent research report. In 2009 a research report on The ILL-Prepared U.S. Workforce (Exploring the Challenges of Employer-Provided WorkplaceReadiness Training) was released by a consortium of organizations, including SHRM (Societyfor Human Resource Management), ASTD (American Society for Training & Development),The Conference Board, and Corporate Voices for Working Families.9 The report was directed atexploring the need for workforce readiness training in
. To support students and faculty, the NRTleadership team encouraged NRT trainees to publish a conference paper. Another challengingaspect of organizing an interdisciplinary Capstone course was forming the teams so that researchtopics aligned with all students’ academic backgrounds. The NRT leadership team explored howto make interdisciplinary research more central to graduate work and discovered that it variesamong departments and disciplines at our university. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceIn addition, we learned through the formative evaluation feedback that it is useful to use a visual-ization tool, such as Loopy, to teach
development [18-20].Research on student engagement has been rooted in a well-established field of inquiry on howpostsecondary students’ experiences affect their learning and development [21-24]. The generalconclusion of this body of literature is correlational, that is, the greater the students’ engagementin curricular and co-curricular activities on campus, the greater their level of cognitive andpsychosocial development. For this reason, student engagement has been well recognized as apredictor of student learning and an important factor of student success [5, 25, 26]. The positivecorrelation between student engagement and learning outcomes has been reported extensively inhigher education literature. For example, a study that used multi
instruments. A number of observations from this data led to refinementsin our project protocols. Some of these refinements have been reported in an ITiCSE panel [53]and research paper [54], as well as in a SIGCSE special session [55] and poster [56].One significant observation from the pilot study was that students rated every disposition as maxi-mally important for their career and course, except for adaptable and collaborative. This is likelybecause questions on dispositions elicited idealized responses from students. To avoid such re-sponses, the rating questions on the pre- and post-survey were changed to refer to behaviors insteadof dispositions. Students rated their application of dispositions in course assignments statisticallysignificantly
and relate to new concepts, improving learning outcomes. Wang and Wang [9] formalized the use of Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA) maps – a type of conceptual model developed for operations research – as a tool for teaching systems thinking in a classroom setting. The SODA map allowed students to practice collaborative and higher level problem-solving by deriving and visualizing different strategies for a case study. Eppler [12] discussed applications of concept maps in the classroom and the benefits of complementary visualization by combining different mapping methods to enable a “richer learning experience for students.” Tranquillo et al. [15] explored various one-page canvas frameworks as tools to help students model and
electronics often begins withmath, memorization, and lecture are not really engaging students, and there is a significant gap inteaching power electronics controls and thermal aspects in undergraduate courses. Practicum andlaboratory experience is instrumental in student professional development, and often the powerelectronics courses have no laboratory. These are main reasons for us to strongly advocate for theintegration of the laboratory in our power and energy minor. Continuity in hardware andsoftware is quite often infrequently preserved between undergraduate, graduate, and research,contradicting the outcome k of the ABET. Power electronics control topics, their goodunderstanding and knowledge must be included into the course content in the
structures of macromolecular assemblies including proteins, polymers, and lipid membranes. Undergrad- uates, graduate students, and postdoctoral scholars are trained in a multidisciplinary environment, utilizing modern methodologies to address important problems at the interface between chemistry, physics, engi- neering, and biology preparing the trainees for careers in academe, national laboratories, and industry. In addition to research, she devotes significant time developing and implementing effective pedagogical approaches in her teaching of undergraduate courses to train engineers who are critical thinkers, problem solvers, and able to understand the societal contexts in which they are working to addressing the grand
sandwich (cooperative) principle of integrated periods of study and trainingin industry. The most popular was six months in industry followed by six months in collegein each of four successive years [4].A requirement of the NCTA was that all students for their diplomas should have participatedin programs of liberal study. This was reinforced in 1957 by a government edict that extendedthe idea of compulsory liberal studies to all levels of technical education even though muchof it was part time study [5]. By 1962 it was seen that the development of literacy, that is theability to read and write, was essential for the general education of all students. Thus, it wasthat in those colleges the term Liberal Studies came to be substituted by General
disagree.Literature ReviewEstablishing the link between EI and teamwork is crucial for several reasons. Teamwork skill isstressed by ABET but unevenly distributed among engineering graduates according to employersurveys (Marra et al. 2016). When students with varying skill levels work together in teams, theirinteractions and perceptions of themselves and others can influence their EI formation.Underrepresented minority (URM) students may be particularly affected. Studies have shownthat female students who asked questions during teamwork were perceived as less competent inSTEM (Hoehn et al. 2020), and racial minority students suffered from low self-esteem for fear ofbeing viewed as diversity “tokens” (Ong et al. 2020). Weatherton et al. (2017) found
innovation laboratories,industry-university research centers, and joint R&D centers. This research tries to provide adetailed analysis of their organizational structures, the nature of their outreach activities,operational strategies, and the driving motivational factors behind their engagement.Literature ReviewUniversity Industrial Outreach can be considered an important form or specific practice ofUniversity-Industry Collaboration or Cooperation (UIC henceforth) (Hellström et al., 2013).This section first examines the relevant literature on UIC and explores its potentialtransformation under the new paradigm of Open Innovation. This study aims to identify thecharacteristics of University Industrial Outreach within the context of new
internationalization. This is vital to maintain “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”leadership of the United States in this interdependent global economy. The goal is to develop andpromote peaceful and fruitful cooperation and collaboration within and across boarders1. Today’sengineers and technologists are expected to be an integral part of a much boarder society. Alsounderstanding of teamwork in terms of inter-human relations when executing projects isnecessary. Only 4% of all engineering and technology students participated in a study abroadexperience during 2000-2001 as a part of internationalization of
graduate students still struggle tofind the most effective models for ensuring that their students internalize professional values andmake them part of their scientific and technical practices4,5,6. This paper will report on the firststage of a three year NSF-funded research project to develop and assess four differentinstructional models that introduce and educate science and engineering graduate students to themicroethical and macroethical issues in their work.Graduate education in science and engineering ethics has typically focused on responsibleconduct in research (RCR) issues and has had a microethical focus (although collectiveresponsibilities are sometimes explored). Topics such as public policy on stem cell research orthe societal
interviews with physics faculty, some of whom had beliefs thatwere aligned with theories emerging from physics education research, but had not adoptedresearch-supported pedagogies, found several structural barriers to adoption of research-supported pedagogies. These included anticipated resistance from students, the one-size-fits-allschedule of courses that meet three fixed-length times a week for a semester, amount of materialthat is expected to be covered in a single course, department norms that support traditionalapproaches, and lack of time (see above). Student resistance to pedagogies that expect moreactive participation in class has been reported elsewhere47,48. Cooper et al.48 offer the followingstrategies to address anticipated student
providing students with discussion questions prior tothe class session. Students discussed the highlights of a research paper in their team beforepresenting a brief summary, questions, and additional thoughts for the class to discuss. The topicscovered in these discussions spanned a wide range of topics including: (1) the impact ofadvanced technology and AI on work (AI, Robotic Process Automation, Chatbots) [7], [8], [9];(2) organizational design and its impacts on how people will work (Crowd Work, Care Work,Telework, Smart Working, Remote Work, Four Day Workweek) [10], [11], [12]; (3)demographics of workers, (4) communication and coordination (Human-machine interaction andhuman-human interaction), (5) collaboration and social interactions
students’ behavior and…to draw reasonable inferences about what studentsknow” (p. 833)2. This information consequently informs instructors and other stakeholders ininstructional processes.A key element of these analyses are the underlying patterns or groupings in the data whichresearchers hope are informative. Using methods such as analysis of variance (ANOVA), t tests,or tests of invariance, these groupings are explicated by the researcher and are known a priori.However, cluster analysis, a method for identifying those groupings which are close togethersolely from the data provided, may prove useful in augmenting instructor and stakeholderunderstanding of student characteristics. “Cluster analysis is the organization of a collection ofpatterns
manipulation and hands-on examination, such as labpractice and experimentation, so far, have been difficult to replicate in the online learningenvironment (OLE) [15]-[17]. Additionally, a new generation of ‘digitally native’ students maydemand more interactivity and involvement [18]-[22] than what online education has providedthus far.To foster greater student engagement while also accounting for individual learner differences andaddressing some of the challenges of the distributed learning environment, a variety ofapproaches have been suggested, ranging from collaborative environments [9],[23],[24] overproblem-, project-, situation-, or inquiry-based learning [25]-[27] to gamifications [6],[28]-[32]1The term self-engagement was introduced by [42] to