dichotomy of some kind betweensocial and technical thinking: “Yeah, I think I've definitely heard some people mention it, or it'sbeen explained to me in some way, but never with the term ‘engineering’ at the end of it”(00:11:06).Throughout the focus group, much of the discussion from Dorothy related social and technicalthinking to engineering design. Dorothy pointed out the importance of social impacts onengineering design and of designing products with everyone in mind. The idea that Dorothyrelates social considerations to engineering design and creativity shows that Dorothy possesses abasic sense of sociotechnical integration, a level of understanding likely also held by other first-year engineering students. One research team member noted during
questions as a whole class before going into the design process. I observed that the students were more concerned about building and launching the catapults rather than thinking about the process that allows them to build and be successful. – 4th grade Much of the rushed discussion involved teaching about the engineering design process..Many expressed a desire to “be more mindful of the process” and “putting more emphasis onwhat stage we were in.” One wished they had created a “powerpoint or some anchor chart todisplay each step” and expressed concern that the second grade students
Paper ID #34826Introducing Multidisciplinary Engineering in a Diverse InterdisciplinaryVirtual Summer Camp for Underrepresented 9th - 12th Graders in RuralLouisiana (Evaluation, Diversity)Dr. Deborah Athas Dardis, Southeastern Louisiana UniversityDr. Ahmad Fayed, Southeastern Louisiana University Ahmad Fayed is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Technology, a former member of the Experiential Learning team, and the Teaching Excellence Team at Southeastern Louisiana University. Ahmad holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV) and taught several engineering classes at multiple
and teaching methods weremade to faculty following accepted best practices with this aggregated data in mind. This surveycaptured both faculty and student responses, although faculty responses were not used at the be-ginning of the pandemic as most efforts were placed on helping students. A total of 113 facultyresponded to this survey, and those responses are discussed here.The Engineering Education Faculty Group (EEFG) began meeting weekly during the pandemicto support each other. During these meetings, the members of the EEFG would share variousmethods that they were using in their own online classes and the struggles or successes that theywere experiencing. Online education specialists would often attend and contribute to discussionsduring
Paper ID #32966Sudden Shift to Online Learning: COVID-19’s Impact on EngineeringStudent ExperiencesMs. Nathalia De Souza, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Nathalia De Souza is a second-year Aerospace Engineering student (B.S.) at California Polytechnic Uni- versity, San Luis Obispo. She obtained her A.A. in Math and Science at West Hills College, Lemoore in 2019. Nathalia currently works as a research assistant for the Cal Poly Mechanical Engineering De- partment and is also pursuing a minor in Ethnic Studies. Her engineering education interests include researching the gap in performance and between
Paper ID #33237Introducing Simple Harmonic Motion – A Teaching Module in a First-YearEngineering CourseDr. Christopher Horne, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Since 2011, Dr. Horne has been a Lecturer at NC AandT State University and East Carolina University. He currently teaches freshman a course in problem solving using MATLAB. He combines twenty years’ experience in management and engineering with a passion to help students learn STEM-related material. He is a licensed professional engineer and holds masters and Ph.D. from North Carolina State University and North Carolina AandT State
most growth in this dimension (termedcollaboration in Table 2) of engineering practice. This is especially encouraging since learninghow to collaborate to achieve desired outcomes is one of the objectives of SEED Lab. It alsodoes not come as a surprise since the complexity of the project demands cohesive collaborationbetween members who are “experts” in a sub-discipline. Evidently, students realized how criticalteamwork is and therefore, it is something at the forefront of their minds as a pathway to success.For the team to succeed, more is required beyond the completion of individual pieces. When theteammates come together to integrate their subsystems, it gives them a means of practicing andlearning collaboration. The phase of integration
Paper ID #33932Modeling Trajectories of Latent Classes to Understand the AcademicPerformance of Engineering StudentsHeather Lee Perkins, North Carolina State University Heather graduated from the Applied Social and Community Psychology program in the spring of 2021, after completing her Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the University of Cincinnati. She has par- ticipated in various research projects examining the interaction between stereotypes and science interest and confidence, their influence upon womens’ performance in school and the workplace, and their pres- ence in the media and consequences for viewers. Her
Paper ID #33249Traditional Lecture Format vs. Active Teaching Format in an OnlineFreshman Engineering CourseDr. Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas at Austin Dr. Nina Telang is an associate professor of instruction in the ECE department at UT Austin. She has taught a variety of courses in the ECE department at the freshman, sophomore and junior undergraduate levels that include 4 required (core) courses, and 2 elective (tech-area) courses. Her repertoire of courses is from a range of areas such as circuit theory, digital logic design, solid state devices, computing sys- tems, and embedded systems. Her teaching style
ExpectationsAbstractThis work-in-progress paper presents an ongoing evidence-based practice implementingintegrative professional communication activities derived from an investigation of professionalcommunication expectations of industry co-curricular partners. Contemporary pedagogicalapproaches, such as problem-based learning and entrepreneurially minded learning, have as acentral focus the desire to expose students to authentic experiences which integrate technicalknowledge with workplace skills connected to professionalism, communication, collaboration,and leadership. This approach can conflict with traditional engineering curricula where theinstruction of technical skills are frequently separated or deemed more important than “softskills” instruction in
complete over a dozen projects on four continents. Shall’s work in this arena has been disseminated widely, including presentations at Third and Fifth International Symposia On Service Learning In Higher Education, lectures at Brown University, the University of Maryland, and the New School for Design, publications by the AIA Press and the University of Indi- anapolis Press and exhibitions at the San Francisco Museum of Art in La Paz, Bolivia, the Sheldon Swope Museum of Art, the Goldstein Museum of Design, the Venice Architecture Biennale and MoMA. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Engineering Change: Addressing Need through Collaborative
, no. 18, pp. 2762–2794, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1262567.[23] J. Aurigemma, S. Chandrasekharan, N. J. Nersessian, and W. Newstetter, “Turning Experiments into Objects: The Cognitive Processes Involved in the Design of a Lab-on-a- Chip Device,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 117–140, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20003.[24] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, 1978.[25] J. Piaget, The Psychology Of The Child. Basic Books, 1969.[26] P. Dourish, Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, 2004.[27] W. J. Clancey, Situated Cognition: On Human Knowledge and Computer Representations
. A. Leydens, K. Johnson, S. Claussen, J. Blacklock, B. Moskal, and O. Cordova, "Measuring change over time in sociotechnical thinking: A survey/validation model for sociotechnical habits of mind," in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2018.[5] A. L. Pawley, "Universalized narratives: Patterns in how faculty members define “engineering”," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 309-319, 2009.[6] J. A. Leydens and J. C. Lucena, Engineering justice: Transforming engineering education and practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2017.[7] B. K. Jesiek, N. T. Buswell, A. Mazzurco, and T. Zephirin, "Toward a typology of the sociotechnical in engineering
in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. In this role, she conducts qualitative research to expand and deepen existing literature related to the experiences of civil engineering students who identify as having a disability.Dr. Cassandra J McCall, Virginia Tech Cassandra McCall, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech and M.S. and B.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. The core of Dr. McCall’s work is to broaden participation in engineering by exploring the intersections of identity, engineering, and culture as students become
Paper ID #32171Gen Z’s Declining Engagement with WE@RIT, a Women in Engineering Pro-gramMs. Kathrine Ehrlich-Scheffer, RIT Kathy has served as Director of Women in Engineering at RIT (WE@RIT) since 2015, and brings a rich array of life experiences to the position. After graduating with a bachelor’s degree in Public Affairs from a women’s college where she learned first-hand the value of a female-centric support network, Kathy made her way to Silicon Valley. There she studied CMOS Mask Layout Design which eventually led her to a position in IT for a semiconductor IP start-up. Fast forward through coast-to-coast moves to
Paper ID #33148Work in Progress: Qualitative Differences in Learning Processes andSkill Development Across Engineering Capstone TeamsCaroline Clay, Arizona State University Caroline Clay is a graduate student pursuing her PhD in Engineering Education Systems and Design at Arizona State University. As an undergraduate at James Madison University, she studied how engineering students learn in informal learning environments and makerspaces, with an emphasis on how students learn in structured and unstructured settings. After participating in the University Innovation Fellows pro- gram Caroline also completed an honors
deployed to the students enrolled in eachparticipating course.The survey design and implementation has been mindful of both student and faculty time.Students first select aspects of the course they feel need improvement and are only asked detailedsurvey questions about those areas. Then students respond to multiple select questions to identifywhat is going particularly well in the course, both in class and on assignments. A third block ofquestions, suggested and vetted by Cornell’s Diversity Programs in Engineering Office, asksstudents about feeling included in the course. Using drill-down and multiple select optionsorganizes student's responses, making it more efficient to identify themes in the data. When thestudents' responses have been
Paper ID #34327Integrating History and Engineering in the First-Year Core Curriculum atBoston CollegeDr. Jonathan Seth Krones, Boston College Dr. Krones is an Assistant Professor of the Practice in Boston College’s new Department of Human- Centered Engineering (HCE). Before starting this position in 2021, he was a Visiting Assistant Professor of Environmental Science and Environmental Studies at BC, where he introduced engineering-style ped- agogy into the first-year Core Curriculum and helped to establish HCE. In addition to engineering educa- tion, his research focuses on industrial ecology and environmentally
participation in higher education, and the educational attainment and schooling experiences of Mexican descent youth in the mid-20th century.Dr. Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Valerie Martin Conley is dean of the College of Education and professor of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She previously served as director of the Center for Higher Education, professor, and department chair at Ohio University. She was the PI for the NSF funded research project: Academic Career Success in Science and Engineering-Related Fields for Female Faculty at Public Two-Year Institutions. She is co-author of The Faculty Factor: Reassessing the American
EESI in all courses they teach, such as Palden whoincorporates ethics in her environmental courses, but not necessarily in her engineering courses.Ron was an engineering teacher who strongly integrated environmental/societal impacts. I would definitely say [environmental and societal impacts] is on the forefront of my mind, and in the past when I have developed projects for students that has been a key motivator. We had one group that tried to make a solar powered car, so I think the societal/ environmental impacts have always been a driving but underlying force in pretty much all of the big projects that I’ve done. It’s hard to find hope these days in the world at large, but I definitely have hope in
Paper ID #33519Motives, Conflicts and Mediation in Home Engineering Design Challengesas Family Pedagogical Practices (Fundamental)Dr. Jungsun Kim, Indiana University Bloomington Jungsun Kim, Ph.D. is a research scientist at Indiana University in Bloomington. Her research focuses on how students can consistently develop their talents throughout their educational experiences and in what ways parents, school, and community support students from underrepresented groups support it.Dr. Soo Hyeon Kim, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Soo Hyeon Kim is an assistant professor of Library and Information Science at School
Paper ID #33112Uncovering Strategies to Improve Student Engagement and Enhance theEngineering Education CurriculumDr. Ekundayo Shittu, George Washington University Ekundayo (Dayo) Shittu is an Associate Professor of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at George Washington University. Professor Shittu conducts basic and applied research that take a systems approach to address the different dimensions of decision making under multiple and sequential uncertain- ties. His focus is on the economics and management of energy technologies, the design and impacts of climate change response policies, sustainability
mindful of how systemic discriminatory biases and inequalities play out in the local,individual behaviours. Those who hold social capital, may have the opportunity and a greaterresponsibility to share and increase the shared level of social capital [10].3.2 Exclusion and Inclusion in Peer LearningDuring university, two types of peer-mediated experiences of exclusion were highlighted:Isolation and microaggression.3.2.1 IsolationSome students experienced or observed difficulty in engaging with peers for collaborativelearning, feeling excluded or unwelcomed by smaller groups that formed in the cohort. Peerlearning has an important place in engineering education, and yet there can be small groups peersthat do not engage beyond their circle throughout
skills. Additionally, in the context of SD1, SD1 requires that students beginto think about how they are going to handle the different tasks within their project (i.e., includescreating a timeline of the project, dividing tasks among team members, etc.). With the projectmanagement components of these Engineering Design Courses, the students perceivedconfidence in using project management might be impacted.Overall, the results from the Mann-Whitney tests are supported based on the structure andcomponents of University Core, Engineering Pre-requisite, Engineering Core, and EngineeringDesign courses in mind. However, 5 of the ten skills tested did not yield a statistically significantrelationship with any of the courses. This result may indicate
Paper ID #356582020 BEST PIC V PAPER WINNER - Reimagining Engineering Education:DoesIndustry 4.0 Need Education 4.0 ?Dr. Shuvra Das, University of Detroit Mercy Dr. Shuvra Das started working at University of Detroit Mercy in January 1994 and is currently Pro- fessor of Mechanical Engineering. Over this time, he served in a variety of administrative roles such as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair, Associate Dean for Research and Outreach, and Director of International Programs in the college of Engineering and Science. He has an undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
were very awful. But I think that really is what a lot of people get out of college is the positive experience of meeting people who are like- minded and accepting, especially with regards to sexuality and orientation and those identities.”Jordan was heavily involved in on-campus student organizations, participating in variousdiversity-centered engineering student organizations such as Society of Women Engineers(SWE), Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE), and Women in Electrical andComputer Engineering (WECE). These student organizations are also designed to be inclusivespaces for certain marginalized populations, providing spaces for marginalized peoples to buildcommunity around their identities. For
Paper ID #35303A Study of Available Time for Engineering Undergraduates’ Involvement inCo-curricular ActivitiesDr. Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Andrew Olewnik is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. His research includes undergraduate engineering education with focus on engineering design process and methods, ill-structured problem solving, problem typology, and experiential and informal learning environments in the professional formation of engineers. He is interested in the development of tools, methods, and strategies
Paper ID #32547The Role of Study Abroad Curricular Interventions in EngineeringStudents’ Intercultural Competence DevelopmentDr. Sigrid Berka, University of Rhode Island Sigrid Berka is the Executive Director of the International Engineering Program (IEP) at the University of Rhode Island, Professor of German and also the Director of the German and Chinese IEP, responsi- ble for building academic programs with exchange partners abroad, corporate relations, and fundraising for the IEP. Sigrid is co-editor of the Journal of International Engineering Education (JIEE) and a cer- tified Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI
Paper ID #34238Adding a ”Design Thread” to Electrical and Computer Engineering DegreePrograms: Motivation, Implementation, and EvaluationDr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University, followed by 14 years as a faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering educa- tion. While at Oklahoma State, he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in
Paper ID #33450Cohort-Based Supplemental Instruction Sessions as a Holistic RetentionApproach in a First-Year Engineering CourseMiss Nisha Abraham, University of Texas at Austin Nisha coordinates the Supplemental Instruction program. She received her B.S. in cell and molecular biology from The University of Texas at Austin in 2007, her M.S. in biology from Texas A&M University in 2012 and her M.A. in STEM Education from The University of Texas at Austin in 2019. Additionally, she has over five years of combined industry and science research experience, has worked as a senior bioscience associate at UT’s Austin Technology