: internet, videos, class exercises, discussions, and case studies • Informal classroom learning environments where diversity is accepted Most of the students at RMU are regional, commuter students who work whileattending school, which means that the flexibility for organizing activities outside of thescheduled class times is quite limited. In addition, students often say, “Our friends in artsand management have fun and still get A grades, why do we have to work so hard to getgood grades in engineering?” In other words, some students feel that the faculty sets thebar too high in engineering, and therefore the grade does not always reflect the hard workthey put into the learning process. Further, the lecture rooms are typically equipped
its inception the Engineering Technology Division has conducted a seminar for freshmanstudents. Topics offered have evolved over time reflecting trends in industry and education. Inrecent years the Academic Support Center staff has become involved with the ET seminar andpresented several of the topics directly related to their area of expertise. These efforts werecoordinated by an ET faculty member responsible for the freshman seminar and served as the“Commission.”While both the ET faculty and Academic Support Center possess different abilities and aptitudes,they share the same student centered commitment and the common goal of preparing students foruniversity level classes. Transitioning the traditional ET freshman seminar into the
Aeronautics at the UnitedStates Air Force Academy for his assistance in explaining various aspects of the Thermal FluidsToolbox during the author’s work. Many faculty at the Academy graciously agreed to review andcomment on an early draft of this manuscript and on preliminary versions of the variousspreadsheets. As always, feedback from cadets in the thermal fluids systems engineering coursesat the Academy was essential in the grooming of the various worksheets.DisclaimerThe views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position ofthe U.S. Air Force, Department of Defense or the U.S. Government.References1Caretto, L, McDaniel, D., and Mincer, T., Spreadsheet Calculations of Thermodynamic Properties, 2005 ASEEAnnual
instructors typically connected from either home or work (Figure 5) using ahigh bandwidth connection (Figure 6). Figures 7 and 8 illustrate that participants felt that theywould use Centra again and that it met their expectations. Page 11.1029.8 Figure 5. Location From Which Students Connected. Figure 6. Bandwidth of Student’s Connection. Page 11.1029.9Figure 7. “I Would Be Interested in Using Centra Again”. Figure 8. “Centra Met My Expectations”.Reflections and ConclusionsAlthough the first cohort has not finished the fifth course, preliminary data give some indicationof the effectiveness of the program. Comments here
sponsors anopportunity to participate easily with helping students manage schedule and timing ofdeliverables, and serves as a platform for discussing student performance and work habitsover time.Evaluation of student Basecamp performance is done in a variety of ways. Averagefrequency of student entries vs. promptings by the class professor is plotted, and othermeasures of interaction frequency are explored. Additionally, students are interviewed atthe end of the semester for their views and reflections on the utility and ease of use of thesoftware.IntroductionIn order to fulfill ABET certification requirements, a Senior Capstone Design class mustbe taught that integrates students’ experiences gained over an entire course of study in themechanical
asoften as once a year and/or whenever new members have been recruited. Page 11.327.6Commitment to Inclusivity and DiversityA university organization such as an advisory board should respect all people’s race, religion,ethnicity, gender, age, social status, sexual orientation and ability. The board should: • Reflect the diversity of your organization and the broader community. • Conduct its business in facilities that are accessible to persons of all ability levels. • Act in a way that furthers opportunities among individuals and the community. • Act in ways that are consistent with the mission of the program and university.12At the
of the report. Forexample, human error was frequently cited as a source of error in experimental procedure – withthe implication that this is acceptable, legitimate, or unavoidable. In the laboratory, studentsfailed to use techniques to reduce experimental error when necessary. Data were often notreported correctly to reflect uncertainty in measurement, and simple statistical techniques wererarely used to analyze error.A variety of methods for the introduction of error analysis to lower level engineering studentshave been described by other educators. Sterrett and Helgeson2 used parametric computersimulations to introduce error analysis to sophomores in a design course. Reardon3 introduceslinear regression and propagation of error analysis
formal recognition of HE asa tradable good in the 1997 Dearing report6 advising the UK government on the future direction ofHE. This idea is also reflected by official acknowledgement of what Malaysia requires overseassuppliers of education and training to offer: • international recognition of quality at all levels • quality assurance systems that demonstrate the appropriateness of study to purpose • an international reputation in key subject areas • a wide range of specialists, types of service, training options and modes of delivery • appropriate training for employment • practical examples of educational reform and functioning systems • substantial experience of producing goods and services for overseas
bemost significant, represented as columns that reflect the number of students that sharedthat particular response. Here are the statements the students were asked to respond to: 1. Compared to a standard approach, this project demonstrated better that thermodynamics affects contemporary issues. (Average = 4) 2. This projected demonstrated how economic, environmental, and societal concerns must be included in the design process. (Average = 4.4) 3. This project helped me communicate more effectively. (Average = 3.4) 4. This project took too much time. (Average = 2.5) 5. I enjoyed this project more than a standard lecture/homework/quiz approach. (Average = 3.7) 6. I learned a lot of new
the Bridge) reflect his determination to define and demonstrate structural art.His most recent issue, the Innnovators, moves beyond specific civil works to focus on theevolution of American technology, organized to emphasize both key technologicaldevelopments and the individuals who played central roles in their development. Thus,through a history of technology approach which includes a strong biographical character,Billington provides opportunity for a multidsciplinary representation of technology, asseen from his chapter sequences summarized in Table 4Table 4 Engineer-Technology associations in The Innovators8______________________________________________________Engineer TechnologyNewcomen (steam engine)Watt
reasons like sick. It is reflected because some studentscan take undue advantages by submitting their assignments later.Q10. She/he accepts lower standard for class performanceAn examination of the survey data revealed that 77% of respondents were certainly against theidea of a faculty accepting lower standards for the class performance. About 7% respondents,however, would evaluate a faculty positively if faculty accepted a lower standard for the classperformance.Q11. She/he provides ample office hoursProviding of a generous quantity of office hours ranks very high at Southern Polytechnic StateUniversity, and perhaps in other higher institutions in the USA. About 76% respondentsindicated their desires for out-of-class discussions and guidance in
should be able to take advantage of adding the previous section’s skills to theirpersonal toolbox. But because not all people have the same personal aptitudes, and talents, theresults can differ significantly. The following section deals with skills which, if a person has Page 11.1363.5them (or can learn them), will enhance the results of using design thinking.The characteristics of a design thinker are: 1. High Tolerance for Ambiguity 2. Curiosity 3. Visual ThinkerSome may be tempted to place these skills in the section on design thinking. However, they areseparated out here because they reflect more attributes of the
has a stakein developing your skills. When you look good – the team looks good. As RedGold continues to prosper, more broad-based business managers will emerge tolead us.Diverse OpportunitiesRed Gold can deliver a variety of experiences needed to expand your skill baseand prepare you for future leadership roles in our customer-driven organization.Quality of LifeAt Red Gold, we recognize that success is measured by more than financialrewards. True success must include a quality of life that reflects our respect foryou and your family.Where We Are HeadedMaintaining and expanding our leadership status demands an energetic,innovative team approach to all dimensions of our business. Astute professionalsworking together continually explore new
organization has trained 300 persons in computer repair todate.The student volunteer at the computer recycling location took his son and neighborhood highschool students with him on Saturdays. They were exposed to diversity, learned to give of theirtime, developed their own talents and helped transport loads of computer parts. Hopefully, theirexperiences will help them to develop some lifelong habits of giving to the community. Thestudent made a strong emotional commitment to his project despite his reservations.In reflection, the information technologist admitted that his was an emotionally challengingexperience. He worked with disabled, unemployed, low-income, inner-city residents. Thesepersons were likely to be ethnically or racially diverse. Some
controlsystems 2.54 2.23 3.83 3.46Size Limitations on controlsignals of real systems 1.60 1.50 3.02 2.69Benefits of a state variablemodel 2.26 2.04 3.44 2.96AcknowledgmentsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant No.DUE-0310445. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Shannon Sexton, Director ofAssessment, who compiled the student
response, there was a “chipping away” of instruction in thoseareas that enrich the very essence of being, those referred to as general education subjects. Thisresulted in those prepared for practice in medicine and law being in a better position to positivelyinfluence society’s perception of their disciplines. Higher social regard for these professionsleads to higher compensation for doctors and lawyers.The erosion of the enrichment of basic intellectual skills is reflected in the humorous comment of50 years ago “… four years ago I couldn’t spell engineer, but today I are one.” This commenthas more truth than humor in that we have sacrificed an important aspect of our education at the“altar” of specialization.LicensureAs initially cited, licensure
in advancing computationtechnology. “The field is the product of the convergences of various disparate disciplinesand activities: library science, computer science (and its antecedent punched-cardtechnology), documentation of research and development, abstracting, indexing,communications science, behavioral science, micro- and macro-publishing, and video andoptical science, among others.”10 In the years since this has been written, this perspectiveof the inclusiveness of IS has perhaps become even broader.The origins of these programs reflect the discipline’s breadth. For example, a 1972 paperfrom Ohio State speaks of the Computer and Information Science department existent at
2005 ASEE Annual Conference (Session 3170), June 12-15, Portland, Oregon.13. Steven C. Zemke, Donald F. Elger, “Growing Undergraduate Student Mentoring Skills Using a Reflective Practice Guided by Peer Feedback”, presented at the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference (Session 1430), June 20- 23, 2004, Salt Lake City, Utah.14. R. Morsi, “Girls In Science, Engineering, and Technology (GISET)”, presented at the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference (Session 1793), June 12-15, Portland, Oregon. Page 11.265.10
to faculty. For others, the policy information isseen as a recruiting tool, making the guidebook useful only during searches. A couple chairsnoted that the policy synopsis for their campus did not reflect practice, making them aware of theneed to have the policy information updated online. The guidebook is seen by a few chairs as aresource only for policy makers, and they have given it to their dean, provost, or chancellor or totheir ADVANCE department or Women’s Committee. The guidebook has been useful tocampuses interested in benchmarking themselves by what family-friendly policies their peerinstitutions offer. Similarly, for campuses in the process of modifying existing or adopting newfamily-friendly policies, the guidebook has provided
MadagascarFigure 2. Nations where Michigan Tech Civil and Environmental Engineering Master’sInternational Peace Corps students have served.Figure 3. Timeline depicting program availability to students in Michigan Tech’s Civil Page 11.822.7and Environmental Engineering Department. Year 0 marks first day on campus as a first-year student.However, the strategy has been designed for maximum effect should a student beengaged in all four programs. Since retention of knowledge is a major goal of thestrategy, its structure should reflect that goal. Kolb identified a cyclic structure thatelevates retention among students6,7,8: Motivation 1 Theory 1
only the final design project submission is shown, the Sum of Correlation Points values may not reflect the sum of the shown Correlation with Requirements values squared. • Measure of Correlation was determined by dividing the Sum of Squares of Correlation Points value by the Sum of Correlations Required for Acceptable Correlation value. A value greater than one meant the result was a reliable assessment of the particular CE Program Outcome. A value less than one meant the result was perhaps not a reliable assessment of the outcome.The following definitions apply to Figure 2 which provides a compilation of grade and outcomeassessment results for CE492 during the spring semester of Academic Year 2004-20054
the kurtosis value. Kurtosis isdefined asK= ∑ (X − µ ) 4 (2) Ns 4where X is the individual data points, µ is the mean, N is the total number of samples, and s isthe standard deviation. A value of –1 is considered acceptable for quantitative work6.Other statistical measures considered and rejected include the uniformity gradient, Laplacian,lighting uniformity ratio and point spread function.Flat image analysisIn order to test the planar uniformity in these designs, a flat piece of white paper was placed onthe imaging surface, and a image was taken via a CCD camera. Typical white paper is a usefultest target due to the high uniformity of reflectance and color. These pictures are then loaded intoMatlab
, they are using these technologies to solve the infrastructure andenvironmental problems faced by today’s society, are adopting a system-integration view of thebuilt and natural environments, and are embracing the concept of sustainability.Vision for CEE Research Civil and environmental engineers work on complex, large-scale systems that improve thebuilt and natural environments. Typically, these systems are unique, insofar that they must takeinto account diverse considerations associated with technical developments and their implica-tions, prevailing local conditions, as well as available resources and talents. This is a monumen-tal task, and CEE’s innate breadth reflects the many areas of expertise required to accomplish it.Inevitably
information systems (GIS). Key topics include: participatorycommunity development; community assessment (self-assessment and GIS); public health;epidemiology; and tropical medicine. Team projects related to a real engineering project in adeveloping community are being retained as a large component of the course. A significantassessment component will be executed with the revised course.AcknowledgmentsThis material is partially based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 0431947. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1. ABET. 2004. Criteria for Accrediting
necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1 D.N. Buechler, C.M. Papadopoulos, T.R. Johnson, E.S. Key, “Development of a targeted engineering applicationcourse to improve retention,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, Portland, OR, June, 2005.2 University of Texas at Austin and GE Foundation, “Water Rockets: First Derivatives, Building and UsingClinometers,” 2004. Located at:www.engr.utexas.edu/aim/curriculum/files/AIM_Calc_2004/Rockets_T_BuildingClinometer.doc3 Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation Page 11.765.11
. Changes were not seen regarding student intent to study at a 4-year college vs. acommunity college, nor were there changes in the intent of students to study bioengineering atour university or any other. For the former, we naively presumed passive exposure to theuniversity environment would cause some changes in these areas. However, the mean of 9.53for this question in CY2 suggests that this was not an area that needed improvement. At anyrate, without actively addressing these issues via lectures or laboratory sessions, no significantchanges in these attitudes were recorded. Interestingly, the means for post-camp CY2 andCY3 were very similar overall, likely reflecting a consistent pool of students. For instance,the highest mean of 9.53 in CY2
lectures in ECE3183 helps me conduct experiments involtage and current measurement”, “the lectures in ECE3183 helps me conduct LabViewexperiments in resistance measurement”, “the lectures in ECE3183 helps me conduct straingauge analysis”, “the schedule coordination between ECE3183 and ME3701 is reasonable”.Possible open-ended questions are “any other help that I get from the coordination of ECE3183and ME3701”, “suggestions for improvement”.For a small number of ME students who have taken ME3701 before, they will only participate inthe exit interview as a group. The purpose of such an in-person interview is to collect the mostauthentic data that reflects the student perspective about the class. Because it is quite time-consuming, the subjects
Ergodicity Karhunen-Loeve expansion Power spectral density 4. Analysis and Processing of Response of linear systems to random signals Random Signals Optimum linear systemsMany graduate students do not like this course, because the content is difficult and the classesare boring. This has been reflected by historically low student evaluation. Students usuallyavoid taking this course, unless their academic advisors force them to take it.2.2 Improvement ApproachThe approach to improving the teaching and learning effectiveness of ECE8803 is to designapplication-oriented computer projects with four objectives: to help students
spatial visualization skills.An interactive multimedia software based on work by Sorby and Baartmans1 and a 3Dsketch-based solid modeling software (Pro/Engineer) were utilized in the class. Theinteractive media provided students with the opportunity to gain fundamentalunderstanding of orthographic projection, rotation about one or more axes, reflection andsymmetry. Pro/Engineer was utilized to create solid models and project them at differentangles, enabling students to realize various mental visualizations. Preliminary assessmentof the class indicated that combining the interactive media and the solid modelingsoftware was effective in the development of spatial skills in undergraduate engineeringand technology students. The assessment also
, and college courses for non-majors). The dissemination of work in this area isdominated by publication in refereed conference proceedings, most likely reflecting the fact thatthe effort of developing such work for journal publication is not likely to be recognized in thereward structure of most engineering colleges.VII. Bibliography1 International Technology Education Association (ITEA) (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content forthe study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.2 Prime, G. (1998). Tailoring assessment of technological literacy learning. Journal of Technology Studies. 24, (1),18-23.3 Noeth, R.J., Cruce, T. & Harmston, M.T. (2003). Maintaining a strong engineering workforce. ACT Policy Report