studentswishing to pursue careers in ecological engineering and may impede mainstreaming of EcoEeducation. Thus, there is a need to clarify a set of core competencies that EcoE programs andconcentration areas should incorporate to guide curriculum design.Current work to develop an ecological engineering body of knowledgeIn recognition of this need, the American Ecological Engineering Society (AEES) formed acommittee to define the EcoE Body of Knowledge (BOK). A BOK represents the full set ofconcepts, skills, knowledge, and abilities needed by professionals working in a particular domain.The process for developing the EcoE BOK presented herein was focused at the undergraduatelevel, though defining an expanded set of core competencies at the post
reflected on why understanding redlining andother social justice issues are important to their future careers as civil engineers. This paper describeswhat was done in both classes and reflections from both students and instructors.IntroductionService-learning and community-based learning are proven pedagogical approaches used across multipledisciplines and educational levels to bridge teaching and community engagement (Billig, 2000; Kuh,2008). Over the course of decades, research demonstrates the benefits of service-learning (SL) to studentlearning (Warren, 2012), satisfaction (Drinkard & Tontodonato, 2019), engagement, and retention(Bringle, Hatcher & Muthiah, 2010). This paper describes how information on redlining wasincorporated into a
9 Black 5 2 1 Hispanic/Latino 2 4 2Limitations and Future workTracking long-term enrollment outcomes post-participation is a future focus, necessitating longerstudies and collaboration with more institutions. Assessment of the program's impact on students'academic and career choices through follow-up surveys or interviews is vital, however, ensuringscalability and replicability across diverse educational settings requires refining the program'smaterials and implementation strategies. The team is planning to employ a more comprehensiveevaluation methods such as pre- and post-program assessments and
that contribute to the opportunity to attend STEM high schools across the United States." Education and Urban Society, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 716-737, 2014.[6] L. C. Landivar, "Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin." Education Review, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 911-922, 2013.[7] L. Andersen and T. J. Ward. "Expectancy‐value models for the STEM persistence plans of ninth‐ grade, high‐ability students: A comparison between Black, Hispanic, and White students." Science Education, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 216-242, 2014.[8] J. J. Gottlieb. "STEM career aspirations in Black, Hispanic, and White ninth‐grade students." Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1365-1392, 2018
, doi: 10.1111/j.1744- 6570.1988.tb00632.x[3] D. Jackson, J. Fleming, and A. Rowe, “Enabling the Transfer of Skills and Knowledge across Classroom and Work Contexts,” Vocations and Learning, vol. 12, pp. 459-478, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12186-019-09224-1[4] L.A. Perry, and J.S. London, “The Transfer of Learning Between School and Work: A New Stance in the Debate About Engineering Graduates’ Preparedness for Career Success abstract Paper,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37899[5] M. Taguma, E. Feron, and M.H. Lim, “A Literature Summary for Research on the Transfer of Learning,” in Future of Education and Skills 2030
/nanofabrication. His current research focus is on miniaturized environmental sensors and sample handling devices. He earned his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2002. He worked as Research Engineer at Korea Electronics Technology Institute (KETI) from 1993 to 1997. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2004 and was given the WCU (World Class University) Visiting Professorship under the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea in 2009. He is currently leading the NSF-supported HSI IUSE (Improving Undergraduate STEM Education) Project: Enhancing Student Success in Engineering Curriculum through Active e-Learning and High Impact Teaching Practices (ESSEnCe). In this project, a team of
and credibility. They should justify their part of their career path rankings, emphasizing the importance of credible information in decision-making195196 To nurture critical thinking skills throughout the course, we have designed class activities and197 assessments that not only assess comprehension but also encourage students to interrogate the198 rationale behind their learning. By prompting students to question, analyze, and evaluate concepts199 independently, these assignments serve as catalysts for the development of robust critical thinking200 skills. Our aim is to guide them in forming
summer and fall of 2023. Research participants were remindedabout confidentiality and the goal to leverage underrepresented students’ voices to reassure themand encourage candid responses. Two interviews were fully conducted in Spanish to supportstudents’ preferences. A 13-question protocol guided the interviews. Interview topics includedstudents’ background information; STEM knowledge and skills; STEM curricular experiences;knowledge and perceptions of career opportunities, campus support services, and campuspolicies; and perceived sense of belonging. Interviews were audio recorded, and notes/memoswere typed after each interview. Interviews lasted 31 to 112 minutes (average 57 minutes). The sample included 23 male students (56%) and 18
sent in Fall 2023 to students in their current second year andbeyond as an initial assessment of academic experience and factors included course content,workload, stress, engineering identity, graduate attributes, and more. This survey will berepeated in the summer of 2024 to determine continual improvement measures and to assess anyadditional modifications that may be needed within the curriculum redesign. An initial review ofthe survey feedback (n=74) showed that students who went through the new curriculum are morelikely to agree or strongly agree that the course content has been valuable and relevant to theirfuture careers. Table 1 shows a comparison between students who began their softwareengineering studies prior to Fall 2022, and those
meet-and-greet eventbetween students and BAE200 faculty member was a key activity that contributed to helpingstudents select a degree concentration and think about career opportunities.References[1] A. Baker et al., “Preparing the Acquisition Workforce: A Digital Engineering Competency Framework,” in 2020 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon), Montreal, QC, Canada: IEEE, Aug. 2020, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/SysCon47679.2020.9275661.[2] R. Mansbach et al., “Reforming an undergraduate materials science curriculum with computational modules,” Journal of Materials Education, vol. 38, no. 3–4, pp. 161–174, 2016.[3] D. Ahmed, M. Nayeemuddin, T. Ayadat, and A. Asiz, “Computing Competency for Civil Engineering Graduates: Recent
results and insights from the proposed educational game developed byintegrating a spreadsheet-based app and virtual reality (VR). This game is a great tool to getcollege and high school students excited about learning how to design a chemical product whilethinking about economic evaluation, environmental impact and sustainability. The game isdesigned to fit into courses about sustainability or chemical engineering, for both studentsspecializing in these areas and those who aren’t but have a keen interest in sustainability,especially the role hydrogen plays in promoting it. It's also suitable for high school programs,mini study groups and career day presentations. The game is free to use and helps studentspractice making important decisions in
of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez with a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering. She earned an NSF RIEF award recognizing her effort in transitioning from a meaningful ten-year teaching faculty career into engineering education research. Before her current role, she taught STEM courses at diverse institutions such as HSI, community college, and R1 public university.Justin Ortagus, University of Florida Justin C. Ortagus is an Associate Professor of Higher Education Administration & Policy and Director of the Institute of Higher Education. His research typically examines the impact of online education, community colleges, and state policies on the opportunities and outcomes of underserved college students. His recent
) Statics (Control) PLTL High Effort 2 81.12 PLTL Medium Effort 2 84.16 PLTL Low Effort 2 70.23Pre- and Post-SurveysOffering an incentive to complete the pre- and post-Surveys had the desired effect of increasingstudent completion of those instruments. 94 students completed the pre-survey and 68 studentscompleted the post-survey. In both surveys, students were asked demographic questions thatincluded military status. Students also answered questions regarding self-efficacy in generalengineering, engineering skills, tinkering, and design [8].In the post-survey, students were asked the following open-ended questions: • Has the interaction with peers helped support your academic and career
emphasis in Energy and Climate from Cal PolyHumboldt in 2023. As a graduate student in the Engineering and Community Practice Program I ampreparing for a career in service to our local tribal communities, in particular supporting their autonomyin the face of numerous climate change impacts.Natalie Mendez My name is Natalie, and I am a first-generation American whose family immigrated tothe United States from Sahuayo Michoacán. My hometown, Sahuayo (Nahuatl: Tzacuātlayotl), resides onP'urhépecha land, and its name translates to “turtle-shaped pot” in the Nahuatl language. I do not claimtribal affiliations, nor can I trace back my Indigenous roots, if any, to any particular people, but for aslong as my family has known, we have lived in this region
the success of any technology depends on theend users [16], we must investigate learning technologies that characterize foundationalengineering courses to ensure effective implementation in preparing engineering learners forfuture careers. Furthermore, there is a need to develop and make available validatedinstruments for measuring technology acceptance-related factors towards a standardizedunderstanding of the literature.Presently, we observed adoption and acceptance to be used interchangeably in most of thereviewed studies and propose that a clear distinction be made by researchers in theirpublications. This distinction enables instructors to identify literature relevant to theirclassroom or institutional phase, yielding positive impacts
aredisproportionately negative impacts for traditionally underrepresented students (i.e., Black,Hispanic, and Native American and/or Alaska Native individuals [4]) who often experienceadditional challenges that threaten their persistence and completion of their engineering degree.Representation issues within STEM and the associated challenges for students of color are oftenfurther exacerbated within predominantly white institutions (PWIs) [5], [6].Despite the fact that faculty are often more invested in scholarship than teaching [7], qualityinstruction is critical for the successful transfer of knowledge and achievement of studentlearning outcomes, degree completion, and a career in the profession. While engineeringeducation scholarship offers numerous
groups with faculty, and one focus group withgraduate teaching assistants. Faculty were divided into two focus groups: those teaching junior-level and those teaching senior-level core courses. Topics covered during the focus groupsincluded the awareness of Evidence-Based Instructional Practices (EBIPs) and their use in theclassroom [3], [4], how participants felt that the curriculum could be enhanced to better supportstudents, career discovery, and their perception of the current diversity and inclusion in thedepartment. As the focus of this WIP is on faculty perspective, we will present student focusgroup perspectives in future work.Results from the focus groups indicated that faculty felt that the department as a “whole is lessthan the sum of
Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. His research interests are engineering education, diversity, equity, inclusion, and retention of underrepresented minority groups. Luis will research how diverse human talents contribute to our profession’s social and global relevance.Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career
Department of Mechatronics Engineering in Shan- tou University in China. He obtained his Ph.D. in department of Mecahnical Engineering in National University of Singapore in 2004. His earlier academic career includes:2008˜2011, Associate Professor of Doshisha University and, 2006˜2008, Visiting Researcher of Toyota Central R&D Labs., Inc. in Japan, His majors are computaional and exeperimental fluid mechanics, particularly on lattice Boltizmann method and magnetic fluids. Page 19.16.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Evolution of a Chinese-Canadian
in a real situation or problem that needs tobe addressed and solved,…”.Mourtos8 offered the following link between the learning framework and Student Outcome 3(i)"a recognition of the need for (affective - organization), and an ability to engage in lifelonglearning (cognitive - analysis)". Thus, the potential lifelong learner must at some point in theiracademic career develop value for information that pertains his or her discipline and has a strongenough sense of self-efficacy to be intrinsically motivation to independently learn.Concomitantly, in exploring his or her discipline, the student will face new, ill-defined andchallenging tasks which require concerted, systematic and extended efforts in order to succeedand subsequently graduate
, agriculture, materials, career planning, and other topics. b) This is Engineering, taken in the second semester, will be a freshmen design style class, with hands-on problem-based learning, with sustainability embedded in all projects. c) A seminar on Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion will be developed for students to explore issues such as implicit bias and paternalism and reinforce the idea that co-design with communities will reduce discrimination and lead to better solutions. d) New courses, Wellbeing and Sustainability Economics will be developed to introduce students to essential ideas of natural capital, circular economies, and measures of well-being and prosperity. e) Other new courses include Products, Services, and
experiences andprepare students for the challenges of the 21st century in the engineering industry.This paper illustrates a few case studies on integrating these tools in the classroom. This paperalso explains the outcome of the student's perspective in using them. In addition, the paper alsocovers other programs using these tools that may encourage critical thinking, stimulate real-world scenarios, and solve problems more effectively. Overall, using these tools should providestudents with valuable skills and knowledge that will benefit them in their future careers and bein tune with the new technology that the industry offers.Introduction“AI” is a method of making a machine, a computer, a computer-controlled robot, or a softwarethink like the human
artificial intelligence andits impact on their career prospects. Students found to be more confident through position-of-stress surveys administered later in the academic term were found to be more positive about theirfuture in a world more influenced by artificial intelligence. The figures below show this result. Figure 1. Boxplots for the confidence levels. Figure 2. Three groups of confidence levels and their associated ECTD scores (Y axis) and confidence levels (X axis).In short, students who lack confidence see themselves as being impacted and possibly evencontrolled by artificial intelligence. Students who are more confident see themselves controllingartificial intelligence and are
future careers. Recognizing the significant value of practicalexperience, it is essential to incorporate such opportunities into the engineering curriculum[1].West Texas A&M University (WTAMU), located in the Texas Panhandle, distinguishes itself as aneducational institution. As a Primarily Undergraduate Institution (PUI) and a Hispanic ServingInstitution, WTAMU serves a diverse student population, including many first-generation collegestudents. The College of Engineering at WTAMU offers a variety of disciplines and is supported byadvanced research facilities like the Palo Duro Research Center. This research hub boasts cutting-edge equipment such as microfabrication and high-speed microscopic imaging tools, high-endmaterial characterization
technical standards,ensuring their readiness for lifelong learning. The synthesis of these demonstrated student outcomesequips engineers to exhibit critical thinking, creativity, and leadership in diverse team roles withinthe industry.The curriculum's depth extends to include content in essential areas for all engineers, such as ethics,devices, integrated circuits, and engineering economics. The objective is to offer a comprehensiveelectrical engineering education that serves as a foundation for graduates to specialize in their earlyprofessional careers and pursue advanced studies through graduate education.The College holds annual programmatic assessment meetings every Spring semester. These sessionsevaluate the assessment, enabling College
, and access to careers in STEM fields for students from historically underrepresented groups. Sharona is a founding organizer of ”The Grading Conference”, an annual two-day online confer- ence focused on reforming grading as we know it across STEM fields throughout higher education, now entering its fifth year. She coordinates a large general education Quantitative Reasoning with Statistics course for over 1,400 students per year as well as teaches a wide range of mathematics courses including Calculus and Linear Algebra.Mr. Robert Christopher Bosley, California State University, Los AngelesDr. Dina Verdin, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Dina Verd´ın, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Ira
time and experience of professionals in theengineering education system and the students. This optimization would open up opportunitiesfor students to learn and practice multidisciplinary projects as well as prove a student’s ability toadapt and apply their skills to any industry.Introduction While the engineering education system breaks down the discipline of engineering intosubdisciplines, such as electrical and mechanical engineering, it is not realistic to expect a projectgroup to be made up of monodisciplinary engineers. Real-world problems demand a range ofexpertise and perspectives to develop the optimal solution. In addition, experienced engineersdeviate from one another based on the direction of their career and the area of
by Isabel Briggs Myers, categorizes individuals into 16 unique personalitytypes identified by a four-letter code as indicated in Table 1. This code reflects preferences infour key dimensions: ENERGY (E for Extraversion or I for Introversion), INFORMATION (Sfor Sensing or N for iNtuition), DECISION (T for Thinking or F for Feeling), and LIFESTYLE(J for Judging or P for Perceiving). Understanding this code provides valuable insights into one'spsychological preferences, promoting self-awareness, informed decision-making, and personaldevelopment. For students, the MBTI aids in comprehending their learning styles,communication preferences, and problem-solving approaches, facilitating more informededucational and career decisions. Educators can
Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI). Her career in higher education began at Howard University as the first Black female fac- ulty member in the Department of Computer Science. Her professional experience also includes Winthrop University, The Aerospace Corporation, and IBM. She is a graduate of Johnson C. Smith University (B.S., ’00) and North Carolina State University (M.S., ’02; Ph.D., ’05), becoming the first Black woman to earn a Ph.D. in computer science at the university and 2019 Computer Science Hall of Fame Inductee.Shaundra Bryant Daily, Duke University Shaundra B. Daily is the Cue Family professor of practice in Electrical and Computer Engineering & Computer Science at Duke University and Levitan
, environmental, and mechanical engineering students have doneindependent learning of the LEED rating system since this time as CENG 4097 Civil EngineeringResearch (3 semester credits per student). It brings something unique to the engineering programsand encourages students to consider engineering licensure and credentialing (i.e. LEED AccreditedProfessional) in their engineering careers. Students learn the LEED system and submit weeklyreports, a final summary report including a case study LEED project, and produce a presentationbased on lessons learned and the final case study. Students are not required to take the LEED exambut are sufficiently prepared that if they wish, they may take the LEED Green Associate Exam at thesame testing centers that also