Paper ID #26321Construction Management Technology Students Choice of MajorDr. Anthony E. Sparkling, Purdue University Anthony Sparkling is an Assistant Professor in Construction Management Technology (CMT) at Pur- due University where he teaches courses in mechanical and electrical systems, electrical estimating, and electrical construction. His research interests include teams, organizations, contract governance, orga- nizational processes, project/team performance and behavioral feedback systems. Meanwhile, he has a growing interest in the skilled-trades shortage in the United States. He can be contacted at asparkli
many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to assess impact of good supply chain practices such as
initiatives at an interdisciplinary research institute called the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS) at Virginia Tech. He is the founding director of an interdisciplinary lab called Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) at VT. He received a Ph.D. in civil engineering from VT. His research interests are in the areas of computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, engineering education, and international collaboration. He has served as a PI or co-PI on 16 projects, funded by the National Science Foundation, with a $6.4 million research funding participation from external sources. He has been directing/co-directing an NSF/Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU
; Turner, 2010; Turner et al., 2017; Turner, Smith et al., 2015; Turner, Trotter et al., 2006). She has been awarded over $1 million to sup- port her research. She currently is PI on an EEC EAGER award focusing on factors that affect Native Americans’ entry into and persistence in the engineering faculty.Dr. Gale Mason Chagil, Culture Inquiry Consulting, LLC Dr. Gale Mason-Chagil, Cultural Inquiry Consulting, LLC, has 18 years’ experience conducting culturally- competent educational and career development research with Native American communities. She special- izes in social change and social justice research and in consultation for projects administered by schools, community-based organizations, and foundations. She
cannot be <> by a block). This promotes a crispness inrequirements formulation and fosters singularity and precision.Figure 9: VerificationThe author found that despite providing quality check tables (that contained elements thatviolated a style guide rule), some students had difficulties in using them to improve modelquality. The introduction of an on-demand validation suite (See Table 1) significantly improvedproject quality (no projects have been submitted with violations since its introduction). It allowsthe codification of the quality checks and when the validation engine processes the rules,violating elements are identified within the model. It is relatively simple for modelers to thencorrect the issues (receiving satisfying feedback
scaling to launch. There is plenty of support in place to nurture thestudents and projects as they move from one stage to another – mentors, community knowledge,resources/deals, and online tools. Our entrepreneurship program seems to fall in between theapproaches of Rice and Cornell. Perhaps more importantly, our situation allows us to viewentrepreneurship and engineering business from a distinctive perspective and to recognizepotential problems that are emerging (and from which we are certainly not immune).Good Intentions Gone Astray? How Entrepreneurship Gets Reduced to Composite SkillsAn article published in The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship in 2015 by Duval-Couetil,Kisenwether, Tranquillo, and Wheadon illustrates one path by which
Heads(CIEADH).6Comparison of Two CoursesThe broad comparison of ergonomics classes at the authors’ universities is shown in Table 2.There are many similarities and a few differences. Most of the differences are programmatic,rather than classroom specific.Similarities: University A and University B are similar in that they both require a prerequisitecourse in basic Methods and Standards as well as a basic course in probability and statistics priorto taking Ergonomics. They both have an extensive lab component with written reports used forlearning assessment and incorporate a student project. They both include physical and cognitiveergonomic concepts with a foundation in the PE Exam topics, and they both require studentprojects.Differences: Term
for an NSF grant which provides schol- arships and career counseling to engineering students at Suffolk University. Her role in the project is to assess career development trajectories for the scholarship students, create program evaluations, collect assessment data and disseminate information to the STEM community.Emily Shamieh, Latino-STEM Alliance Emily Shamieh, Latino-STEM Alliance Emily Shamieh is a leader of the Latino-STEM Alliance. She has spent over 30 years as a bilingual educator, including 19 years as an Elementary School principal, plus another 7 years as a Budget Director & Assistant Commissioner for the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. During her career, Ms. Shamieh has been active
Education, 2016 Improving the Writing Skills of Engineering Students: Assessment of a Writing Workshop ModelAbstractThis Evidence Based Practice paper will report on a multi-year project to improve the writingskills of engineering freshmen at San José State University (SJSU). For the last ten years, thecollege has offered an optional class to students who are not proficient in writing. Students canenroll in a one-unit lab class as many semesters as they wish to get practice in writing. The goal isto provide students with weekly writing activities that include: instruction in basic grammar,proofreading, and editing. In addition to study and practice exercises, students in this writingworkshop have writing assignments, which provide
andtraining of military members and veterans who have served on or after September 11, 2001.From its implementation through the end of 2013, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hasrecorded an increase of greater than 200 percent in Post 9/11 GI Bill awardees. Projections arefor this number to continue to grow, reaching two million total beneficiaries by 2020.1 In manycases, engineering and engineering technology programs have not adjusted their student supportservices to serve the rapid increase in these non-traditional students. Failure to understand andmake the most of this non-traditional student population diminishes an outstanding opportunityfor schools to utilize a unique set of knowledge, skills and life experiences that can enhance
graduate and undergraduate levels. Robin also serves as the Director of Research for the Engineering Leadership Project at the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering which aims to identify how engineers lead in the workplace.Ms. Annie Elisabeth Simpson, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering Annie is the Assistant Director of the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. Her doctoral work focusses on young women and leadership development. She has her Mas- ters degree in Adult Education and Counselling Psychology. Annie teaches courses, designs experiential curriculum, and contributes to the strategic direction of ILead.Dr. Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto
? Trajectories are measured atmatriculation, four years later, and six-year graduation for matriculants to the disciplines as wellas all students in the major, including first-time-in-college (FTIC) and transfer students. Theimpact of first-year engineering (FYE) programs is also considered. We focus on the mostpopular disciplines of engineering: Chemical, Civil, Electrical, Mechanical, and Industrial. Inaddition, we have considered Aerospace Engineering given its similarity in curriculum toMechanical and Computer Engineering given its similar curriculum to Electrical. We have begunto work on comparisons of the five most popular engineering disciplines.Project goalsThis project focuses on examining the research question “How do the trajectories of
course team project will be quantified and demonstrated through a game that theteam will design, create, play, and demonstrate. Teams are given full freedom (empowered) to Page 26.507.7 6create/innovate and even to adopt any existing game to suit the project under study. This SCLhas been successfully implemented in more than one course in the MS SustainabilityManagement program. This particular SCL is perhaps one of the most advanced SCL used in thegraduate classes since real world problems need to be well understood to be able to bring theconcepts down to game objective(s), rules, and winning
latter in 1968. Prior to coming to UT in 1970 he taught for two years at Prairie View A&M as a Woodrow Wilson Teaching Fellow. In 1994 he was named Texas Professor of the Year by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and in 1995 he was selected as one of the 10 inaugural members of the Academy of Distin- guished Teachers at UT Austin. Dr. Schmidt received ASEE’s Ralph Coats Roe Award in 1992, and the Chester F. Carlson Award in 2010 for his contributions to development of project-based engineering edu- cation and promotion of educational and professional opportunities for women and minorities. During the past 10 years he has worked actively with the Austin Children’s Museum to encourage
afinancial need. The average financial package was $7,659 for full-time students and $5,144 forpart-time students, which, when compared to Table 1, fell significantly short of the overall costsof attendance. Furthermore, in April 2011, the S-STEM project team surveyed all science,engineering, and mathematics majors at SUU. Of the 299 students that responded to the survey,58% were receiving no financial assistance from their families, 50% were accumulating debteach year they attended college and 35% of students had at least one other person who dependedon them financially. In addition, 59% of respondents claimed that the number of hours employedin a job unrelated to their field of study had a negative impact on their academic performance,and 50
mathematical modeling course and suggesting standards for secondary modeling education.3. Infusion Working Group: We propose a working group of active participants be charged with formalizing strategic approaches to address challenges teachers face in infusing modeling in their daily practice.4. Repository: We recommend a small group develop a proposal for a curated repository of modeling resources, preferably peer-reviewed. (This is likely a huge, ongoing project, needing foundation support for any chance of being successfully and popularly used by teachers and the public.)The first of these is nearing completion, while the other three are all supported by a new NCTM-SIAMJoint Committee on Modeling across the Curriculum, which will likely
Paper ID #14773Using the Flipped Classroom Model to Improve Construction Engineeringand Management EducationDr. Namhun Lee, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Namhun Lee is an associate professor in the department of Manufacturing and Construction Manage- ment at Central Connecticut State University, where he has been teaching Construction Graphics/Quantity Take-Off, CAD & BIM Tools for Construction, Building Construction Systems, Building Construction Estimating, Heavy/Highway Construction Estimating, Construction Planning, and Construction Project Management. Dr. Lee’s main research areas include Construction
Paper ID #16509Balancing the Influence of Driving and Restricting Factors to Use ActiveLearningDr. James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach James J. Pembridge is an Assistant Professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He earned a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering, M.A. Education in Curriculum and Instruction, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. His research has focused on mentoring as pedagogy for project-based courses and understanding the adult learning characteristics of undergraduate students.Dr. Kari L. Jordan, Embry-Riddle
efficient supply chain for urban water projects. Jessica has worked for many successful consumer product companies including Unilever, and Georgia Pacific. Currently, Jessica is completing her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University to focus on practical methods of corporate outreach in STEM for minority communities. In her free time, writes children’s books, teaches yoga to children, and enjoys her family.Dr. Mary K. Pilotte, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Mary Pilotte is Associate Professor of Engineering Practice in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. She is an instructor for Multidisciplinary engineering course- work, and is
can follow.Research QuestionsThe experience of women in undergraduate engineering programs has not been examinedthrough a critical and qualitative lens; nor has the question of university type played a role in theresearch. The hope is that understanding how women experience undergraduate engineeringprograms at public state universities, the broadest impact on participation can be made. The goalof this project is to look at various stages of a woman’s educational journey in engineering toexamine the following: 1. How do women experience undergraduate engineering programs at public universities? 2. What role does classroom discourse play in shaping women’s experience in “gatekeeper” courses
]. Our study is focused on rewardpoints and leaderboard and evaluating their impact on student learning.Collaborative learning: Collaborative interactions among individuals, has shown positive resultsacross different levels of education, ranging from young children doing their school projects likecraft work in teams to university students working on development projects [17],[ 21]. At thesame time, it is essential to make a distinction between team performance and teameffectiveness. This is because team performance represents the results of group’s activities whilepaying little heed to how the group have accomplished the task. Team effectiveness, however,takes a more holistic point of view in considering not only whether the group
the final project. This section will introduce the topics under each of the fourcategories as well as provide references to the teaching materials.It is possible for our departments to provide hardware to students, but that was not done in thispreliminary case. Thus, the course will require students to purchase their own hardware to build afinal project. To offset this cost, the class will rely on open source teaching materials whenavailable. Consequently, most of the referenced books are available for free and provide thenecessary technical content that is appropriate for our students’ level.Section 1: Background (Weeks 1-3)This section refreshes analytical and programming topics that are needed for EAI.In terms mathematical content, we will
something real and direct formulates a concrete experience that standsto have more lasting memories and impact.B. Research Purpose and QuestionsPast efforts to foster inclusion have primarily focused on the numbers and been limited in theways we teach, train and expose people to learning inclusiveness and empathy. Moreover, suchefforts are also linked to the misconception that increasing demographic representationnecessitates an inclusive environment. Cultures must change to achieve inclusion. The role of thefaculty in shaping culture, specifically in engineering, is critical and yet, understudied. Throughfaculty, this project seeks to address a major area of engineering research, broadeningparticipation, in a novel way. Specifically, rather than
out.At the workshop, I was partnered with this Asian guy. They asked us to tell ourpartner, "What are you most aware of everyday?" And I said, "What I'm most awareof everyday is that I'm Black, I'm a woman, and I'm short."How does your gender impact your experience in your doctoral program?It impacts it a lot. As an example: I was in a group project last semester, and Imade some suggestions. Everybody ignored my comment. Some guy said thesame thing 10 minutes later, and they're were like, "That's a great idea." And Ithought, "I'm just going to shut up from now on and just.” I reverted back into thatminimization because it's like I literally said that's what we should do, and nobodypaid me any attention.What does it mean to be a Black woman in
werestereotypes based on the “double bind” of being a woman of color in engineering and leadership[12]. Finally, being unable to be authentic was also prevalent among the students of color in thisstudy. For example, a Latina woman discussed how she tailored her behavior when performingher leadership duties: “The way I converse, definitely a male thing. Because I definitely talk a littlebit differently when I'm with family and people I know very well.” Thus, failing to includeracialized and gendered experiences may overlook factors that can act as stressors on the leadershipexperiences and development of engineering students.AcknowledgementFunding for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation under grant EEC-ENG1738132. The views
. just communicate, just um, have a little bit problem.”Making Experiences of interactions and “In engineering especially, it is soFriends relationships with U.S students. hard to get close with people because you start talking to them and the subject just does not get any deeper.”Working in Academic experiences in “I was in high school we write ourTeams collaborating with U.S. peers in group paper by our own, and when I go here projects
The introduction of Team-based learning (TBL) in the 1980s marked a significant shift inaddressing the challenges of large class settings in educational environments [1], [2]. Originally abusiness school innovation, TBL has now permeated various disciplines including engineering,medicine, and social sciences globally. Some courses, such as first-year engineering, maycombine TBL with project-based learning (PBL) to introduce students to common engineeringthemes such as design, sustainability, and ethics. Despite its wide-ranging benefits, TBL'seffectiveness can be inequitable for a variety of reasons, including free riders, imbalances in taskallocation, and more broad communication issues [3], [4]. Thus, the application of teamworkassessment
instruction. Excellent teaching style, course organization, and commitment to expectations of adult learning applied to real world problems. 3 We’ve done many project assignments related to every topic in environmental engineering like air pollution, water pollution, etc., so this is a strong benefit and aspect of the course for students. 4 Without getting into the weeds of computer models, this course teaches us a great overall understanding of the fundamentals of modeling and the key elements. I never felt like we got bogged down with the non-material problems, such as learning programs or
safeguards to protect the privacy of medical records aswell as other identifiable health information. However, that information needs to be utilized by thesystem and be readily accessible. It is desirable that the underlying NLP models do not expose theprivate information contained in the training data. However, de-identification methods even whenapplied correctly yield data that sometimes retains the risks of identification [13]. Because mostITSs have not been geared towards patients, privacy of the models and user data has not been amajor concern, therefore the research gap we intend to address is that of maintaining privacy whilemaintaining accuracy and low latency during NLP model training that may be computationallyintensive.2 Project
has mentored dozens of graduate and undergraduate students in research and K-12 outreach activities and is the Director of the Excellence in Computing and Information Technology Education (ExCITE) program. She is a fellow of the Center for the Advancement of STEM Leadership Program (CASL) and the Opportunities for Under-Represented Scholars (OURS) post-graduate institutional leadership certificate program and an alumna of the Frontiers of Engineering Education program (FOEE) of the National Academy of Engineering. She has been serving on the Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL) Capital Area Regional Network steering committee since 2016.Rui Kang Rui Kang is Professor of Secondary Education (6-12) of Georgia College &