Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies," U.S. Department of Education, 2010.[10] D. S. Brewer, The Effects of Online Homework on Achievement and Self-efficacy of College Algebra Students, Utah State University, 2009.[11] W. Ziemer, "WeBWorK: An Open-Source Online Homework System," in Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education, NSF DUE in collaboration with EHR and AAAS, 2004, pp. 169-171.[12] D. Doorn, S. Janssen and M. O’Brien, "Student attitudes and approaches to online homework," International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 4, no. 1, January 2010.[13] D. M. Nguyen, Y.-C. J. Hsieh and G. D
26.261.13 undergraduate engineering students?Q54 Other Please list any themes you would like us to consider for future program eventsBibliographical Information[1] NACIE University Presidents Commitment Letter, April 19, 2011, http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/NACIE_Letter- University_Commercialization-20110617084146-20110617215655.pdf[2] The Innovative & Entrepreneurial University: Higher Education, Innovation, & Entrepreneurship in Focus, U.S. Department of Commerse, October 2013.[3] Duval-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhodes, T., Haghighi, S., The Engineering Entrepreneurship Survey: An Assessment Instrument to Examine Engineering Student Involvement
, learning activities, assessments, and student learning styles resulted in a moderate-to-strong positive correlation between students’ self perception and direct assessments of the learning objectives. Based on the results of our study and studies done in literature by Felder, we highly recommendthat any educators teaching summer courses should consider using our approach as a modelwhen designing their own courses.Bibliography1. Ressler, S.J., Welch, R.W., and Meyer, K..F., “Organizing and Delivering Classroom Instruction,” Teaching Lessons Learned. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE 130 (3), pp. 103-120,July 2004.2. Estes, A. C., Welch, R. W., and Ressler, S. J., “Teaching
International Education in Business, vol. 4, pp. 6-29, 2011.[5] A. Aytac and V. Deniz, "Quality Function Deployment in Education: A Curriculum Review," Quality and Quantity, vol. 39, pp. 507-514, 08 2005.[6] J. W. Denton, V. Franke, and K. N. Surendra, "Curriculum and Course Design: A New Approach Using Quality Function Deployment," Journal of Education for Business, vol. 81, pp. 111-117, 11/01 2013/10/03 2005.[7] A. Crişan and R. Enache, "Designing customer oriented courses and curricula in higher education. A possible model," Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 11, pp. 235-239, 2011.[8] J. S. Pérez and F. G. Aleu, "Industrial Engineering Approach to Develop an Industrial Engineering Curriculum," IIE Annual
Sensing (S) or Intuition (N). The third categoryis about the way one takes decisions. Does he/she base decision on logic and consistency(Thinking (T)) or on people and circumstances (Feeling (F))? The last category is about howpeople deal with the outside world. Do they prefer to get things decided (Judging (J)) or stayopen to new information and options (Perceiving (P))? When the preference in each category isrecorded, the personality type is expressed as a code with four letters, one from each of the fourcategories. That leads to sixteen different personality types. This test is widely used in Americancompanies to form teams and it is used more than twenty years to form engineering designteams.12 However, some studies have shown that the Myers
like to thank Sonoran Schools CEO: Fatih Karatas, and CAO: RobertHobbins, also Sonoran Science Academy’s administrators Jim Satterlee and Naci Karadeniz fortheir support during this study.Bibliography[1]Stoeger, H., Duan, X., Schirner, S., Greindl, T., & Ziegler, A. (2013). The effectiveness of a one-year online mentoring program for girls in STEM. Computers & Education, 69, 408. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.032[2]Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2014). Student perceptions of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) content and careers. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 173-186. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.046[3]Chatzinikolakis, G., & Papadakis, S. (2014). Motivating K-12 students learning
of Testing Tools in SE Courses," in the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '11)., New York, NY, USA, 2011. [8] A. P. Rovai, M. K. Ponton and M. J. Wighting, "A Comparative Analysis of Student Motivation in Traditional Classroom and E-Learning Courses," International Journal on E-Learning, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 413-432, 2007. [9] A. Goswami, G. S. Walia and S. Aburardeh, "Using a Web-Based Testing Tool Repository in Programming Course: An Empirical Study," in the 2014 International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Enginee, 2014. [10] S. Wolfe and R. Flewitt, "New technologies, new multimodal practices and young children’s metacognitive," Cambridge Journal
. References[1] A. Taylor. Women and the city: Examining the gender impacts of violence and urbanisation. ActionAid USA, Available: http://www.actionaidusa.org, Accessed 17 October 2013.[2] A. Taylor. Women and the city 2 combating violence against women and girls in urban public spaces the role of public services. ActionAid USA, Available: http://www.actionaidusa.org, Accessed 17 October 2013.[3] US Agency for International Development, Excellence in Higher Education for Liberian Development Request for Applications 66910019, Available: http://liberia.usaid.gov/EHELD, Accessed 25 June 2013.[4] Reddivari, S., Dreyer, E. F. C., Rimer, S., & Cotel, A. (2016). Towards a global virtual community of female engineering students and professionals
programs such as S-STEM for just such students with unmet financial need. Thescholarships allow the students to work less or not at all, and to put more of their energy intoacademics. At Arizona State University, the author has led such scholarship programs with anAcademic Success and Professional Development classes for nearly 15 years. During this timeshe has continually done research on the best way to support and encourage students to do wellacademically, to graduate, and to go right on to graduate school. This research has used groundedtheory and Social Cognitive Career Theory to understand how best to recruit and retain students.Beginning with seminars, over the years, the author developed a successful two-credit AcademicSuccess and
campus through initiatives such as the ”S” course designation and showcasing of best practices. Mrs. Ellenburg’s work on campus-level initiatives at UT has included service on the 2015 SACS Qual- ity Enhancement Plan writing team, the 2014 Carnegie Community Engagement writing team, the 2010 UT Community Engagement Task Force writing team, and coordinating author for the 2010 whitepaper ”Student Ownership, and the College Experience.” Last year she received the Chancellor’s Award for Environmental Leadership for her leadership of sustainability-focused service-learning and the SCI. Mrs. Ellenburg serves on the Board of Directors for the Educational Partnerships for Innovation in Communi- ties Network (EPIC-N), the
). Dr. Leydens won the James F. Lufkin Award for the best conference paper—on the intersections between professional communication research and social jus- tice—at the 2012 International Professional Communication Conference. In 2015, he won the Ronald S. Blicq Award for Distinction in Technical Communication Education from the Professional Communica- tion Society of the Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). His current research focuses on rendering visible and integrating the social justice dimensions inherent in three components of the engineering curriculum—in engineering sciences, engineering design, and humanities and social science courses. That research, conducted with co-author Juan C
: The Industry View. The Royal Academy of Engineering, London, 2006.[12] L. H. Jamieson and J. R. Lohman, “Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: ensuring U.S. engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society,” Phase 1 Report, ASEE, 2009.[13] I. C. Peden, E. W. Ernst, and J.W. Prados, “Systemic engineering education reform: an action agenda,” National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1995.[14] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the selfdetermination of behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268 (2000).[15] C. F. Ratelle, F. Guay, R. J. Vallerand, S. Larose, and C. Senécal
Science Foundation.References[1] Froyd, Jeffrey E., et al. "Estimates of use of research-based instructional strategies in core electrical or computerengineering courses." Education, IEEE Transactions on 56.4 (2013): 393-399.[2] Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Froyd, J., Prince, M., & Henderson, C. (2011). Faculty use of research basedinstructional strategies.[3] Prince, Michael, et al. "Use of research-based instructional strategies in core chemical engineering courses."Chemical Engineering Education 47.1 (2013): 27-37.[4] Henderson, C., Beach, A., and Finkelstein, N., Facilitating change in undergraduate stem instructional practices:An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011. 48(8): p. 952-984.[5] Borrego
stimulated my learning. 1 15 6 I am very satisfied with this workshop. 1 15 7 The presenter(s) was enthusiastic and pleasant. 1 15 8 The workshop was well organized. 1 15 9 I feel prepared to use this module in my class. 3 11 2 10 My students have the necessary background knowledge to complete this module
and understanding the electrical characteristics from a data sheet,etc. Using the Analog Discovery Boards, several experiments and tutorials were created, for in-class demonstration and/or lab experiments. Such an example is presented in figure 6. In thisexperiment the transfer characteristics of a CMOS logic gate used as an inverter is investigated. 1 14 1A S VCC 2 13 1B N 4B 12 3 1Y 7 4A
Colleges and Universities (2016). Recent Trends in GeneralEducation Design, Learning Outcomes, and Teaching Approaches, Association ofAmerican Colleges and Universities, Washington, DC.Barber, James. Integration of Learning: A Grounded Theory Analysis of CollegeStudents’ Learning, American Educational Research Journal, June 2012, Vol. 49, No. 3,pp. 590-617.Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. (1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. HandbookI: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.Boix-Mansilla, V. (2005). Assessing student work at disciplinary crossroads. Change, 37(January/February), 14–21.Bordogna, Joseph, Fromm, Eli, and Ernst, Edward W. (2013
specifically, responses from Question 2 of the firstand second activities were qualitatively evaluated using the rubric presented in Table 4. Thisparticular question, which was repeated in both activities, prompts the students with “Whatinformation do you think you need to know to answer the driving question? List all of the factorsand/or variables that are needed and identify which ones are the most important. For eachfactor/variable listed, offer a rationale for why it is needed. For example, through whatmechanism/s does it affect strength enhancement?” The rubric was designed to gain an overviewof the general state of student understanding of nanomaterials at the nanoscale and theirrelevance in the context of cement mortar. Scores of Poor, Good
-study Scholar. She served as chair of S-STEP from 2013-2015 and is a current Co-PI of two National Science Foundation (NSF) funded grants: Designing Teaching: Scaling up the SIMPLE Design Framework for Interactive Teaching Development and a research initiation grant: Student-directed differ- entiated learning in college-level engineering education. Her research centers on facilitating and studying her role in faculty development self-study collaboratives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Applying Conjecture Mapping as a Design-Based Research Method to Examine the Design and Implementation of a Teaching Development Project for
, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. v-viii.[3] C. J. Thaiss and T. M. Zawacki, Engaged Writers Dynamic Disciplines, Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers, Inc. , 2006.[4] D. Melzer, Assignments Across the Curriculum, Boulder, CO: Utah State University Press, 2014.[5] M. Eodice, A. E. Geller and N. Lerner, The Meaningful Writing Project, Boulder: Utah State University Press, 2016.[6] S. Harrington, S. Dinitz, R. Bennett, L. Davenport and K. Warrender, "Turning Stories from the Writing Center into Useful Knowledge: Writing Centers, WID Programs, and Partnerships for Change," in Writing Program and Writing Center Collaboration: Transcending Boundaries, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 141-160.[7] M
: http://www.science-engage.org/index.html. [Accessed April 26, 2018]. [7] J. Hempel. “The Zuckerbeg hearings were silicon valley’s debut.” [Online]. Available: Wired, https://www.wired.com/story/the-zuckerberg-hearings-were-silicon-valleys-ultimate-debut/. [Accessed April 26, 2018].[8] D. MacMillan, and R. Winkler. “Silicon valley to washington: why don’t you get us?” [Online]. Available: The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/silicon-valley-to-washington-why-dont-you-get-us- 1523451203. [Accessed April 26, 2018].[9] March for Science. [Online]. Available: https://www.marchforscience.com/. [Accessed April 26, 2018].[10] S. Khimm, and A. Rafferty. “Pruitt makes EPA science board more industry friendly
of faculty in the establishment of MEERCat and how faculty-led researchprojects can contribute to informing both policy and practice at the department level. Thenarratives provided details on the history behind the development of these research projects, thelarge data collection efforts involved, and the collaborations inside the University that help theprojects function smoothly. Faculty who engage in course innovation or education research canuse this paper as a case study of how to get actively and collectively involved in influencingdepartment-level practices at their respective institutions.References[1] J. L. Melsa, S. A. Rajala, and J. P. Mohsen, “Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education
DIRECT concept inventory. In the same vein, possibilities for future workinclude assessing the impact that context variables can have on the effectiveness of PeerInstruction and its implementation in different settings, as well as evaluating the pros andcons in instructors’ workload, and possibilities for conducting classrooms research.References[1] D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith, Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Interaction Book Company, 1991.[2] M. Prince, “Does active learning work ? A review of the research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, pp. 223–231, 2004.[3] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson, “Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices,” J. Eng
University, and PhD in Mathematics from Auburn University in 2014. He is a contributor to the Australian Maths Trust, and member of the MASAMU international research group for mathematics.Dr. Carl Pettis, Alabama State University Carl S. Pettis, Ph.D. Professor of Mathematics Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Al- abama State University Administrative role: Interim Provost Office of Academic Affairs Alabama State UniversityDr. Uma Kannan, Alabama State University Dr. Uma Kannan is Assistant Professor of Computer Information Systems in the College of Business Administration at Alabama State University, where she has taught since 2017. She received her Ph.D. degree in Cybersecurity from Auburn University
andreferential language to communicate conceptual understandings. Finally, the holistic applicationof rubrics to interview data allowed for understandings of the engineering design process to beexpressed in multiple ways: both implicit and explicit understandings could be expressed byparticipants and then scored by analysts’ application of the rubrics to each participant’s interviewas a whole.References[1] E. P. Douglas, S. S. Jordan, M. Lande, and A. E. Bumbaco, “Artifact elicitation as a method of qualitative inquiry in engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, June 2015.[2] Engineering Accreditation Commission. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs,” Accreditation Board for
programs tend to focus on leadership asa set of skills or experiences bolted onto a traditional engineering education with limited formalevidence of the impact these experiences have on student development.The purpose of this study is to test the effect of experiences engineering students have in leadershiproles on their perceived gains in leadership skills, using a national dataset. The framework guidingthis study is a model for engineering leadership identity constructed from Lave and Wenger’scommunities of practice model and Komives et al.’s model for leadership identity development(LID) which recognizes that the engineering formation process is, at its core, an identitydevelopment process. Engineering leadership is theorized to develop from
conceptualprimitive works. Then a final project was created in the course (2010~2013); students wererequired to finish a group project adopting the primitives lectured in the classes. Studentstaking the EOS course could thus be well trained and solve problems as expected. However,we got some feedbacks from graduated students, who asked to introduce more skills ofinnovation and imagination in such a course. Their values can be demonstrated not only fromtheir competencies of hands-on skills but also from designing a new product. Hence, in the fourth phase (2014~2016), CIM was adopted and SCAMPER wasintroduced in the EOS courses. Students were encouraged to put more innovation skills intotheir final project. The more verbs (S, C, A, M, P, E, R) applied to
in everyday life. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2013.[8] D. Sue, Microaggressions and marginality. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2010.[9] K. Kawakami, J. Friesen and L. Vingilis-Jaremko, "Visual attention to members of own and other groups: Preferences, determinants, and consequences", Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 12, no. 4, p. e12380, 2018.[10] B. Hansen, P. Rakhshan, A. Ho and S. Pannasch, "Looking at others through implicitly or explicitly prejudiced eyes", Visual Cognition, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 612-642, 2015.[11] M. Mele, S. Federici and J. Dennis, "Believing Is Seeing: Fixation Duration Predicts Implicit Negative Attitudes", PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 8, p. e105106, 2014.[12] L. Granka, T. Joachims and G. Gay, "Eye
describedbeing exalted for being the first in their family to pursue such advanced education. In this way Intersectional Perspectives 10they felt pressure to stay in their doctoral programs even when they questioned if it was right forthem. Erica’s familial experience highlighted this conflicting message: Since I'm the only one in my family who has gone to college and to graduate school, every time I come around, my family is like, "oh, you're gonna be a doctor!"… [So] every single time that I'm at work and I'm considering "is this really what I want to do," I have that in the back of my mind, wait, I'm going to let all these people down? And it feel[s
position. However, it has been noted by the DOE AdvancedScientific Computing Advisory Committee (2) and others (3) (4) (5) that the DOE Laboratories faceworkforce development and recruitment challenges. Further complicating the matter is theunderrepresentation of women and minorities in high end computing. Disparities in representation andparticipation impede educational attainment and access to the Science and Technology (S&T) workforce.While underrepresentation and lack of diversity are noted generally across S&T fields, they are more 1pronounced in mathematical and computing sciences (6) (7) (8) (9). Statistically, women earnapproximately 40 percent of the undergraduate degrees in
proceedings, San Antonio.https://peer.asee.org/31357[10] Pearson Weatherton, Y., & Chen, V. C. P., & Mattingly, S. P., & Rogers, K., & Sattler, M. L. (2012,June), Sustainable Engineering Internships: Creation and Assessment Paper presented at 2012 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/21976[11] Powers, K., & Chen, H. L., & Prasad, K. V., & Gilmartin, S. K., & Sheppard, S. (2018, June), Exploring HowEngineering Internships and Undergraduate Research Experiences Inform and Influence College Students' CareerDecisions and Future Plans Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah.https://peer.asee.org/30491