recommend continuing use of learningcommunities in the future. The method for forming communities depends on whether the courseis first or later in the department sequence, and may also vary for flipped versus lecture-basedcourses. We recommend using software like CATME [10] for first courses and flipped courses,while we recommend using seating preferences in later courses and lecture-based courses.Reforming communities mid-semester depends on the need for getting to know more peers andon the type of course: flipped or lecture-based.References[1] M. Prince, "Does active learning work? A review of the research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 179-263, July 2004.[2] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N
; Zurhellen, H. S. (1978). Student attitudes toward the grade contract. Improving College and University Teaching, 26(4), 239-242.[7] Frank, T., & Scharff, L. L. (2013). Learning contracts in undergraduate courses: Impacts on student behaviors and academic performance. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 36-53.[8] Hiller, T. B., & Hietapelto, A. B. (2001). Contract grading: Encouraging commitment to the learning process through voice in the evaluation process. Journal of Management Education, 25(6), 660-684.[9] Inoue, A. B. (2019). Labor-based grading contracts: Building equity and inclusion in the compassionate writing classroom. WAC Clearinghouse.[10] Carillo, E. C. (2021). The
also felt they know enough to make problems, which may reflect their havingcompleted the course(s) in the topics they were working on. Shakurnia et al. found learningbenefits for students who created 60 multiple choice questions covering different topics over thelength of the term, which is closer to the experience of the OER students than the coursestudents. OER students overall reported that their understanding of mechanics increasedfollowing their work term.Course students seemed to stick with topics they were comfortable with (e.g. Work-Energy), andwere not required to revise and correct their problems. The students who completed the problemcreation activity and the post-survey did not indicate substantial gains in confidence in the
Mason University: https://go.gmu.edu/videos5 S. Pham et al., “Correlation between Linguistic Racism and Anxiety using Physiological Data“, Biomedical Engineering Society Annual Meeting 2022.6 E. Kwari et al., “Robotic mirror therapy Exoskeleton“, Biomedical Engineering Society Annual Meeting, 20227 V.Yasa et al., “Pupil as an indication for neuropathic pain”, Biomedical Engineering Society Annual Meeting, 20228 S.Pham et al., “Testing the reliability of an E4 watch for in-the-field experiments. Biomedical Engineering Society Annual Meeting, 2022.9 Sutherland, J. and Sutherland, J.J., 2014. Scrum: the art of doing twice the work in half the time. Currency. © American Society for Engineering
evaluate candidate’s contributions to DEI● Consideration of any change to length of probationary period included in one-third of R1 templates (34.6%) and one R2 template (4.3%) ○ “Please note that Professor <<< Last name >>> received a <<< number of year(s) >>> extension of their tenure clock by virtue of university policy. We ask that you recognize this extension’s adjustment to the candidate’s time in rank and evaluate their work as if it were accomplished in the period of service that excludes their extension years. “ (Texas A&M University)Findings● About one third of templates at both R1 (36.5%) and R2 (30.4%) institutions asked if candidate would earn tenure at
thatstudents could quickly pick up the dashboard and learn the functionality of the controls. The issuesmostly came up with loading the dashboard across various devices for the first time. For instance,initial testing in ABC Course revealed that “https://” at the beginning of the URL was necessaryfor the dashboard to work. If not, the camera's live feed will not be displayed, since the WebSocketrequired an encrypted connection to the server.4.3.2 Hardware Issues 14Apart from issues with defective components such as servo-drivers, electronic steering controls,etc., some groups, initially, were provided with Raspberry Pi 3’s instead of Raspberry Pi 4’s
tool for use in outreach activities and in industry. We will present the currentFossilSketch interface and the most recent data at ASEE 2023 NSF grantees poster session.1 AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant “Developing a DigitalSketching Application That Delivers Personalized Feedback to Improve Student Learning andEngagement in Micropaleontolog” #1937827.References[1] R. W. Jones, Foraminifera and their Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2013.[2] J. W. Murray, Ecology and applications of benthic foraminifera. Cambridge university press, 2006.[3] L. Capotondi, C. Bergami, G. Orsini, M. Ravaioli, P. Colantoni, and S. Galeotti, “Benthic foraminifera for environmental monitoring
CourseGrades. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Feldman, J. (2018). Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transformschools and classrooms. Corwin Press.Ferns, S., Hickey, R., & Williams, H. (2021). Ungrading, supporting our students through apedagogy of care. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 12(2),4500-4504.Gaver, W. (2012). What should we expect from research through design?. In Proceedings of theSIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 937-946).Ghosh, S., & Coppola, S. (2022). Reflecting on Hybrid Learning in Studio-based Courses:Complications and Effectiveness during the Pandemic and Beyond. In Proceedings of the HumanFactors and Ergonomics Society
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Journal of Social Studies Research, School Science and Mathe- matics, and Mathematics Teacher. She served as the Program Chair of the Special Interest Group (SIG) Democratic Citizenship in Education of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) from 2016 to 2018. She has taught high school mathematics and holds a clear renewable teaching certificate in mathematics in the state of Georgia. She currently serves as a Co-Principal Investigator (Co-PI) of a National Science Foundation (NSF) S-STEM grant. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Developing Post-pandemic Learning Community
survey.Table 1Project Research Plan Phase Research Question Data Source(s) Quantitative To what extent does engineering USS + PSO surveys students’ social capital predict their opportunities for professional skill development? To what extent do students in different USS survey first-year cohorts have significantly different levels of social capital? To what extent do students in different PSO survey cohorts have different reported levels of opportunities
planning and product design.Based on this review, we developed our survey as follows: • The existing surveys primarily targeted CXOs. Our survey targeted plant technical managers. As the focus of our project is on Industry 4.0 tools and technologies, we anticipate that we can learn more about what is happening on the plant floor if we gather data where “the rubber meets the road.” • In surveying managers about the technologies they are using, we followed Frank et al’s conceptual framework, which provides a useful taxonomy of Industry 4.0 technologies. However, Frank et al.’s sample consisted of Brazilian companies in construction and machinery which may be more traditional and less high-tech than U.S
: Creatingconditions that matter. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass Inc. 2011.[11] V. Tinto, Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL,USA: University of Chicago Press. 1987[12] E. T. Pascarella and P. T. Terenzini, How college affects students: A third decade ofresearch, vol. 2, Indianapolis, IN, USA: Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley. 2005 13[13] S. M. Lord, R. A. Layton, and M. W. Ohland, "Multi-institution study of studentdemographics and outcomes in electrical and computer engineering in the USA," IEEETransactions on Education, vol. 58, pp. 141–150, Aug. 2015.[14] S. M. Lord, R. A. Layton, M. W. Ohland, C. E. Brawner, and
National Science Foundation Award #1928611. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Bailey, R. (2020) “Chaos and Control: How First-Year and Upper-Level Students Experienced Design Differently in a Project-Based Class.” Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2020.2. Leung, J.K.L., Chu, S.K.W., Pong, T., Ng, D.T.K., Qiao, S. (2022) “Developing a Framework for Blended Design-Based Learning in a First-Year Multidisciplinary Design Course.” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 65 (2).3. Prince, S.P., Tarazkar, Y. (2013) “Mechanical Engineering Design
the school’s Green Team led her to grapple with the role science educators play in advancing environmental justice. She holds a MA in Curriculum and Instruction and a BS in Biological Sciences from the University of Connecticut.Dr. Chrystal Smith, National Science Foundation Chrystal A. S. Smith, Ph.D., is a cultural anthropologist with expertise in diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM education. Her research uses social science theoretical frameworks to examine how implicit factors such as culture and social capital influence the persistence of students belonging to groups historically underrepresented in STEM education. Currently, she is a Program Officer in the Division of Equity for Excellence in STEM
, S. D. Blum, and S. D. Blum, Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead). Morgantown: West Virginia University Press, 2020. Accessed: Feb. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/20/edited_volume/book/78367[5] M. E. Selbach-Allen, S. J. Greenwald, A. E. Ksir, and J. E. Thomley, “Raising the Bar with Standards-Based Grading,” PRIMUS, vol. 30, no. 8–10, pp. 1110–1126, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2019.1695237.[6] J. K. Zimmerman, “Implementing Standards-Based Grading in Large Courses Across Multiple Sections,” PRIMUS, vol. 30, no. 8–10, pp. 1040–1053, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2020.1733149.[7] T. Buckmiller, R. Peters, and J. Kruse, “Questioning points and
the college environment. Her research interest focuses on higher education policy, access, and representation of marginalized groups in STEM disciplines.Dr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Dr. Roberta Rincon is the Associate Director of Research with the Society of Women Engineers, where she oversees the organizationˆa C™s research activities around issues impacting girls and women from elementary through college and into the engineering workDaniel E. Chand, Kent State University Daniel E. Chand is an associate professor of political science and public administration at Kent State University. He earned his Ph.D. in Public Policy from the University of Arkansas in 2013. His research applies policy and
Organization, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://covid19.who.int/region/amro/country/us.[2] M. P. A. Murphy, “COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy,” Contemp. Secur. Policy, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 492–505, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749.[3] A. M. Stern, M. S. Cetron, and H. Markel, “Closing The Schools: Lessons From The 1918–19 U.S. Influenza Pandemic,” Health Aff., vol. 28, no. Supplement 1, pp. w1066– w1078, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1066.[4] D. A. Gill, A. Ladd, and J. Marszalek, “College students experiences with Hurricane Katrina: a comparison between students from Mississippi State University and three New
University, Syracuse, NY. Registered Professional Engineer (Ohio). Robinson’s teaching approach comes from an amalgam of academic, industrial (Bell Labs), governmental (VA) and clinical experiences, plus an interest in science and ethics from his undergraduate days.Ms. Loretta Driskel, Clarkson University Since the late 1990’s my passion has been to create engaging, diverse teaching and learning experiences for students and faculty. As the senior instructional designer at Clarkson University, I have presented at conferences such as the Online Learning Consortium and I have presented at a wide variety of other venues including ADEIL; Sloan-C International Online Learning; Sloan-C Blending Learning; eLearning Consortium of
[Accessed January 28, 2021].[6] ABET, “ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020,” URL: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/ [Accessed August 8, 2019][7] B.A. Oakley, D.M. Hanna, Z. Kuzmyn, and R.M. Felder, “Best Practices Involving Teamwork in the Classroom: Results from a Survey of 6435 Engineering Student Respondents,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2007.[8] R. Lingard and S. Barkataki, “Teaching Teamwork in Engineering and Computer Science,” IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, 2011.[9] M.L. Loughry, M.W. Ohland, and D.J. Woehr, “Assessing Teamwork Skills for Assurance of
Academy is on efficacy in this area, thenthere is some evidence to suggest the investment in the STEM Academy has paid off.References[1] New American Economy. (2017). Sizing up the gap in our supply of STEM workers: Data & analysis. New American Economy. https://research.newamericaneconomy.org/report/sizing-up-the-gap-in- our-supply-of-stem-workers/[2] Goldman, A., Schweig, J., Buenaventura, M., & Wright, C. (2017). Geographic and demographic representativeness of junior reserve officer training corps. Santa Monica, CA; Rand Corporation[3] Kamarck, K. N. (2020). Defense Primer: Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC). In Focus. Congressional Research Service. December 2, 2020.[4] Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D
): 1447-1451[12] Yeager, David S., Carissa Romero, Dave Paunesku, Christopher S. Hulleman, Barbara Schneider, Cintia Hinojosa, Hae Yeon Lee et al. "Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school." Journal of educational psychology 108, no. 3 (2016): 374.[13] Brady, Shannon T., Geoffrey L. Cohen, Shoshana N. Jarvis, and Gregory M. Walton. "A brief social-belonging intervention in college improves adult outcomes for black Americans." Science Advances 6, no. 18 (2020): eaay3689.[14] Silva, Mariana, Matthew West, and Craig Zilles. "Measuring the Score Advantage on Asynchronous Exams in an Undergraduate CS Course." Proceedings of the 51st ACM
ID: 186; Line: 12) 1 Read the poem line as is I say it’s important to focus on what people want the most 2 Highlight words within the line that reference I say it’s important to focus on what people want the most supply chain key terms 3 Extract the phrases that reference supply focus on what people want the most chain key term(s) 4 Relate it back to the general supply chain Item Classification concept(s) referenced. In this case there are Different Level of Importance two. These now become the condensed codes Table 2. Identification and extraction of supply
] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2004.[2] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005.[3] E. F. Redish and K. A. Smith, “Looking Beyond Content: Skill Development for Engineers,” J. Eng. Educ., no. July, pp. 295–307, 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2008.tb00980.x.[4] I. B. Mena, S. E. Zappe, and T. A. Litzinger, “Preparing the Engineer of 2020: Analysis of Alumni Data,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://cms.jee.org/21819%0A%0A.[5] S. R. Daly, E. A. Mosyjowski, and C. M. Seifert, “Teaching creativity in
and engineeringspecifically."CitationsAlimahomed, S. (2010). Thinking outside the rainbow: Women of color redefining queer politics and identity. Social Identities, 16(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504631003688849Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2010.545065Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Coming Out in Class: Challenges and Benefits of Active Learning in a Biology Classroom for LGBTQIA Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar37. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0074Jennings, M., Roscoe, R
," Digital Promise, San Mateo, CA, 2020.[3] M. Adnan and K. Anwar, "Online Learning Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students' Perspectives," Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, vol. 2, no. 1, 2020.[4] I. Chirikov, K. Soria, B. Horgos and D. Jones-White, "Undergraduate and Graduate Students' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic," SERU Consortium Reports, University of California Berkley, 2020.[5] J. Malisch, B. Harris, S. Sherrer, K. Lewis, S. Shepherd, P. MacCarthy, J. Spott, E. Karam, N. Moustaid-Moussa, J. Calarco, L. Ramalingam, A. Taller, J. Canas-Carrell, K. Ardon-Dryer, D. Weiser, X. Bernal and J. Deitloff, "Opinion: In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity
: A fourfold classification,” British Journal ofManagement, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 131-142, 2003.[2] J. R. Hackman and A. C. Edmondson, “Groups as agents of change,” in Handbook oforganization development, T. Cummings, Ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2008, pp. 167-186.[3] L. Long III. and J. A. Mejia, “Conversations about diversity: Institutional barriers forunderrepresented engineering students,” Journal of Engineering, vol. 105, no. 2, 2016.[4] E. J. Theobald, M. J. Hill, E. Tran, S. Agrawal, E. N. Arroyo, S. Behling, N. Chambwe, D. L.Cintron, J. D. Cooper, G. Dunster, J. A. Grummer, K. Hennessey, J. Hsiao, N. Iranon, L. JonesII, H. Jordt, M. Keller, M. E. Lacey, C. E. Littlefield…S. Freeman, “Active learning narrowsachievement gaps for
/ngv:78746.[3] K. A. J. Mohr and E. S. Mohr, “Understanding Generation Z Students to Promote a Contemporary Learning Environment,” J. Empower. Teach. Excell., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 84–94, 2017, doi: 10.15142/T3M05T.[4] H. Hyytinen, A. Toom, and L. Postareff, “Unraveling the complex relationship in critical thinking, approaches to learning and self-efficacy beliefs among first-year educational science students,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 67, no. August, pp. 132–142, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.004.[5] S. K. Wang, H. Y. Hsu, T. C. Reeves, and D. C. Coster, “Professional development to enhance lecturers’ practices in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) as cognitive tools: Lessons
ceiling for women leaders", Women in Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 482-496, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420710778718[9] A. García-Holgado, A. Camacho Díaz, and F. J. García-Peñalvo, “La brecha de género en el sector STEM en América Latina: una propuesta europea,” (The gender gap in the STEM sector in Latin America: a European proposal). October 9-11, 2019. Madrid, SPAIN. V International Congress on Learning, Innovation and Competitiveness (CINAIC 2019). DOI: 10.26754/CINAIC.2019.0143[10] A. Garcia-Holgado, J. Mena, F. J. Garcia- Peñalvo, J. Pascual, M. Heikkinen, S. Harmoinen, L. Garcia-Ramos, R. Penabaena-Niebles, and L. Amores, “Gender equality in STEM programs: a proposal to analyse the situation of a
set of histograms,figure 1, show the students’ grades on both assignments while the second, figure 2, shows thosescores standardized, otherwise known as Z-score normalized. Figure 1: Student GradesFigure 1’s histograms show the counts of each score, with the binwidth and numbers of binsappropriate to the counts. The spread for the UN SDG Assignment was much larger than theFinal Written Report, with a range of 28, minimum of 68, and maximum of 96 relative to a rangeof 14, minimum of 82 and maximum of 96, respectively. This spread becomes considerablewhen looking at figure 2’s histograms: Figure 2: Student Grades, StandardizedWhen considering the standardized scores, the UN SDG
additionalcollege graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. ExecutiveOffice of the President. Washington, DC.[3] Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A., Campbell, P., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutierrez, C. G.,Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., Okpodu, C. M., Robinson, T. J., Summers, M.F., Werner-Washburne, M., & Zavala, M. E. (2016). Improving Underrepresented MinorityStudent Persistence in STEM. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(5), 1–10.[4] Yoder, B. L. (2017). Engineering by the numbers. Washington, DC: American Society forEngineering Education.[5] Fiegener, M. K. National Science Foundation, Division of Science ResourcesStatistics.(2010). Numbers of doctorates awarded continue to grow in 2009; indicators