Asee peer logo
Displaying results 421 - 450 of 1805 in total
Conference Session
M1C: WIP - Readiness and Professional Development
Collection
2019 FYEE Conference
Authors
Todd France, Ohio Northern University; J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Lauren H. Logan, Ohio Northern University; Louis A DiBerardino III, Ohio Northern University
Tagged Topics
FYEE Conference - Paper Submission
completion among college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 83-88.[4] Bembenutty, H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2003). The relation of motivational beliefs and self-regulatory processes to homework completion and academic achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.[5] Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of educational Psychology, 90(1), 70.[6] Bonham, S., D. Deardorff, and R. Beichner. 2003. Comparison of student performance using web and paper- based homework in college-level physics. Journal
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Focusing on Student Success
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Melissa Lynn Morris, West Virginia University; Robin A. M. Hensel, West Virginia University; Joseph Dygert, West Virginia University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
College John R. Williams Outstanding Teacher for 2012, and the 2012 Statler College Teacher of the Year.Dr. Robin A. M. Hensel, West Virginia University Robin A. M. Hensel, Ed.D., is the Assistant Dean for Freshman Experience in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University. While her doctorate is in Curriculum and Instruction, focusing on higher education teaching of STEM fields, she also holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in Mathematics. Dr. Hensel has over seven years of experience working in engineering teams and in project management and administration as a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst for the U. S. Department of Energy as well as more than 25 years of
Conference Session
Engineering Design for Elementary Students
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
. References[1] National Science Foundation. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities inscience and engineering. Arlington, VA. Retrieved, from www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.[2] Crim, S. M., Iwamoto, M., Huang, J. Y., Griffin, P. M., Gilliss, D., Cronquist, A. B., ... &Lathrop, S. (2014). Incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonlythrough food—Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 US sites, 2006–2013. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 63(15), 328.[3] Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). Autism: the empathizing–systemizing (E-S) theory. Annals of theNew York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 68–80.[4] Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in cognitivesciences, 6(6
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 7: Learning and Research in Makerspaces
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Louis Nadelson, University of Central Arkansas; Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University; Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University; Sarah Lanci, Colorado Mesa University; Kate Youmans, Utah State University; Cindy Ann Lenhart, Oregon State University; Alexis K. Van Winkle, University of Central Arkansas
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #26249Knowledge in the Making: What Engineering Students are Learning in Mak-erspacesDr. Louis S. Nadelson, University of Central Arkansas Louis S. Nadelson has a BS from Colorado State University, a BA from the Evergreen State College, a MEd from Western Washington University, and a PhD in educational psychology from UNLV. His scholarly interests include all areas of STEM teaching and learning, inservice and preservice teacher pro- fessional development, program evaluation, multidisciplinary research, and conceptual change. Nadelson uses his over 20 years of high school and college math, science, computer science
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Molly McVey, University of Kansas; Carl W. Luchies, University of Kansas; Camilo Giraldo, University of Kansas; Logan Sidener, University of Kansas
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
communication skills.Presenting problem solutions in a clear and concise structured manner is an important skill for the studentto develop. This provides an opportunity to practice the language of the scientific method includingspecifying the knowns and unknowns, the assumptions and the applicable principle(s), the solution, aninterpretation of the results, and a discussion on the accuracy and the recommendations for further study.Working homework problems outside of class, whether done individually or in a study group, is also anopportunity for the student to engage in a self-evaluation of mastery of the concept and whether additionalhelp is required to develop the expected level of mastery. Learning is enhanced when homework is goal-directed
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 9: Persistence and Retention
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University; William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University; Brett Tallman P.E., Montana State University; Romy Beigel, Montana State University; Emma Annand, Montana State University; Monika Kwapisz, Montana State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
research into engineering identity is the extent to which it reflects a commitment toengineering as a career [19]. Nora et al.’s model leads to the proposition that engineering identityis an intermediate outcome preceding the decision to reenroll, and increasing degree productivityhas become an important policy goal for the field of engineering [1]. Figure 1 depicts theconceptual framework of this study.Nora et al.’s model also identifies and organizes other factors that affect students’ decisions topersist in their studies [14]. These factors also impact student persistence. Differences have beenobserved among students based on their background characteristics in terms of their likelihood ofbeing retained, such as gender, underrepresented racial
Conference Session
The Best of First Year Programs: Best Paper Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Noah Salzman, Boise State University; Ann Delaney, Boise State University; Catherine Rose Bates, Institute for STEM & Diversity Initiatives; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
engineering include a program at University of Arkansas that showed significantly higherfall-to-spring student retention and higher average GPA among students who were part of a freshmanpeer mentoring program ​[6]​, as well as Marra et al.’s study of students who participated in a peermentoring program and their subsequent feelings of belonging and intentions to persist in engineering[7]​.Summer Bridge ProgramsIt is well established that summer bridge programs work. Summer bridge programs have beenimplemented at many universities in an attempt to combat the high rates of attrition observed in STEMmajors, especially in students from underrepresented backgrounds in STEM ​[8]​. Bridge programs takemany forms, with some focusing substantially on
Conference Session
Advancing Research on Engineering Leaders’ Confidence, Careers, and Styles
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University; Brett Tallman P.E., Montana State University; Emma Annand, Montana State University; Romy M. Beigel, Montana State University; Monika B Kwapisz, Montana State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Leadership Development
, "The green report: engineering education for a changing world," American Society for Engineerig Education1994, Available: https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/The-Green-Report.pdf.[5] M. Klassen, D. Reeve, C. Rottmann, R. Sacks, A. E. Simpson, and A. Huynh, "Charting the Landscape of Engineering Leadership Education in North American Universities," in ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016: ASEE Conferences.[6] S. Stryker and P. J. Burke, "The past, present, and future of an identity theory," Social psychology quarterly, pp. 284-297, 2000.[7] K. L. Tonso, "Engineering identity," in Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
April A. Dukes, University of Pittsburgh; Lucille A. Sowko, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing; Mark Gartner, University of Pittsburgh; Brandon Joseph Barber, Sawnson School of Engineering University of PIttsburgh; Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
value overall team/group work differently, or justinterdisciplinary teamwork. Thus, we anticipate that future analyses will support the initialpositive results shown by the perceived benefits to interdisciplinary teams as well as additionalstudent gains in self-efficacy, project competencies, and other design course objectives.References[1] S. McComb and J. Kirkpatrick. “Impact of pedagogical approaches on cognitive complexityand motivation to learn: Comparing nursing and engineering undergraduate students,” NursingOutlook, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 37-48, Jan. 2016.[2] World Health Organization, Framework for Action on Interprofessional EducationCollaborative Practice. Geneva: World Health Organization, pp. 1–64, 2010.[3] M. Cox, P. Cuff, B. Brandt
Conference Session
Track Special Topic: Intelligence Technical Session 14
Collection
2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity
Authors
Turhan Kendall Carroll, Ohio State University; Amy Kramer P.E., Ohio State University; Emily Dringenberg, Ohio State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Special Topic: Intelligence
constructs in engineering, and they operate as gatekeepers forwho participates and who is recognized as “capable” in engineering education. This tool (seeFigure 1) can be used in an exercise of self-reflection around one’s own beliefs about therelationship between intelligence and smartness.An understanding of how intelligence and smartness are constructed as well as active reflection onour own view(s) of the relationship between these two constructs can help us better understandhow we are active participants in processes that either validate or invalidate students’ abilities, inour own practice as educators. This is of vital importance because of the implications that theexclusionary nature of smartness and intelligence can have for students
Conference Session
Track: Pre-college - Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity
Authors
Tanya D. Ennis, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Pre-College
assignments. CAD software was accessible online to accommodate the independent coursework and to provide flexibility for students to complete these assignments. As students learned these engineering skills, the engineering design instructor lectured them about the ways in which their newly acquired skills would aid them in designing and creating their search and rescue assistants (S.A.R.A.’s). The students synthesized these skills in the engineering design process and when physically creating their final S.A.R.A.’s in their engineering design class.Figure 3: Updated Conjecture Map with Integrated Engineering Design and Spatial Visualization Figure 3 illustrates the updated conjecture map
Conference Session
The Best of First Year Programs: Best Paper Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joshua L. Hertz, Northeastern University; Noah Daviero, Northeastern University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
concept(s)claimed. Unlike the real patent system, enforcement of patent claims was formally left to theinstructor. Typically, enforcement involved a quick meeting with the infringing team to find away to modify their idea so that it now fell into a useful gap in the other team’s patent claims.Teams who subsequently felt that their patent was being infringed upon were likewise brought infor a quick discussion to see how the other team’s idea fell into a gap in their claims. Having theclass patent system thus generated very effective discussions about what patent claims mean,how they work, and why they are written as they are. Class patent applications were submitted as a pdf file attached to an email to theinstructor. A sample patent
Conference Session
Manufacturing Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Divya Pahuja, Florida State University; Marcia A. Mardis, Florida State University; Faye R. Jones, Florida State University
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing
personological issues suggests thatgovernmental, industry, and educational stakeholders need to address the issue of a clearlystated, commonly used definition of AM to attract investors, recruit workforce participants, andguide effective educational opportunities.AcknowledgementThis work was supported, in part, by National Science Foundation award 1700581.References[1] B. Esmaeilian, S. Behdad, and B. Wang, "The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 39, pp. 79–100, 2016.[2] P. Panchak, "The manufacturer's agenda: Why we need a better definition of 'advanced manufacturing'," Industry Week, November 14. [Online]. Available: https://www.industryweek.com/leadership/manufacturers
Collection
2018 Gulf Southwest Section Conference
Authors
John R. Clegg; Kenneth R. Diller
the problem, students movewithin and outside of the biotransport domain. We believe that on to the second step, analysis, that involves identifying andthis illustrative case study provides significant quantitative defining the system(s) being studied, and interactions thatevidence supporting the effectiveness of challenge-based occur between the system(s) and the environment.pedagogies for engineering courses. Conservation laws (i.e. mass, energy, momentum) frame the
Conference Session
SED Technical Session: Applications
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angran Xiao, New York City College of Technology; Rafaela Alba, New York City College of Technology; Ozlem Yasar, City University of New York, New York City College of Technology; Andy Zhang, New York City College of Technology; Gaffar Barakat Gailani, New York City College of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
York, New York City College of Technology Prof. Yasar is currently working as an assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology at City Tech. She is also the director of Research Laboratory SET – Scaffolds for Engineered Tissues. Her research interests are: - Design and Fabrication of Tissue Constructs - Bio-fabrication - Biomechanics - Soft lithography Techniques for Cell Micro-patterning - CAD/CAM ApplicationsDr. Andy Zhang, New York City College of Technology Dr. Andy S. Zhang received his Ph.D. from the City University of New York in 1995. He is currently the program director of a mechatronics project in the New York City College of Technology/CUNY. For the past 15 years, Dr. Zhang
Conference Session
Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Angeles Dominguez, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico and Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile; Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico and Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics and Physics
American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) where he was vice president candidate, a member of the Committee on Research in Physics Education (RIPE) a member and chair of the International Education Committee and elected member of Leadership Organizing Physics Education Research Council (PERLOC ) in the period 2015-2018. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Students’ perception of teaching practice in an active learning environmentAbstractPhysics Education Research has been very active since the late 70’s trying to reduce the gapbetween what the instructor teaches and what the students learn. One of the most importantresults of that research is the design of educational strategies and
Conference Session
Faculty Development Lightning Talks
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laura E. Sullivan-Green, San Jose State University; Patricia R. Backer, San Jose State University; Ravisha Mathur, San Jose State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Constituent Committee
., Aragon, M. C., Suchard, M. R. & Hurtado, S. (2014). Undergraduate teaching faculty: The 2013–2014 HERI Faculty Survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA. Available: http://www.heri.ucla.edu/monographs/HERI-FAC2014- monograph.pdf[10] Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the literature. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.[11] Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010, July). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 185-207.[12] Lord S, & Camacho, M. (2007). Effective teaching practices: preliminary analysis of
Conference Session
Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 1 - Current Issues
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeff P. Morris, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Design Graphics
currently offering assistance or evaluating other students. Student B must wait for an available evaluator. If an evaluator does not become available, the student may be forced to leave without getting credit for work completed. The longer a student takes to finish their assignments during class, the more likely this case is to occur. • Student C believes he/she has met all five grading criteria prior to class start or during class time. A free evaluator begins an evaluation and flags a mistake(s). Student C may elect to fix them without assistance or ask the TA for assistance in fixing them. This process may take up to (10) minutes or longer. Student C must fix these mistakes or be graded “as-is
Conference Session
CEED Technical Session I: WIP: Experiential Learning Potpourri
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Faye R. Jones, Florida State University; Marcia A. Mardis, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; Ebrahim Randeree, Florida State University
Tagged Divisions
Cooperative and Experiential Education
Academies Press, 2018.[2] A. Bargagliotti, D. Herreiner, and J. A. Phillips, “Breaking boundaries: Presing issues in equity, computing, and problem-solving in STEM undergraduate education,” J. Res. STEM Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 2–12, Jul. 2018.[3] AAC & U, College learning for the new global century. Washington, DC: The Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2007.[4] S. Ricker, “The skill set more than 3/4 of employers want,” 10-Apr-2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.careerbuilder.com/advice/the-skill-set-more-than-of-employers- want. [Accessed: 25-Apr-2019].[5] M. Akdere, L. Hickman, and M. Kirchner, “Developing leadership competencies for STEM fields: The case of Purdue Polytechnic Leadership Academy
Conference Session
Communication in Pre-College Engineering Education
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ashley R. Strong, Utah State University; Amy Wilson-Lopez, Utah State University
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
inunderstanding and generating complex information and ideas. ReferencesBritner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middleschool students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485-499.Cannady, M. A., Greenwald, E., & Harris, K. N. (2014). Problematizing the STEMpipeline metaphor: Is the STEM pipeline metaphor serving our students and the STEMworkforce? Science Education, 98, 443-460.Cervetti, G. N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P. D., & Goldschmidt, P. G. (2012). Theimpact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 631-658.Chen, Y.-C., Hand, B., & McDowell, L. (2013
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Brock Alexander Hays, Ohio Northern University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
used at a much higher rate since the late 1990’s. [24]Although the rubric has been viewed solely as an assessment tool for quite some time, recentstudies have suggested that it can also be used as a learning instrument. Arter and McTighesuggest that in collaboration with a formative assessment of student’s current un-finished work,the rubric can highlight areas that students are excelling in, as well as show opportunities wherethey can improve. [25] Jonsson and Svingby also note that a great benefit to using a rubric is thatit can be incredibly consistent in regards to the use of judgment when assessing specific studenttraits in class. [23] A prominent example of rubric use, the VALUE Rubrics developed and published by theAssociation of
Conference Session
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Spencer Rosen, Harvey Mudd College; Sabrine Griffith, Harvey Mudd College; Eli Byrnes, Harvey Mudd College; Steven Michael Santana, Harvey Mudd College; Laura Palucki Blake, Harvey Mudd College ; Matthew Spencer, Harvey Mudd College
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies
learning of classroom concepts. This study did not control the tutorial instructionthat students received, so different tutorial instructors could have affected the exchange ofknowledge between the classroom and laboratory. However, the techniques used in this studycould be used to prompt reflection on in-class concepts that appear in a lab. This could be a greatopportunity to improve student learning.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the Claremont Center for Teaching and Learning.REFERENCES[1] L. B. Buck, S. L. Bretz, and M. H. Towns, “Characterizing the Level of Inquiry in the Undergraduate Laboratory,” ​Res. Teach.​, p. 7.[2] A. M. Schoffstall and B. A. Gaddis, “Incorporating Guided-Inquiry Learning into the Organic Chemistry
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen, Technical University of Denmark; Jason Bazylak, University of Toronto; Steffen Foss Hansen, Technical University of Denmark; Redante Delizo Mendoza
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
) Structure; and 7) Peer review [24].Active learning exercisesALEx or active learning activities (ALA) is an instructional method where pre-plannedactivities in class make the students put to use the content that they have just been taught. Manydifferent ALA and ALEx exist [23], [25], which are either informal or graded. The plainestversion of ALEx is regular multiple choice questions, which the students have to solve duringlectures but ALEx also comes as small written exercises, sketch drawings, group workactivities or the like. In class, the instructor presents the theory or case(s) and instruct thestudents how to answer the upcoming ALEx. Typically, the ALEx activities open for studentsubmissions only for a few minutes thus, when conducting graded
Conference Session
Technical Session 12: Teaching and Learning
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Florian Schmidt, TU Berlin; Franz-Josef Schmitt, Technische Universität Berlin; Laura Boeger, TU Berlin; Arno Wilhelm-Weidner, Technische Universitaet Berlin; Nicole Torjus
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
research andinstruction. Curriculum Models for the 21st Century, 73-89. New York: Springer.[6] Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning: globalperspectives, local design. Pfeiffer.[7] Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S.C., & Wagemann, J. (2014). Effects of the flippedclassroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistrystudents. J. Chem. Educ., 91(9), 1334–1339.[8] Holmes, M. R., Tracy, E. M., Painter, L. L.; Oestreich, T., & Park, H. (2015). Movingfrom flipcharts to the flipped classroom: Using technology-driven teaching methods to promoteactive learning in foundation and advanced master’s social work courses. Clinical Social WorkJournal, 43, 215–224[9
Conference Session
Mechanics Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Josue Njock Libii, Purdue University Fort Wayne
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics
described in this paper, we devised special courseassignments: we gave a group problem to the students in a given course on the first day of classand organized students in groups of three or four, depending on the size of the class. Groupingsof students were alphabetical, based on the first letter of their last names. The student at the topof each grouping was designated the convener and leader of the group. Students were asked tomeet weekly and work collaboratively to solve the assigned problem(s) as a group and to submitone report of their work as a group on the last day of class, which is about one week before theday of the final exam. This report was worth 10% of the course grade. Students were encouragedto collaborate on other assignments, as
Conference Session
STEM Issues
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emel Cevik, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University; Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Jennifer Whitfield, Texas A&M University; Jay R. Porter, Texas A&M University; Joseph A. Morgan, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
understanding of building automation, IoT, the engineering design process, andengineering careers.The S-STEM survey consists of 37 items. It is a five-point Likert-scale instrument that wasdeveloped to capture students’ attitudes toward science, math, engineering/technology, and21st century skills [18]. In the present study, the survey questions that measure students’attitudes toward science, math, and engineering/ technology concepts were utilized.Students’ responses to those questions were analyzed.ResultsAt the completion of the summer camp, evaluative feedback was collected from theparents regarding their knowledge and understanding related to building automation,Internet of Things, the engineering design process, and engineering careers
Conference Session
Bridge Programs Connecting to First-Year Engineering
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adrienne Steele, Louisiana State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs, Pre-College Engineering Education
created a new position to keepthe program going long-term. The current E2 director has other job duties, but the camp and thepeer mentor program make up 50% of her responsibilities (25% for each program). Fortunately,the current staff member spent two years assisting the previous camp director with this program,and experienced students also have assisted in easing the transition between staff. It is alsoimperative to partner with other campus programs, units, and resources to ensure that theprogram is successful. Some changes made by campus residential life in 2018 possibly had anegative impact on the camp’s enrollment and participation due to competing activities.Communication for planning 2019’s camp began immediately after the 2018 program to
Conference Session
Mechanics Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Narasimha Siddhanti Malladi, Malladi Academy
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics
convoluted set of equations requiring several intermediatesteps. as shown in section 2's typical textbook solution for the Timoshenko problem. Tosimplify, all vectors are represented in polar form. Five Simplified Integrated Methods ofSolution (SIMS) are developed and applied progressively to solve the ten types of basicplanar vector systems that occur in statically determinate engineering mechanics problems.SIMS will yield scalar equations each with only one unknown for solving basic vectorsystems with two or three unknowns. For use in SIMS, polar vectors are classified as below.Solutions to examples start by identifying the type and forming the vector system equations.1. Vector with known magnitude and direction 3 (20) Known
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division: Postcard and Student Essays
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Roxana Maria Carbonell, University of Texas, Austin; Madison E. Andrews, University of Texas, Austin; Audrey Boklage, University of Texas, Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
ofengineering education that benefit from makerspace projects. As we continue to survey studentsin makerspaces, we hypothesize that our results will adjust to give us a richer view of the impactmakerspace use has on individual’s education throughout their undergraduate studies.References 1. American Society for Engineering Education. (2016). Envisioning the Future of the Maker Movement: Summit Report. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education. 2. Barrett, T. W., & Pizzico, M. C., & Levy, B., & Nagel, R. L., & Linsey, J. S., & Talley, K. G., & Forest, C. R., & Newstetter, W. C. (2015, June). A Review of University Maker Spaces. Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &
Conference Session
FOCUS ON EXHIBITS: Welcome Reception & NEW THIS YEAR! 2018 Best Division Paper Nominee Poster Session Sponsored by Engineering Unleashed
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Margaret Phillips, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics
ASEE Headquarters
Paper ID #22551Effective Methods of Engineering Information Literacy: Initial Steps of aSystematic Literature Review and Observations About the LiteratureMargaret Phillips, Purdue University, West Lafayette Margaret Phillips is an Assistant Professor of Library Science and Engineering Information Specialist in the Purdue University Libraries. Her research interests include technical standards and engineering and technology information literacy.Amy S. Van Epps, Harvard University Amy S. Van Epps is Director of Sciences and Engineering Services in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Li- braries at Harvard University. She was recently an associate professor of Library Science and Engineering Librarian at Purdue University. She