prototyping in design projects," in ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, IL, 2012, pp. 737-747.28. V. K. Viswanathan and J. S. Linsey, "Physical models and design thinking: A study of functionality, novelty and variety of ideas," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 134, p. 091004, 2012.29. D. Faas, Q. Bao, and M. C. Yang, "Preliminary sketching and prototyping: comparisons in exploratory design-and-build activities," presented at the ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Buffalo, NY, 2014.30. A. Römer, M. Pache, G. Weißhahn, U. Lindemann, and W. Hacker
algorithms from a given team will look very similar, but theindividual submission provides accountability that each student is at least writing up a plan andstarting to think deeply about each problem.Before the second class in the learning cycle, students are told to work with their teams to comeup with 25 questions for each problem by the start of the next class (a reduced version of a 100question Q-storm session [11, pp. 154–155]). They must also submit one of those questions foreach homework problem a day prior to the class. The instructor develops a response to eachquestion and during the second class, discusses the students’ submitted questions. Sometimes theinstructor might provide a direct answer; sometimes the instructor will ask for
differencesto form engineering design teams," Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 54-66, 2007. [Online].https://doi.org/10.11120/ened.2007.02020054.[12] R. Sach, M. Petre, and H. Sharp, "The use of MBTI in software engineering," 22nd AnnualPsychology of Programming Interest Group, 19-22 Sep 2010, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.[13] A. B. Soomro, N. Salleh, E. Mendes, and J. Grundy, "The effect of software engineers’personality traits on team climate and performance: A Systematic Literature Review," Informationand Software Technology, vol. 73, pp. 52-65, 2016.[14] A. R. Gilal, J. Jaafar, A. Abro, M. Omar, S. Basri, and M. Q. Saleem, "Effective PersonalityPreferences of Software Programmer: A Systematic Review," Journal of Information Science
response corresponds to a rating of 1 or 2 (strongly disagree or disagree), a neutralresponse corresponds to 3, and a positive response corresponds to 4 or 5 (agree or stronglyagree). Note: the number of responses is 20-21, however the total response may not add to 100%due to rounding. Construct Q# Statement Negative Neutral Positive Response: Response Response: Disagree Agree Growth Q1 I prefer to work on my own 19% 19% 61.9% Mindset through the design process. Q2 I believe the design review
: From Ab Initio to Monte Carlo Methods, 1999th edition. Berlin ; New York: Springer, 2000.[17] A. D. Rollett and P. Manohar, “The Monte Carlo Method,” in Continuum Scale Simulation of Engineering Materials, D. Raabe, F. Roters, F. Barlat, and L.-Q. Chen, Eds., Weinheim, FRG: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2005, pp. 77–114. doi: 10.1002/3527603786.ch4.[18] R. N. Giere, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. in Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988. Accessed: Jan. 06, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo3622319.html[19] D. Hestenes, “Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction,” Am. J. Phys
mentoring programs in education and other professions: A review of the literature,” Educ. Adm. Q., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 518–540, Oct. 2004, doi: 10.1177/0013161X04267118.[16] “What is undergraduate research?.” The Council on Undergraduate Research. Accessed: Jun. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.cur.org/about/what-is-undergraduate- research/[17] S. Brunhaver, S. K. Gilmartin, M. M. Grau, S. Sheppard, and H. L. Chen, “Not all the same: A look at early career engineers employed in different sub-occupations,” in Proc. 2013 ASEE Annu. Conf. and Expo., Atlanta, GA. 10.18260/1-2--22315[18] H. Haeger and C. Fresquez, “Mentoring for inclusion: The impact of mentoring on undergraduate researchers in the sciences,” CBE
, "Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth," Race ethnicity and education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69-91, 2005, doi: 10.1080/1361332052000341006.[6] M. Denton, M. Borrego, and A. Boklage, "Community cultural wealth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: A systematic review," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 556-580, 2020.[7] C. C. Samuelson and E. Litzler, "Community cultural wealth: An assets‐based approach to persistence of engineering students of color," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 93-117, 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20110.[8] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, and M. E. Allen
, and S. Gambino, “The impact of new or renovated collegiate recreation centers on recruitment and retention,” Recreat. Sport. J., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 18– 32, 2018, doi: 10.1123/rsj.2017-0005.[18] E. Swanson, K. Kopotic, G. Zamarro, J. N. Mills, J. P. Greene, and G. W. Ritter, “An evaluation of the educational impact of college campus visits: A randomized experiment,” AERA Open, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1177/2332858421989707.[19] S. Secore, “The significance of campus visitations to college choice and strategic enrollment management,” Strateg. Enroll. Manag. Q., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 150–158, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1002/sem3.20114.[20] A. Pavlik, “Offer virtual reality tours to attract
. Malmi et al., “How authors did it – a methodological analysis of recent engineering education research papers in the European Journal of Engineering Education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 171–189, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1202905.[8] A. Goncher, A. Hingle, A. Johri, and J. Case, “The Role and Use of Theory in Engineering Education Research,” in International Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri, Ed., Taylor & Francis, 2023, pp. 137–155. doi: 10.4324/9781003287483.[9] Q. Liu, “A SNAPSHOT METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW OF JOURNAL ARTICLES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION RESEARCH,” Proc. Can. Eng. Educ. Assoc. CEEA, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.24908/pceea.vi0.13795.[10] Y. Chetioui, H. Benlafqih, and H