class. The data reveal common themes or features the teachersfocused on in their design of the rubric. The teachers initially focused on team and process-oriented features (e.g., teamwork, organization, steps of design process) and how well the finalsolution worked. The teachers tended to focus less on knowledge-oriented features relating to theapplication of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) principles as theydeveloped their rubrics. As the teachers applied their newly developed rubrics to their students’final projects, they focused on surface features of teamwork and process and struggled to identifythe specific technical accomplishments of the teams’ work. The conclusion includes implicationsand future research work
this qualitative assessment of a pilot program spanning 3 semesters, two (2) College ofEngineering faculty at Northeastern University explored and managed several experientialservice-learning projects in their first-year engineering courses between Fall 2012 – Fall 2013.As a result of 84 first-year engineering students working with 7 different community partners,215 middle school and high school students were exposed to engineering curriculum throughmeaningful service-learning projects involving STEM (science, technology, engineering &mathematics) education that they otherwise would not have received. The service-learningprojects were qualitatively very successful in delivering STEM curriculum to young students, asdetermined from faculty
innovate through their creativity built on the foundation of a thoroughunderstanding of the design process and an integration of technical knowledge and socialawareness. The importance of teaching design in engineering education has been highlyrecognised by Professional Engineering Associations; for example, the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) and the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board(CEAB) have recognized facility with design as one of the most important learning outcomes ofan engineering education. However, design is difficult to teach because (1) design is a complexcognitive process [2], which requires what are classified in the Bloom’s taxonomy [3] as higher-level thinking skills: analysis, evaluation and
Paper ID #9334Training the Trainer: An Integrated University/Industry Program of Improv-ing Russian Industrial TrainersProf. Svetlana Vasilievna Barabanova, Kazan National Research Technological UniversityJulia Ziyatdinova,Dr. Vasiliy Grigoryevich Ivanov, KAZAN NATIONAL RESEARCH TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITYDr. Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Page 24.1272.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Training the Trainer: An Integrated University/Industry Program of Improving Russian Industrial
? 3. Helps them learn science at a deep conceptual Heat transfer, experimental design, Studio STEM is an after-school program level insulation, conduction, convection, designed to increase middle school youth’s 4. With the support of face-to-face discussions radiation, energy transformations, understanding of science, technology, and with peers, teachers, and mentors, torque, gears, friction, mass and engineering through issues related to energy 5. And with the support of a social networking weight, gravity, electromagnetic security and sustainability. Youth are given the forum (Edmodo) that connects peers, teachers
Paper ID #9005Lessons Learned Developing an Engaging Engineering Summer CampMs. Karen J Krapcho, University of Utah Karen Krapcho,M.S. is the Outreach and grant coordinator for NSF-0652982.Dr. Cynthia Furse, University of Utah Page 24.861.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Lessons Learned Developing an Engaging Engineering Summer CampIntroduction In order to meet the growing workforce needs in science and technology it is projected thatthe U.S. must increase the
discarded,and some presented to the University administration as action items.Introduction and Previous WorkWhile talking about clean energy President Obama stated in his weekly address on October 2nd2010 that “Our future as a nation depends on making sure that the jobs and industries of the 21stcentury take root here in America.1” The innovation productivity and quality must increase to stopthe country's technological and manufacturing decline. While most engineering programs producesolid problem solvers, this may not be sufficient. The education of engineers must also enhancetheir inventive and entrepreneurial skills by including topics on innovation methods, disruptivetechnologies, intellectual property, entrepreneurship, etc. Engineering design
., Engineering Ethics, 4th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.2. Lathem, S., M. Neumann, and N. Hayden. 2011. The Socially Responsible Engineer: Assessing Student Attitudesof Roles and Responsibilities. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3):p. 444-474.3. Redish, E., Smith, K., Looking Beyond Content; Skill Development for Engineers. Journal of EngineeringEducation. 97(3):p. 295-307.4. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. 1997.ABET Code of Ethics ofEngineers.http://wadsworth.cengage.com/philosophy_d/templates/student_resources/0534605796_harris/cases/Codes/abet.htm (accessed January 3, 2014).5. Gilbane Gold. 1989. 24 min. Lubbock, TX: National Institute for Engineering Ethics, Texas Tech University.(DVD)6. Sweeney, R. 2013
has a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech and received a Master’s of Civil Engineering and an Ed.D. in Technology Education from N.C. State University. He specializes in developing and integrating project-based activities into the K-12 classroom that incorporate engineering and STEM learning concepts as well as providing professional development for K-12 teachers.Dr. Frank M. Bowman, University of North Dakota Dr. Frank Bowman is Associate Professor, Tom Owens Fellow, and Associate Chair in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of North Dakota. He holds a Ph.D. from the California Institute of Technology and a B.S from Brigham Young University, both in Chemical Engineering. His research
Paper ID #8751The Traditional Engineer vs. The Innovative EngineeerDr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is the recipient of three NSF awards supporting research in engineering education. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University and Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology. His research interests include engineering innovativeness, entrepreneurial engineering, teamwork, and mindset changes and learning strategies of both engineering students
projects spon- sored by the Illinois Department of Transportation’s Center for Transportation, Peoria County Highway Department, FHWA, ITE, OSHA, Michigan DOT, AAA, and others. Dr. Al-Khafaji is the Executive Director of the Center for Emerging Technologies in Infrastructure and a Professor of Civil Engineering at Bradley University. He earned his BS in Civil Engineering and MS degree in Construction Management from Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan. He received a second MSCE in soil dynamics and a Ph.D. in Geotechnical Engineering from Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan. Dr. Al-Khafaji is the co-author of 11 engineering textbooks including Nu- merical Methods, geotechnical, Statics and
Paper ID #8877Learning Outcomes of Introductory Engineering Courses: Student Percep-tionsProf. Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University Dr. Kaul is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Western Carolina University. His re- search interests include Fracture Diagnostics, Structural Dynamics and Control, and Motorcycle Dynam- ics.Dr. Robert D. Adams, Western Carolina University Dr. Adams is the Interim Department Head of the Department of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University. He has 9 years of industrial experience as an electrical engineer working in the area of analysis and testing of
Paper ID #9342Fostering Intra- and Entrepreneurship in Engineering StudentsDr. Erin Jablonski, Bucknell University B.S. Biochemical Engineering 1999, Rutgers; M.S. Chemical Engineering 2001, Rutgers; Ph.D. Chemical Engineering 2002, Iowa State University; NSF Graduate Research Fellowship 1999-2002; NRC Postdoc- toral Fellow at NIST 2002-2004. Page 24.624.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Fostering Intra- and Entrepreneurship in Engineering StudentsAbstractEngineers value
that high quality of life. Engineers must determine how to allocate scarceresources effectively while also thinking of the operation and eventual dismantling orrehabilitation of their creations. As such, getting buy-in and agreement from all involved partiesis crucial, including engineers, architects, scientists, contractors, owners, users, and otherconcerned parties.While computer science and engineering technology have been well established at West TexasA&M University (WTAMU), the mechanical (2003) and civil (2010) engineering programs are Page 24.1147.2more recent. Curricula for the newer engineering degree programs are similar to other
Printrun/Pronterface. Anotheralternative is Repetier, which is relatively newer but not fully proven tool, but has a nicelydeveloped user interface4.Two former RMU manufacturing engineering students, David Beddard and Charles Mura,constructed an open source wooden frame-based NC router in 2011 at the department. Then theinterest of these students and others shifted to Maker Movement and especially the Rep-Rap andother open source technology. After building two Mendel Max machines and promoting them inthe new National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Institute (NAMII) where the institutionwas in the original proposing team5, Charles Mura was recruited by the lead author to mentortwo biomedical engineering students to build a Mendel Max 1.5
specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science departments on diversifying their under- graduate student population. Dr. Brawner previously served as principal evaluator of the NSF-sponsored
American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Enhancing the Educational Experience in Introductory Engineering CoursesIntroductionThis paper outlines the restructure of the content and delivery of an introductory engineeringseminar course for first-year undergraduate students using core service learning projectexperiences to shape early student learning of engineering design and practice. The First-YearSeminar in Engineering (FYSE) is a critical entry-level course for undergraduate engineeringmajors in accredited degree programs (accreditation by the Accreditation Board of Engineeringand Technology (ABET)) at institutions of higher education. The course is designed to orientnew students to the University and introduce engineering as a
for the entire first- yearengineering students. All engineering students are brought into the First-YearEngineering Program that is part of the Department of Engineering Education.They are required to complete a common first year core of classes matriculating to theirrespective engineering major (Jeremy, 2006). As the industries and societies that revolvearound faces mind-boggling challenges especially if one works with Informationtechnology, manufacturing, oil or gas. They need for engineers in this field are veryacute. Federal stimulus spending in such areas as energy technology and infrastructureshows an increase in demand. But there is still
environments. She is also interested in broadening participation in electrical and computer engineering (ECE) by determining better ways to recruit young women to the profession and retaining women in ECE programs. Page 24.757.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Innovative Engineering Outreach: Capacitive Touch Sensor WorkshopAbstract:The United States is rapidly falling behind internationally in Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics (STEM) recruiting with currently, only 16 percent of American high schoolseniors
Designing Solutions (engineering)Practice 7: Engaging in Argument From EvidencePractice 8: Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information8.1 Expository Text: the teacher integrates the use of expository text within the science lesson.8.2 Technology: the teacher has students use technology during inquiry activities; or teacher uses the technology with student involvement. Page 24.508.58.3 Formative Assessment: the teacher integrates formative assessments into the lesson.Frequency codesFrequency codes are identified as momentary instructional practices or events that may occurrepeatedly throughout a lesson. Furthermore, frequency codes are
Paper ID #9049Predicting Entrepreneurial Intent among Entry-Level Engineering StudentsDr. Mark F Schar, Stanford University Dr. Schar works in the Center for Design Research - Designing Education Lab at Stanford University. He is also a member of the Symbiotic Project of Affective Neuroscience Lab at Stanford University and a Lecturer in the School of Engineering. Dr. Schar’s area of research is ”pivot thinking” which is the intersection of design thinking and the neuroscience of choice where he has several research projects underway. He has a 30 year career in industry as a Vice President with The Procter & Gamble
capstone course is done at the end, students are encouraged to identifyand select a project about six months before graduation. Typically, projects are proposed bycorporate sponsors, frequently employers of the students or corporations looking for answers to aproblem through the lead faculty (faculty in charge of program). As a result, students deal withreal problems of significant issue to the sponsor and typically involve engineering, technology,science, and business related issues. Interdisciplinary teams of two to three students are assignedto each project. These teams work with faculty members and representatives of the sponsors todevelop detailed, implementable solutions. At the end of the course, students present the projectpresentations to
and have become a powerful force indriving the U.S. economy13. Moreover, entrepreneurs in the technology field are viewed ascritical to the future success of the United States and its position as a global leader1. Manyuniversities around the U.S. have begun to implement curricular and co-curricular programs inan attempt to influence and expose students to experiences that will foster entrepreneurialthinking. More research is being conducted to investigate the impact of these programmaticinitiatives and identify what factors promote an entrepreneurial mindset.In this study we investigate how both interest and intention have influenced engineering alumnitowards entrepreneurship. With respect to entrepreneurial interest, Lent, Brown, Sheu
) degree from Pierre and Marie Curie University - Paris VI, Sorbonne Universities (2011) in the area of Engineering Sciences. Prior to his actual position, he was an Associate Professor at University of Wyoming (UW) and prior to that he was an Assistant Professor and the Director of the AE Program at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT). He participated significantly to the development of the current architectural engineering undergraduate and master’s programs at IIT. During his stay at IIT, he taught thermal and fluids engineering (thermody- namics, heat transfer, and fluid mechanics), building sciences, physical performance of buildings, building enclosure, as well as design courses, such as HVAC, energy, plumbing
graduate levels. Her work is often cross-disciplinary, collaborating with colleagues from engineering, education, psychology, and industrial design.Eli M. Silk, University of MichiganMeisha Nicole Rosenberg, Iowa State University Meisha Rosenberg is a 2nd year PhD student in Mechanical Engineering and Human-Computer Interac- tion at Iowa State University. She received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from Iowa State University in 2011. Her research interests include the use of Immersive Computing Technologies in collaborative design work among engineers and design students. She is current working with Dr. Seda Yilmaz to in- vestigate the role that cognitive style plays in a designer’s ideation process and how tools can be
Paper ID #8649Exploring Engineering Students’ Beliefs on Effort and IntelligenceNora B. Honken, University of Louisville Nora Honken holds degrees in industrial engineering from Virginia Tech and Arizona State University. She will receive a PHD in Education Leadership, Foundations and Human Development from the Uni- versity of Louisville in May 2014. She has held positions in engineering and management for Axxess Technologies, Varian, Amoco and Corning, and has taught in industry, at community college and at the graduate and undergraduate levels. Her research interests include engineering student performance and
own learning are better able to adapt to our increasinglyknowledge-driven economy and stay abreast of change in science and technology and thusremain relevant to the modern workforce.PurposeIn order to address these gaps, we need robust curricula that target information literacy skills andattributes necessary to enable life-long learning. Even more importantly, however, we needuseful assessment tools that will provide a better understanding of engineering students’ self-directed learning skills and a valid measure of how these skills improve. While there areassessment instruments that address these skills, most of them focus on information search skillsand a non-engineering application.In this project, we aim to develop two valid and reliable
Paper ID #9860Measuring the Effects of Precollege Engineering EducationMr. Noah Salzman, Purdue University, West Lafayette Noah Salzman is a doctoral candidate in engineering education at Purdue University. He received his B.S. in engineering from Swarthmore College, his M.Ed. in secondary science education from University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and his M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University. He has work experience as an engineer and taught science, technology, engineering, and mathematics at the high school level. His research focuses on the intersection of pre-college and undergraduate engineering
Paper ID #9596Consistency in Assessment of Pre-Engineering SkillsDr. Shelley Lorimer P.Eng., Grant MacEwan University Dr. Shelley Lorimer, P.Eng. is Chair of the Bachelor of Science in Engineering Transfer Program (BSEN) at Grant MacEwan University in Edmonton, Alberta. She teaches undergraduate courses in statics and dynamics, as well as courses in engineering professionalism. She is currently participating in a research project with Alberta Innovates – Technology Futures in the oil sands and hydrocarbon recovery group doing reservoir simulation of enhanced oil recovery processes. She has a Ph.D. in numerical modeling
engineeringleadership effort can use this paper to identify potential approaches for their institute.The Need for Leadership Education in EngineeringEngineering colleges are being driven to infuse leadership education into the engineering andcomputer science fields. The need for engineering leaders is being driven by the manychallenges the nation faces (e.g., see the National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges2010; http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/). Technology and engineered systems can providesolutions to these challenges. To bring forth these solutions, the nation needs engineeringleaders. Many studies have explored the role of engineers and the need to change theeducational system to produce these engineers. For example, see • The Science and