Paper ID #36532Evolution of a Flipped Classroom: From Prototype to Personalized LearningProf. Autar Kaw, University of South Florida Autar Kaw is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of South Florida. He is a recipient of the 2012 U.S. Professor of the Year Award (doctoral and research universities) from the Council for Advancement and Support of Education and the Carnegie Foundation for Advancement of Teaching. Professor Kaw’s primary scholarly interests are in engineering education research, adaptive, blended, and flipped learning, open courseware development, and the state and future of higher
Paper ID #37879Making Learning Goals More Apparent Across theCurriculum for Mechanical Engineering Fundamentals andDepth CoursesAdrianna LarsonBrian Alumbaugh Brian Alumbaugh is an undergraduate student at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology pursuing a BS in Mechanical EngineeringMicah Lande (Assistant Professor) Micah Lande, PhD is an Assistant Professor and E.R. Stensaas Chair for Engineering Education in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. Dr. Lande directs the Holistic Engineering Lab & Observatory. He teaches human-centered engineering
Paper ID #32562Teaching Ethical Theory and Practice to Engineering Students:Pre-Pandemic and Post-Pandemic ApproachesMs. Alexis Powe Nordin, Mississippi State University Alexis Powe Nordin is an instructor in the Shackouls Technical Communication Program in Mississippi State University’s Bagley College of Engineering. She is a member of ASEE and ASEE-SE and has taught university-level writing and communication courses since 2004.Ms. Amy K. Barton, Mississippi State University Amy Barton is the coordinator of the Shackouls Technical Communication Program in the Bagley College of Engineering at Mississippi State University
track, ● support networking of these and other members, ● development of a STEM pipeline of female STEM academics.SWE, like other professional societies, recognizes the significance of mentoring, relationships,and retention of like-minded engineers. In the case of this discussion, it has been recognized fordecades that female STEM faculty benefit from mentoring due to their unique position inacademia.1 Not only are there issues based on gender, but female STEM faculty are often part ofa non-traditional group, which may include older, minority, and disabled women. Due to thenature of this paper, we will consider these topics as appropriate, but will focus on retention ofwomen in academia, support from other professional societies, networking
Paper ID #14811Dialogues Toward Gender Equity: Engaging Engineering Faculty to Promotean Inclusive Department ClimateJ. Kasi Jackson, West Virginia University Dr. J. Kasi Jackson is an Associate Professor of Women’s and Gender Studies at West Virginia University. Her research covers supporting women faculty in STEM, STEM education, gendered impacts on animal behavior research, and the representation of science in popular culture. She completed her PhD in biology, with a focus on animal behavior, and graduate certificate in women’s studies at the University of Kentucky. She is a Co-Investigator on a National Science
scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship be- tween educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co-developer of the Re- formed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 1500 times and his publications have been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Prof. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen
Paper ID #15411Connectivity at RIT - Developing & Delivering an Effective Professional De-velopment Workshop Series for Women Faculty in STEMProf. Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Dell is an associate professor in the Manufacturing & Mechanical Engineering Technology department at RIT. She serves as the Faculty Associate to the Provost for Women Faculty and is co-PI for RIT’s NSF ADVANCE project. Her research interests include: characterization of biodegradable plastics and environmental consideration in materials selection for production design, the impact of technology paired
Paper ID #16882Exploring Barriers in the Engineering Workplace: Hostile, Unsupportive,and Otherwise Chilly ConditionsRachel Yonemura , University of Washington Rachel Yonemura is currently working on her B.S. in Environmental Science and Resource Management at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. She has been working at the University as a Re- search Assistant under Dr. Denise Wilson on projects regarding the Engineering Workplace as well as E-waste Sustainability. Motivation for these projects stem from an interest in public discourse and the interrelationships that occur among people of different
Paper ID #14763Leaning into Engineering: Tenured Women Faculty and the Policies and Pro-grams that Support ThemDr. Deborah Ilana Karpman, University of California San Diego Deborah Karpman currently works as an administrator at the University of California San Diego in the Office of Research Affairs coordinating limited submission opportunities. Prior to that, she directed the planning and coordination of efforts to increase the external recognition of faculty in the Viterbi School of Engineering at the University of Southern California. Her dissertation (UCLA, 2015), ”Leaning into Engineering: Tenured Women Faculty and
Paper ID #36960Impact of Scaffolding ‘Making’ Assignments withinMechatronics on the Three Student Learning Outcomes ofKEEN’s Entrepreneurial Mindset: Curiosity, Connections,and Creating ValueVinayak VijayanShanpu FangSkyler MillerMegan Reissman (Dr.)Timothy Reissman (Assistant Professor) Timothy Reissman is an Assistant Professor at the University of Dayton. He teaches courses related to mechatronics, robotics, and controls for the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Within engineering education research, Dr. Reissman is interested in the development of hands-on experiences to enhance students' entrepreneurial mindsets
Paper ID #36743Exploring the impact of project-based mechatronics coursedesign on alumni’s entrepreneurial career pathwaysTimo Bunk Timo Bunk is a researcher in the Designing Education at Stanford University. His research focuses on the intersection of engineering education and entrepreneurial behavior. He holds a master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Technical University of Munich and a second master’s degree in Management. Timo is an alumnus of the entrepreneurial qualification program ‘Manage and More’ at the Center for Innovation and Business Creation in Munich. He worked at several startups
. Justine reflected on times when she did not trust herinstincts, stating, “The most important thing is to not give up on that instinct. There’s a reasonyou feel that way.”Acknowledging Pressure to Go Along Just like pressure in a liquid or gas may be used by a professional engineer to exert forcein a mechanical system, pressure may be used by a leader to encourage compliance with anunethical directive or request. Of course, pressure in a liquid or gas may be easier to measure andevaluate than the human mind when under stress. Participants emphasized the importance oftheir awareness of what actions others had taken to apply pressure and how they were feelingunder that pressure, both as a means to respond appropriately and to avoid
serving. As discussed in Part 1, these purposes included: increasing awareness ofengineering, promoting engineering in the K-12 classroom, increasing diversity in engineering, andincreasing recruitment for the host institution.The table below shows correlations between types of events and these four purposes. Keep in mind thata single program might be reported as serving multiple purposes. To calculate the correlations, wegrouped responses by purpose and then totaled the programs reporting each type of event within eachgroup. The correlation value is the second number divided by the first number. For example, 44programs reported doing exposure events among the 65 programs working to promote awareness ofengineering. The correlation between
alsoimportant to keep in mind that virtual laboratories should not replace physical laboratoriesaltogether. More over, if not used with proper care, they can lead to loss of creativity, Page 6.442.6 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationimagination, interpersonal skills, problem solving skills, and discipline among students.Like everything related to current computer technology, the URLs mentioned here and even thetechnology used to implement the sites may have a relatively short “shelf life
the heart of the reason for listening toothers: “I think a part of innovation is life’s experiences, what someone has really done in their lifetime, what kinds of experiences they’ve had. (Innovation happens) if in fact their mind or their thinking is open to the point where they are inquisitive. They want to know. They want to know more. Or they’ve had a personal experience in their life that has been puzzling and they just don’t have a solution for it and they want to be able to find it.”- GeorgeRisk taking or the willingness to risk failure is an attribute of an innovative engineer but not anattribute that is found in abundance among practicing engineers. Frank makes the point thatorganizations tend to
AC 2007-1561: ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY?!Roger Hadgraft, The University of Melbourne ROGER HADGRAFT is Director of the Engineering Learning Unit in the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Melbourne. He has been working on problem-based learning issues since 1991 and has implemented significant curriculum change using project-based learning at both Monash and RMIT Universities. He is a civil engineer with interests in hydrologic modelling, knowledge management and engineering education. He has recently moved to the University of Melbourne to assist in the implementation of the Melbourne Model.Jenni Goricanec, RMIT University Jenni Goricanec has 25+ years of experience in
, Sonia. 2003.Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in collegescience teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40 (3), 731-767.Gosling, Jonathan and Mintzberg, Henry. 2003. The five minds of a manager. Harvard Business Review, November,54-63.Halpern, Diane F. 2002. Cognitive science and the work of reform. New Directions for Higher Education, 119, 41-43.Jackson, Shirley A. 2003. Changes and challenges in engineering education. Main plenary address, AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, June 23, 2003.http://www.rpi.edu/web/President/speeches/asee.html (accessed 12/31/03).Jaafari, Ali. (2003). Project management in the age of complexity and
are generally mindful to consider the unique challenges faced by students fromunderrepresented groups and how students’ backgrounds and identities affect their academicexperiences. However, because the majority of our students are straight, white, cisgender males,advisors may be less aware of how their backgrounds and identities affect their academicexperiences. Although unintentional, treating white male engineering students as our “standard”students and students from underrepresented groups as our “special” students further normalizesthe white male standard in engineering education. This complex subject should be explored from a variety of perspectives. However, withthe goal of improving advising practices this GIFTS paper will focus
Paper ID #32527Engineering with Engineers: Fostering Engineering IdentityDr. Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University Yen-Lin Han is an Associate Professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Seattle University. Dr. Han received her BS degree in Material Science and Engineering from National Tsing-Hua University in Hsinchu, Taiwan, her PhD degree in Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and MS degree in Elec- trical Engineering from the University of Southern California. Her research interests include micro-scale molecular gas dynamics, micro fluidics, and heat transfer applications in MEMS and medical devices as well
importance to determining where funding is needed is determining how it willget there. As mentioned before, engineering education research is a narrow issue that is not onthe mind of most legislators. Any attempt at gaining support for a single-issue bill would bemost likely be unsuccessful. Education research must be cast as part of the solution to a largerproblem, so a place can be found for it on an appropriate bill. The most typical vehicles for an engineering education funding would be as part of anNSF Authorization Act, such as the STEM Talent Expansion Program (STEP), or as anamendment to the Higher Education Act. However, success on either of these fronts is only halfthe battle; an appropriation must also be secured. It is
Page 14.449.3engineers are creative team players rather than relying on a prior negative stereotype of a loneengineer working on an abstract project with few discernable real-world applications. Related toavailability, using the representativeness heuristic involves judging both whether an exampleaccurately represents its group and whether the choice of example appears random [5]. Forexample, portraying engineers as intelligent, hard-working, and creative in several situations willmake that portrayal represent engineers in the minds of the viewers.Examples of Television Shows Featuring EngineersEngineers and engineering have been featured in some reality or narrative television shows. Thereality shows include Design Squad on PBS, which
paying for. The student said that he didn’t think of it in that way, but it Page 13.1363.3was clear that many people are willing to pay for peace of mind in general. What is interesting about the list is its variety. Perhaps one-third of the list would bethought of as the traditional purview of the engineer. The other entries represent the wide varietyof things of value to the college junior. The students might now have begun to think that it’s justpossible that thermodynamics is more widely applicable than they had realized. But they werealso somewhat skeptical. At this point, the class returned to consideration of what might bethought
AC 2010-1486: NEW FACULTY AND NAVIGATING THE CONTRACT RENEWALPROCESSJay Wierer, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Jay Wierer is Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Wisconsin - Madison in 2008. He is a Member of the IEEE and enjoys teaching courses in communications, signals and systems, DSP, controls, and circuits.Roger Frankowski, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Frankowski is Vice-President of Academics and Professor of General Studies at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He received his Ph.D. degree from Marquette University in 1992. He has been Vice-President
Paper ID #38050Empathy as Key to Inclusivity in Engineering EducationJan L. Fertig (Associate Professor) Dr. Jan Fertig is an associate professor in the Humanities, Social Science and Communication Department at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. She teaches a variety of courses in psychology and sociology, as well as a course in addictions. She serves as co-leader of the Team Science Module at the Clinical and Translational Science Institute of Southeast Wisconsin (CTSI) and Co-Principal Investigator with Dr. Subha Kumpaty of the NSF S-STEM grant which provides scholarships and activities to 20 diverse
AC 2010-2048: ENGINEER DEVELOPMENT AND MENTOR PROGRAMTammy Baldwin, Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Tammy Baldwin graduated with a B.S. in Psychology and an M.S. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Idaho. She is currently pursuing her PhD in Educational Administration. Tammy has been with Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. for four years and is the University Relations Coordinator responsible for encouraging and supporting engineering curriculum at universities across the United States and internationally.Marisa Hemingway, Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc Page 15.473.1© American
the soul, but as an awareness of the connections witheverything –Mycorrhiza. Figure 2. The individual triadTo care for others, we need to start caring for ourselves. As shown in Figure 2, keeping abalance of cognition-emotion-spirit or body-mind-soul is a good way to start. When doingengineering work or engineering education, engineering educators could ask studentsquestions related to the Japanese concept of purpose, Ikigai4. These and other questions areoffered in Table 1.Table 1Practical questions to ask engineering students at the Mycorrhiza’s individual level Questions at the Individual level Mycorrhiza’s principle Is my engineering work connected to my
Paper ID #42879Navigating the Personal and Professional: How University STEM MentorshipPrograms Support Women in Austria and GermanyRebeca Petean, Society of Women Engineers Rebeca Petean is the Research Analyst for the Society of Women Engineers and a Ph.D. candidate in Sociology at Portland State University. Her work bridges research, advocacy, and equity in STEM education. Rebecca collaborates with educators, policymakers, and nonprofits to maximize the impact of STEM initiatives. Her dissertation focuses on the school-to-prison pipeline, specifically examining school safety strategies in K-12 school spaces. She
new Midwest home by bike commuting year-round. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Bridging FEA Theory and Practice with MATLAB Grader – Work in ProgressAbstractFinite element analysis (FEA) is a powerful tool that allows engineers to evaluate how well astructure can withstand a given loading environment. While commercial FEA software has awide range of capacities, it requires substantial insight and a minimum requisite skillset inundergraduate mechanics to generate meaningful results. The purpose of an undergraduate finiteelement course is to build such insight within the minds of students. This
AC 2010-1688: TEACHING TO ABET'S CRITERION 3(I) LIFELONG LEARNINGOUTCOME: LESSONS ON INNOVATION FROM CREATIVE COMMUNITIESKatherine Wikoff, Milwaukee School of Engineering KATHERINE WIKOFF is Associate Professor in the General Studies Department at Milwaukee School of Engineering, where she teaches courses in freshman communication, business and technical communication, literature, political science, film studies, and creative thinking. Email: wikoff@msoe.edu Page 15.1189.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Teaching to ABET’s 3(i) Lifelong Learning Outcome
demonstrated both the shortcomings ofgraduates in their ability to write and the demands of the workplace for improved performance.2However, what has been stated with insufficient clarity is what is the specific purpose of writing,and, therefore, how can one more effectively address this issue in a curriculum?We, like other programs, have both lofty and practical intents with our writing requirements.They are to enlarge and enrich the mind, to capture nuances as well as grand and complexconcepts and to convincingly demonstrate achievements. The challenge becomes one of havingstudents see writing as an integral part of their work as engineers, or their engineering practice