as in frequent event patterns. The :2example in the first section includes 4 event sequences, whichincludes 3 types of events. If we enumerate all event Figure 1 Frequent Closed Pattern Tree after Pruningsequences, the sequence set will be: {A:4; AA:2; AB:4; In the Figure 1, this tree is built use BIDE algorithm, thereABB:2; ABC:4; AC:4; B:4;BB:2; BC:4; C:4; CA:3; CAB:2; are only 6 nodes left in this tree. In this tree, all these nodesCABC:2;CAC:2; CB:3; CBC:2; CC:2}. We can construct a are frequent closed pattern, which can be used in further steps.pattern tree through this event sequence set. There are some It is a very
AC 2008-1422: CHAMPIONING HIGH-TECH RENAISSANCE: SENSOR ANDCONTROLLER SYSTEM INTEGRATION COURSEKhanjan Mehta, Pennsylvania State University KHANJAN MEHTA is a Senior Research Associate in the College of Engineering at Penn State. His professional interests include Innovative System Integration, High-Tech Entrepreneurship and International Social Entrepreneurship. He is an amateur photographer, cook, bartender, poet, traveler, adventurer and proud generalist.Sven Bilen, Pennsylvania State University SVEN G. BILÉN is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design, Electrical Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering at Penn State. His educational research interests include developing techniques
impacts (ACS) when teaching these units with realworld connections. The “Provide” factor is the initial factor that should change as a result ofprofessional development because these statements relate to teacher-centric behaviors. The“Guide” factor typically develops more slowly because it is related to intentionally changingone’s practices to more student-centered instructional approaches. The final factor, “Connect,”has the teachers incorporating information specifically related to the real world applications andcareers into their units. This last factor does not include EDP and will not be included in thispaper. See Table 1 for list of questions used in the Current Instructional Practices survey andtheir mapping to the different attributes
research. International Journal of Listening. 22 (2), 141-151.[4] Trevelyan, J. 2014. The Making of an Expert Engineer. CRC Press.[5] Crumpton-Young, L. Pamela McCauley-Bush, L Rabelo, K Meza, A Ferreras, B. Rodriguez, A. Millan, D. Miranda, M. Kelarestani, 2010, “Engineering leadership development programs: a look at what is needed and what is being done.” Journal of STEM Education, 11 (3/4), 10-21[6] Wikoff, K., J. Friauf, H. Tran, S. Reyer, O. Petersen. 2004. Evaluating the communication component of an engineering curriculum: A case study. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 2004-2532, 8 pp.[7] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2019. Civil Engineering Body
, and approximate the effects of equipment degradation over time. Many of these tools areavailable online for free including PV Watts [7] and the System Advisor Model [8], both ofwhich were developed by the National Renewable Energy Lab. Using multiple models toestimate system performance can allow a team to explore the effects of different inputparameters, and consistent results from multiple models lends confidence to the analysis. Solar Radiation AC Energy Month (kWh/m2/day) (kWh) January 2.35 115,372 February 3.32 144,642 March 4.18
electroosmosis isequation; the Hemoltz-Schmulowski, Henry, and Huckel equations; decoupling electrophoreticmobility and hydrodynamic fluxes; and the principle of electroosmotic microfluidic pumping.“Lecture 3: Dielectrophoresis” expanded this focus with particle assembly and crystallizationunder AC electric fields, the advantages of AC over DC electric fields, the Clausius-Mossottiequation for dielectrophoretic force, and particle chaining force. Finally, the fourth lecture,“Electrokinetics in Microfluidics”, provided a comparison of electroosmotic microfluidicpumping with pumping and valving by MEMS and pumping by passive valves. It also includedon-chip function of electrophoretic separations in microchannels.Laboratory Module IV: Effect of Ionic
AC 2012-5229: FACULTY SURVEY ON LEARNING THROUGH SERVICE:DEVELOPMENT AND INITIAL FINDINGSDr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University Olga Pierrakos is an Associate Professor and founding faculty member in the School of Engineering, which is graduating its inaugural class May 2012, at James Madison University. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in engineering science and mechanics, an M.S. in engineering mechanics, and a Ph.D. in biomedical en- gineering from Virginia Tech. Her interests in engineering education research center around recruitment and retention, engineering design instruction and methodology, learning through service (NSF EFELTS project), understanding engineering students through the lens of identity theory
AC 2010-1091: RESTRUCTURING A DESIGN-FOCUSED INTRODUCTORYTRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING COURSE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDYUSING THE THRESHOLD CONCEPT FRAMEWORKDan Cernusca, Missouri University of Science and Technology Dr. Dan Cernusca is Instructional Design Specialist in the Department of Global Learning at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. He received his Ph.D. degree in Information Science and Learning Technologies in 2007 from University of Missouri – Columbia. He also holds a BS and a Ph.D. from the University of Sibiu, Romania with a specialization in manufacturing technologies and respectively cutting-tools design. His research interests include Design-Based Research in technology
AC 2010-1296: "BRIEF ENCOUNTER:" A REFLECTION ON WILLIAMSPROPOSALS FOR THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUMJohn Heywood, Trinity College Dublin Professorial Fellow Emeritius of Trinity COllege Dublin (Ireland. Formerly Professor of Education and Chair Department of Teacher Education.Has published over 50 papers on topics related to engineering and technological education and several books. His book "Engineering Education; Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction" received the best reseach publication award of division i (professional) of the American Educational Research Association in 2005. previously he has been awarded a premium of the Education, Science and Technology division of the
AC 2010-1467: TOWARD A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF ACADEMIC ANDSOCIAL INTEGRATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF FACTORS RELATED TOPERSISTENCE IN ENGINEERINGJustin Micomonaco, Michigan State University Justin Micomonaco is a doctoral candidate in Higher, Adult and Lifelong Education at Michigan State University. His research interests include organizational development and various aspects of undergraduate education including living-learning communities, teaching and learning, and preparation of faculty in STEM.Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University Page 15.1267.1© American Society for Engineering Education
AC 2011-845: HOW INSTRUCTORS AND CLASSROOM CLIMATE CON-TRIBUTE TO THE MOTIVATION OF FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING STU-DENTSHolly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Holly Matusovich is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Dr. Matusovich has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She also has a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and an M.S. in Materials Science with a concentration in Metallurgy. Additionally Dr. Matusovich has four years of experience as a consulting engineer and seven years of industrial experi- ence in a variety of technical roles related to metallurgy and quality systems for an aerospace supplier. Dr. Matusovich’s research interests include the role of
at the Uni- versity of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez. Subsequently, she graduated from Carnegie Mellon University with a PhD in Chemical Engineering and a Masters of Science in Polymers, Colloids and Surfaces. Her disserta- tion work presented a novel technique to allow for the control of mass transport in crosslinked hydrogels with applications in the fields of biosensors and microfluidics. Under a fellowship from the National Research Council, Marvi worked as a postdoctoral fellow at the National Institute of Standards and Tech- nology (NIST). Her project at NIST involved the study of encapsulated neural stem cell’s viability and differentiation under AC electric fields. More recently (2008-2010), she worked as a
evaluate the benefits in education and industry settings.References1. ABET. 2013 - 2014 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Baltimore, MD: ABET, 2012.2. Allen, Kathleen. Launching New Ventures. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2009.3. Altshuller, G. 40 Principles (Extended Edition): TRIZ keys to technical innovation. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center, Inc., 2005.4. Altshuller, G. Creativity as an exact science: The theory of the solution of inventive problems. Luxembourg: Gorden and Breach Science Publishers Inc., 1995.5. Andrew, James P., Joe Manget, David Michael, and Hadi Zablit. “Innovation 2010, A Return to Prominence.” Boston Consulting Group, April 2010.6. Atman, Cynthia J., Robin S. Adams
electrodeposition through monolayer polystyrene sphere template and electrochromic properties, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 186–192.15. Amalorpava Mary, L.; Senthilram, T.; Suganya, S.; Nagarajan, L.; Venugopal, J.; Ramakrishna, S.; Giri Dev, V.R., Centrifugal spun ultrafine fibrous web as a potential drug delivery vehicle, eXPRESS Polym. Lett. 2013, 7, 238–248.16. Bao, N.; Wei, Z.; Ma, Z.; Liu, F.; Yin, G., Si-doped mesoporous TiO2 continuous fibers: Preparation by centrifugal spinning and photocatalytic properties, J. Hazardous Mater. 2010, 174, 129–136.17. Wang, L.; Shi, J.; Liu, L.; Secret, E.; Chen, Y., Fabrication of polymer fiber scaffolds by centrifugal spinning for cell culture studies, Microelectronic
, faculty,alumni, and IAB) and the recommended action, implementation of CAS Calculators has beencompleted. The ET department faculty implemented the recommendation of requiring CAScalculators by incorporating a statement in the syllabus in fall II 2021, spring, spring I & II 2022,and summer III 2022 in several of its MATH based 2000 level courses, 3000 and 4000 levelcourses.(I b) Documented evidence demonstrating that the results of student outcome assessment andevaluation are systematically utilized as input for the program's CI actions – Continuedimplementation of Oral Presentation in ENGT 2030, AC Circuits and Applications, a course thatis required for the BS in EET program:In fall 2019, assessment and evaluation were performed in ABET SO 2
of the Year in 1982. Dr. Slaughter, a licensed professional engineer, began his career as an electronics engineer at General Dynamics and, later, served for 15 years at the U.S. Navy Electronics Laboratory in San Diego, where he became head of the Information Systems Technol- ogy Department. He has also been director of the Applied Physics Laboratory and professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Academic Vice President and Provost at Washington State University, the Irving R. Melbo Professor of Leadership in Education at the University of Southern Cal- ifornia and, until his return to USC in January 2010, president and CEO of the National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering, Inc
AC 2011-1138: KRISYS: A LOW-COST, HIGH-IMPACT RECRUITINGANDJoseph A. Morgan, Texas A&M UniversityJay R Porter, Texas A&M University Jay R. Porter joined the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University in 1998 and is currently Professor and Program Director for the Electronics and Telecommu- nications Programs. He received the BS degree in electrical engineering (1987), the MS degree in physics (1989), and the Ph.D. in electrical engineering (1993) from Texas A&M University. His areas of inter- est in research and education include product development, analog/RF electronics, instrumentation, and entrepreneurship.Dr. Wei Zhan, Texas A&M University Dr
Paper ID #35802Why is thermodynamics so hard for students and what can an instructor doabout it.Dr. Randall D. Manteufel, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Randall Manteufel is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). He has won several teaching awards, including the 2012 University of Texas Sys- tem Regent’s Outstanding Teaching Award and the 2013 UTSA President’s Distinguished Achievement Award for Teaching Excellence, the 2010, 2014, 2018 and 2019 College of Engineering Student Council Professor of the Year Award, 2008 Excellence in Teaching Award for
. Econ., vol. 125, no. 3, Art. no. 3, 2010.[5] D. J. Nelson, “Diversity of Science and Engineering Faculty at Research Universities,” in ACS Symposium Series, D. J. Nelson and H. N. Cheng, Eds., Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2017, pp. 15–86. doi: 10.1021/bk-2017-1255.ch002.[6] K. N. Rask and E. M. Bailey, “Are Faculty Role Models? Evidence from Major Choice in an Undergraduate Institution,” J. Econ. Educ., vol. 33, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1080/00220480209596461.[7] G. Sonnert, M. Fox, and K. Adkins, “Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering: Effects of Faculty, Fields, and Institutions Over Time,” Soc. Sci. Q., vol. 88, pp. 1333– 1356, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00505.x.[8] D
, S. J., & Biemer, S. M. (2011). Systems engineering principles and practice (Vol. 83). John Wiley & Sons. 8. McGrath, E. (2011). Research on Building Education & Workforce Capacity in Systems Engineering. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER HOBOKEN NJ. 9. Sage, A. P., & Cuppan, C. D. (2001). On the systems engineering and management of systems of systems and federations of systems. Information knowledge systems management, 2(4), 325-345. 10. Sheard, S. A., & Mostashari, A. (2009). Principles of complex systems for systems engineering. Systems Engineering, 12(4), 295-311. 11. Surju, M. (2010). "Systems engineering influences on projects and the systems engineering workforce
the Blind, "Blindness Statistics," Published Apr. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://nfb.org/resources/blindness-statistics. [Accessed February 3, 2023].[2] W. Erickson, C. Lee, and S. von Schrader, Disability statistics from the American Community Survey (ACS). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Yang-Tan Institute (YTI), 2022.[3] L. Schuck, R. Wall-Emerson, D.S. Kim, N. Nelson, "Predictors associated with college attendance and persistence among students with visual impairments," Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 339-58, winter 2019.[4] M. Hersh and M. Johnson, Assistive technology for visually impaired and blind people. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2008.[5] S.I
through the input positions in the correct order or same assembly mode, whichmay require further adjustments to the input positions. Figure 6 presents an illustration of a planarfour-bar mechanism passing through five positions without any assembly mode or order defect.Nonetheless, this is often a challenging problem to solve.5 Classroom UsageAs of April 2023, MotionGen Pro is being used by 6,210 registered users world-wide (no cost)across 145 countries in in colleges and universities, high-schools, which teach the author’s Fresh-man Design Innovation class through Stony Brook University’s Accelerated College Education(ACE) program, and in informal STEM learning environments, such as summer and after-schoolrobotics programs. Among several
] conducted a literature review summarizing the findings of 58 articles from 13 differentcountries about the different equity-oriented approaches in education from 2010 to 2020. Thepapers were categorized into 4 different education interventions: programmatic configurations,curricular settings, pedagogical approaches and learning activities. The programmaticconfiguration category refers to integrating equity methodically into the most important elementsof education programs, for instance curriculum design, admission process, internships, andteaching. The program curricula category refers to off-campus experiences and academic courses.The pedagogical approaches category refers to fundamental rules, models, or educational teachingstrategies. The
number of mutually tested learning objectives, there were a few learning objectives that were not tested for each cohort. Figure 2: Proportion of competency level achievement by Furthermore, only two each cohort for objective X in the quizzes proportions at a time can be considered for a directionalhypothesis test. Therefore, each cohort was compared against every other cohort generating threegroups of tests (AB, BC and AC). For each group, these tests were carried out
://doi.org/10.28945/4628 (accessed January 2022).4. N. Chick, Learning Styles. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. 2010, from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/learning-styles-preferences/.5. M. A. Peshkin, Lightboard home, from https://lightboard.info/ (accessed January 2022).6. F. M. Fung, Adopting Lightboard for a Chemistry Flipped Classroom to Improve Technology-Enhanced Videos for Better Learner Engagement. Journal of Chemical Education, 94, 956−959. 20177. T. R. Corkish, M. L. Davidson, C. T. Haakansson, R. E. Lopez, P D. Watson, and D Spagnoli, A How-To Guide for Making Online Pre-laboratory Lightboard Videos. Advances in Online Chemistry Education. ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC
Paper ID #37532Work in Progress: An Integrative Learning-CenteredAdvising Experience for First Year StudentsShelly Gulati (Associate Professor and Chair) Dr. Shelly Gulati is Associate Professor and Chair of Bioengineering. She is also serving as the Faculty Fellow, Academic Advising. She has been at Pacific since 2010. She received a BS in Chemical Engineering from Johns Hopkins University and a PhD in Bioengineering from University of California, Berkeley. She also spent two years as a postdoctoral fellow in London at Imperial College. Dr. Gulati’s research expertise is biomicrofluidics. More recently, her
the risk of bodily injury. During this course, emphasis was placed on developing theability to choose the correct tooling that is required to complete a part in the most efficient andprecise manner. The material selected to build thrust stand was 80/20 because it is designed to belight, sturdy, and easily implemented. However, machining was necessary to make the parts forthe stand. This was achieved with the use of two machines (Bridgeport vertical mill and Jet Toolshorizontal bandsaw). The proper usage of those machines was also covered in the class. Introduction to electrical engineering (ECE 2001) covered DC circuits and analysis methodssuch as mesh analysis, node analysis, and circuit reduction methods. AC circuits were alsoexplored