barriers to the success of CC students and CC transfers; changes infaculty and staff perceptions regarding CC transfers; and the effects of the program on CCstudent matriculation and completion of Lipscomb’s engineering program are presented.IntroductionThe National Science Foundation (NSF) created the Scholarships in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) program to enable low-income, talented domesticstudents to pursue successful careers in STEM fields and contribute to the American innovationeconomy with their knowledge [1]. The NSF provides support to institutes of higher educationin a competitive grant process to develop S-STEM programs and encourages four yearinstitutions to collaborate and encourage students to complete 4
understanding. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The PEERSIST Project: Promoting Engineering Persistence through Peer-Led Study Groups Thien Ta1, Cody Jenkins1, Gary Lichtenstein1, Ryan James Milcarek1, Samantha R. Brunhaver1, Karl A Smith21 2 Arizona State University University of Minnesota, Twin CitiesIntroductionThe Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act (1980) made recruiting women andunderrepresented groups (URG) into STEM a federal priority. Today, the proportion of URG andwomen who attain engineering degrees continues to drop relative to the increase in collegeenrollment [1]. Transfer
has always been praised by students and department for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. To supplement his teaching and research, he has been involved in numerous professional societies, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published thirty journal papers and thirty-nine conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Structural BIM Integration, 3) 4D/5D BIM, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Innovative Construction Demolition, and 6) Carbon Footprint Analysis on Roadways.Dr. Caroline Murrie Clevenger P.E., Caroline M. Clevenger is an Associate Professor and Assistant Director of Construction
, and replicated, and question the lack of a strong, central foundation of Black womanscholars and theorists. We situate our study alongside the complex theoretical treatments ofintersectionality in Hill Collins, Hancock, and other treatises that tie intersectionality tooppression rather than identity. We make recommendations that address the politics of citationswithin engineering education as the field continues to address issues of social justice, equity andinclusion.IntroductionFor scholars in engineering education, the need to tackle, study and interrogate issues ofdiversity, equity and inclusion has become increasingly apparent [1]–[5], and both the increase inNSF programs dedicated to broadening participation and the emergence of ASEE
net generation came from wind power [1]. Thepace of technological change embodied in this rapid growth drives the need to educatesubstantially more highly-trained engineers and scientists. According to the U.S. Energy andEmployment Report [2], there were nearly 115,000 people working in the U.S. wind energyindustry, and consequently this sector has the third-largest share of electric power generationemployment. The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Wind Vision report sets forth plausiblescenarios in which 20% of the U.S. electrical energy requirement in 2030 is served by windenergy, and 35% by 2050 [3]. The estimated number of jobs in these scenarios, both direct andindirect, necessary to achieve the proposed levels of wind energy
samples would betrue of different populations. To address these issues, a study was conducted examining 1. therelation between ethical reasoning and moral intuitions among engineering students in China,and 2. the effects of ethics education on ethical reasoning and moral intuitions. To do so,engineering students at a US-Chinese educational institute in Shanghai, China completed theESIT (Engineering and Science Issues Test) and MFQ (Moral Foundations Questionnaire) beforeand after a course on global engineering ethics. The ESIT uses two measures of ethicalreasoning: The P score assesses the prevalence of postconventional reasoning, while the N2score measures the amount of postconventional relative to preconventional reasoning. The MFQassesses
spatial thinking; others did not. Results fromthis Work-In-Progress study will be used to conduct an in-depth study examining the relationshipbetween spatial skills and solving problems in engineering mechanics. This paper outlines keyfindings from this Work-In-Progress study and makes recommendations for future work in thisarea.IntroductionSpatial visualization is defined as “process of apprehending, encoding, and mentally manipulatingthree-dimensional spatial forms” [1]. Spatial cognition has been widely studied throughoutpsychology and education for more than 100 years [2-4]. Engineering students and engineeringprofessionals exhibit some of the highest levels of spatial skills compared to their counterparts inother majors/careers [5-6
largeand persistent. Women are needed in STEM, not only to grow a qualified workforce to meetfuture economic needs, but also because their contribution to innovation can help design a futurefor our country that will better serve the needs of all its citizens. There is an abundance ofliterature on the gender gap in STEM, which attempts to identify causes of this gap and touncover effective interventional strategies. Much research is focused on external factors andhow these impact girls’ self-efficacy such as gender stereotypes, gender bias, and perceptions ofengineering and computer science, as well as on internal factors such as student mindset andinterest level [1] - [6]. A subset of the research focuses on discipline-specific identity and how
African American students’ e-mentoringexperiences in higher education. IntroductionMentoring has long been shown to be a process that can assist minoritized students in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields (e.g., persons who identify as AfricanAmerican/Black, Hispanic/Latinx, American Indian/Alaska Native) [1, 2]. Yet today, a newform of mentoring, e-mentoring, has emerged as a viable mechanism with the ability to engagementors and mentees differently than traditional mentoring. Mentoring has been shown to beessential in supporting and empowering people during criticall personal and careerdevelopmental stages [3]. E-mentoring, which is also known as virtual mentoring, occurs
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Role of Prior Knowledge in the Performance of Engineering StudentsAbstractIn engineering, students’ completion of prerequisites indicates an understanding of fundamentalknowledge. Recent studies have shown a significant relationship between students’ courseperformance and their prior knowledge. Weak knowledge retention from prerequisitecoursework can present challenges in progressive learning. This study investigates therelationship between prior knowledge and student performance with a focus on 1) levels ofpreparedness, 2) perception of preparedness in subjective and objective metrics, and 3) theirpotential impact on performance. More specifically, the study places students into three
their differences andenable them to build relationships and to work together effectively” [1]. As a result, interculturalcompetence, “the complex abilities that are required to perform effectively and appropriatelywhen interacting with others who are linguistically and culturally different from oneself” [2], hasbecome a highly desirable skill for all workers in the 21st century. Therefore, helping studentsdevelop their intercultural competence has become an important mission for higher education[3]. The development of students’ intercultural competence has been positively associatedwith the study abroad experience and program and curricular interventions. However, little isknown on how study abroad curriculum impacts students
participants regarding such attributes as their STEMidentities and sense of belonging compare to responses from a control group of students who didnot participate in the program. Preliminary identification of some program best practices willalso be presented.IntroductionWhatcom Community College (WCC) is a two-year open enrollment institution in the PacificNorthwest serving 6,795 students in 2019-20. WCC is situated in a county that experienced a14% growth rate between 2010 and 2019, with a current population of 229,247 people [1]. Thepopulation of students at WCC has been steadily diversifying, with those identifying as a studentof color increasing from 24.9% in 2009-10 to 33.4% in 2019-20. The college offers studentsaccess to the initial coursework
students' attendance patterns. In the first phase we teamed with the company VEC that tasked their two interns, alsoundergraduate students in the Construction Management major, to create a LIDAR point cloudcapture of an existing campus building. The building chosen for the pilot project was theConstruction Innovations Center at Cal Poly. The student interns then created a buildinginformation model (BIM) using Autodesk Revit from the imported point cloud data. Figure 1shows a subset of the BIM of the Construction Innovations Center. Figure 1: A subset of the BIM of the Construction Innovations CenterTo monitor locations 32 RFID tags and 3 gateways were used to update location of entities onthese models. The databases from the
. She earned her B.S.M.E. at Grove City College. She is currently researching under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognition Research Laboratory.Dr. Monique S. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, designs research focused on broadening par- ticipation in computer science through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and disciplinary identity; 2) discipline-based education research (with a focus on computer science and computer engineering courses) in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women (specifically Black and His
; Williams, Smiley, Davis, & Lamb, 2018). Non-cognitivefactors are defined as unobservable traits and latent skills related to students academicachievement (Yoon et al., 2014).The Student Attitudinal Success Instrument (SASI; Immekus, Imbrie, & Maller, 2004; Immekus,Maller, Imbrie, Wu, & McDermott, 2005; Reid, 2009; Reid & Imbrie, 2008; Yoon et al., 2014)was developed to quantify non-cognitive characteristics of first-year engineering students beforeentering colleges or universities. The original SASI consisted of 161 items assessing ninespecific non-cognitive constructs: 1). intrinsic motivation, 2). academic self-efficacy, 3).expectancy-value, 4). deep learning approach, 5). surface learning approach, 6). Problem-solvingapproach, 7
interdisciplinary partnerships within and across institutions; change the undergraduate mathematics curriculum in ways that support improved STEM learning for all students while building the STEM workforce of tomorrow; and, monitor various aspects of the CF recommendations being implemented at participating institutions while measuring the impact on faculty and students.Because this collaborative approach for curriculum development is being implemented at avariety of institutions, each institution 1) uses locally appropriate strategies, 2) engages facultyfrom locally-selected partner disciplines, and 3) focuses on mathematics courses selected by thatinstitution. The consortium holds regular virtual meetings of the institutional
generalprinciples model (Judd, 1908). Deemed the classical approaches in this paper, these three transfermodels are depicted in Figure 1 and provide the foundation for current transfer literature. Figure 1 – Classical transfer approaches The formal disciplines model assumed that transfer occurred automatically as a result oflearning a subject. By learning a formal discipline, supporters of the theory suggested that studentsdevelop faculties such as memory, attention, and judgment. The model suggested that thesefaculties can then be leveraged to learn other subjects (Leberman, McDonald, & Doyle, 2006). Forexample, the formal disciplines approach posited that learning Latin would give students the abilityto learn other
classes were held through live videoconferencing environments (Synchronous), and some others were taught by recorded materials(Asynchronous). In this study, we present survey results on students’ perception of the transitionto online learning. Surveys were conducted on two synchronous and two asynchronousengineering courses. The survey's goal was to allow students to share their challenges and overallexperiences of the transition. Another goal of the survey was to ask students’ opinions on howcertain features of the online classes impacted their learning. The specified features for thesynchronous lectures were: (1) live discussions, questions, and answers; (2) connecting with theclass on a regular basis; (3) receiving lessons at certain times of
critical to engineering, reflected in an emphasis onethics in educational accreditation guidelines, as well as funding for research than addressesethics in engineering [1]–[3]. Curricula have tended to take an applied and case-based approach,where professional engineering codes and/or philosophical ethical theories are introduced, whichare then used to resolve questions that arise in cases concerning engineering and technology [4],[5]. In recent years, however, there has been a proliferation of novel approaches, as well asdisagreement concerning the form engineering ethics education should take, and criteria fordetermining what would count as success [1], [5]–[7]. In part, this confusion stems fromdisagreements about the goals of ethics
the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) and three years as a faculty member at Olin College of Engineering in Massachusetts. Alexandra’s research aims to amplify the voices and work of students, educators, and Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs) overall and support continued educational innovation within engineering at these in- stitutions. Specifically, she focuses on (1) educational and professional development of graduate students and faculty, (2) critical transitions in education and career pathways, and (3) design as central to educa- tional and global change.Dr. Jay Phillip Jefferson, Florida International University I am currently a Postdoc within SUCCEED at Florida International University. My
],[13]. Given the promising nature of these findings for integrated STEM settings, we suggest thatit is important to study the impact of standalone engineering design coursework on high schoolstudents’ relationship with science, namely their interest in learning more about science.The Interconnectedness Between Engineering and Science KnowledgeIn recent years, there have been efforts to understand the relationship between scienceknowledge and engineering knowledge. Specifically, Antik-Meyer and Brown developed aconceptual framework on the nature of engineering knowledge (NOEK), in which they describedengineering as interdisciplinary due to its interrelated and co-dependent relationship with scienceand technology [1]. Furthermore, Pleasants and
the same fourdomains but ties specific needs and activities to those of postdoctoral scholars endeavoring totransition into the professoriate (see Figure 1). Forging connections involves the ways in which amentor provides access and networking opportunities for a mentee, such as making connectionsfor them while on the tenure-track faculty job market. Activities in the domain of providingscholarly opportunities comprise promotion of the mentee’s research expertise and advice onpotential research collaborations. A hands-on approach identifies the support a mentor providesto a mentee in terms of critiquing a mentee’s scholarly products, such as grant proposals, andoffering strategic coaching on time management and priority identification that
, and culturallandscapes which shape and direct the problems and solutions generated by engineers. It is welldocumented that the practice of engineering requires heterogeneous interactions involving bothpeople and things - humans and technologies - yet often the focus of schooling remains on theinanimate equipment rather than the messy people [1]–[3]. Moreover, engineering courses whichinclude a focus on human interactions like communication and teamwork are undercut by theinaccurate and demeaning labeling of these as “soft” rather than “hard” skills to learn.This false divide between hard and soft, between the technical and social, is increasinglyoutdated and ineffective in preparing engineers to understand and address the
researchefforts have helped develop new network modeling tools, replicate the structural propertiesobserved from empirical network data and build these networks effectively to acquire moreadvanced knowledge of evolutionary network growth mechanisms [1]. Most of the real networkshave interesting properties[2], unlike random graphs that show possible mechanisms that directnetwork building and ways to manipulate network structure with specific goals [3].Social network analysis (SNA) is used to explore an individuals’ social ties, network density, andstrength [2]. The study of the Social Network (SNA) helps to analyze relevant data which areinterconnected in nature. SNA can be effective to analyze students’ community interactions tomeasure student relations
first-year sequence that allows students to switch their engineering major withoutnecessitating a delay to graduation.Major selection has been studied at individual institutions [1], [2], and across multipleinstitutions [3], [4]. Some studies have focused on specific disciplines [5]–[7]. In this work, wefocus on examining when students enroll in the major they will eventually graduate in and how itvaries by matriculation model. The research questions this work will address are: 1. When do engineering students enroll in the major they are going to graduate in? 2. How does this vary by matriculation model?Understanding when students enroll in their graduation majors can inform policies and programdevelopment as well as identify areas for
students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Exploring the Relationships between Acculturation Attitudes and Demographic Characteristics in Engineering WorkplacesIntroductionSeveral factors have contributed to increased focus on diversity and inclusion in workplaces inrecent years [1]-[3]. A demographic shift driven by globalization, immigration, anddiversification of the population has been underway in the U.S. such that no demographic groupwill be a clear majority in the nation by 2055 [1], [4
theirbelief in their ability to perform but do not see a correlation between their belief in ambiguitytolerance with their belief in the ability to perform or their self as a leader. The narrativeselicited from the study provide additional context around why that correlation between ambiguitytolerance and self as leader does not exist. As leaders today need to navigate the volatile,uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) landscapes, understanding leaders and futureleaders' perceptions of how this belief in ambiguity tolerance becomes part of their identity as aleader is critical to knowing how to develop leaders in the engineering field.Introduction Engineering leadership research has been expanding since the turn of the century [1],with a
Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs) overall and support continued educational innovation within engineering at these in- stitutions. Specifically, she focuses on (1) educational and professional development of graduate students and faculty, (2) critical transitions in education and career pathways, and (3) design as central to educa- tional and global change.Dr. Trina L. Fletcher, Florida International University Dr. Fletcher is currently an Assistant Professor at Florida International University. Her research focus equity and inclusion within STEM education, STEM at HBCUs and K-12 STEM education. Prior to FIU, Dr. Fletcher served as the Director of Pre-college Programs for the National Society of Black Engineers
virtual teams during the rapid transition online due to COVID-19 Alexis Walsha, Sarah Norrisb, Nathaniel Blalockc, Daniel Mountainc and Courtney Faberd a) Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering; b) Department of Mechanical Aerospace Biomedical Engineering; c) Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering; d) Cook Grand Challenge Honors Program University of Tennessee KnoxvilleIntroductionTeam projects are common in undergraduate engineering courses and have been shown toimprove self-efficacy, communication, and teamwork skills through group discussions andpresentations, preparing students for professional engineering practice [1], [2
sharp rise in the lasttwo decades to address the growing needs of providing engineering experiences at the elementaryand secondary levels [1-2]. The existing literature has expanded our understanding of pre-collegeengineering curricula, extracurricular activities, teacher professional development efforts, andstudent motivations. The majority of this work has been conducted as small-scale, exploratorystudies [3]. Studies are still needed that explore cognitive and affective constructs within a pre-college engineering context to provide depth of understanding that is reliable and generalizableacross different pre-college student populations [4]. The present study aims to partially fill this gapby examining validity evidence associated with the