that were remarkably good.One of the best is shown here as Figure 1, depicting an engineer working on a computer,performing calculations on a white board, and displaying a design drawing on an easel. Thecoffee cup and what might be a diploma hanging on the wall really added to the accuracy of thepicture. Figure 1. Sample illustration submitted in response to the survey prompt “Draw an engineer doing their work”.Overall, the survey responses indicate a quantifiable impact that the “4th Grade Engineering”sessions and in-class STEM activities were having on students’ perceptions and understandingsof the engineering profession. Compared to the students that were not exposed to those sameengineering elements, their understanding of engineering
Paper ID #21534Advanced Manufacturing Research Experiences for High School Teachers:Effects on Perception and Understanding of ManufacturingMr. Debapriyo Paul, Texas A&M University Debapriyo Paul is a graduate student at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. He is pursuing a Master’s degree in Industrial Engineering with a focus in statistics and data sciences. He is currently working as a research assistant in the Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Department.Dr. Bimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M University Dr. Bimal Nepal is an assistant professor in the Industrial Distribution Program at Texas
designed for this major will be reduced.ConclusionThis work investigated how students select their engineering or computer science major byexamining factors affecting their decision. Based on the survey results, the top three factorsimpacting major selection were job opportunities after graduation, personal interest, and salarylevels. Examining demographics, gender did not have a significant effect on impacting factors,but first-generation college student status did, with first-generation students ranking personalinterest and role models significantly lower than non-first-generation students. There weredifferences in impacting factors between majors, with computer science students rating jobopportunities and salary higher than all other majors
over- seas in Germany and France and speaks four languages. In her research and teaching background, she focused on leadership, cultural intelligence and high-performance teams, and has completed extensive interdisciplinary research on cultural intelligence in cross-cultural engagements, transnational communi- cation styles and international negotiations. Cate has been working in higher education since 2004 and has served as the Honorary Ombudsman since 2009. Cate currently serves as the Consultant for Academic Innovation advising and counseling faculty of all disciplines on best teaching practices and is a faculty member in the College of Business.Dr. Frances Matos, University of Texas at San Antonio Dr
provided an overview of the new outcomes aswell as potential methods for teaching and assessing.Table 1: Current ABET student outcomes for engineering programs1. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve an ability to function effectively on a team complex engineering problems by applying whose members together provide leadership, principles of engineering, science, and create a collaborative and inclusive mathematics. environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives. an ability to apply engineering design to an ability to develop and conduct appropriate produce solutions that meet specified needs
University. Olga is a national thought leader in higher education and engineering education. She is a biomedical and mechanical engineer as well as an STEM education researcher. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Inclusive and Bias-Minimizing Hiring Practices to Build a Diverse Team at Wake Forest Engineering: Transforming Engineering Education through Faculty Diversity and Broadening ParticipationThis paper presents a comprehensive case study of Wake Forest Engineering's successful launchand transformation to build a diverse faculty team to support innovation across curriculum,pedagogy, research, and community impact. By implementing research-grounded hiringpractices focused on
, persistence, and has beenlinked to a boost in students’ motivation to learn (Ditta, Strickland-Hughes, Cheung, & Wu,2020). Undergraduate research experience was also found to better equip students for graduateschool or careers (Sell, Naginey, & Stanton, 2017; Altman, et al., 2019). Through undergraduateresearch, students learn professional skills such as maintaining notes, identifying researchproblems, reading scientific literature, collaborating with peers in a research setting, and writingand presenting findings to an audience in their field of discipline (Carpenter & Pappenfus, 2009).Undergraduate research is said to be one of ten high impact practices shown to enhance andimprove college student performance and success (Kuh, 2008). A
several university teaching awards, outreach awards, and best paper awards. His passion is creating engaging learning environments by bringing useful research results and industry practices into the classroom as well as using design research results to inform engineering practice. Page 26.1606.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Travel for a Penny a Mile: An Engineering Design Challenge Inspiring Student Engagement and Sustainable LivingAbstractStudent engagement and success in engineering and science is paramount in developing thecountry’s needed
Paper ID #22462Integrating Design Thinking into an Experiential Learning Course for Fresh-man Engineering StudentsDr. Mark J. Povinelli, Syracuse University Dr. Mark Povinelli is the Kenneth A. and Mary Ann Shaw Professor of Practice in Entrepreneurial Lead- ership in the College of Engineering and Computer Science and the Whitman School of Management at Syracuse University where he is developing and teaching curriculum in innovation and entrepreneurship. Dr. Povinelli current research interests and curriculum development are in experiential team learning approaches to engineering education focused on design thinking
this course – in a positive fashion (i.e., “I do not think I have had an instructorstimulate and motivate me more than Dr. Oerther has to become a better engineer … Iwill almost certainly remember that duty to the public I have with my profession as anengineer…”).DiscussionCommunity engagement is an important skill for engineers to acquire, and collaborationwith other healthcare professions, such as nursing, is one practical approach [15, 16].Ideally, engineers would learn through hands-on experience how to perform communityengagement following best practices as implemented in healthcare. This should includeidentification and recruitment of stakeholders, who work with the researcher to identifythe problem, brainstorming solutions, and select
mentoring. Extremal effects areavoidable, so mentees do not need to exhibit the “extra-scientific effect.” A condition whereunderrepresented students minimize their identities (race or gender) to conform to the STEMcommunity [42].This study investigates the relationship between mentorship and the corresponding effects onengineering persistence for FTIC female students. The existing mentorship process in engineeringaccounts for surface-level similarities and rarely deep-level similarities in shared values, beliefs,and interests [17, 43]; however, the underlying mechanism by which the practice of mentorshipaffects female persistence in engineering remains an unmet challenge. We investigate differingmentorship structures and examine their impact on
possess [17].We are seeking to understand how a unique co-op based engineering program, designedspecifically for increased access, impacts the experiences of participating students. Additionally,we are using CCW and funds of knowledge to understand what assets students bring into theprogram and their co-op jobs, and how they gain from participation in the program itself. Ourprimary research question is: What assets do students in a co-op based engineering programbring to that program, and what assets do they gain from participation in the program?Background of the Bridge AcademyThe Bridge Academy presented within this WIP is a two-and-a-half-year (five semester) upperdivision engineering program, designed for off-campus students. It is housed in
Paper ID #17643How to Shape Attitudes toward STEM Careers: The Search for the most Im-pactful Extracurricular Clubs (RTP)Dr. Fethiye Ozis, Northern Arizona University Fethiye has been working in CECMEE at Northern Arizona University since 2014. She has received her Ph.D. in environmental engineering from University of Southern California in 2005. Her doctorate work focused on modeling of bio filters for air pollution control. After graduation, she has been involved in K-12 STEM institutions both as a teacher and administrator. Her research interests include biotechnology for environmental issues, engineering education
often meet the curriculum content and practice goals better thansingle-subject lessons. Engineering, as a key component of STEM education, offers hands-on,designed-based, problem solving activities to drive student interest and confidence in STEMoverall. However, K-12 STEM teachers may not feel equipped to implement engineeringpractices and may even experience anxiety about trying them out in their classrooms without theadded support of professional development and professional learning communities.To address these concerns and support engineering integration, this research study examined theexperiences of 18 teachers in one professional development program dedicated to STEMintegration and engineering pedagogy for K-12 classrooms. This
]. Angelo and Cross’ 1993book discusses classroom assessment techniques [6]. Nilson’s 2012 book focuses on research-based resources for college instructors [7]. Walvoord published a practical guide to assessment in2010 [8]. The pre-post methodology is similar to that of one of the co-authors at the Air ForceInstitute of Technology [9] which presents a three-year study of a two-course graduate sequenceand employed a pre-test/post-test methodology with teaching techniques of Felder and Brent [10]to assess student learning using learner-center teaching techniques, one of which was Real-worldmini-sessions in industry, defense, and security. A statistically significant improvement wasobserved in student performance for some courses when the Pre
five-year period. Extending this study beyond graduation to look at careerchoices and graduate study will also be considered. We also propose to increase studentinvolvement in the research design and data analysis process, and continue involving students aspeer-facilitators. Finally, looking closely at variables that might affect student success such associoeconomic class, family support, high school preparation, race/ethnic background, and socialnetworks, and using this information to create a supportive, beneficial environment for allengineering students through all stages of their academic careers is a goal as we continue thisresearch
courses,experiential learning can promote lifelong learning, a common goal for many higher educationinstitutions.6 The research also found that professional skills are best cultivated and enhanced bypracticing them through real experiences.6 Davis et al. also stated that it is difficult for studentsto achieve leadership skills in a lecture format.11ReflectionExpanding on the experiential learning theories, reflection is an increasingly important elementthat must be discussed in student learning. Self-reflection is a way to bridge connectionsbetween elements of specific experiences and contributes to true learning and positive changes.4Similarly, Wong et al. stated that reflection integrates theory with practice and appreciation ofthe world.14
, colleges and/or institutions to guide them insystem-wide development and measurement of policies, practices and procedures to ensure notonly sustainability, but also to positively impact student, faculty and staff learning for continuousimprovement purposes. In this paper, we focus on student learning by coursework program andpresent the results and analysis of a pilot study using a case study methodology. Included is adiscussion on the presented comprehensive evaluation tool’s usefulness for the continuousimprovement at programmatic and institutional levels, as well as for collecting and providingevidence for quality assurance and accreditation organizations, such as ABET.IntroductionFrom development, ecology, energy, to biology, sustainability
South Korea. She currently works as graduate research assistant in engineering education department. Her research interests are assessment for learners in diverse settings, and teacher education in multicultural settings.Prof. Jeffrey F Rhoads, Purdue University at West Lafayette Jeffrey F. Rhoads is a Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University and is affiliated with both the Birck Nanotechnology Center and Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at the same insti- tution. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees, each in mechanical engineering, from Michigan State University in 2002, 2004, and 2007, respectively. Dr. Rhoads’ current research interests include the predictive design, analysis, and
Paper ID #28213Understanding the Impact of a Diversity and Inclusion OrientedCurriculum in Short-Term Study Abroad Programs for UndergraduateEngineering StudentsDr. Tojan Rahhal, University of Missouri Dr. Tojan Rahhal is an Adjunct Professor in the Biomedical, Biological, and Chemical Engineering Department and the Assistant Dean for Inclusive Excellence and Strategic Initiatives at the University of Missouri-Columbia in the College of Engineering. Rahhal graduated from North Carolina State University with a BS in Biomedical Engineering. She went on to pursue a PhD in Pharmaceutical Sciences at the University of North
education research. Her research interests include faculty change, 3D spatial visualization, gender inclusive teamwork, and study- ing authentic engineering practice. Dr. Panther has experience conducting workshops at engineering education conferences both nationally and internationally, has been a guest editor for a special issue of European Journal of Engineering Education on inclusive learning environments, and serves on the Aus- tralasian Journal of Engineering Education advisory committee.Prof. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a Professor in Biological Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell
studying college impact. 2005.[7] J.B. Main, B.N. Johnson, N. M. Ramirez, H. Ebrahiminejad, M.W. Ohland, and E.A. Groll,“A Case for Disaggregating Engineering Majors in Engineering Education Research: TheRelationship between Co-Op Participation and Student Academic Outcomes,” InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, 36(1A). 2020.[8] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches(4th ed.). SAGE Publications. 2014.[9] B. D. Jones, Motivating students by design: Practical strategies for professors (2nd ed.).Charleston, SC: CreateSpace. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/102728. 2018.
Paper ID #34332Thinking as Argument: A Theoretical Framework for Studying how FacultyArrive at Their Deeply-held Beliefs About Inequity in EngineeringJeremy Grifski, Ohio State University Jeremy Grifski is a Graduate Research Associate in the department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. Previously, he completed an undergraduate degree in Computer Engineering at Case Western Reserve University and went on to work for General Electric Transportation as a part of their Edison Engineering Development Program. Recently, Jeremy completed a Master’s in Computer Science and Engineering under Dr. Atiq and is
lead broad-based change initiatives (rather than relying on individual facultymembers) and taking advantage of funding opportunities to support change such as NationalScience Foundation IUSE/PFE: REvolutionizing engineering and computer science Departments(IUSE/PFE: RED) grants. 4. If you were an NSF program director, what major engineering education research project would you propose and champion?Below is a sampling of specific suggestions for funding initiatives suggested by workshopparticipants, which focused on creating or enhancing NSF support for: Infusing more design thinking into engineering education Assessing best practices nationwide and methodologies for assessment Placing engineering education graduate
-independency that is expected from graduate students when it comesto research. Some of the students anticipated more guidance and/or daily contact with the facultyhost and felt a little lost at the beginning. Better preparing the students for that environment willallow them to engage in the research project and adjust to the lab environment more quickly.The program was designed to provide intensive language training in the morning. For that, thecollaboration of Texas A&M University’s English Language Institute was crucial. The EnglishLanguage Institute integrated the 50 students into their regular summer session while creating atailored TOEFL preparation class for the group and designating conversation partners that wouldaddress each student’s
research. Cambridge University Press, 2014.[23] B. Yoder, “Going the distance in engineering education: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology, and computing students,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2012.[24] L. Tsui, “Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature,” J. Negro Educ., pp. 555–581, 2007.[25] J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, R. R. Cocking, and others, How people learn, vol. 11. Washington, DC: National academy press, 2000.[26] H. Darabi, E. Douzali, S. Harford, P. Nelson, and F. Karim, “Beyond Grade Point Average and Standardized Testing: Incorporating a Socio-Economic Factor in Admissions
are formalagreements with overseas universities to facilitate the successful transfer of students withoutduplication of course work, which can provide another source of students coming to the UnitedStates [10].International Graduate Students Recruiting Strategy – A Partnership ProgramAs shown in the literature review above, best practices in recruiting international studentsaccording to Özturgut (2013) are: 1. Providing academic support and utilizing campus resources;2. Attending and participating in international education fairs and recruitment events; 3.Partnering with other organizations (colleges and universities, non-profit and governmentalinstitutions, high schools, for-profit organizations); 4. Passive Marketing such as Webadvertising
and engineering employers consider as a must for engineering graduates.However, the process of achieving critical thinking skills is not always well laid out and /ordeveloped. Although a number of models have been developed in this topic by many academics,developing “critical thinking skills” can be a long and arduous process. In particular, thedevelopment of higher education program level critical thinking skills require detailed courselevel planning, structured assignments, critical analysis of case studies, student centric learning,and guided design using tools such as simulation and gaming, communication exercises, andlaboratory experiments. Research suggests that the development of any skill is best facilitated bypractice and not by
Paper ID #38482Panel: Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Fellow Perspectives onAdvancing Women and Gender Equity in Engineering - for the Next 130YearsDr. Baishakhi Bose, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Baishakhi Bose is currently a Postdoctoral Scholar at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (LBNL). Her cur- rent research focus is on life cycle assessment of novel polymers, building materials and plastic recycling processes. She obtained her PhD. in Materials Engineering from Purdue University in 2021. Since 2014, she has taught courses in Civil, Materials and First Year Engineering to undergraduates, and mentored
evaluating teamwork models, statewide pre-college math initiatives, teacher and faculty professional development programs, and S-STEM programs.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Dr. Rebecca Brent, Education Designs, Inc Rebecca Brent is President of Education Designs, Inc., a consulting firm located in