Displaying results 451 - 480 of 632 in total
- Conference Session
- Faculty Development and Change
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Stephanie Adams, Oregon State University; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Jeff Knowles, Oregon State University; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Maya Menon, New Jersey Institute of Technology
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Faculty Development Division (FDD)
mentorship insupporting EBIP adoption. Theoretical saturation was achieved when no new themes or insightsemerged from the data.Rigor and trustworthiness were supported through reflexive memo-writing, peer debriefing, andthe use of constant comparative analysis to enhance credibility [25]. Team members who werefamiliar with the project but not involved in the interviews or analysis reviewed the findings toprovide an addition check on accuracy and validity [27]. Ethical considerations includedobtaining informed consent, protecting participant confidentiality, and ensuring secure datastorage [28]. These measures upheld ethical integrity and strengthened the dependability of thestudy.By employing constructivist GT, this study provided a nuanced
- Conference Session
- ERM Technical Session: Quantitative Instrument Development
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Trevion S Henderson, Tufts University; Avis Carrero, Tufts University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
professional practice [1].Indeed, team-based, project-based learning experiences are thought to support myriad social,technical, and sociotechnical learning outcomes for engineering students, such as learning tothink and communicate in the languages of engineering, technical writing and communication,prototyping and fabrication, and so on [1]–[3]. However, existing research has indicated that thebenefits of participating in team-based, project-based learning experiences are not always sharedby all students, and sociodemographic characteristics, such as race/ethnicity, sex/gender,socioeconomic status, and international student status, can inform the socioacademic dynamicsby which students come to participate (in)equitably in engineering teamwork.The
- Conference Session
- Mechanics Division (MECHS) Technical Session 1B
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Wayne L Chang, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Mikayla R Hoyle, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Melany Denise Opolz, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Jean-Christophe Raymond-Bertrand, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Nikhil Chandra Admal, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Thomas Golecki, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Kellie M Halloran, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Shelby Hutchens, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Callan Luetkemeyer, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Brian Mercer, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Matthew West, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Mariana Kersh, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Tagged Divisions
- Mechanics Division (MECHS)
Integer-Linear Programming (MILP) to determine unintended disparities in the impact of automated traffic law-enforcement on different groups in the city of Chicago.Nikhil Chandra Admal, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Admal is a professor of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. He holds a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics and a Master’s in Mathematics from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. His research focuses on multiscale modeling of materials, particularly the mechanics of defects. Dr. Admal has published over 20 papers in peer-reviewed journals. He is actively involved in engineering education, especially in incorporating real-world examples
- Conference Session
- ECE-Career Development and Program Structures
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Shiny Abraham, Seattle University; Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University; Mehmet Vurkac, Seattle University; Henry Louie, Seattle University; Shruti Singh, Seattle University; Margarita D. Takach, Seattle University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)
myths, such as theidea that mentorship is a one-sided or strictly formal relationship, while emphasizing howmentorship fosters professional growth and personal development. After the lecture, studentsengaged in a brief interactive discussion with a peer, reflecting on their experiences withmentorship (or lack thereof) and sharing their expectations for an effective mentor. This activityencouraged students to connect the theoretical aspects of mentorship with their personalcontexts.Subsequently, students were organized into 10 groups, each consisting of around four menteesfrom ECEGR 1200 and around two mentors from ECEGR 3110. These groups were tasked withengaging in two structured activities specifically designed to cultivate mentorship skills
- Conference Session
- Motivation and Engagement in Engineering Students
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Autumn Cuellar, Utah State University; Marissa A Tsugawa, Utah State University - Engineering Education; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Student Division (STDT)
steps outlined in Borrego et al.’s [9] paper.Multiple databases were examined using the Utah State’s database directory. The author selectedthree databases for the paper selection phase: Scopus, ASEE Peer Directory, and Google Scholar.Autumn Cuellar selected these databases because they were the only ones that produced validpaper entries when using specialized keywords. Other databases did not produce any papers thatmatched the inclusion criteria outlined below. Most articles came from Scopus and the ASEEPeer Directory. A few articles were discovered on Google Scholar.The first author used multiple keywords in conjunction with each other for the search. Thekeywords used were UDL, universal design for learning, stem, engineering, students
- Conference Session
- Disability in Engineering Programs (Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division ECSJ Technical Session 3)
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Ella Hedberg, University of Michigan; Caroline Louise Carter, University of Michigan; Xiaping Li, University of Michigan; Laura Hirshfield, University of California, Berkeley; Robin Fowler, University of Michigan; Prachi Shah, University of Michigan
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
factors that inhibit full participation of students who identify with historically marginalized groups and investigate evidence-based strategies for mitigating these inequities. In addition, she is interested in technology and how specific affordances can change the ways we collaborate, learn, read, and write. Teaching engineering communication allows her to apply this work as she coaches students through collaboration, design thinking, and design communication. She is part of a team of faculty innovators who originated Tandem (tandem.ai.umich.edu), a tool designed to help facilitate equitable and inclusive teamwork environments.Prachi Shah, University of Michigan ©American Society for
- Conference Session
- Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) Technical Session 3
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Kristina Bloch, University of Louisville; Campbell R Bego, University of Louisville
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering Libraries Division (ELD)
an ongoing collaboration between anEngineering Fundamentals professor and the Engineering Librarian at a largesuburban university in the Southeast. In this study, a purposive sample of sixstudents in an Introduction to Engineering course participated in semi-structuredinterviews regarding the student experience of course- integrated GenAI research intheir class.Researchers utilized Charmaz’s constructivist grounded theory to analyze the data[13]. ChatGPT-3.5 was not utilized in the analysis or in writing this article. Thisstudy was approved by the Institutional Review Board (Reference Number794713) at the University of LouisvilleParticipantsAll study participants were enrolled in the Introduction to Engineering course atthe University of
- Conference Session
- Two-Year College Division (TYCD) Technical Session 2: Student Success and Support
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- John Krupczak Jr, Hope College; David R Brown; Amy B Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Two-Year College Division (TYCD)
faculty, internship or fieldexperience, study abroad, and capstone project.Also included in NSSE is the extent to which students report that they have used learning supportservices such as tutoring services or a writing center. Students are asked the extent to which theinstitution has proved supportive of their overall well-being in areas such as recreation, healthcare, and counseling and if they were able to obtain help to manage non-academicresponsibilities such as work and family. Students are asked if they feel like part of thecommunity at their institution.As an institution-level data source, the NSSE, if used, can provide context and institutionalbaseline data. NSEE provides an opportunity to compare with peer institutions, which is one
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Best in DEED
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- L'Nard E.T. Tufts II, Stanford University; Alessandra O. Napoli, Stanford University; Shima Salehi, Stanford University; Anna Lisa Boslough, Stanford University
- Tagged Divisions
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
screenshot or print your responses to use as a conversation guide during your 1-1 thisweek.Consider some or all of the items below. You don't need to write a lot, bullet points are fine.Keep it concise!!! The idea here is to get you thinking, not to write an essay.Summary: Concept RefinementReflect on how you refined your ideas and selected your top three project concepts. Here aresome guiding questions you might consider: ● How have I incorporated feedback from instructors, peers, or other sources since my initial sketches? ● What was one key insight or moment that helped me narrow down my ideas? ● What adjustments did I make to my designs or process, and what inspired these changes? ● What synthesizing or evaluation strategies
- Conference Session
- New Engineering Educators (NEE) Technical Session 3 - Professional and Faculty Development
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Gracie Kerr, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Hayden J Wulf, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)
resources for student learning, such as availability of tutoringsessions, writing centers, or student disability services [6]. Syllabi also provide an opportunityfor instructors to exhibit empathy or provide motivation to students through the communicationof course policies. Demonstrations of empathy have the potential to provide additional support tostudents within the classroom and influence student success [8], [9]. Furthermore, past studieshave demonstrated that fundamental information about a course can be deduced from coursesyllabi [10], [11], [12]. However, there has been a lack of research exploring the ways in whichcourse syllabi can be used to examine transparency and support systems provided to students inengineering courses. The purpose
- Conference Session
- Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 8
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Pooya Niksiar, The Citadel; Dimitra Michalaka P.E., The Citadel
- Tagged Divisions
- Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)
peer-reviewed journal papers in the area of his research, has received grant form NASA and Amazon and has been reviewer for several journals. Dr. Niksiar is teaching graduate and undergraduate courses in the area of thermal and fluid Sciences, aerodynamics, materials, design, measurements and numerical methods.Dr. Dimitra Michalaka P.E., The Citadel Dimitra Michalaka, Ph.D., P.E., is an associate professor in the civil, environmental and construction engineering department at The Citadel, the Associate Director for the Center for Connected Multimodal Mobility (C2M2), and a register professional engineer at the state of SC. She received her undergraduate diploma in civil engineering from the National Technical
- Conference Session
- Track 5: Technical Session 1: Engineering and Computer Science Faculty Members' Personal and Professional Perspectives on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
- Collection
- 2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)
- Authors
- Yvette E. Pearson P.E., University of Texas at Dallas; Canek Moises Luna Phillips, Rice University; Lisa J. Borello, University of Texas at Dallas; Torrie Cropps; Jue Wu, Univertify of Florida; Samara Rose Boyle
- Tagged Topics
- 2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity
grew up in racially isolated neighborhoods can benefit socially from participating in racially integrated classrooms. Multicultural education is most beneficial for students of color. (R) Large numbers of students of color are improperly placed in remedial courses (e.g., mathematics) by university personnel. In order to be effective with all students, faculty should have experience working with students from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. Multicultural education is less important than English, writing, mathematics, and computer science. (R) All students should be encouraged to become fluent in a second language. Historically, STEM education has been monocultural, reflecting only one reality and has been biased toward the dominant
- Conference Session
- GSD 7: Innovative Graduate Education
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Yunus Doğan Telliel, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Matthew James Lydon, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
- Tagged Divisions
- Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
receive. For some graduate students, this question wasreflected in their need to learn how to identify, evaluate, and navigate potential sources offeedback. The NRT FORW-RD program’s emphasis on applied ethics and broader impacts ofresearch played a significant role in spotlighting a world of ‘feedback’ that exists outside of theone inhabited by academic advisors and peers: The program has been helping people shift their mindset, look at other perspectives through things like the ethics class [and] the workshops. [It is an] undercurrent [and it] ends up sinking in even though it wasn't the main thing. [We now ask:] “who are the collaborators you think can help you on your project?” [This does not have to be] directly
Enhancing Student Learning in a Blended Undergraduate Dynamics Course through Hands-on Mini-Projects
- Conference Session
- ME Division 7: Making it Matter: Projects and Communication
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Sudeshna Pal, University of Central Florida; Sierra Outerbridge, University of Central Florida; Mohammadreza Chimehrad, University of Central Florida; Michelle Taub, University of Central Florida; Hyoung Jin Cho, University of Central Florida
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)
and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Central Florida. He coordinates two undergraduate programs – B. S. Mechanical Engineering and B. S. Aerospace Engineering. He has published over 130 peer-reviewed journal and proceeding papers. He has 12 and 6 patents granted in the U.S. and Korea, respectively, in the areas of sensors, microfluidic devices, and micro/nanofabrication. His current research focus is on miniaturized environmental sensors and sample handling devices. He earned his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2002. He worked as Research Engineer at Korea Electronics Technology Institute (KETI) from 1993 to 1997. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2004 and was given
- Conference Session
- Civil Engineering in the Age of AI
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Christina Cercone, Manhattan University; Konstantine Aristomenis Mendrinos, Manhattan College; Matthew Volovski, Manhattan College; JUNESEOK LEE, Manhattan University; Medya Fathi, Manhattan University; Mehdi Omidvar, Manhattan University; Shahriar Quayyum, Manhattan College
- Tagged Divisions
- Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)
has led to a book on visualization of the fundamental physics of rapid earth penetration, several highly cited reviews, and over 60 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings. He has served on the board of the New York Metropolitan Section Geo-Institute, provides expert witness services related to Civil Engineering projects, and has several years of industry experience in design of earth dams, earth retaining structures, and deep foundations.Shahriar Quayyum, Manhattan College ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Leveraging AI-Generated Supplemental Videos to Enhance Undergraduate Engineering EducationAbstractOne of the greatest
- Conference Session
- Engineering Education Methods and Reflections
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Ruidong Ma, University of Washington; Renee M. Desing, University of Washington
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Student Division (STDT)
. I have critically analyzed my self-reflections and evaluations to assess my personal andprofessional growth as an instructor over the last three years. In this paper, I present the results ofmy critical self-reflection through a set of lessons learned and how my teaching philosophy hasevolved, including improvements in teaching skills, time management, career development, andDiversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the classroom. Based on my personal experience, thispaper aims to share a journal with peers who are interested in teaching while pursuing a Ph.D.degree and to bridge the teaching experience with career development.Keywords: self-reflection, graduate student instructors, improvement of teaching skills 1. Introduction
- Conference Session
- Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED): Developing Professional and Career Readiness
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Fatemeh Mirzahosseini Zarandi, University of Cincinnati; Madeline Martin, University of Cincinnati; Siqing Wei, University of Cincinnati; David Reeping, University of Cincinnati
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED)
behavior even without manager guidance or positive feedback while sustainingprogress and professional development. Moreover, people are more likely to engage in activitieswhere they expect a positive outcome and where their involvement will be valued (Lent, 2002).When students articulate their outcome expectations, a deeper understanding of the impact of theirco-op experiences on future expectations can be gained. The question is: Write a goal to help you develop the professional skill selected above.A thematic analysis was applied to these responses. This approach allows for the exploration ofrecurring themes related to students’ experiences, perspectives, and reflections on their co-opplacements and provides insights into how students' co
- Conference Session
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Teaching Engineering Decision and Process
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Erica J Marti, University of Nevada - Las Vegas; David Earl James, University of Nevada - Las Vegas
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
featuringdifferent civil engineering disciplines and a semester-long design project. Through scaffoldingand repetition, students work through problem definition, criteria development and forming anevaluation matrix multiple times over the course of the semester. The second course is a capstonedesign course that is taken in the final semester. Students complete a project based on a real-world problem and are guided by the instructor and external mentors.We assessed students’ abilities to apply the engineering design process in both classes. In thesecond-year seminar lab, we examine students’ success over time with writing problemdescriptions and needs statements, generating design criteria, and recognizing design constraints.Through repeated practice
- Conference Session
- Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 6.A
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Gabriel Beal, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand; Chi Yan Daniel Leung, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand; Joe Mazzone, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand; Chelsea L Gordon, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand; Yamuna Rajasekhar, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand
- Tagged Divisions
- Computers in Education Division (COED)
Insights feature.Examples of outlier students' behavioral dataI n this section, we describe real examples of using Student Behavior Insights to detect students who appear to be (1) completing assignments as intended, (2) using an external source, such as ChatGPT to completetheir assignments, and (3) struggling on the assignments and resorting to an external source. We also highlight patterns of student behavior that we observed.Example student 1, who earnestly completed the programming assignments. hen an individual earnestly writes code, it is an iterative and dynamic process.WStudents progressively develop their code by frequently running and testing it toe nsure functionality. This involves running code multiple
- Conference Session
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES) Technical Session 6: LEES Works in Progress
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Gary P. Halada, Stony Brook University; Lori Scarlatos, Stony Brook University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
conferences ASEE citations proceedings7. Co-PIs will: use Assessment Participant Exit survey Analysis andan exit survey and of the feedback and interview discussion ofinterview a sampling response to section in the summaries results (amongof participants about be included project report PIs and inprogram in the and in writing)effectiveness program resources for report (and future for future training iteration of the training)III. Results:In all, 38 new participants completed the
- Conference Session
- Construction Engineering Division: Best of Construction
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Kenneth Stafford Sands II, Auburn University; Xi Wang, Drexel University; tianjiao zhao, East Carolina University
- Tagged Divisions
- Construction Engineering Division (CONST)
moreinteractive and student-centered.The role of ethics in AI learning has also been explored by Shih et al. [14], who emphasized theimportance of situated learning in teaching non-engineering students about AI concepts andethics. This is relevant to engineering education, as it underscores the necessity of understandingethical implications when applying AI technologies to real-world engineering problems.Furthermore, Neumann et al. [15] addressed the growing relevance of ChatGPT in engineeringeducation, highlighting its potential applications in scientific writing, code creation, andassessment preparation. They proposed structured approaches for integrating generative AI intohigher education while mitigating challenges such as plagiarism and
- Conference Session
- ENT-4: Experiential Approaches to Developing Entrepreneurial Mindsets in Engineering
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Sydney Casperson; Heather Dillon, University of Washington; Jeffrey Walters, University of Washington; Chris Sharp, George Fox University; Kayt Frisch, George Fox University
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)
, students who had an interest in graduate programs were alsoencouraged to take an M-CURE that focused on writing peer reviewed papers and transition to graduateprograms [3,5].The last element of the CURE experiences was tied to development of an entrepreneurial mindset (EM).EM for this project is defined as a set of attitudes, dispositions, habits, and behaviors that shape a uniqueapproach to problem-solving, innovation, and value creation. In the context of research, we are focused onhelping students connect research with value creation. We have defined a research mindset as a broaderidea that includes many facets of an entrepreneurial mindset. These factors in turn are connected to theidea of student-centered research [6].All of the CUREs in the
- Conference Session
- GSD 2: Identity and Motivation
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Gouri Vinod, Cornell University; Allison Godwin, Cornell University; Trevor Franklin, University of Colorado Boulder
- Tagged Divisions
- Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
ongoing formation of their researcher identities.GRG Workforce Development ContextWithin the GRG, IBM theory underpins the workforce development plan and is a normal part ofhow all outreach and professional development activities for graduate students are structured. Theconcept of Action Readiness within IBM theory highlights how students in the GRG areencouraged to engage in interdisciplinary research that helps develop their personal and careergoals. Dynamic Construction is also highlighted, as students are encouraged to take the lead onprojects, transitioning from participants to leaders in their research. Additionally, they are guidedon projects through mentor feedback and peer collaboration through weekly meetings, fostering asupportive
- Conference Session
- Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 2
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Fadhla Binti Junus, Purdue Engineering Education; Alfa Satya Putra, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
- Tagged Divisions
- Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)
centers around developing personalized learning environments for higher education students studying computer programming. She is particularly interested in investigating students’ programming learning processes, exploring methods to simplify programming instruction, examining theoretical foundations for effective instructional design, and integrating artificial intelligence technologies to facilitate peer-like knowledge construction.Alfa Satya Putra, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Alfa Satya Putra is a 3rd year PhD student at School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University. Before joining the PhD program
- Conference Session
- ME Division 7: Making it Matter: Projects and Communication
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Ismail I Orabi, University of New Haven
- Tagged Divisions
- Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)
LabVIEW.” • “The rigorous workload, combined with the instructor’s detailed feedback and high expectations, greatly enhanced my technical writing skills.”Suggestions for Course Improvement: • “Allow more time for students to explore their design projects freely.”Advice for Future Students: • “Be prepared to put in the work and embrace hands-on learning.” • “Start thinking about design project ideas at the beginning of the semester.”Learning OutcomesSurvey results indicate that 90% of students found the project beneficial. Key highlights include: • Hands-On Application: Projects enhanced the practical application of classroom principles. • Problem-Solving Skills: Open-ended challenges encouraged critical
- Conference Session
- Engineering Identity and Student Support (Features 2 papers of STDT)
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Brandon Wilson, California State University, Los Angeles; Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Student Division (STDT)
, someengineering students shoo this responsibility, recognizing that unethical situations and practicesexist in industry but choosing to write them off as a necessary or justifiable part of the field [9].What’s more, the importance engineering students place on public welfare in general is seen todecline as they progress through their undergraduate education [10].This study seeks to build off of these latter two findings in an attempt to further improve thecharacterization of ethical and political disengagement among engineering students. Through alongitudinal mixed-methods survey given to engineering students at multiple California StateUniversity (CSU) campuses, which serve primarily working class students and Students ofColor, this study will
- Conference Session
- Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 10
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Abhijit Nagchaudhuri, University of Maryland Eastern Shore; Madhumi Mitra Ph.D, University of Maryland Eastern Shore; Aaron H. Persad, University of Maryland Eastern Shore; Yan Waguespack, University of Maryland Eastern Shore; Mary L Bowden, University of Maryland, College Park; Gilbert Lee Pinkett, University of Maryland Eastern Shore
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)
) courses at both junior and senior levels.She has also expressed her intention to broaden the inclusion of Artemis-related content acrossother chemistry courses she teaches.The second mini-grant enabled the creation of a simulated lunar yard within the "High Bay" areaof the engineering building, which continues to be utilized by the faculty lead for demonstrationsto K-12 students and other visitors. Additionally, the faculty lead is engaging UMES students inthe ongoing development of the EVA Smart Tool throughout 2025. He has outlined specific plansfor 2026, which include an additional peer-reviewed publication as well as expanding the studentparticipant pool to collaborate on the design and construction of a high-fidelity "Grabber Tool" foruse on
- Conference Session
- ECE-Circuit Courses: Instructional Innovations and Student Success
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
- Gang Sun, Northern Kentucky University
- Tagged Divisions
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)
projects related to embedded systems design D. Collaboration with peers on research projects 4) To what extent did hands-on learning in embedded systems courses enhance your ability to contribute to research projects? A. Significantly enhanced my contributions B. Moderately enhanced my contributions C. Had little impact on my contributions D. Did not impact my contributions 5) Did working with the MISL-ASE board in the embedded system courses improve your understanding of the electronic product development process (e.g., hardware/software integration, software debugging, etc.)?? A. Yes, significantly B. Yes, moderately C. No, only slightly D. Not at all 6) How did the hands-on learning experience influence
- Collection
- 2025 ASEE -GSW Annual Conference
- Authors
- Lance Leon Allen White, Texas A&M University; Karan Watson P.E., Texas A&M University
be markedly different was the mode inwhich students studied for their exams. Many students spent a significant time working out theirpractice problems and other study materials by hand on physical media, whether that be paper ora writing enabled tablet. Through discussions with students, it was clear that students wereattempting to simulate the exam environment as much as possible. This simulation of assessmentenvironment is far from evidence to suggest the larger difference seen for Exam 2, although itdoes provide insight for further explorative work. Conclusions and Future WorkThis work was inspired by the striking presence of academic misconduct during exams in afoundational first-year engineering course at
- Collection
- 2025 Northeast Section Conference
- Authors
- Yegin Genc; Gonca Altuger-Genc; Akin Tatoglu
, [8] Engineering Education: Redesigning Peer Feedback Assessments for Step 2: Calculate the frictional head loss. 2024 World Engineering Education To estimate the frictional head loss, we can use the Darcy-Weisbach Forum-Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC), IEEE, 2024, equation for head loss due to friction, which is given by: pp. 1 6. [9] L. Cruz- -based system