first year retention rate of 86%is comparable to the entire entering cohort of 2013, despite the higher risk of attrition in thispopulation of students. The first year retention rates for the summer bridge program cohorts of2011 and 2012 were 85% and 86%, respectively. Therefore, there does not appear to be a majorshift in retention as a function of this course revision. First year retention data for theSummerStart students of 2014 is not yet available. At the start of their second semester, all 25participants were still officially enrolled in the College of Engineering and Computer Science.However, three of these students are no longer taking courses towards their engineering orcomputer science degree, indicating that they plan to transfer out
is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by over $14.5 million from the National Science Foundation and
partners to integrate manyof these activities in order to provide more professional practice skills beyond traditionalengineering education to our students. We believe our recent success in fostering sustainedindustrial partnership is the direct result of the following practices: Proactive recruitment: selecting partners who have long-term interest to affiliate with the program and replacing inactive members through normal attrition. Relevant engagement: involving partners with activities that have potential impacts on the program and providing them with a well-planned agenda so they feel full engaged and take ownership of the affiliation. Steady leadership: selecting and retaining strong leaders who understand
students gave a total of 277 responses or anaverage of 8.15 items per student. The number of student responses ran from 1 to 17 per student.The topics were selected from a low frequency of once to a high of 12 times with an average of2.50 selections per topic.If the authors were to analyze the technology and society course on their own based on thetextbooks and course content, they probably would not have done as thorough a job of selectingcontent items or topics as the 34 students did. The instructor in the course attempts to present thecourse in a conscientious manner, but the intent is not to spend the entire semester teachingethics. The course detailed plan includes many topics such as: 1. The Natural World 2. Application of
, physical keys (e.g., smart cards andsmart card readers), the supporting server infrastructure, and the related locking mechanismsthemselves (e.g., magnetic or electromechanical locks). With careful planning, design, testing,and deployment, the advantage can be tilted back in favor of active defenders so long as theyare willing to consider the security of the system as a whole and not only its parts.REFERENCES 1. Das, S., and Beaman, J. Direct selective laser sintering of metals, January 2004. 2. Hull, C. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography, March 1986. 3. Laxton, B., Wang, K., and Savage, S. Reconsidering physical key secrecy: Teleduplication via optical decoding. 4. TOOOL. Assa twin
Machine Design class taken in fall 2013. Alexis’s contribution to the Twisted Sister Project was the concept and design of the articulating center drum, as well as the rear body frame design. These components enabled the robotic rover to climb over non-uniform obstacles that existed in its drive path while retaining traction on at least three out of the four wheels during motion. Outside of school he works seasonally at a private tax office in his local town in Long Island. His experi- ence both in and out of school has furthered his innate abilities to plan, organize and lead design projects to proliferate his experience with mechatronic design. Alexis continues his desire for mechatronic design as he is currently
Paper ID #11339Measuring Engineering Students’ Ability to Thrive in Diverse and Global En-vironmentsDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Matilde L. Sanchez-Pena, Purdue University Matilde Sanchez-Pena is a first year PhD student in the Engineering Education program at Purdue Uni- versity. Her research interests are global
,”There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom”, Engineering and Science, 23(5): 22-36, 1960. 4. Mongillo, John, “Nanotechnology 101”, Greenwood Press, 2007. Page 26.1183.13 5. Roco, Mihail C. , Chad A. Mirkin, and Mark C. Hersam, “Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020: Summary of International Study”, Springer, 2011.6. Greenberg, A. “Integrating Nanoscience into the Classroom: Perspectives on Nanoscience Education Projects”, ACS Nano, Vol.3, No. 4, 2009, pp. 762-769.7. The National Nanotechnology Initiative – Strategic Plan, December 2007.8. Veety, E., et al., “Multidisciplinary Undergraduate Minor
, have similar results. This allows us to increase our data set and tounderstand if these methods are more generally applicable to a range of courses and under whatconditions. Our second direction, which we have learned might be the most important part of thiswork, is how should the criterion map be created? Even though our results seem to show positiveresults, we suspect that the criterion map is fundamental in this process. For example, if the termsin a field are highly connected (larger degree) then does this make it easier or harder for a student.Also, how does the timing of when the terms are presented in the course impact the longitudinalstudy. Our plan is to use this new metric in these studies and to try and answer these questions forthe
from public safety tosupporting environmental research.ACUASI’s recently expanded education mission has funded a new, joint faculty position at UAF’sGeophysical Institute (GI) and the College of Engineering and Mines (CEM) to teach UAS technology.The first classes took place during UAF’s winter 2014 term; going forward, a foundation for UASeducation and training has been established, and UAF has just approved plans for an undergraduateaerospace engineering minor beginning fall 2015. Faculty hired specifically for the center’s STEMprogram are an integral part of the university’s UAS technology courses. Page 26.1613.2Leveraging strong
!4. Communication(depending on what format you choose, and mitigated by creative stylistic choices) Written (short story, poem, scene from play) a. Conciseness (avoid wordiness – omit needless words) b. Clarity (no ambiguity – use definite, specific, and concrete language) c. Accuracy (what you are saying is correct) OR Plan, construct, and deliver an effective oral presentation. Creating slides/presentation (graphic novel/comic strip) a. Clear logical organization b. Readable graphics and text c. Good signal to noise ratio - omit needless ink, aesthetically pleasing Delivery (skit/song) a. Timing - within time allowed, appropriate pace
engineers at his company, bald men earn more on average thanmen with full heads of hair. He would be foolish to shave his head in hopes of a raise; the oldestengineers are paid the most, and are more likely to be bald.Students who write lengthy responses may tend to be smarter, harder working, more thoughtful,more literate; or perhaps they are simply better at planning their time. These characteristics leadto higher grades.Do Prerequisites Matter?A third indicator of success in 100Strength of Materials is the grade 80earned in the prerequisite class, StrengthStatics. This graph shows the of
and data compiled by special tools built by 6Lab are used to analyze data relatingto IPv6 adoption. The 6Lab program segments world IPv6 adoption into four phases: planning,core network, content, and users. By all four phases, global IPv6 adoption is rapidly increasing.Planning - Measured by looking at the number of IPv6 prefix allocations from the RIRs and howmany of these allocated prefixes show up in Internet routing tables. By measuring the number ofallocated IPv6 prefixes, it is possible to get an indicator of future IPv6 deployments. All threeprefixes (Allocated IPv6 Prefixes – dashed line, Routable IPv6 Prefixes-dotted line, and AliveAllocated IPv6 Prefixes-solid line) exhibit an increasing trend (Figure 1
is the assessment chair and study abroad advisor for her department, the freshman director of the Civil Engineering Division for ASEE, and is the chair of the Continuing Education Committee for the Geo-Institute.Mrs. Kathleen Louise NazarPaul Bonfanti, Villanova University Paul Bonfanti is the Director of Planning and Policy Analysis for Villanova University. In that capacity, he performs quantitative and qualitative research and analysis for the University to inform policy and support strategic decision making. He also serves as an adjunct faculty member in the University’s Department of Public Administration, teaching Non Profit Management and Research and Analysis
2a part of Engage (Engaging Students in Engineering), which works to increasing the retention rateof engineering majors [35, 36]. These schools typically offer freshman spatial courses that can beas simple and low cost as drafting or as highly refined 3-D CAD work. Whatever course of actiontaken is highly dependent on the student’s preexisting level of spatial skill and the likelihood of acertain format succeeding which is too unique for a standardized, nationwide plan [27, 6, 37, 38,8, 39, 40, 41]. 1.7 Recommendations for Enhancing Spatial Skills (Practitioners) While the traditional philosophy of spatial skill gaps has to do with gender differences,recent studies are pointing out that environmental factors are influential as
inappropriately, but examining every word in context is too time- consuming for a large-scale study. For the results reported here, we compiled a list of 37 words that are often vague, absolute, unnecessary or inaccurate, based on previous analysis of student papers and faculty input. Occurrences of the words were examined in context. For example, you is accurate when referring to the reader (e.g. closing a technical memorandum to a client with It was a pleasure serving you) but inaccurate when it does not refer to the reader (e.g. Using the graph, you can calculate...). In the future, we plan to expand the list. (Other language features with other analyses are used in the project but are not included in this paper.) 3. Holistic
knowledgeregarding its use.4 However, it is a general test and does not assess discipline-specific issues.16 There have been several attempts to develop engineering-specific tests to assess moraljudgment. At conferences in 2003 and 2004, initial results of a study to develop a test werereported.11,15 The reports seemed promising, but Barry and Ohland reported that the principalinvestigators were no longer working on the project and had no immediate plans to resume thestudy (p. 384).4 Davis and Feinerman developed a method of comparing ratios of pre- and post-tests Page 26.240.5developed by the instructor. This method allows instructors to customize
Page 26.257.19 Figure 16. Rubric used for direct assessment of student designs in semesters with and without PBL techniques. Page 26.257.20References 1. Carpenter, D., Hayes, K., Ward, C., Gerhart, A. (2011) “Assessment and Evaluation of a Comprehensive Course Modification Plan.” The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship. Vol. 2, No. 2. 2. Gerhart, A. and Carpenter, D. (2013) “Campus-wide Course Modification Program to Implement Active & Collaborative Learning and Problem-based Learning to
above.b) work as a team, especially to develop standard procedures including safety rules, share resources, and exchange technical ideas.c) obtain new experience and knowledge, which will not only be used for millimeter-class mechanisms but also for other engineering applications.d) experience interdisciplinary work.Two case studies describing developments of electrostatic force driven grippers and suctiondevices for micro-assembly applications are presented in the next two sections. A summary ofother ongoing projects and future plans of our group will be given in the conclusion section.Case Study 1: Electrostatic force–driven grippersGripper designFor one of the projects, a group of a few students decided to develop a miniature 1-DOF
selected engineering at 5-10 times the rate oftypical students8. Though this report concluded women were not well-represented, they expectedthe implementation of Biomedical Engineering PLTW courses would attract females at highernumbers, thereby increasing the participation of women in engineering university programs.This study also found that 80% of PLTW students planned to go to college, compared to 63% oftheir peers. Further, 90% indicated they knew what they wanted to major in because of theirPLTW experience and 80% indicated their PLTW experience would significantly assist theirsuccess in their postsecondary education8. This comprehensive report suggests further evidencePLTW increases the quantity, quality and diversity of engineering
institutions, they were designed and implemented to provide some supplementary skills and experiences that will address some of the voids in their education. Additionally, the international network of peers has fostered the ability for continued peer networking to occur between LSWE and the undergraduates from the UMSWE. It is planned that the Leadership Camp will be carried out by the University of Michigan graduate students for multiple years until members of LSWE begin to graduate and are able to facilitate the camp’s programing thereafter. Additionally, the partnership will look to expand its capacity as it supports LSWE members past their undergraduate education, as they look for engineering employment and to apply to graduate school
performance.Limitations The primary limitation of this study is the lack of diversity among the participants. Wewere able to get good analyses of how motivational and early life experiences impact spatial skillsbut were not able to investigate how this effect might vary across different demographics. Wewere also not able to make good comparisons of different demographic groups. Future studieswill incorporate data from a more diverse set of participants.Future Research The authors’ future research plan is to use the results of this study to implement and testthe instructional interventions. The first intervention will focus on the instruction regarding thenature of knowledge and how this impacts self-efficacy beliefs and further impacts spatial
Research Fellowship. His research interests range from sophomore-level engineering curricula to spatial ability and creativity to student entrepreneurship.Mr. Steven David Wood, Utah State University Steven Wood is a junior in the Civil Engineering program. After finishing his BS he plans on completing a MS in Civil Engineering. In addition to studies, he is a teacher’s assistant and he teaches a recitation class for the Statics course. His Interests in the field of engineering are public transportation, specifically in rapid and heavy rail systems. His research interests include spatial ability, learning styles, and gender differences in meta-cognition. c American Society for Engineering
and many have elective courses focused on I&E. • Only a few had I&E as part of the core curriculum. • There was almost universal interest in increasing the presence of extracurricular and elective course offerings and a majority view that I&E should be part of the core curriculum. • On most campuses, the number of faculty engaged in supporting I&E education was said to be limited. • Most saw their university leadership as supportive of I&E, and engaged in early or more advanced stages of strategic planning. • Common challenges included finding space in the engineering curriculum, overcoming faculty and, to a lesser degree, administrative resistance
appropriate, with Expanded participation including many of the attendees from the first workshop, and including Both pairwise and three-way interactions among themes to explore connections. An important outcome of the second workshop will be to identify small leadership teams for each theme. The workshop steering committee would begin that process in the planning stage.”The foregoing demonstrates that this objective was met. Substantial progress was made in each of thethree groups resulting in specific recommendations and action items. One overarching recommendationwas again that there should be a third such workshop to address some of these specifics, and todisseminate progress that has been made in
stand out that affected your choice to pursue engineering? This program? 18. Do you think being a woman will help your hinder your career as an engineer? Why? 19. Are male and female engineers equally rewarded for the same work?” 20. Do you think there are preconceived expectations of your performance because you are a woman? If yes, can you think of an example? 21. Do you feel you have to prove yourself as a woman? 22. Do you think female students are taken less seriously? 23. Do you feel like you’re going to be equally compensated? 24. As a female, do you feel that it hurts you’re chances of being an engineering/having an engineering future? 25. Do you plan on going to graduate school, working in
Paper ID #15882Using Focus Groups to Understand Military Veteran Students’ Pathways inEngineering EducationDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego Michelle Madsen Camacho is Chair and Professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of San Diego. She formerly held two postdoctoral
for the first time. Other eventssuch as bowling and bubble ball soccer were held in the middle of each semester, with theintention of creating and strengthening relationships outside of the academic environment. Thehope in providing these opportunities for social interaction is that the students will feel a strongerconnection to the department and university, build stronger relationships with each other, andthrive academically and socially because they are having positive experiences. The plan is tocontinue to offer social activities at least once or twice per semester going forward.4. AssessmentProgram SuccessThe peer mentor program is in the first year of implementation. Preliminary assessment ofprogram goals was achieved through voluntary
Paper ID #14773Using the Flipped Classroom Model to Improve Construction Engineeringand Management EducationDr. Namhun Lee, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Namhun Lee is an associate professor in the department of Manufacturing and Construction Manage- ment at Central Connecticut State University, where he has been teaching Construction Graphics/Quantity Take-Off, CAD & BIM Tools for Construction, Building Construction Systems, Building Construction Estimating, Heavy/Highway Construction Estimating, Construction Planning, and Construction Project Management. Dr. Lee’s main research areas include Construction
technology, etc.); demonstrate academic ability or potential; and demonstrate financial need, defined for undergraduate students by the US Department of Education’s rules for need-based Federal financial aid, Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), or, for graduate students, defined as financial eligibility for Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need (GAANN).”3History of NSF-funded scholarships in STEM:The following press release statement announced this new H-1B visa-funded NSF program onMarch 29, 1999: “The National Science Board…approved plans by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) to provide some $21 million to fund 8,000 one-year scholarships of up to$2,500 each to low