Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Carpenter Ed.D., CCD - Custom Curriculum Design; Logan Edward Micher, Florida Polytechnic University; Chris Yakymyshyn; Jorge Vargas, Florida Polytechnic University; Christina Drake, Florida Polytechnic University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

engineering.” Hyman3, in hisoperational definition of design as “a proposed solution to a problem,” states that “the designitself is a value added proposition, meaning there is a business value in the solution, or else whybother designing it?” One of the ongoing challenges facing engineering programs is how toprovide freshmen with an engaging, budget-aware introduction to engineering that enhancesprogram retention and provides the student with skills that are applicable throughout theireducation and careers.The learning outcomes of engineering programs have evolved over the past century. In the1800’s, programs promoted “the application of sciences to the common purposes of life,”4 withthe goal of training employees for the rapidly expanding economy

Conference Session

Assessing Learning Outcomes for Flipped Classrooms, Recruitment and Research Internships, and Alternate Assessments for Online Courses

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brittain Sobey, The University of Texas - Austin; Margo Cousins, The University of Texas - Austin; Mia K. Markey, The University of Texas - Austin; Stephanie Ruth Young M.Ed., The University of Texas - Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

Austin BME graduate recruitment efforts.References1. Bell, S. M., Blumstein, J., Brose, K., Carroll, A., Chang, J., Charles, J., ... & Smith, R. (2014). Defining success in graduate school. Molecular biology of the cell, 25(13), 1942-1944.2. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological bulletin, 127(1), 162.3. Ehrenberg, R. G. (2003). Method or madness? Inside the USNWR college rankings. Working Papers, 42.4. Howell, L. L., Sorenson, C. D., & Jones, M. R. (2014). Are Undergraduate GPA and General GRE Percentiles Valid Predictors of

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sergio Celis, Universidad de Chile; Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

traditional, with lowcommitment to research and development. Internally, there have been difficulties incommunicating the project goals and orientations. The project seems huge and with a not clearset of priorities. Finally, hallways and informal talks mention that faculty leaders are seen asbelonging to a clique close to the top administration, which risks the wide adoption of theprogram.The Clover 2030 Engineering Strategy: A joint venture between UC and UTFSMNew Engineering for 2030 has been the opportunity that UC-Engineering was expecting tovalidate its efforts to create world-class education in Chile. Along CORFO' s intention totransform Chilean engineering schools towards national competitiveness and productivity, UC-Engineering had already

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Faculty Perspectives and Training

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; James A. Middleton, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University; Robert J. Culbertson, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Yong Seok Park, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

selected from VECTERS as seedsof conversation among faculty members. Discourse about not only the strategy but the specificsof value, expectation, and cost, are anticipated to enrich dialogue. This type of deeper discussionwill hopefully aid instructors in developing introspection regarding their own beliefs andperceived obstacles of implementation.AcknowledgmentThe authors gratefully acknowledge support of this work by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No. 1524527References 1. Branford, J. D., & Donovan, S. M. (2005). How students learn: history, mathematics, and science in the classroom. National AcademiesPress, Washington. 2. Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bryan Paul Ruddy, University of Auckland; Poul Fønss Nielsen, University of Auckland

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

emphasized the ease ofholding the device, while the team on the right focused on miniaturization, using figure 2’s PCB.While both these groups used non-inverting buffer amplifiers for signal conditioning, others usedlevel-shifted inverting op-amp circuits.Student feedback is positive, with students valuing the project highly for its contribution to theirunderstanding. Student performance (as assessed via overall grades) has remained stable throughthe introduction of this project. Work is ongoing to determine the impact of this course moreprecisely, and to determine the best sequence of lecture content to complement the project.[1] Sheppard, S. D. and Jenison, R. (1997). “Freshman engineering design experiences: An or-ganizational framework

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington; Ken Yasuhara, Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT); Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

describes reflection activities implemented in twobioengineering courses for the development of specific leadership competencies. The poster willinclude preliminary assessment data on the activities.          Bibliography    1. Ambrose, S. A. (2013). Undergraduate engineering curriculum: The ultimate design challenge. The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, 43(2).2. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.3. Kaplan, M., Silver, N., LaVaque-Manty, D., & Meizlish, D. (Eds.). (2013). Using Metacognition and Reflection to Improve Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.4. Seemiller, C. (2014). The Student

Conference Session

CEED Paper Session 2: Leveraging Internships and Experiential Learning in Higher Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Massi, University of Central Florida; Jenna Christie-Tabron, University of Central Florida; Michael Georgiopoulos, University of Central Florida; Mari Pina, University of Central Florida; Richard Allan Quinn, University of Central Florida; Jackie Herold, University of Central Florida; Kim A. Small, University of Central Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative & Experiential Education

Paper ID #14976Transforming the Culture of Internship Experiences through Social LearningCommunitiesDr. Lisa Massi, University of Central Florida Dr. Lisa Massi is the Director of Operations Analysis for Accreditation, Assessment, & Data Adminis- tration in the College of Engineering & Computer Science at the University of Central Florida. She is Co-PI of two NSF-funded S-STEM grants and program evaluator for two NSF-funded REU programs. Her research interests include factors that impact student persistence and career development in the STEM fields.Ms. Jenna Christie-Tabron, University of Central Florida Ms

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Angelina Lane, Seattle Pacific University; Donald M. Peter P.E., Seattle Pacific University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

: Lessons Learned From Community College Transfer Scholarship Recipients AbstractWith funding from the National Science Foundation’s S-STEM grant program, the ECASE(Engaging the Community to Achieve Success in Engineering) Scholarship at Seattle PacificUniversity (SPU) has targeted transfer students from urban and rural community colleges in theregion. For the past nine years, this program has provided scholarship and other support funds toassist these transfer students in obtaining a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering.The goal of the ECASE Scholarship is to provide pathways for financially needy, academicallytalented transfer students to thrive in the university environment, enter the workforce as well-trained

Conference Session

Automation, Instrumentation, and Computer Simulations

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas E. McDermott, University of Pittsburgh; Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

Paper ID #15181Improving a Flipped Electromechanical Energy Conversion CourseThomas E. McDermott, University of Pittsburgh Thomas E. McDermott is an Assistant Professor at the University of Pittsburgh, with over 30 years of industrial experience in consulting and software development. His research interests include electric power distribution systems, renewable energy, power electronics, electromagnetics, and circuit simulation. Tom is a registered professional engineer in Pennsylvania and an IEEE Fellow. He has a B. S. and M. Eng. in Electric Power from Rensselaer, and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Virginia

Conference Session

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies: Best Papers

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anahid Behrouzi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Daniel Kuchma, Tufts University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

week. The topics/activities foreach week and their type classification(s) are listed in Table 1. In this table, classifications A-Cwere developed by the authors to describe teaching approaches used in the DBE course thatrange from fully deductive to a combination of deductive/ inductive; D-G are based on theinquiry classification scheme proposed in Tafoya et al.7 and expanded by Staver and Bay8; andH-L are drawn from a comprehensive review of inductive teaching approaches assembled byPrince and Felder5. In general the classifications are listed left to right in Table 1 ranging fromdeductive to increasingly self-directed, inquiry-based methods. The remainder of this section willdefine each classification in the context of the DBE course.Table 1

Conference Session

That's a Great Idea! Learning-focused Methods to Revitalize Your Courses

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rob Sleezer, Minnesota State University, Mankato, Twin Cities; Jacob John Swanson, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

assessments from faculty, experiments they perform, and client corrections. Theassessments from faculty are often based on intuition and wisdom which allow them to predictwith some success the outcomes of the experiments the students perform. Regardless of thepredictions of the faculty and the students, the actual outcome of the experiments dictate nextsteps. Either the design works, or it does not. If it does not, which is most often the case, at thispoint in the semester there is little to no time for recovery. Finally, as a design comes togetherthe client(s) may provide feedback that the students did not appropriately frame the problem (i.e.the design is doing what was asked, but this is not what is needed) or that the design teammisinterpreted

Conference Session

Idea Generation and Creativity in Design

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eli M. Silk, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Seda Yilmaz, Iowa State University; Amy Rechkemmer; Jennifer Marguerite Wenger, University of Michigan College of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

countsas flexibility, while also better evaluating interventions designed to improve flexibility.References1. Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., Jablokow, K. W., Silk, E. M. & Rosenberg, M. N. Investigating impacts on the ideation flexibility of engineers. (2014).2. Kirton, M. J. Adaption-Innovation in the Context of Diversity and Change. (Routledge: London, UK, 2011).3. Valle, S. & Vázquez-Bustelo, D. Concurrent engineering performance: Incremental versus radical innovation. International Journal of Production Economics 119 (1), 136–148, doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.02.002 (2009).4. Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P. & O’Keefe, R. D. Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation

Conference Session

Assessment of Learning in BME

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aldin Malkoc, Arizona State University ; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

, interactive activities and assignments.In summary, although there are universally favored resources, there are differencesdepending on course type and assignment category (learning concept vs.programming/software assignment). Therefore, it is important to determine and developthe most appropriate resource for the student need.AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge the support of this work from NSF Grant #1226325.References[1] Krause, S., Baker, D., Carberry, A., Alford, T., Ankeny, C., Brooks, B., Gibbons, B. (n.d.). The Impact of Two-way Formative Feedback and Web-enabled Resources on Student Resource Use and Performance in Materials Courses. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings.[2] Pego, J. (2013). Peer

Conference Session

Concurrent Paper Tracks Session II Courses

Collection

2016 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Jennifer Craig, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

International Forum

technical content is necessary and that contentmust be well organized and specific. Based on this analysis (often done in a matter ofminutes), a speaker can then determine the scope, style, and organization of what s/hewants to say.Experienced communicators do this analysis and synthesis without much difficulty, movingefficiently to the appropriate oral communication act. But students are usually novices at thiskind of thinking and speaking. Moreover, engineering students may be unused to thestandards of excellence in their technical discipline and thus fall back onto older strategies,often adopted from the humanities. Because they are novices, they need to learn activelyunder the guidance of instructors who help shape student skills.The design

Conference Session

Professional Skills development in Design

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Deininger, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Jennifer Chen Lee, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Development, 8(1), 22-41.3) Skaggs, P. (2010). Ethnography in product design-looking for compensatory behaviors. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 3, 1.4) Kelley, T. (2007). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America's leading design firm. Crown Business.5) Schrage, M. (2013). Serious play: How the world's best companies simulate to innovate. Harvard Business Press.6) Cardella, M. E., Atman, C. J., Turns, J., & Adams, R. S. (2008). Students with differing design processes as freshmen: Case studies on change. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), 246. 7) Lande, M., & Leifer, L. (2009). Prototyping to learn: Characterizing engineering students’ prototyping activities and

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah Ilana Karpman, University of California San Diego

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

any credence or acknowledge it. We’rehere to do a job.” However, she stated that at times she felt like she was “back in the 1980’s.”However, another faculty member said that she had not felt either advantaged or disadvantagedfor being a woman in engineering. Finally, an associate professor in a different department alsoreported a strong amount of support from both male and female colleagues at ResearchUniversity I. Yet, she described a “systemic bias” during her graduate and postdoctoral careerthat caused some of her female peers to decide not to seek a faculty position. She recalled, “I hada lot of friends who wanted to be faculty and they just got tired. They got tired of constantlyfighting.” At Research University III, women faculty

Conference Session

Aerospace Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Scott Fleming, Georgia Institute of Technology; Amy Pritchett, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

Institute of Technology Amy R. Pritchett is the Davis S. Lewis Associate Professor in the Georgia Tech School of Aerospace Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Creating and Validating a Model to Support Aerospace Engineering Students’ Coordination of Knowledge about a DesignIntroductionAs a general field, design symbolizes the "conception and realisation of new things".1 However,engineering design differs from other design areas (e.g. graphic, industrial, and software design) in theenhanced complexity involved with clarifying and defining engineering products. Engineering designcan also be defined as a structured approach to developing, validating, and

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto; Mike Klassen, Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto; Doug Reeve, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

.’s fourteen leadership competenciesinclude2: initiative (assess risk and take initiative to create a vision/course of action), decision-making (make data-informed and risk-informed decisions about your course of action),responsibility and urgency to deliver (commitment to on-time deliverables), resourcefulness (getthe job done with passion, discipline, intensity and flexibility), ethical actions and integrity(courageously adhere to ethical standards), trust and loyalty (instil trust in your team byempowering members), courage (face difficult actions head-on), vision (create compellingimages of the future), realizing the vision (design processes to move from abstraction toimplementation), inquiry (listen to others and recognize that their

Conference Session

Student Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Galczynski, University of Maryland - College Park

Tagged Divisions

Student

Conference Session

Engineering Physics Technical Session 4

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Teresa L. Larkin, American University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

interested in assessing studentunderstanding of a particular lecture or class session, it would be best to give it during the lastfew minutes of class time. However, if the goal of the instructor is to assess studentunderstanding of a reading or other homework assignment, the minute paper could be givenduring the first few minutes of a class period.The minute paper is typically structured in the form of two short questions such as: “What wasthe most important thing you learned during our class session today?” and “What importantquestion(s) remain uppermost in your mind as we ended our class session today?” It isrecommended that the students’ answers remain anonymous in order for them to feelcomfortable to share their true understanding (or

Collection

2016 ERC

Authors

Andrew Szmerekovsky

Relationships• Promote Awareness – Accelerate S&T advances and transitions to the U.S. and avoid technological surprise• Engagement – Strengthen partnerships• Build Relationships – International goodwill • Nano-Bio Information Technology (Taiwan, Korea) • Brain Science (Korea) • Space Situational Awareness (Chile) • Ultra-Short Pulse Lasers (Europe) • Quantum Information Science (UK) 11 Explore AFOSR• APAN Collaboration Website – Presentations – Portfolio

Conference Session

Developing Better Engineering Managers - Curricular Ideas from Year 1 Through Graduate School

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peilin Fu, National University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

performance,capacity planning, supply chain, inventory management, forecasting, operations planning andscheduling, and resource planning etc., which are all closely related with the daily operations ofenterprises.The Course Learning Objectives (CLOs) are as follows: • Describe operations management and how it applies to project management engineering. • Analyze the role of behavior and communication in operations management. • Apply problem identification and problem-solving processes. • Determine the appropriate operations management tool(s) to be used during the problem-solving process. • Design and develop a process including comparison of methodologies to maintain and manage a process. • Determine the appropriate

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seemein Shayesteh P.E., Indiana University Purdue University - Indianapolis; Maher E. Rizkalla, Indiana University Purdue University - Indianapolis; Lauren Christopher, Electrical and Computer Engineering, IUPUI; Zina Ben Miled, ECE Department, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, Indiana University Purdue University - Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

Purdue University Calumet. In August 1986 he joined the department of electrical and computer engineering at IUPUI where he is now professor and Associate Chair of the department. His research interests include solid state devices, applied superconducting, electromagnetics, VLSI design, and engineering education. He published more than 175 papers in these areas. He received plenty of grants and contracts from Government and industry. He is a senior member of IEEE and Professional Engineer registered in the State of IndianaLauren Christopher, Electrical and Computer Engineering, IUPUI Dr. Lauren Christopher attended Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where she received her S. B. and S. M. in Electrical Engineering

Conference Session

Automation, Instrumentation, and Computer Simulations

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alamgir A. Choudhury, Western Michigan University; Jorge Rodriguez P.E., Western Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

operate at higher efficiency during the duration of theraces. Based on the desired speed of the bike in race track, shaft rpm of pump and motor wasdetermined as function of time. Table 1 shows the bike speed, corresponding track length, shaftrpm and its duration. The data is used to calculate a Speed Factor (S) at each pump and motorspeed as fraction of total race time. ti Si  … (1) TWhere, Si = Speed Factor ti = Duration of a specific speed T= Completion time of race.For each wheel velocity, the corresponding shaft speed is calculated based on wheel rpm andgear ratio. In the

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty Development

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura D. Hahn, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Cinda Heeren

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

://chairacademy.com/conference/2007/papers/best_practices_for_supporting_adjunct_faculty.pdf15 Kezar & Maxey (2015). Ibid.16 Lyons (2007). Ibid.17 Sorcinelli, M., and Aitken, N. (1995). Improving teaching: Academic leaders and faculty developers as partners.In W. Wright, W.McKeachie, and B. Hofer (Eds.), Teaching improvement practices: Successful strategies for highereducation. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Co.18 Pulford, S., Ruzycki, N., Finelli, C., Hahn, L., and Thorsen, D. (2015, June). Making value for faculty: Learningcommunities in engineering faculty development. Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.2446519 Sirum, K. L. and Madigan, D. (2010). Assessing how science faculty

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chi-Cheng Cheng, National Sun Yat-Sen University; Chia-Chi Wang, National Sun Yat-Sen University; Yu-Jen Wang, National Sun Yat-Sen University; Ying-Yao Cheng, National Sun Yat-Sen University; Chua-Chin Wang, National Sun Yat-Sen University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

., R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, and C. D. Sorensen, “A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 17-28, 1997.4. Noble, J. S., “An Approach for Engineering Curriculum Integration in Capstone Design Courses,” Int. J. Engng. Ed., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 197-203, 1998.5. Chandrasekaran, S., A. Stojcevski, G. Littlefair, and M. Joordens, “Learning through Projects in Engineering Education,” in Proc. 40th SEFI Annual Conference, 2012.6. Wu, J. J., C. H. Kuo, W. W. Lin, S. H. Liu, and Y. H. Chen, Development of a New Creativity Test for Use with Students in Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education, 1998.7. Torrance, E

Conference Session

Exploring Research Methodologies in Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Algeo Wilson IV, Louisiana State University; Adrienne Steele, Louisiana State University; Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University; James Blake Gegenheimer

Tagged Divisions

Student

few or no sessions in hopes to encourage higherattendance in future semesters. Contradictory to the authors and SIs original assumptions, there remains a good value forexam review sessions. This is particularly evident in students who cannot or do not attend SIsessions on a regular basis. However, incorporation of better active learnings strategies in largegroup settings and more training for SIs geared towards large group settings is likely necessary.This may include requesting rooms that can be tailored to breaking up large groups into smallerones (9, 10, 11). Similarly, further encouragement for students to attend regular sessions is vital forthe program to have a larger impact.References[1] E. Kokkelenberg, M. Dillon, and S

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4A: Retention Programs and Strategies

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meg Harkins, University of North Carolina - Charlotte

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Retention Rates," in ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 2012.[3] K. Brinkley, F. Rankins, S. Clinton and R. Hargraves, "Keeping Up With Tecnology: Transitioning Summer Bridge to a Virtual Classroom," in ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[4] W. Lee, C. Wade and C. Amelink, "Examining the Transition to Engineering: A Mulit- Case Study of Six Deiverse Summer Bridge Program Participants," in ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis Indiana, 2014.[5] President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, "Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology and Mathematics," Washington, DC, 2012.[6] UNC Board of Governors, "Our Time

Conference Session

Instrumentation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Priom Chakraborty, Purdue University - Calumet; Akram Hossain, Purdue University - Calumet; Vivek Pillarisetty P.E., Purdue University - Calumet

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Instrumentation

2090-XXLF-X330B IAM 2094-AC16-M03-S AM1 2094-AM03-S AM2 2094-AM03-S AM3 2094-AM03-S Motor Cable Motor Feedback Cable Feedback connector Servo Motor MPL series servo Motor MPL-430P-MJ24AA Eye Vision Checking System Cognex Vision checking System 5100C HMI Panel view 1000 plus Table 2 List of Components for Trainer Panel2. Electrical LayoutAfter the Mechanical design it is needed to identify the I/O of the components which are mountedon the panel. The next

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gon Namkoong, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

toinvestigate what could have gone “wrong” and “why”. This practice truly allowed students toexperience the entire scientific process from solid theoretical reasoning obtained from virtuallaboratories, to designing their own activities, to initial observations, and to follow-on activitiesbased on the results of earlier activities. As a consequence, combined virtual and physical hands-on activities greatly helped students to explore inquiry-based organic solar cell projects withenhanced reasoning, problem solving, and communication skills. Overall, students not onlyenjoyed this course but also appreciated the importance of collaborative learning.AcknowledgementThis work is supported by NSF TUES (1244707, 1244079) and NSF S-STEM SoLEAP program(1355678