; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Indicators of Change in Mechanical Engineering Instructors’ Teaching Practices Across Five YearsAbstractCurrent best practices in teaching and learning are often not implemented in engineering courses,including those of mechanical engineering. The low rate of the adoption of best practices inteaching and learning can be attributed to the variation in training among individual educatorsand a lack of time to learn about and implement new teaching strategies. A significant disruptionto higher education in 2020 created an opportunity for instructors to change their
solicitation of the College of Engineering in 2020 and a three-yearredesign was undertaken and completed in Fall 2023 with its third iteration.This paper assesses how the redesign achieved the initial goals and how its delivery reflects thedesired characteristics. Four course outcomes were adopted: 1) Develop creative solutions byapplying engineering design, math, science, and data analysis, 2) Construct an effectiveprototype or model using technology and tools, 3) Demonstrate improved power skills(communication, teamwork, information literacy, professionalism), and 4) Employ NSPE Codeof Ethics to examine case studies and extrapolate for other situations. In terms of the courseoutcomes, this paper describes how students self-assessed their achievement
participant identity, allresponses were collected anonymously to encourage free sharing without repercussions [17].Moreover, respondents indicated who could read their story by answering the question, “Whowould you share this story with?” and they had the option of answering: 1) Everyone 2)Researchers Only, or 3) No one [17]. Participants who chose options 1 and 2 were used to completedata analysis and reported responses to this question were filtered by option 1.SenseMakerData collection was accomplished through the platform SenseMaker. Sensemaking is a researchapproach used to understand complex and ambiguous data such as narratives [18]. This tool usesmixed methods analysis to allow participants to use quantitative responses to reflect on their
Ethics Narrative Game [Research Paper] Knowing what's right doesn't mean much unless you do what's right. -Theodore RooseveltFostering ethical decision-making skills in undergraduate engineering students is central toABET accreditation and crucial to student engineers’ success in future careers [1]. This ongoingresearch focuses on the development of a narrative game called Mars: An Ethical Expedition(Mars) [2]. The game draws on the contemporary learning theory of situated cognition to providestudents with a situated, contextualized, and playful platform for using and reflecting on theirethical reasoning abilities [3, 4]. The game aims to be an engaging and
Group Week Module F Humans in Space Both GroupCourse DesignAeroverse was offered as a for-credit, pass/fail course that focused on introductory fundamentaltopics and therefore had no pre-requisite requirement. As such, students were expected to attendevery class and submit assignments for grades. The assignments included pre-readings beforeevery class, a pre-reading quiz, a pre-class reflection, an in-lab worksheet, a post-class quiz, and apost-class reflection. The post-class reflection recorded how enjoyable students found the class andhow confident they were that the class allowed them to meet certain learning objectives. The latterresults were compared to the pre-class reflection that
organizational change at the graduate level within one university’s College ofEngineering (COE). As members of this center strive to make equity-focused changes within theCOE, we must ensure our thinking considers the decentralized nature of graduate educationwithin the institution. Moreover, we must also grapple with faculty resistance to change,regardless of reason. The purpose of this work-in-progress research study is to report on thedevelopment of a reflection instrument that can be used to assist change leaders in determiningtheir unit’s readiness for change. In particular, we will report on instrument development,piloting results, and the current instrument iteration. We leverage the Competing Values CultureFramework (CVCF) to better understand
approaches to • Student reflections community-engaged research • New programs and curricula • Disseminate community-engaged STEM • Research products graduate traineeship model. • Publications and conference presentations • Trainees publish papers with authors from • Collaborative grant proposals multiple disciplines; • Student placement statistics • New transdisciplinary collaborations. • Community of diversity recruitment • Trainees articulate and analyze the advocates
toengage students in the practices of front-end design [4] supporting students throughout each lesson todevelop a strong understanding of stakeholder need while exploring the ill-structured, real-world issue ofwater conservation. Another central purpose of the curriculum was to help students draw connectionsbetween and leverage science, engineering, and social or community knowledge. The curriculumsupported students to explore this problem locally, understanding water conservation issues andchallenges in their own communities, to allow students to leverage funds of knowledge [12], [13] andtheir local expertise as they engaged in the process of front-end design. The summative assessment at theend of our series of lessons is an extended reflection
, social constructions and hierarchies, historical background, andsocioeconomic status among other social constructs. As Anzaldúa explored her ownupbringing and lived reality, she deconstructed those spaces she inhabited where she faceddiscrimination and ambiguity to imagine and (re)shape a third space where new realitiescould exist [16]. Through a process of self-reflexivity, Anzaldúa explains, Nepantla becomesa (re)imagined space rather than a dichotomy of worlds [16]. Anzaldúa claims that Nepantlasoften emerge through writing – the writing that comes from deep and critical reflection thateventually leads to a process that catalyzes transformation.Nepantla is also a way to explore the world through lived experience and engage indecolonial
specific goals were twofold: a) to providea reflective perspective on participants' institutional experiences related to gender, equality, androles within the School of Engineering, and b) to shed light on the challenges and barriersencountered in institutional life. Data was collected using the LEGO® Serious Play®methodology as an innovative and dialogic facilitation method. Twenty students and professorsparticipated. A phenomenological and qualitative analysis was conducted on the workshoprecordings to discern emerging perspectives. The results of the initial pilot workshops highlightthe significance that gender equality holds for both students and faculty within the realm ofuniversity education, as it is seen as the heart of institutional life
to comprehensively assess students'knowledge and attitudes about sustainability in engineering design, we employed three distinctmethods: self-developed questions and assignments. The survey, initiated with a statementsecuring participants' consent, focused on demographic details before delving into six open-ended questions gauging perspectives on sustainability, life cycle assessment (LCA), andsustainable design. Furthermore, the LCA reflection assignment served as a valuable component, providingdirect evidence of students' understanding of the significance of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) inengineering designs. The thorough assessment of assignments focused on aspects such as theproduct's lifespan and its broader impacts, encompassing
real-world problem analysis into science-relatedsubjects using case study approaches. These approaches engage students with practicalissues, fostering sophisticated thinking, promoting reflection, integrating, applying priorknowledge, and developing self-management learning skills. In our university's ConstructionEngineering program, introducing case studies addressing real-world problems in thesisprojects in the first semester of 2017 significantly improved the graduation rate, rising from10% in 2016 to 25.9% by 2022. These enhancements across various performance metricsdemonstrate the efficacy of this methodology. This research employs a non-experimentalmixed-methods approach, utilizing surveys and interviews as primary data collection
use the lab manuals and other written or verbal instruction etc. We believethis led to clear instruction and student satisfaction with the overall experience.Course Under ConsiderationEngineering Electromagnetics is an undergraduate-level course at our university intended forElectrical Engineering students with Junior or Senior standing. The content primarily includeselectromagnetic wave propagation, transmission line propagation, voltage and currentwaveforms with multi-boundary reflections, Smith chart analysis, and application of Maxwell’sequations. The course is offered once a year with enrollment in recent years ranging between 30and 40 students. Over the last three years, we have tried to transition the course from a traditionallecture
. The self-assessment form can be found in Appendix A. In general, very few students are aware of ABETor of its student outcomes [11]. By having the students participate in the self-assessment processand reflect on their experiences, each student is able to identify outcomes which have not beenachieved and develop a plan to achieve all ABET outcomes prior to graduation. This proactiveself-assessment prompts students to identify weak points in their education and has the potentialto shape better student outcomes, filling all the ABET student outcomes and preparing studentsto be well-rounded engineers.[12]. The two senior semesters of IBL allow the students to directtheir learning and create their own learning experiences to address these
you understand those concepts very well you won’t have to waste more time relearning it.” “Review your Physics II before you start the class.” “Do well in University Physics 2” Needs for Visualization “Bringing more visualization would be helpful.” “I would have preferred more visual aids, specifically animations of the fields.”Conditions and Constraints in Class EnvironmentThe class environment plays a pivotal role in fostering effective learning and holds significantimportance in shaping the educational experience for students. It is useful to clarify the classenvironment for both universities along with the constraints so that it reflects better howvisualization tools and trials work. Both institutions adopt typical university classes and
community workshop where members shareaccess to tools in order to produce physical goods” [5]. In a recent literature review, Mersanddefined a makerspace as “an area that provides materials and tools to encourage individuals orgroups to make things, to create new knowledge, or to solve problems” [6]. In educationalcontexts, makerspaces should provide access to defining elements of the Maker movement,including digital tools, community infrastructure, and “the maker mindset,” involving a positiveview of failure and focus on collaboration [7].While these definitions do not mention gender or race, they may reflect a bias of the predominantusers of makerspaces [8], as makerspaces have, at times, struggled to adequately serve a broadcommunity [9]. Rather
as reflected in ENGR350 projects; and (3) promotion of diversity inthe regional technology workforce.4. Second Year ResultsRecruitment, Retention, and DemographicsThe program began the [inaugural] 2022-23 academic year with ten scholars enrolled. Onescholar left the program after the fall 2022 semester due to academic difficulties. Two scholarsleft the program after the spring 2023 semester to attend other institutions. The program retainedseven students to begin the 2023-24 academic year. As shown in Table 2, the program has acapacity of twenty-four participants in the second year. Thus, recruiting for fall 2023 aimed tofill seventeen available seats.The recruiting campaign began with an email solicitation to students who had been accepted
for all students.Within the context of this project, the course redesign process is guided by a set of faculty-created standards for neuroinclusive teaching, known within the project as I-Standards; thesestandards have undergone multiple iterations to reflect the team’s understanding of current bestpractices. The standards were developed along with experts from the university’s Center forExcellence in Teaching and Learning and the School of Education. Anchored in a strengths-based approach to neurodiversity, the standards focus on three main areas: 1) building a cultureof inclusion, 2) instructional design and inclusive teaching practices, and 3) enhancingcommunication and supports for students [41]. The teaching and learning standards are
and retooling stated learning outcomes.PBL approaches across engineeringPBL is an instructional approach that platforms a student-centered classroom dynamic, andrequires teamed students to propose solutions for open-ended, discipline-specific problems andprocesses. Students produce results that can be assessed with outcome-based standards. As afinal project phase, students are invited to reflect on their problem-solving posture, identifyingopportunities and gaps in their knowledge [16]. As supported by findings in cognitive science,true learning requires higher energy cost for the brain. Connecting old and new informationsupports deeper integration, learning, and memory retrieval, a consolidation process that isstrengthened by self-reflection
by instructional designers at thePennsylvania State University to help ADDIE support diversity, equity, and inclusion in theclassroom [11]. In a way, it combines ADDIE with UDL while maintaining the easy-to-followprocess of course design.In the following descriptions below, the individual developing the lesson or course is referred toas the designer. The designer may also be the instructor of that course.Breaking Down Each LetterAnalyze - The designer defines the problem and establishes learning outcomes. The designer alsoassesses the existing knowledge and skills of learners, as well as the learning environment. • Introspection - The designer reflects on their personal and professional identity and worldview, considers classroom
courses are so rigorous that the cost of fully engaging intheir engineering courses is high.Consistent with existing literature that use multiple elements of value to investigate the nuancesin academic outcomes [28], [29], [32], this study uses items that both reflect intrinsic and utilityvalue. In addition to expectancy and value measures, several control variables are relevant to thisstudy of cognitive engagement. Specifically, we control for gender, race, ethnicity, familyincome, first generation status, and international student status in our regression models. We alsostudy the contribution of broad prior interests (to pursue engineering) as well as more specificintrinsic interests to self-efficacy, value, and ultimately to cognitive
knowledge to elicit performance (Gagne’s Event #6). This is done by applying problem-solving tasks and group projects that require students to apply their abilities in a hands-on manner. The discussion questions and case studies in the course encourage collaboration, experimentation, and creativity and encourage students to solve real-world problems in simulated environments. • The course instructor has a clear plan to offer constructive feedback (Gagne’s Event #7) during discussions and project milestones and after students have submitted assignments. This emphasizes the importance of self-assessment and encourages reflective thinking in students about the concepts they have learned during
change.Impact of the Work on the SELs: It was my first time doing any ADEI work, and I have learned from this experience that it is a very hard thing to navigate. I have learned that I am very passionate about efforts like this, especially ones that I am involved in such as my department, so I have learned that professionally this is something that I want to continue with doing in relation to my career. -KAThe faculty members of the ECO group asked each of the SELs to reflect upon their experiencewith the culture related work. The purpose of the reflection was to better understand theexperience of the students leading the work to help determine what supports they might needgoing forward and the overall impact of the work
provided table file). Operating conditions that do not meet the system requirements should be highlighted red. • Evaluating Solutions Against Requirements – for each solution, evaluate the solution against the requirements. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the solution. If the solution does not meet one or more of the requirements, discuss approaches to correcting the issue (which should be reflected in the subsequent solution). At minimum, you must have three iterations. There is always a way to improve your design. • Making Trade-offs – Discuss any trade-offs made throughout the design iteration process. Discuss any other changes that were made throughout the design iteration process and
. Research Team Dr. Walter Lee Malini Josiam Artre Turner Crystal Pee Taylor Johnson Dr. Janice Hall Associate Professor PhD Student PhD Student PhD Student PhD Student Postdoc This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1943811. "Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation
exams are well written [2]. Even in the context of standardized testing ithas been found that student GRE scores compared to student written responses had a highcorrelation between the results [3]. Multiple-choice tests can be valid assessment instruments ifwritten correctly, which has led to many concept inventories being created in STEM, like theMechanics Diagnostic Test, Force Concept Inventory, Statics Concept Inventory, DynamicsConcept Inventory, and many others [2, 4, 5].Often MCT are used as pre-/post-tests to try to identify changes in learning. The quantitative resultsof these multiple-choice tests provide easy comparison data when looked at from a pre-/post-testanalysis, but the scores do not always adequately reflect a learning
using active andcollaborative learning pedagogical approaches. For the course project, the first-year studentswere required to design a 65,000 ft2 community park on a brownfield site in Charleston, SC, witha $5,000,00 budget for site cleanup and redevelopment. A few assessments were implemented,including weekly summary reports, poster creation, presentations, peer evaluation on teamwork,reflection assignment, and a survey. This paper discusses the redesign of the course through thebackward design approach, the implementation of project-based learning, and the assessment ofactivities. Additionally, it provides insights into its implementations in other institutions.BackgroundEML has emerged as a relevant educational approach fostering an
learn. For example, according to the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate, a well-structured program should be purposeful (i.e., programmatic requirements and elements should be aligned with specific goals). It should also be created by a process of iterative individual and collective reflection, transparent (i.e., collectively understood by the faculty and graduate students), and accessible (i.e., elements can be evaluated in terms of their contribution in achieving the purposes of the program) (Golde et al., 2006).● A cascading mentorship model works well, in which members of research groups receive mentorship from more senior members and provide it to more junior members (Feldon et al., 2019).● Institutional
to enhance Hispanic/Latino transfer student success. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Investigating Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning for Students in a Fundamental Engineering CourseAbstractMotivation and self-regulated learning (SRL) are two interconnected constructs that are criticalfor student learning, especially for those in challenging fundamental engineering courses such asThermodynamics. Each of these elements are integral to the learning process and typicallyimpact one another, as fostering motivation can lead to improved self-regulatory skills. SRL isdescribed as a cyclical process where students plan, set goals, monitor learning, and reflect tofurther plan
inquiries and discussions have brought to light several issues with thereliability and validity of SETs as the primary measure of teaching quality. There is mountingevidence that end-of-semester evaluations are biased and represent an imperfect measure of aninstructor's performance. They may not accurately reflect the true quality of teaching, or at thevery least, they are unfair [6], [7], [8].Transitioning from traditional paper-based surveys to electronic ones in higher education, whilecost-effective, presented certain drawbacks, particularly in terms of significantly reducedresponse rates, which led to skepticism about the validity and reliability of SETs [9], [10].The limitations of SETs have led to continuous calls for a more comprehensive and