Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Distinguished Professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication and the School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. She is the Butler Chair and Director of the Susan Bulkeley Butler Center for Leadership Excellence. Editor of three books and author of over 170 journal articles and chapters, her research centers on the intersections of career, gender communication, leadership, and resilience. Fellow and past president of the International Communication Association, she has received numerous awards for her research, teaching/mentoring, and engagement. She is working on Purdue-ADVANCE initiatives for institutional change
. And the third group con-centrated on quality of life and future plans for the region. In addition to that, all of the groupswere asked to compare their results with their home countries in terms of any major differ-ences or even similarities. The results were presented and discussed in class during one of theearly live sessions. Hereby the students simultaneously gained knowledge about their futuredestination and challenged their personal understanding about their own cultural background.Furthermore, they were introduced into the home countries of their future classmates. Anoth-er activity in this course part was dominated by several discussions about the essence of theengineering profession, necessary competences for successful careers in
contradicts a careful study of four institutions constrained in terms of educationalinnovation by accreditation, not because the process itself was cumbersome, but because of thenorms and constraints imposed by ABET evaluators and the broader engineering culture. 33Because ABET relies strongly on “old-boy networks” – exclusive relationships of mutualsupport and influence – to select leadership from Program Evaluators on up, the decision-makingstructure has a pronounced problem of underrepresentation (even by engineering standards) ofwomen, people of color, and younger engineers. Have any ABET evaluators been educatedunder EC 2000? How many have a true appreciation for professional skills? How many havespent careers focused narrowly in technical
broad categories for these competencies. For example, as outlined inFurco and Billig’s Service-Learning: The Essence of Pedagogy11, some learning non-academicoutcomes that are intrinsic to the service-learning philosophy fall within these domains:vocational (career); personal; civic and cultural; ethical; and, social. For a more thoroughelaboration of these domains, the reader is directed toward the original source. Other key components driving the decisions behind the project selection in a service-learning context are the resources available and student capacities to meaningful engage in theproposed projects. Resources refer to the institutional, community, financial, and materialresources and support available to a service-learning
focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design
Electrical and Mechanical Engineers (Fundamental)IntroductionIn spite of efforts to diversify the engineering workforce, the profession remains largelydominated by White, male engineers [1]. Better approaches are needed to attract and retainunderrepresented groups to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers,such as engineering.One literacy-based approach that has been shown to provide effective instruction for K-12students generally, and students from underrepresented groups specifically, is DisciplinaryLiteracy Instruction (DLI). DLI utilizes knowledge of the ways advanced practitioners read,interpret, and generate discipline-specific content in their professional environment to apprenticestudents
Vehicle Research Institute operates as a technology development center that provides undergradu- ate students with opportunities for career specific training and research. Funding comes from a variety of sources including the Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, EPA, Paul Allen Family Foundation, BP, Washington State Department of Agriculture, Whatcom Public Utility District, Boeing, Janicki Industries, Northwest Porsche Club, Danner Corp. and Fluke. Past supporters include the De- partment of Defense, Fuji Heavy Industries (Subaru), PACCAR, Mazda, Ford, Bentley (parent company Audi), Alcoa, Conoco-Phillips, CNG Fuels of Canada, Chrysler, and DaimlerChrysler. c American Society
successfully transitioned to student-centered teaching strategies. She co-designed the environmental engineering synthesis and design studios and the design spine for the mechanical engineering program at UGA. She is engaged in mentoring early career faculty at her univer- sity and within the PEER National Collaborative. In 2013 she was selected to be a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Faculty Member.Dr. Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Brooke Coley, PhD is an Assistant Professor in Engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Dr. Coley is Principal Investigator of the Shifting Perceptions
Kellerton reported 4% AfricanAmerican, 87% white, 6% two or more races, 3% Hispanic, and other categories too low toreport.We used two of four kindergarten classrooms at Adamsville, the single kindergarten classroom atBlakely, and two of three kindergarten classrooms at Kellerton. (Principals at Adamsville andKellerton preferred that our research not be conducted in the other kindergarten classrooms inwhich there were early-career teachers.) The study occurred during the second half of the schoolyear, when participants ranged in age from 5.5 to 7 years. A total of 53 kindergartnersparticipated in the study with the following rates of participation: (1) Adamsville (36%participation; 13 participants); (2) Blakely (100%; 9); and (3) Kellerton (70%; 31
suggested that the rural females are more likely thanurban females to restrict their career choices to female dominated fields and in turn, rural femaleswho enter engineering show larger degrees of motivation and self-confidence [5]. Having alarger number of female participants would allow to probe this theory further and confirm thequantitative trends with qualitative experiences of female engineers.Conclusions and future workThis study explored the lived experiences of seven first-year students from rural communities touncover barriers and challenges they face in the pursuit of an engineering degree. Using narrativeinquire, we identified five themes that pose barriers for students transition into an engineeringcourse of study: exposure to
. My education and career inengineering took place in predominantly white, male settings. Because of the privilege Iexperience as a white person and the sheltering of experiences that my privilege offers, I haveundergone a massive amount of learning to identify systems of oppression embedded in theculture that may limit others in the profession. My goal with my research is to explore norms inengineering to understand and identify systems of oppression embedded in the culture that maylimit marginalized communities in the profession.Author 2: I am a queer, white woman raised by upper middle-class parents in a suburb to a midsized Southeastern city. I attended a mid-size public high school that was mildly diverse in termsof race and socio
– Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program.Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring Engineering Graduate Students’ Perceptions of
287 engineering doctoral students from 28 institutions in the U.S. Weidentified the scale’s latent factor structure for construct validity evidence and evaluated internalconsistency reliability evidence. Results from studies using the finalized survey are expected toindicate specific policies, practices, and procedures that may serve as interventions to enhanceorganizational performance specifically in the strategic area of doctoral student retention at thedepartment level.I. IntroductionThe long-term vitality of the U.S. workforce relies on the full range of science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) career pathways being available to all Americans [1]. Theincreased participation of women and members of racially minoritized and
consideration of the socioeconomic development of the local workers.[29]Targeting five main audiences (workers, governmental officials, scholars, professors, andstudents), Schlezak aimed at influencing academic research, partnerships, and policies for thedevelopment of environmentally sound and socially just interventions related to e-wastemanagement and promoting safe working conditions in Argentina. At the global level, sheintended to motivate action towards occupational safety in the informal sector and call theattention of traditional mining and engineering professionals, scholars, and educators into futurework in the field of urban mining.The RT activities that this early-career researcher conducted were designed differently accordingto each
2015-16 academic year and the Faculty Outstanding Teaching Award (Individual Award) in the Faculty of Engineering for the 2012-13 academic year. Additionally, he has been honored with the Teaching Excellence Award in the Department of Computer Science for the academic years 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16. Furthermore, he was a shortlisted candidate for the UGC Teaching Award (Early Career Faculty Member). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Embrace Diversity and Inclusion in Academic Makerspaces with a Network of Tutors (Work in progress)AbstractThe Tam Wing Fan Innovation Wing [1] (a.k.a. the HKU Inno Wing) of the Faculty ofEngineering at
, however processesfor effective team management are also critical. As other disciplines are brought into theconversation, this importance of consultative communication – listening and incorporatingvarious perspectives to build a shared mental model – will be even more challenging. Creating asafe and engaging classroom environment, where students can ask questions, float ideas, makemistakes, and give and accept feedback, is important, given the iterative and collaborative natureof systems mappingFuture WorkMany students expressed a desire to see the introduction of systems thinking/mapping toolsearlier in their undergraduate careers, particularly in design courses where students are quick toconverge on a given understanding of the problem. Given
Synthesis of Findings 4.3 Results for RQ2: Ethical Discussions 4.4 Results for RQ3: Evaluating Stakeholder Involvement 4.4.1 Analysis Framework 4.4.2 Evaluation of Stakeholder Involvement in Selected Articles 4.4.3 Synthesis of Findings 4.5 Results for RQ4: Stakeholder Perceptions5. Discussion6. Limitations7. Conclusion1. IntroductionArtificial intelligence (AI) stands at the forefront, which is a signal for considerable changesacross career fields and our daily lives in the era of rapid technological evolution. As AIbecomes a necessary element of the modern workforce, the imperative to teach students thefoundational AI skills and competencies has never
program in 2015.Ms. Meghan M. Alexander, Texas A&M University Meghan M. Alexander is the assistant director for Engineering International Programs at Texas A&M University. She has an M.Ed. in Counseling and over 15 years experience in international education and partnerships.Mr. Victor Manuel Camara-Poot, Yucatan Government Ministry of Education A graduate of the Masters in Government and Public Policy by te Universidad Aut´onoma de Yucat´an (UADY) , workink since 2 years ago as Head of the Department of Planning and Strategic Projects at the Department of Higher Education in the Ministry of Education of the Yucatan Government in Mexico . Throughout his career he has worked in entrepreneurial activities
repair facilities, and as a Six Sigma Black Belt for Global Engine Overhaul Operations. Gerica is a 2008 graduate of UD’s Mechanical Engineering program, received her Master’s in Supply Chain Management from Penn State in 2014, and just recently earned her doctorate in Educational Leadership from the University of Dayton in December 2021. During her time with GE Aviation, Gerica also served as a University Relations lead-recruiter, and led a number of community engagement efforts with the GE Women’s Network and African American Forum. Gerica is passionate about equity and inclusion in STEM as a means to broadening the participation of underrepresented groups in STEM education and careers. Her experiences as the
Mathematicians and Scientists Teaching Engineering Courses: Practices, Advantages, and ConcernsAbstract:Engineering is highly intertwined with science and mathematics. The connection between thethree fields of engineering; and mathematics and science is illustrated based on the commonlyknown and ABET definitions of mathematics and science with those of engineering. Anevidence of this connectivity lies in STEM which is a recent field that has been highly visible inthe last twenty years. It stands for science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Studentshave been noticeably swayed away from these crossing disciplines for various reasons. STEMwas partially created to attract students back to these careers again.Discussions are
sense that the number of individuals graduating and seeking positions in those programs will be decreased.One of the participants further emphasized this, stating: For me, I have to consider not just legally as a female, but also legally as a Black person. The abortion ban, the affirmative action ban, I think that has a double hit on people like me who are Black and Brown and also female. We have a lot more to consider in terms of our career because of these laws and where we feel like we can stay where we’ll be emotionally, physically and psychologically safe.Jean was first drawn to the university because of their DEI admissions team. Jean notes that “Thatwas probably one of the most appealing parts of going into
courses; conscientiousness showed significant positiverelationships with all five of the online course impression factors, while agreeableness andopenness had positive relationships with value to career [6]. Of the demographic variables, workexperience was significant for all online course impression factors except for online coursepreference [6]. In Rivers, 2021 [13], the author examined the role of personality traits and onlineacademic self-efficacy in acceptance, actual use, and achievement in online learning [13]. Thestudy defined personality as “dimensions of individual differences in tendencies to showconsistent patterns of thoughts, feelings, and actions,” and to measure specific personality traits,the study used the five-factor
conocimiento [24]. I began my engineeringeducation career by studying the ways in which different ways of knowing, doing and beingimpact engineering narratives and practices, with a particular focus on dismantling dominantdiscourses that (re)produce deficit models.As a critical scholar invested in racial equity, my broad aim is to elevate these students’voices, epistemologies, and help (re)frame Latino/a/x engineering students as holders andcreators of knowledge [25-27] that should be acknowledged in our pursuit of educationalequity in engineering. My research opposes the notion that students possess inherent deficitsthat must be “fixed.” Instead, I argue that these deficit ideologies further marginalize studentsand perpetuate false models of
– extremely)Post survey items to measure engineering self-efficacy (response options strongly disagree – strongly agree): I will be able to achieve most of the engineering-related goals that I have set for myself When facing difficult tasks within engineering, I am certain that I will accomplish them I believe I can succeed at most any engineering-related endeavor to which I set my mind I am confident that I can perform effectively on many engineering-related tasksPost survey items to measure commitment to engineering (response options): I have no doubt that I will graduate with a degree in engineering (strongly disagree – strongly agree) It is my intention to pursue a career in engineering (strongly disagree – strongly agree