M.S. degrees are in ma- terials science and engineering from Stanford University and her B.S. degree in metallurgical engineering from the Michigan Technological University.Dr. Lizabeth T Schlemer P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Lizabeth is currently a visiting professor in engineering education at Cal State LA. She is also a professor at Cal Poly, SLO in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. She has been teaching for 26 years and has a track record of using innovative pedagogy such as project based, flipped classroom and competency grading to support students success. Currently her research is in the area of social justice in Engineering Education.Dr. Yevgeniya V. Zastavker
data.Table 2. Three main student-reported activities during fall break 2018 2019 Category (Keywords) #1 #2 #3 #1 #2 #3 Activity Activity Activity Activity Activity Activity Studying/Homework (study, library, assignment, 77 56 52 104 62 42 help session, homework, hw, review, notes, school, lecture, education, project, WEEF, class, coding, design, team, work, question, class) Family/Friends (family, friend, socializing, 76 75 38
Paper ID #22816A Failed Attempt to Develop a Measure of Engineering Students’ SubjectiveTask-value for Diversity and Inclusion in EngineeringMs. Ashley R. Taylor, Virginia Tech Ashley Taylor is a doctoral candidate in engineering education at Virginia Polytechnic and State Univer- sity, where she also serves as a program assistant for the Center for Enhancement of Engineering Diversity and an advisor for international senior design projects in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Ash- ley received her MS in Mechanical Engineering, MPH in Public Health Education, and BS in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her
Vegas Ezgi Yesilyurt is a PhD student in curriculum and instruction/science education at University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She is working as a graduate assistant and teaching science methods courses. She received her MS degree and BS degree in elementary science education. She participated European Union Projects in which she conducted series of professional development programs for in-service science teachers. Areas of research interest are engineering education, inquiry learning and evolution education.Johana Iglesias, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Johana Iglesias is a third-year undergraduate student at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She helped to develop and manage NSF EPSCoR STEM high school outreach
ideal typical professions(Friedson, 1994; Child and Fulk, 1982; Abbott, 1988, 1989). They are, if anything, ideal atypicalprofessions that continue to haunt the conduct of other professions. Thus, although we draw onMagali Larson’s (1977) notion of “professional project” to document how and when engineeringeducators act to bolster their professional image, it is as important to this study that we alsoemploy a basic understanding of the distinct professional configuration of engineering, and howthis configuration shapes the profession’s educational reform practices. In this respect, the earlystudies of the engineering profession remain an important point of departure (Layton 1971;McMahon 1984; Sinclair 1980; Reynolds 1983; also Noble 1977
Paper ID #26328Facilitating Transfer Student Success in an Engineering Baccalaureate Pro-gramDr. Nena E. Bloom, Northern Arizona University Dr. Nena Bloom is an evaluator and education researcher at the Center for Science Teaching and Learning at Northern Arizona University. The primary area of her work is evaluating STEM education projects that focus on opportunities for, and retention of, K-20 students in STEM areas, majors and fields. She also conducts education research focusing on questions about professional development for educators and how educators support student learning in STEM.Mrs. Jennifer Johnson, Northern
Engineering and Language Attitudes in the U.S. A QuandaryGlobalization and the international projection of engineering In the last 30 years, the literature on engineering education has been paying increasingattention to the changes that the field has experienced due to the advancement of globalization.The goal of this concerted effort is to determine and validate the set of skills the job marketdemands from the engineer in the 21st century. There is consensus among researchers that in the context of globalization the U.S.engineering programs either adapt their curricula to meet the expectations of the globalworkforce or take the risk of becoming irrelevant [1]. Irrelevance refers to the currentcurriculum
Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering
Paper ID #15732A Sense of Belonging: Creating a Community for First-generation, Under-represented groups and Minorities through an Engineering Student SuccessCourseEmily E Liptow, California Polytechnic State University Emily Liptow is an AmeriCorps VISTA member at California Polytechnic State University. She works with the College of Engineering and the Center for Excellence in STEM (CESAME) on a variety of projects to promote equity in STEM. She recently finished her bachelors of science in Industrial and Systems Engineering at The Ohio State University, where she was also active with many social justice and diversity
applying science knowledge in the classroom and engaging in engineering practices.4As of early 2016, 17 states plus the District of Columbia have adopted NGSS as the basis of theirscience standards.5 And engineering content of many forms has proliferated. Third-party curriculainclude Engineering is Elementary, Project Lead the Way, and The Infinity Project, and schools havealso developed their own programs, either on their own or with other institutions, to make engineering aclassroom option for students.We asked three questions to hone in on specifically how outreach programs might be working to bringengineering directly into K-12 classrooms: • Does this program work to bring engineering into the K-12 classroom through student teachers
Project Lead theWay, engineering education in K-12 is mostly not public, and the role of teachers in developingthese experiences has to date been limited. In this paper we seek to show why this is a problem,particularly for creating pathways to engineering for students of low socioeconomic status andstudents of color. As the Next Generation Science Standards come online, and as more and morestates adopt engineering standards for K-12 education, how can engineering education bedelivered as part of public education, involving teachers and unions fully in the process? Whatkinds of redirection are needed to reverse the privatization that has already occurred?IntroductionEngineering, along with most other STEM disciplines, has made scarce progress in
aerodynamics as an applied example.Figure 1. Strategy and toolkit for Backwards Design of courses.The course content emphasizes understanding of pilot controls of the hardware of a rotor,mathematical modeling of theoretical performance models, and design of a rotor to meet adefined mission. The assessment strategies are based on the types of learning in this course,where project-based learning and design thinking employ higher levels of thinking and thereforeneed the matched assessment strategy of a rubric. Pedagogy is primarily based on Perkins’Making Learning Whole, where certain elements for the student are emphasized: distributed,deliberate practice; intrinsic motivation and choice; working on the hard parts with feedback andassessment
Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a GK-12 Fellows project, and a DR K-12 research project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and control system tech- nology. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has con- ducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach activities to integrate engineering concepts in science classrooms and labs of dozens of New York City public schools. He received NYU- SoE’s 2002, 2008, 2011, and 2014
, she was the director of the Savannah River Environmental Sciences Field Station. Dr. Simmons has nearly fourteen years of engineering and project management experience working with public utility companies, a project management consulting company, and a software company. She is a registered professional engineer, project management professional and LEED accredited professional. Her research interests are in investigating students’ development of leadership skills and other professional competencies and in students’ involvement in curricular, co-curricular and extra-curricular activities. Dr. Simmons is a NSF CAREER award recipient for her research entitled, ”Investigating Co-Curricular Participation of Students
operation in a detailed way. It also readily demonstrates the three areas ofmechanical engineering: structures and materials, thermo-fluid sciences, and engineeringdesign.The students (who had no particular technical preparation) were divided into small teams andguided through a discussion of what it means to be an engineer and a qualitative overview ofdesign, solid mechanics, material properties, and thermodynamic principles as applied to theconstruct of a small machine. This paper will describe that project-based learning exercise in Page 26.1055.2detail and propose options for extending and adapting it for use as a module within or as aframework for
Paper ID #11644Creativity and Innovation as Part of the Civil Engineering BOKDr. Stuart G. Walesh P.E., S. G. Walesh Consulting Stuart G. Walesh, Ph.D., P.E., Dist.M.ASCE, D.WRE, and F.NSPE (stuwalesh@comcast.net, www.helpingyouengineeryourfuture.c is an author; teacher; and an independent consultant providing leadership, management, and engineering services. Prior to beginning his consultancy, he worked in the public, private, and academic sectors serving as a project engineer and manager, department head, discipline manager, marketer, legal expert, professor, and dean of an engineering college. Walesh’s technical specialty
Early Childhood Education/Special Education from Temple University in Philadelphia, PA and an M.A. in Education from LaSalle University in Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Nagle has completed graduate work in Educational Research Methodology at the University of North Carolina-Greensboro and earned his doctorate at George Wash- ington University in Educational Administration and Policy Studies.Professionally he has conducted 21 national and international research and evaluation projects and over 100 regional and local research and evaluation projects. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering achievement: An exploratory case study of minority
STEM teaching workshop, the workshoppurpose and goals were met. The short- and mid-term outcomes of this project to develop abroader awareness on campus of alternative teaching strategies for STEM classrooms andincrease comfort level in using alternative teaching strategies, such as active learning, wasachieved. Participants demonstrated alternative teaching strategies in their individual short peerreviewed teaching demonstrations. However, the goals to develop relationships and increasecommunication between the multiple STEM departments at SUU were less successful. The post-survey data is somewhat contradictory. The lowest Likert-scale numbers indicate that some ofthe participants are less likely to follow-up with the peers they met at the
education policy, and academic motivation.Miss Raeven Carmelita WatersMs. Ashley R Taylor, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Ashley Taylor is a doctoral student in engineering education at Virginia Polytechnic and State University, where she also serves as a program assistant for the Center for Enhancement of Engineering Diversity and an advisor for international senior design projects in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Ashley received her MS in Mechanical Engineering, MPH in Public Health Education, and BS in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include broadening participation in engineering, the integration of engineering education and international development, and
economics, and public policy. Dr. Cowell previously worked as an Assistant Regional Economist for the Buffalo Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. She was previously a member of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation-funded re- search project, ”Building Resilient Regions” and also part of a team of researchers assessing southwestern Virginia’s entrepreneurial ecosystem for the Kauffman Foundation. She is currently a faculty member and co-Faculty Lead for Virginia Tech’s National Science Foundation Research Traineeship (NRT) program on Disaster Resilience and Risk Management. Dr. Cowell’s research has been funded by the National Sci- ence Foundation, MacArthur Foundation, Kauffman Foundation
consultant for Engineering for One Planet with The Lemelson Foundation. Cindy specializes in innovative sustainability-focused research and curriculum projects for academic institutions, non-profits, government and corporations. Cindy has taught thousands of people through courses and workshops, around the world and online, in the fields of biology, sustainability and biomimicry. She is honored to be a collaborative partner on the Engineering for One Planet initiative since its inception, co-author of the EOP Framework and framework companion teaching guides, and active EOP Network Member. Cindy holds a MS from Oregon State University, a MEd from Griffith University (Queensland, Australia), and a BSc in biology from the
a multi-year, mixed-methods research project funded by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) to understand factors contributing to the attrition and retention of studentsfrom racially minoritized and marginalized groups in engineering doctoral programs, wedeveloped a survey to assess engineering doctoral students’ experience of department-levelorganizational climate. We aimed to survey engineering doctoral students using a valid andreliable instrument that focuses on the climate constructs that contribute to the retention orattrition of students from historically excluded or underrepresented groups. Here, climateconstructs, in general, refer to the theoretical concepts or dimensions as organization members’shared perceptions of climates
education is understood to beinherently valuable, institutions continue to inadequately center the inclusion, retention, andthriving of engineering students from historically minoritized groups. The intentionaldevelopment of critical consciousness in engineering students may be one important tool foradvancing this greater project. Holly [10] proposes that “CC presents itself as a useful concept tobetter understand why these efforts have not been successful in transforming the quality ofexperiences and statistical representation of people [from] groups that have been marginalized inengineering throughout history.” The elusive goal of “broadening participation in engineering”may in fact be strongly supported by the development of critical
] include: “using ratings systemssuch as Greenroads, ENVISION, and/or LEED to introduce students to metrics related to societalwell-being”, and case studies of past CE projects that “failed to address the needs of anunderserved community (e.g., the 2014 Flint, Michigan, water supply crisis)” [11, 12]. There arean increasing number of examples of efforts to introduce issues of equity in concert withinfrastructure in the literature. Sanford et al. conducted a systematic review of literaturedescribing interventions that have been implemented in practice [13]. Examples include Casperet al.’s efforts to integrate social justice into first and third year civil engineering courses [14],case studies developed by Judge [15], and Castaneda et al.’s
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring Engineering Faculty Views on Their Role in Broadening Participation in EngineeringAbstractBroadening participation in STEM is an initiative of critical importance within the United States.In order to maintain its global prominence in STEM fields, as well as maintain national securityand other technological advances, the US must produce over one million more STEMprofessionals than what is currently projected. Broadening participation is a term used todescribe increasing the participation of underrepresented groups in STEM fields. This includesproviding STEM exposure, access, and opportunities for individuals from underrepresentedgroups. According to the
literature on the topic. Abetter understanding of engineering problem-solving mindsets – and possible alternatives from adifferent field – could shed light on engineering teaching, learning, research, and practice.MethodsThe paper is based on analysis of interview data that was collected in 2021 at a public universityin Western Canada. As part of a larger project, this paper’s third author conducted semi-structuredinterviews with faculty and postdoctoral researchers from both the School of Engineering andSchool of Education. As can be seen in the Appendix, interviewees were asked about theirperceptions of macroethics and social justice, their research, and local contexts in sessions thatranged in duration from 30-90 minutes. Seventeen faculty and
articles. While some of this research included qualitative elements, the majority of theseinvestigations used quantitative methodologies. Furthermore, a portion of the articles (15.79%)examined anxiety reduction techniques using cutting edge approaches like cognitive algebra andquasi-experimental procedures. Comparably, studies on self-reported mental health included15.79% of the sampled papers and mostly used cross-sectional and quantitative methods.Moreover, one article (5.26%) that presented a descriptive synthesis of the body of knowledgealready known in the topic was classified as a literature review. All things considered, thisthorough analysis highlights the scope and depth of research projects meant to comprehend andtackle problems
gives students the verbal communicationskills which heighten their integration and interaction with their work teams. In this example, thestudent wrote a detailed explanation in which she described the different elements that affectsuch performance and the measurements used in her project. Her essay shows that the technicalvocabulary was necessary for her verbal communication skills. SPA2_A7 wrote, I did not know many of the words that I used in the previous paragraph [in this paragraph she explained the internship project she conducted at CEIT, a study of the efficiency of electric boat motors] before starting my internship. It is important to learn and understand the terminology used in an office in case your
toinform students and educators on the hiring process and how to prepare for technical interviews.Moreover, this research serves to provide industry with evidence of the problems inherent withthe existing hiring system. Analysis of these results will be used to offer suggestions andguidelines that will enable a hiring process that can still achieve its target of finding qualifiedapplicants, but that does so in a manner more justly to all job seekers.1 IntroductionJobs in computing are expected to experience 11% growth over the next decade, which is agreater rise than the projected averages for other fields [1]. Although these positions may begaining momentum globally, unemployment remains a real concern for new graduates, asindustry adds barriers
- tudes and beliefs teachers hold about cultural diversity and teaching culturally diverse students. Past and current projects include designing and teaching undergraduate and graduate-level coursework intended to help teachers develop effective science teaching practices and culturally relevant pedagogy for their classrooms, mentoring pre-service science teachers, working with in-service science teachers to develop and implement integrated STEM curricula, leading STEM integration professional development for in- service science teachers, working with administration and teachers to develop STEM programming in their schools, and developing a K-12 STEM observation protocol that can be used in a variety of educa- tional