advisory board can serve as a powerful tool to help the school or department in theaccreditation process. The board can also serve as a fund raising mechanism by having itsindustrial partner give grants for scholarships for incoming freshman, or monies to help purchaseequipment and supplies to maintain a laboratory of the department. The industry advisory boardmembers can also serve as mentors on an industry sponsored project. Another important purposeis to advise the department in the area of curriculum development. Industry participation incurriculum development will ensure that ET students are taking the necessary classes to givethem the industry skills to compete globally with other engineering technology graduates.The Industry advisory board
® has served as an important teaching tool allowing the students to visualizedata during the flight test and recognize the impact of changing a given parameter on the aircraftduring a test. An example of IADS® displays used in this course can be found in Figure 2. Page 12.1442.4 Page 12.1442.5Figure 2 Examples of IADS DisplaysCourse OverviewIn the spring of 2006, the Flight Test Techniques class met twice weekly for 75 minute sessions.This time was split into a two week rotation, where the first week was spent in classroominstruction and the second week was spent in simulation testing. Two optional laboratory
where students attempt to calculate the cost of chocolate-chipcookies illustrates some important lessons in determining product cost. This assignmentemphasizes material cost, equipment utilization, and time considerations. Figure 3 shows anexample of the cost analysis results in Excel (both input data and graph.) Figure 3. Cost Analysis ModelSeveral assignments relate to inspection technologies and techniques. A laboratory exercisechallenges students to learn to use and read a micrometer and digital calipers.A similar approach is used to teach rapid prototyping (RP) technologies. Students have readingsand assignments, but they also have a lab where they design a part in Pro/E, create an STL file,and transfer
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Transitioning between a flipped transportation engineering classroom and fully online learning Ryan Fries. PhD, PE* Chaya Gopalan, PhD Ravali Vennu, MS Southern Illinois University Southern Illinois University Bechtel Edwardsville Edwardsville rfries@siue.edu* Corresponding authorAbstractFlipped teaching is a rising pedagogy, but limited information is available about how it canprepare students for a transition to fully online teaching. The COVID-19 pandemic causedUniversities to shift instruction to online modes in Spring 2020. The purpose of this study
that is the result of neuroscience research on how the human brain processes and retainsnew information”. 1Introduction“Acknowledging that students learn at different speeds and that they differ in their ability tothink abstractly or understand complex ideas is like acknowledging that students at any givenage aren’t all the same height: It is not a statement of worth, but of reality”.2 In adifferentiated classroom and laboratory, the teacher proactively plans and carries out variedapproaches to content, process, and product in anticipation and response to student differencesin readiness, interest, and learning needs. According to Tomlinson, our teaching style “caninfluence a students’ IQ by 20 points in either direction, that’s a 40 point IQ
AC 2007-1964: WHY PEDAGOGY MATTERS: FACULTY NARRATIVESSusan Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is currently Associate Professor and Coordinator of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teaching and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engineering courses, as well as feminist and liberative pedagogies. Dr. Lord served as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education Conference. She has been awarded an NSF CAREER and ILI grants. Dr. Lord’s industrial experience includes AT&T Bell Laboratories, General Motors
of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education 5. ensure the continuing technical competency of faculties who teach telecommunications-related programs in the Northeast and nationally.Other educational partners are located at exceptional institutions throughout the Northeast andthe Center’s Business and Industry partners are listed at the end of this summary. The educationaland industrial collaborators together is addressing the needs of business and industry for aneducated workforce in telecommunications technologies by designing, developing, andimplementing a new infrastructure for telecommunications
linking them with undergraduates workingon a multidisciplinary project to manufacture biodiesel from vegetable oil and convert theglycerol side product to marketable specialty chemical products. The high school seniorsparticipating in the project have worked with undergraduate researchers in chemical andmechanical engineering to operate a small scale biodiesel plant and glycerol conversion reactorat the Paducah Extended Campus of the University of Kentucky College of Engineering. Inaddition, the students operate a quality control laboratory and conduct research experimentsdesigned to improve the biodiesel manufacturing process and optimize the process for utilizingthe glycerol side product. Feedstocks utilized for the biodiesel process include
Session 3575 New Engineering Faculty For The New Millennium A/Prof. Rick Homkes, A/Prof. Carlos R. Morales, Mr. Kenneth E. Rowe, A/Prof. Mark L. Smith Purdue UniversityAbstractThree new faculty members team up to relate their experiences moving from industry toacademia. Major topics include teaching, laboratory development, service, publishing, and thebalancing of time among these areas. The teaching area includes incorporating industrialexperiences into classroom preparation and making the transition from industrial presentationsto academic teaching
engineering laboratory courses. We explain our algorithm for using the two-columnrubrics, including how faculty, teaching assistants, and students are trained to apply thealgorithm. Finally, we conducted inter-rater reliability analysis for an example assignment andfound modest improvement in agreement between assessors compared to previous evaluationmethods. We conclude with our next steps in our development and revision of these rubrics.BackgroundThe University of Delaware is a medium-sized, mid-Atlantic, public institution whose chemicalengineering program graduates on average 80 undergraduates per year. The curriculum includestwo semesters of chemical engineering laboratory, though the second semester can be replacedwith a research project. Over
engineering educa- tion.Prof. Sanjeev Arora, Fort Valley State University Dr. Arora holds a B.Sc. (Honors) and M.Sc. degree in Physics from University of Delhi, India, and a M.S. and Ph.D. degree in Physics from University of Delaware. Dr. Arora’s research interest is experimental atomic physics and he is well-versed in the use of the van de Graaff accelerator, scalars, MCAs, and other physics instrumentation. He has been instrumental in acquiring, through various grants, computers, and software for the physics laboratory at FVSU. Some of his funded grant proposals are as follows: 1) Establishing a Nuclear Science and Engineering Minor at Fort Valley State University 2) Establishing an Undergraduate STEM Teaching and
Cross-College Collaboration to Enhance Spanish Instruction and Learning Ana Kennedy, Foreign Languages and Literatures, NCSU, Raleigh, NC David Ollis, Chemical Engineering, NCSU, Raleigh, NC Rebecca Brent, Education Design, Inc, Cary, NC. We report our pilot collaborative results for enhancing foreign languageinstruction and student learning by incorporation of an engineering laboratory componentinvolving use, dissection, and discussion, in Spanish, of four modern consumer devices:compact disc player/burner, electric and acoustic guitar, internal combustion engine, andbicycle. Our original lecture course, “Spanish: Language, Culture
., Proceedings of the 3rd national Conference, Teaching Informatics, University of Peloponnese.5. Piaget, J. “To Understand Is To Invent”, N.Y.: Basic Books, 1974.6. Sergeyev, A., Alaraje, N., “Partnership with industry to offer a professional certificate in robotics automation”, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE 2010), AC 2010-9687. Sergeyev, A., Alaraje, N., “Promoting robotics education: curriculum and state-of-the-art robotics laboratory development”, The Technology Interface Journal, Vol. 10, #3, 2010. Page 22.9.8
9 Bibliography 1. Henson, K. T. “Foundation for Learning-Centered Education: A Knowledge Base,” Education (Chula Vista, CA), vol. 124 (1), Fall 2003, pp 5-16.2. Wurdinger, S.D. and J. A. Carlson, “Teaching for Experiential Learning: Five Approaches that Work,” Rowman & Littlefield, New York, 2010.3. Joye, D. D., A. Hoffman, J. Christie, M. Brown, and J. Niemczyk, “Project-Based Learning in Education: Through an Undergraduate Lab Exercise,” Chem. Eng. Ed. 45(1) 53-2011.4. Davies, W. A., R. G. Prince, and R. J. Aird, “An Engineering Applications Laboratory for Chemical Engineering Students,” Chem. Eng. Ed., 25 (1) 16 (1991).5. Jones, W. E., “Basic Chemical Engineering Experiments,” Chem. Eng. Ed., 27(1) 52 (1993).6. Kelly, J. H
developments in the use of virtual teaching labs, which has led to arguments on thepros and cons of using virtual labs in place of physical labs. Korestky et al. [2] note that virtuallabs are better for experimental design, critical thinking and dealing with ambiguity, whilephysical labs are better for understanding lab protocols and specific content.Penney and Clausen [3] developed several inexpensive fluids and heat transfer exercises thatcould be used in the classroom as physical demonstrations or as laboratory exercises. Many ofthese experiments illustrated correlations from the literature using equipment that could easily beconstructed at low cost in a departmental machine shop. One of these experiments was a simplesharp-edged orifice
, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K.A. (1998), “Cooperative Learning Returns to College: What Evidence Is There that it Works?” Change, 30.4: 26–35. 7) Choi, S., Saeedifard, M., Shenoy, R. (2011), “ A Modern Education Power Electronics Laboratory to Enhance Hands-on Active Learning”, ASEE Conference Proceedings, Vancouver, B.C., June 26-29, 2011. 8) Pejcinovic, B. (2013), “ Application of Active Learning in Microwave Circuit Design Courses”, ASEE Conference Proceedings, Atlanta., June 23-26, 2013. 9) Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D. and Leifer, L. J. (2005), “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education”, 94: 103–120. 10) Copper, J., & Robinson, P. (1998
the semester moved from almost exclusive usage of the 571 to approximatelyequal usage of the two instruments.Thus the development of a LabVIEW interface for an older, more complex transistor curve tracerimproved its utility in a teaching laboratory situation significantly. Experienced users movedfrom infrequent usage to usage equivalent to that of a newer, simpler curve tracer. New usersseem to prefer using the interface, although that preference may be a function of classroomrequirements. When asked the best and worst features of each instrument, complaints centeredaround the 370’s size, age, and the transistor sockets rather than the user interface: only onecomplaint was received concerning software problems. The ease of use, the LabVIEW
the Center for Advanced Manufacturing andProduction [1] that provides rapid prototyping capability for fused deposition modelingand circuit board milling. Students interact with technicians who help support theequipment and the lab giving the students an opportunity to gain respect for the expertiseof the technicians. Page 8.844.3LaboratoryThe laboratory is used to develop student skills in many areas including interdisciplinaryteaming, data acquisition and analysis, using sensors and actuators, using amicrocontroller to interface with both sensors and actuators. The laboratory equipment islisted in Table 1 and Table 2 details the laboratory
Control Laboratory Course”, Chemical Engineering Education, 27, (3), pp. 184-187,193, (Summer 1993). 11. Johnson, S. H., Luyben, W. L. and Talhelm, D.L., “Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Controls Laboratory”, Journal of Engineering Education, 84, (2), pp.133-136, (April 1995). 12. Dunn-Rankin, D., Borrow, J.E., Mease, K.D., and McCarthy, J.M., “Engineering Design in Industry: Teaching Students and Faculty to Apply Engineering Science in Design”, 87, (3), Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 219-222, (July 1998). 13. Edgar, T. F., “Process Control – From the Classical to the Postmodern Era –“, Chemical Engineering Education, 31, (1), pp. 12-17,21, (Winter 1997). 14. Baum, Dave
paper, we present a pedagogy that seamlessly integrates the modernconcepts to the existing conventional methods for teaching distributed systems. Wepropose a set of laboratory experiments that will not only illustrate how to integrate thenewer concepts into existing framework but will also provide the students with hands-onexperience in the application of these concepts. The design and description of threelaboratory projects that cover newer topics in Distributed Systems, namely, (i) location-independence, (ii) active discovery and (iii) interoperability and persistence are shown.These projects will serve as models for development of similar projects illustrating otherconcepts of interest. A major contribution of this paper will be the pedagogy
References[1] Asfahl, Ray, “Robotics and Manufacturing Automation,” Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1992.[2] Fentiman, Audeen W. and Demel, John T., “Teaching Students to Document a Design Project and Present the Results,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, no. 4, October 1995, pp. 329-333.[3] Macedo, Jose A., “Laboratory for Introductory Course in Manufacturing Automation,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Session 3257, Washington, DC, June 26, 1996.[4] Auslander, David M., and Kempf, Carl J., “ Mechatronics: Mechanical System Interfacing,” Prentice Hall, 1995, p. 49.[5] Bollinger, John G., and Duffie, Neil A., “Computer Control of Machines and Processes,” Addison- Wesley, 1989, p
AC 2011-882: USING MATERIALS SCIENCE FOR COMMUNITY OUT-REACH, ENGINEERING EDUCATION, AND INNOVATIONAmy Hsiao, Memorial University of Newfoundland Dr. Amy Hsiao is associate professor in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science and chair of the Master of Engineering Management program at Memorial University of Newfoundland. With also a cross-appointment in the Faculty of Business Administration, she teaches Entrepreneurship, Production and Operations Management, and Materials Science at the undergraduate level and Organizational Be- haviour and Engineering Management Topics at the graduate level. Her research interests are in materials characterization and magnetic materials processing (on the Engineering side
Session 2620 “Choo Choos”, Robots and Computer-Based Instrumentation for Students 1 R. Stephen Dannelly, Carl W. Steidley Texas A&M University – Corpus ChristiAbstract This paper describes a versatile and innovative active learning laboratory currently underdevelopment that will be used to teach a wide variety of computer science and mathematicssubjects. The laboratory, equipped with a model railroad system, autonomous mobile robots anda network of control computers, offers students hands-on experiences with hardware interfacing,data
RaspberryPi Pico board is Thonny. In this paper, Thonny IDE will be used, and simple laboratory examples willbe presented in the following sub-section. Introductory Laboratory Examples using MicroPythonIn the author’s embedded system course, a BH EDU board is typically used in teaching variouselectronics and mechanical components that would be controlled by a microcontroller [8]. A BH EDUboard is a laboratory board with various components, and it can be used with several microcontrollerboards including a Raspberry Pi Pico board. The BH EDU board is not an essential portion oflaboratory examples. A reader can create the same set-up by using individual or separate parts insteadwithout using a BH EDU board. A BH EDU board with a Raspberry
Paper ID #22857Failure Rates in Engineering: Does It Have to Do with Class Size?Dr. Peggy C. Boylan-Ashraf, San Jose State University Dr. Peggy C. Boylan-Ashraf is an Assistant Professor in General Engineering at San Jose State University. She teaches structures courses and researches on new paradigms in teaching introductory solid mechanics courses with an emphasis on large enrollments. Over her years of teaching, Dr. Boylan-Ashraf has taught over 6,500 students and has been awarded numerous teaching awards by her students, department, and college.Mr. John R. Haughery, Iowa State University c
selectedbased on a multidisciplinary approach to exploring how different facets of an embedded sys-tem are developed. Second, course modules and laboratory exercises were developed to givestudents hands-on experience with embedded systems for a given topic of study, for exam-ple, operating systems and digital logic. Third, several innovative teaching techniques weredeveloped and applied to facilitate the understanding of the course materials in the contextof embedded systems. Finally, two of the courses involved group projects in the applicationof new research techniques as applied to embedded systems.The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the VESL projectwith respect to its short term and long term objectives. Section
Program (IEP) and the Freshman EngineeringHonors (FEH) Program. These new programs retain part of the traditional material but add inhands-on laboratory experiences that lead to reverse engineering and design/build projects. Therelational practices – teamwork and project management, along with report writing and oralpresentations and ethics have assumed important roles in this program. The programs aredesigned to have faculty from all of the degree granting departments teach freshmen. Theseprograms were developed to improve the retention and early decision to stay or leave for newfreshmen and to lay a foundation to better address some of the ABET 2000 accreditation criteria.Retention has improved markedly. This paper provides a brief description
laboratories defined by the ABET/Sloan Foundation effort4,5. The coursebegins with labs designed to teach students skills in experimentation, measurements, anderror analysis, along with techniques in a spreadsheet program and MATLAB/FreeMatfor data visualization, analysis and interpretations. The course then progresses to exploretopics in Materials Science, and Civil and Mechanical Engineering. Midway through thesemester, a bridge competition is held and the students work on a Student EducationalPlan that projects their coursework all the way through graduating with the Bachelors ofScience degree. Finally, the course concludes with Electrical and Computer Engineeringtopics in electronics and test equipment, sensors and measuring physical phenomena
Engineering 4 cr. instructor (myself in this case) ensures that students are actively EE531: Power System Modeling and Computational Methods. participating in the class, rather that passively listening.B. Online lectures and assignments. instruments, the laboratory has six LabVolt test benches which can be configured using motor-generator sets as generating Successful teaching of interactive classroom and online- sources or loads. Each bench is tied to its substation andspecific classes means that the teacher not only needs interconnected via transmission lines as a complete powercurriculum and
isgenerally defined as “education being delivered in an online environment through the use of theinternet for teaching and learning” [6]. There are two general types of online content delivery,being synchronous (instructor teaching in real-time) or asynchronous (content is deliveredoutside pre-defined lecture times) [7]. In the Department of Electrical and Software Engineeringat the University of Calgary, both types of online content delivery are being used to teachundergraduate engineering students.This shift to online learning has caused a myriad of issues for students, including resourceintensiveness [8], limited attention span [8], and absence of traditional classroom socialization[9]. Students are reporting higher levels of perceived loneliness