team could be tasked to design a new activity for a spring carnival at a local school. These situation are all open-‐ended and would require non-‐trivial problem formulation. In contrast, none of the prior studies nor the current work presented in this paper use the word “engineering design” to refer to very constrained design optimization-‐ Page 26.1510.2type projects. In an ethnographic study of a third year mechanical engineering design class at Georgia Tech, Wendy Newstetter embedded herself in a design
Paper ID #29856Integrate Manufacturing related Materials and Quality Control Standardsinto Master Level Engineering EducationDr. Hua Li, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Hua Li, an Associate Professor in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Texas A&M University- Kingsville, is interested in sustainable manufacturing, renewable energy, sustainability assessment, and engineering education. Dr. Li has served as P.I. and Co-P.I. in different projects funded by NSF, DOEd, DHS, and HP, totaling more than 2.5 million dollars.Prof. Kai Jin, Texas A&M University - Kingsville Dr. Kai Jin is a Professor of
. Collaborative research projects in the Americas i. Thesis and dissertations ii. Industry and government driven research projects3. Multinational Projects a. Capstone and design projects (course and student competition related) b. Service learning projects i. Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS)7 ii. Engineering Without Borders (EWB)8 iii. Engineering for a Sustainable World (ESW)9Any initiative independent of its size and nature should be evaluated to obtain information,assess its impact and identify opportunities for improvement. In analyzing the global educationinitiatives described in the above, it is found an ample variety of programs and tasks that havebeen
334 would be technicalelectives, and IE 382 and IE 281 would be free electives.IE 281 (Leadership Project) will be implemented using resources/projects from the EnterpriseSystems Center (ESC). ESC is a center at Lehigh University committed to enriching students’education while working to make its clients in industry more efficient and increasinglycompetitive. ESC has provided senior projects for IE and I&SE students for many years. Theleadership project course will allow them to facilitate interaction between their companies and abroader range of students on projects that might not be acceptable for senior capstone design, butstill provide leadership practice and value to the company.Comparing the themes in the Engineering Leadership
AAiT used the new equipment to allow its senior (5th year )students to work on their capstone design projects in groups of 3 to 5 students. The studentsindicated that the availability of the new technology allowed them to expand the application oftheir projects and tackle more advanced topics. Some of the special features of the MS-IOBoardthat were exploited by the students are listed below. It should be noted that most of the featuresof the MS-IOBoard listed below that were exploited by the students are not available using otherequipment in the ECE laboratories. Clamp activated Switch Project: the students used the spectrum analyzer function of the MS- IOBoard to analyze the clap waveforms picked up by an electrets microphone. It
deliberations, a required undergraduate course(CE 497 – Engineered Construction) was implemented and added to the undergraduate civilengineering curriculum at UAB. The course is team taught by faculty with expertise inconstruction and experienced construction professionals. In addition to the coverage of varioustopics, the course includes presentations by experts in the field of design and construction as wellas field trips to major construction projects in Alabama. The course is considered a pre- or co-requisite to the capstone senior design project (CE 499) since the topics covered in the course areessential to the understanding of the overall process of project planning, design, andconstruction.The introduction of a construction focus in the
integration of design and project development, a project isrequired in each course. The ME program strongly encourage teamwork on a class project forcourses in the major. This allows students to develop a design portfolio starting from thefreshman year [3]. Project training continues through their capstone design course. The projectsassigned to students are often combined with on-going faculty externally funded research. Thisaspect of program keeps the students in touch with leading-edge technology and current researchactivities in the real world. At the end of the course the student are expected to learn at a level ofanalysis and synthesis, i.e. beyond repetition
products or outputs. Suchevidence will allow you to refine the tool to ensure that it is being used as intended and willeliminate the need to second guess that question when you analyze the evidence to decide if thetool is working and why it is working. Table 3. Possible sources of evidence considered by workshop participants related to the goals for Task 1 in the case study (Appendix) were: • Pre‐ and post‐tests as evidence of improvement in achieving learning outcomes for the engineering science courses. • Written reports for mini‐projects in engineering science classes that includes description of their problem solving methodology/approach to document understanding of the process. • In capstone design
graduate level, has over 50 publications, is co-author of one book, and has done consulting for industry in Mexico and the US. He can be reached at Karim.Muci@sdsmt.edu.Dr. Laura Ochs Pottmeyer, Carnegie Mellon University Laura Pottmeyer is a Data Science Research Associate at Carnegie Mellon University’s Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence and Educational Innovation. She consults with faculty members and graduate students on implementing educational research projects. She assists with study design, data collection, and data analysis. Laura’s training includes a Ph.D. in Science Education and M.Ed. in Educational Psychology from the University of Virginia, where she studied the impact of engineering design integrated
PN DN [4] Timothy J. Kriewall and Kristen Mekemson, "Instilling the Entrepreneurial Mindset into Engineering Undergraduates", J. T-4 Environmental 19 22 27 20 8 Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 1, no. 1 (July 2010), pp. 5-19. S-3 Environmental 5 10 26 36 17 Online: http://www.jeenonline.com/Vol1/Num1/Vol1No1P1.pdf [5] John K. Estell, Kenneth J. Reid and Jed Marquart, “Addressing Third-These results indicate that many students are able to World Poverty in First-Year Capstone Projects,” American
Paper ID #15347Work in Progress: Enhancing the Undergraduate Research Experience throughPartnership with a Non-profit OrganizationMs. Margo Cousins, University of Texas, Austin Ms. Cousins oversees undergraduate and graduate academic advising at the Department Biomedical Engi- neering at The University of Texas at Austin. She directs the office in strategic academic and professional development advising, capstone projects program, industry partnerships, first-year interest groups, and other special programs.Lynda K. Gonzales, University of Texas, AustinDr. Erin Dolan, University of Texas, AustinKathryn E. Flowers, Texas 4000
or full-time undergraduate students in Prescott. The topic of spacedebris was introduced in these classes and it was found that this field can serve as a veryelaborate example pool for applied orbital mechanics, mission planning, spacecraft design (busand payload), remote sensing and space surveillance, and classes in a traditional liberal artscurriculum such as history, policy, and law.Projects like the analysis of satellite fragmentations, interactive web based flux directionalitycalculations, and the long term effects of perturbations on a satellite’s orbit are a few exampleson how this important topic can be included in a university curriculum. Undergraduate studentshave been integrated into research projects in addition to the classes
capture the knowledge and train the next generation of Chief Engineers. JACME2T provides training for its member companies by sharing internal resources and also by commissioning academic presenters to develop and deliver new course material. Topics are usually focused into 1 or 2-day courses which may then be combined as certificates. A certificate typically requires about 100 hours of class time. In the past 3 years, JACME2T has delivered more than 250 Project Management and 70 Software Engineering certificates. The challenge from the Board was to develop a Chief Engineer Certificate as the first step in the path to a long-term solution. Solution methodology New JACME2T programs are defined and commissioned by Learning and Competency
mechanical engineering students to PLCs is described in thispaper. This module is an updated version of the material presented in an earlier paper 8.Examples of the lab setup, student exercises, and follow-on senior design projects are provided.A website is available that contains these items with additional supplemental materials 9. Keyaspects of the instrumentation course that contains this PLC module are described next.Course OrganizationThe topics covered in the first instrumentation course, ME 360 – Instrumentation and ControlComponents, are listed in Table 1. A detailed listing of course objectives can be found on the UAmechanical engineering department's website (www.me.ua.edu). This course has existed in thisform for the past three years. At
relative mixture of lecture/lab is approximately the same in both programs and the distinction between contact and credit is not a factor for this high level comparison. 2) A masters program in a typical American system is approximately 30 hours with a significant portion of the program covered by a thesis if required. The Russian system also requires a thesis with almost twice the number of course hours (66 vs. 30). 3) In both the older specialist degree and the new bachelor degree, the Russian system requires a project in industry (the equivalent of a short COOP in the American system), plus the equivalent of a significant senior capstone project. The result is an emphasis on practical
yet to disambiguate the impactof design education from persistence behaviors. For instance, a survey study linked participatingin capstone design to stronger engineering identity, but without accounting for the differencesthat might be due to comparing seniors to students earlier in their educational careers [3].To address this gap, we extend typical models of persistence intentions to examine the effects ofengagement in a core engineering practice—design problem framing—across first-year andsenior students. We conjectured that framing agency—the capacity to make decisionsconsequential to design problem framing [4]—relates to engineering identity and engineeringdesign self-efficacy, which in turn predicts persistence intentions. We sought to
materials for a design, labels on items or cartons, or searching astandards supplier database. Attendees will work on the problem of finding related standards to agiven engineering scenario. Scenario possibilities include 1) standards information needs for asmall business for innovative piezoelectric products, 2) locating standards related to tissueengineering, and 3) standards need to be gathered for a university research group that exploresmicrogrids. Scenarios have the possibility of appearing contrived unless academic librariansreach out to engineering professors for possibilities that could be explored for engineering designcourses and capstone project courses.IntroductionAt Carnegie Mellon University, information literacy efforts are
engineering tools and the ability to integrate knowledge from differentdisciplines.1,2 Undergraduate capstone design experiences are largely developed to provide asetting for the attainment of these skills, and many have demonstrated positive outcomes in theseareas.3,4 However, it remains a challenge to provide students with opportunities to hone theseskills, particularly those based in the highest levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy of synthesis andevaluation, elsewhere in the curriculum. The junior-level undergraduate biomedical engineeringlaboratory module described here attempts to do this by asking students to use three distinctengineering approaches toward a common problem in a multidisciplinary laboratory course.Multidisciplinary Laboratory Course
different paths.The faculty of ENGR 100 felt that the course would benefit from a “capstone” designexperience that was not specific to any particular discipline. This type of project hasbeen successfully implemented at a number of institutions in the past, to great educationalbenefit [3-6]. While each of the “seminars” was expected to have a systematicengineering design experience, the extent to which these were internalized by thestudents as teaching of design and teamwork as opposed to teaching only the major- Page 22.746.2related technical content, was limited. Therefore, the faculty sought to incorporate aproject where use of both teamwork and design
ePortfolio; Engineering N/ACapstone taken simultaneously with a capstone design courseDesign Engineering/ Critique & Practice Incorporates all skills learned in the minor in aCapstone Various in Design & Arts team project A pervasive challenge of developing a minor like the IPM is communicating clearlyacross disciplines. Because the IPM core sequence includes courses from three differentcolleges, the faculty teaching these courses have had to work closely to negotiate terminologyand outcomes throughout the minor. One example of this is the term “design,” which can beviewed differently
summer but for the relationships fostered by this exchange. Some ofthe students are still in touch with their faculty mentors, integrating their research experiencesinto their capstone senior design projects. A senior student from UMES, who worked as asummer exchange student at MSU, is now pursuing graduate work at MSU. Also, if thisprogram were to be extended in the future to some of the community colleges in the state, wewould undoubtedly see some of the best community college students transferring to a four-yeardegree program as a result of a summer internship experience, where they might not have feltmotivated or confident enough to do so otherwise. Recruitment and inclusion of communitycollege students may represent an important step in
abroad, service-learning, entrepreneurship programs, interdisciplinary courses) do E/CS students engage / not engage in? 2. How do the HIEP participation rates in E / CS students vary as E/CS students’ progress in their programs?To create a historical picture of the E/CS participation, we gathered and analyzed existing NSSEsurvey data to investigate the possible relationships between student demographics, andparticipation in HIEP.Data Analysis / ResultsThe main objective of this study is to examine the extent to which E/CS students participate inHIEP. The NSSE survey results indicate that the E/CS students engage in culminating seniorexperiences such as capstone courses and senior projects and internships or co-op programs
subject matter. However, a commonly encountered problem with design groupformation in an academic environment is the decision by the instructor on how to form theteams. Should students be allowed to choose their own groups, or should instructors assign theteams directly? If groups are assigned, how should the students be divided among the teams?This project seeks to provide insight into these questions.ME450, a course which provides a capstone design experience to senior non-engineering majorsat the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, is structured around three team-based engineeringdesign projects, or EDPs. Student design teams for these EDPs consist of three to fourindividuals who work toward the common goal of applying the engineering design
“computer intensive (CI)”. In the ENV programcurriculum, the two senior capstone project courses satisfy the WI and OPO requirements;Hydrology and Air Quality are the two courses that are designated as CI and satisfy thegraduation requirements.Engineering topics that are part of the curriculum are appropriate to the discipline ofenvironmental engineering in many ways. Courses like CADD Laboratory, Engineering ProjectAnalysis, and Professionalism & Ethics, Statics, Strength of Materials, EngineeringThermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics support material and concepts in courses such asEnvironmental Engineering Hydraulics, Water Quality, Water and Wastewater Treatment, AirQuality, and Air Pollution Control. Moreover, topics covered in the above
disciplines take a departure course in which theseblocks are introduced. They continue working toward majors in their own departments beforereturning for a design and synthesis course at the senior and graduate student levels. This course,developed at the University of Nevada, Reno, is entitled “Nanotechnology System Design andSynthesis.” It is an integrated microtechnology/ nanotechnology course in which the five blocksare reinforced and expanded upon, drawing on students’ new knowledge in their respectivedisciplines, while at the same time challenging them to apply their knowledge to a real-worldnanotechnology system design. The senior-level course serves as the capstone experience coursefor a newly created nanotechnology minor, and a graduate
A web-based survey collaborative deployed near the end of the information behavior of academic year following a undergraduateSaleh [18] 2011 Canada 42 n/a project that took 8 months engineering students project for a final year working on a course- capstone design course. based engineering project
in authentic cross-disciplinary design projects. While guidance fromprofessors with industry experience and teaching techniques such as project-based and servicelearning are common approaches to supporting student preparation, there is continued need fordesign education to include a focus on the development of skills to support communicationacross disciplinary and team boundaries (e.g., shared language and clarity of narrative). Theseskills, which are frequently thought of as non-engineering work, are as critical to the completionof cross-disciplinary projects as skills associated with conventional engineering design work(i.e., design and technical practices). As a result, a multiple case study was designed to explorethe practices of
coursefocuses on developing skills in 3d CAD modeling (Solidworks), spreadsheet calculations(Excel), and scientific computations (Matlab). The last new course, “Engineering DesignMethods”, taken in the 4th semester, focuses on design projects specifically formulated to allowthe students to practice new skills gained in courses from the first three semesters. While enoughdata is not yet available to quantify changes in retention rates, anecdotal evidence shows that thestudents retained to the 3rd year are more engaged in coursework and extracurricular activities,more knowledgeable, and, most importantly, have good attitudes and are ready to learn in futurecourses.IntroductionThree years ago, the Mechanical Engineering Department at South Dakota State
. The Wickenden Report5(1930) recommended design projects for sophomores and juniors, and the Grinter Report6 (1955)recommended engineering programs contain both technical (including design) and social(general education, social sciences) goals. Credit hour caps reduced or eliminated courses suchas shop, design and manufacturing technology by the 1960’s. Reconsideration of these changesbegan in earnest by the late 1980’s. For example, a 1997 National Science Foundation reportSystemic Engineering Educational Reform- An Action Agenda7 listed teamwork, project-basedlearning and industry interactions as important areas of emphasis. In addition to the creation ofsenior year capstone design classes, existing freshman introductory classes were modified
a two-semester capstone Senior Project course. However, particularly motivated students canpursue additional design and research experiences by seeking out a faculty member andproposing a project, which may consist of either a novel, student-generated concept or a furtherdevelopment of a pre-existing project. These directed research experiences can take place at anypoint during the student’s four years, whether during the academic year or the summer.In this case, the experience itself took place in a seven-week span during the summer between thesophomore and junior year. Funding for the experience was available through the college’ssummer Scholarship and Creative Arts Research Program (SCARP). As mentioned in theIntroduction, both the