Technology at Oklahoma State University has strategically planned a shifttoward an interdisciplinary senior design focus and dedicated extensive resources to achieve it,they are having to adjust previous course models. The paper will discuss the structure of onelong-standing interdisciplinary architectural engineering senior design class within the college inthe architecture department, called the Comprehensive Design Studio (AE-CDS), and compare itto developments of the last three semester of the newly developing engineering InterdisciplinarySenior Design projects (ISD) from the perspective of an architecture faculty member who hastaught both courses. In examining these courses, some important characteristics regardinginterdisciplinary team
of the course basedon student knowledge and attitudes towards a variety of aspects of teaching. Finally, we providerecommendations for others looking to develop similar courses at other universities.MethodsCourse Improvement ApproachImprovement of the pedagogy course was funded by an Instructional Improvement Grant andincluded phases of consultation with experts, literature review, course materials review, anddevelopment of refined lesson plans and course website.The faculty instructor and graduate student researcher consulted with experts on active learningand inclusive teaching. Michael Prince, a professor and scholar in active learning withinengineering education, provided a workshop on active learning for faculty, post
are renewableenergy sources such as wind, solar energy systems, fuel cells and distributed generation deviceswith near zero emissions of hazardous pollutants. These generation systems can be used in stand-alone configurations, microgrids or in configuration connected to the power networks for gridreinforcement. Given the rapid progress in alternative energy and distributed generationtechnologies and usage, there is a greater need for trained professionals and engineers withadequate knowledge in these areas to be able to plan, design and operate such systems, andperform analytic evaluation of their impact on power systems to which they are connected. Theintegration of intermittent energy sources in the power system creates manifold challenges
try out engineering without the long-term commitment of enrolling as an engineeringstudent. Additionally, it allows students to evaluate engineering as an academic pursuit prior tothe college application process [13]. For students who already plan to study engineering, pre-college programs allow them to learn about different engineering disciplines and fields.Exposure to engineering before starting college can allow students to decide if engineering is theright choice for them, and which field within engineering may be the best match for theirinterests. The pre-college program discussed here is modeled similarly to engineering bootcamps. Students enrolled in our pre-college program consist of mostly rising high school juniorsand seniors and
years of external funding. While avariety of data is used to evaluate applicants, such as GRE and GPA scores and letters ofrecommendation, the unique feature of the NSF GRFP is the requirement to write a two pageresearch proposal and a three page statement of personal goals (hereby referred to as the“personal statement”). In the award cycle in which this study was conducted, students couldapply once as an undergraduate student, and both their years in graduate school, anaffordance that has since changed.The prompts for the two essays do not necessarily align with Stewardship theory. Forexample, the prompt for the Personal Statement asks students to “Please outline your educational and professional development plans and career goals. How do
techniquespracticed by modern enterprises. The traditional business plan approach bears similarities to therigid planning and design of the Waterfall model and it consequently suffers from analogousinflexibility. Research has found that adopting a formal business plan is not associated withincreased odds of success [2]. Instead, contemporary Lean Startup methods [3] emphasizecontinuous innovation through experimentation and adaptation to evolving knowledge of themarket.Accordingly, entrepreneurship curricula are evolving to provide experiential learning in adoptingLean methods. There is a movement to apply more hands-on learning in entrepreneurshipeducation [4], including a shift toward PBL pedagogy for business venture projects [5]. Whileentrepreneurship
future plan *Experimental Lab Visit 2 Experimental Lab Visit 2* Engage students in discussion; provide feedback Week 8 Final results *Final Symposium Final Symposium* Presentation feedback Week 10 Poster presentationFigure 1: Organizational structure of Discovery programming. (A) Overall
level (verb) extraction.Figure 2. Steps to Processing Syllabi using NLP3.2. Steps 1 and 2: Data Collection and Text Processing.In Step 1, we collected and inventoried AM course syllabi and AM Competency Model. Wecollected 133 of 200 (66.5%) syllabi documents from five Northwest Florida state colleges andseparated them into four course categories, based on the AM programs’ plans of study: 1) coretechnical (n=77), 2) core non-technical (n=21), 3) elective technical (n=34), and 4) elective non-technical (n=1). We also used the current AM Competency Model downloaded from the DOLCareerOneStop website [4].Step 2 involved extraction of competencies within the documents (e.g., from syllabi coursedescriptions and outcomes and from competencies listed in
university. VTAB scholarship is basedsolely on financial need and academic merit.Before Enrolling at our university: The second section of the survey examined the student’sexperiences at their various 2-year schools. From question #4, the most striking if notpredictable finding was that the majority of all three cohorts attended a 2-year school due tofinancial reasons. Figure 3 shows the % of scholars in each cohort citing financial reasons forattending a 2-year school instead of a 4-year institution. Figure 3: Percentage of Scholars in each cohort citing financial reasons to attend 2-year school instead of a 4-year school. Question #4.Responses to question #6 show that most scholars (over 90% of each cohort) always planned
sessionswere one hour long, and held eight times throughout the semester. The project investigator teamdetermined the workshop topics for the semester: 1. Introduction to active learning and disciplinary communities of practice 2. Bloom’s taxonomy and writing effective learning objectives 3. Pedagogies of engagement I: Making class sessions more interactive 4. Pedagogies of engagement II: Implementing active learning in the classroom 5. Pedagogies of engagement III: Cooperative learning – structured teams 6. Motivation and learning 7. Promoting inclusive practices in the classroom 8. Muddiest points and other tech tools: Facilitating course innovationEach session was carefully planned by the project investigator team
Excellence in the College ofEducation and Human Development. Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Organized by The University of Texas at Dallas Copyright © 2017, American Society for Engineering Education 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual ConferenceFigure 1: Undergraduate students working with elementary- and middle-school children.Fundamentals of Robotics (ME4773) is a senior-level technical elective offered in theDepartment of Mechanical Engineering at UTSA. In this class, students primarily learn aboutkinematics, dynamics, control, and planning of manipulators and mobile systems. Students arealso expected to do
university university universityCurricular documents collected for the study include faculty and institutional publicationsdocumenting course schedules and credit requirements. Student interviews explore a range oftopics including those related to course learning, assessment, relation to discipline, plans afterfinishing their degrees, and extra-curricular engagements. For the study, we are trackingabout ten students in each of the two programs at the participating institutions byinterviewing them once in the second half of the academic year. Students being interviewedfor the study represent variation in race, gender, and nationality.Data were analyzed in two steps. The first step involved analysis of the curricular
Aid and ReliefDistribution (HARD) Game” as an experiential learning tool that explores the potential for increasedoperational efficiency while balancing decision tradeoffs impacting humanitarian supply chain per-formance, including beneficiary demand satisfaction, operational costs, and transportation resourcesutilization. The HARD game is intended for graduate and undergraduate students in courses dealingwith topics on supply chain management. It allows students to analyze aspects that significantly impacthumanitarian supply chain operations, such as: supply chain coordination and planning, supply chainrisks, demand volatility, and competing objectives. Statistical analysis of students’ survey responsesprovide evidence that the HARD game is
.). EPICS still operates and has spread to many universities [5]. While students benefit fromworking on authentic multidisciplinary projects over multiple semesters, a limiting factor on theprogram was the faculty reward structure. Advising teams takes time and energy, and the effortwas not rewarded in the faculty review, promotion, and tenure process. Coyle, one of three co-founders of EPICS, valued the vertical integration of the program, and brought this aspect of theprogram to faculty research. In VIP, faculty establish teams to support large-scale long-termscholarship and exploration efforts, and teams are largely multidisciplinary across the VIPConsortium.In the Summer of 2014, Georgia Tech hosted a planning meeting for a proposed consortium
living, andnational security. Also, mentioning U.S. students lag those of other nations in STEMknowledge. These statements, with the inclusion of other factors, can lead to fewer and lesstalented U.S. scientists and engineers, a decrease in economic growth, and reduced economiccompetitiveness [4], [5]. Also, the United States government, understanding the problem offorming future citizens, put in place in 2013 a Five Years Strategic Plan to address thisproblematic [6].Taking an in-depth look at the formal educational system, in particular, in large urban centers inthe United States, the time and resources distribution did not promote the implementation of astrong curriculum in the area of STEAM. According to the National Center of
design, and Berland et. al’s [22] Epistemologies in Practice framework forcharacterizing considerations for building knowledge that contribute to how students engagemeaningfully in scientific practices. For the purpose of this project, we needed a framework that would be useful forobserving direct evidence of learning and allow for robust transferability across various learningexperiences over time. An added complexity is that engaging with engineering design to learnscience and using engineering design to create a science lesson plan for elementary educationstudents are two different activities that require preservice teachers to engage with engineeringdesign from two different user perspectives – first, as a learner of science, and
University Dr. Pyrialakou is an Assistant Professor at the Wadsworth Department of Civil and Environmental En- gineering at West Virginia University. She received her Diploma in Civil Engineering from the National Technical University of Athens, Greece, in 2011 and in 2016 she earned a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Pyrialakou’s expertise and interests involve the use of statistical, econometric, spa- tial, and economic analysis tools in the broader research area of transportation planning and evaluation of transportation systems. She started working in the area of engineering education at Purdue University when she taught Introduction to Transportation Engineering in spring 2016. She currently
, or physics major. ● Demonstrate progress in the major by enrolling in required courses. ● Have at least a 3.0 GPA in their major field (all STEM courses required for major).All S-STEM programs, as directed by the solicitation, should provide an ecosystem of supportthat includes faculty mentoring and a scholar cohort. The AugSTEM Scholars Program also usesan Individual Development Plan (IDP) framework to scaffold student contact and programming.IDPs can take different forms and appear in many workplace and educational settings. A scholaralumnus in graduate school suggested incorporating IDPs into the program. This led us to theAAAS MyIDP (an IDP platform for faculty, post-doctoral researchers and graduate students) [8],materials on
namesake forreporting to a cycle-based, chapter-centered, growth mindset-oriented development program [8]. Summary of the NRP v.3 components1. Chapter Management Tool (CMT): a comprehensive chapter management and improvement tool consisting of a Chapter Plan is required by the chapters towards organizing their events and programs with continuous feedback from regional leaders and the NRP Reports;2. Chapter Assessment Reports (i.e., NRP Reports 1 & 2): two comprehensive NRP reports documenting the chapter's events, programs, and ability to further the SHPE mission and vision. The reports are be used to assess the chapters areas for growth and strength and making award determinations; and3. Chapter
Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. degree in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University. Dr. Main examines student academic pathways and transitions to the workforce in science and engineering. She was a recipi- ent of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Award, the 2015 Frontiers in Education Faculty Fellow Award, and the 2019 Betty Vetter Award for Research from WEPAN. In 2017, Dr. Main received a National Science Foundation CAREER award to examine
from this experience will allow us to understand thedifferent types of costs that influence the student’s decision to stay another year and completetheir master’s degree. Studies found that exposure to research at an undergraduate level createspositive experiences for students which as a result, leads engineering students to pursue theirgraduate studies [1], [15]. Moreover, social interactions with graduate students, mentors, as wellas professors, can play a role in the decision to pursue post-graduate degrees. Lastly, Abhyankaret al. studied the socializer influence on engineering students’ career planning, which revealedthat these different socializer categories influence students’ post-graduation plans in three areas:“thinking about
specifications, milestones, feedback, andreporting procedures along with the challenges encountered by both the students and theinstructors. The paper also presents the analysis of the student outcomes accessed by theinstructors, student comments, and discussion on methods to increase student motivation,participation, and project evaluation. This paper will serve as a teaching aid for the instructorswho are currently teaching or plan to teach senior design in the near future. Most specifically,this will help newly joined junior faculty members in planning the senior design course andadapting some of these material and reporting procedures.Keywords: Engineering technology, Multi-disciplinary senior design, Autonomous vehicle1. IntroductionThe two main
and events In addition to the obvious implications for planning and event logistics, discussing student wellness in faculty meetings keeps the topic fresh in faculty members’ minds, hopefully making them more aware of and sensitive to their students’ mental health concerns.6. Mental health resource handouts To address the goal of informing students about some of the mental health resources available to them (see Section 2.3), a mental health resources flyer was created by the committee. Various pamphlets describing on-campus resources are available from different organizations at Ohio State (CCS, Wellness Center, Student Health Center, Office of Student Life, etc.) but the committee wanted to create a flyer specifically
Electrical Engineering from Howard University and a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University. He is currently serving as professor and Interim Dean for the Clarence Mitchell Jr. School of Engineering. Morgan State University at one of the na- tion’s preeminent public urban research institutions in the Clarence Mitchell Jr. School of Engineering at Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland. His career spans over twenty-eight years of progressive scholarly experience in such areas as research administration/ implementation, pedagogical innovation, international collaboration, strategic planning, promoting community engagement and academic program development. He instructs courses in computer vision
authors plan to test the feasibility of integrating data visualization ethics andteam science components into the design of the data visualization activity worksheet.Data Visualization Activity WorksheetsThe design process is a non-trivial process which requires more than one week to master. In theinterest of introducing a complex process in a short period of time, a series of data visualizationactivity worksheets were used to facilitate the process. The data visualization worksheetapproach has been used in many platforms for teaching the design process for data visualization[4] - [5]. The goal of these methods are to develop data visualization systems. It was beyond thescope and unrealistic to expect a visualization system as a deliverable for
, there islittle research regarding effective ways of introducing blockchain concepts into higher educationcourses. This paper will show the effectiveness of using a paper-based supply chain simulationas a pedagogical tool for introducing blockchain, distributed ledger technology, and creatingopportunities to change how business transactions and processes are taught in higher education.IntroductionThis paper introduces a paper-based simulation game to introduce students to blockchaintechnology, with specific applicability for an enterprise resource planning or information andcomputer technology course. This is accomplished by modifying the “Paper Game” simulationoriginally developed by the ERPsim Lab at HEC Montreal (https://erpsim.hec.ca
;Cohen, 2007). Mendoza-Denton et al. (2006) indicate that social support can mitigate thesechilling effects. Further, Mendoza-Denton et al. (2006) cited mentoring and cross-groupfriendships (so forming friendships with those in the other group – between genders or betweenethnicities/races, e.g.) as forms of social support that they found to have such a mitigatingeffect. Therefore, the proposed student tutoring and resource center is also planned to providesome social events to encourage student friendships, such as these important cross-groupfriendships in addition to the natural mentoring that can develop through tutoring.Belonging has been tied to self-efficacy and engagement, which also are tied to positive careeroutcomes (aka persistence in
/Entrepreneurshipcompetency; (4) Multicultural competency; and (5) Social Consciousness competency [1]. AtASU, a Perspectives on Grand Challenges for Engineering course is offered to engineeringstudents in the GCSP, to help them develop an interdisciplinary perspective on the GrandChallenges, identify and explore their interests, and develop a preliminary plan for their GCSPstudy. The majority of these GCSP students take this course in their first year, and it is the firstof the two requirements to achieve the GCSP’s multidisciplinary competency.As a part of the authors’ work with the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN), anonline version of this course was developed for the MOOC environment, offered through ASU’sEarned Admission program, a program that
implement transformative autonomous technologies,and improving health and welfare sectors while extending human reach to previouslyinaccessible realms large and small, near and far” [2].The long-term goals of the team were to: • Develop a diverse, inclusive community of MRE educators, students, and practitioners • Define the MRE knowledgebase as a community • Achieve recognition of MRE as a distinct engineering discipline • Accelerate adoption of MRE courses and curricula [2]During the course of planning, running, and documenting the workshops, the organizers had theopportunity for discussions about the nature of MRE and our individual perceptions of the field.Even within a small group that was focused on a common outcome, individual
that current education, which has not dramatically changed in X years, does notprepare students for the workforce. Through this effort, we hope to change that perception.We plan to use a “backward design” instructional design framework to develop curricula [16].This approach ensures that student learning focuses on particular actionable learning objectivesthat are measurable to improve student achievement. This approach involves 1) identifying thedesired outcomes and results, 2) determining what constitutes acceptable evidence ofcompetency in the outcomes and results (i.e., assessment), and 3) planning instructionalstrategies and learning experiences that bring students to these competency levels [17]. TheDelphi study addresses the first of