, Transfer Students, Identity Development,Institutional Challenges, Curriculum Alignment.1. BackgroundEngineering Technology (ET) programs in community colleges represent a distinct facet ofengineering education, catering to different student populations and workforce developmentneeds compared to conventional four-year degree paths. ET programs prioritize practical,application-oriented learning, equipping students with hands-on problem-solving skills directlyrelevant to the industry. For instance, students in ET programs may engage in projects simulatingreal-world engineering challenges, fostering their ability to tackle practical issues. In contrast,traditional four-year engineering programs delve deeper into the theoretical foundations
, students of color, and Pell-eligible students are found to benefit the least from blocktuition, paying more per credit. This work explores the systemic inequality created by thispreviously unconsidered mechanism and will hopefully result in a much-needed conversationabout the disparate impacts of tuition structures.IntroductionEquality of access to college gets a lot of attention. The media, policy makers, and academicliterature often focus on the convoluted and secretive admissions process at elite schools andoverall college affordability [1] [2] [3]. Advocates also are drawing attention to the fact thatseemingly neutral policies such as requiring remedial courses and limiting credit transfers fromassociate degree programs can contribute to
of leadership, project management, accountability, andsolutions-focused mental posture are a natural fit for the engineering field—a match that studentveterans can use to build a sense of ‘belonging’ as they transition.1. Background - Student VeteransStudent veterans are older, post-traditional students who pursue higher education [1-2]. Ohlandreports that economics plays a major role for non-traditional students, and especially for studentveterans. It is the primary factor to return to school, where to attend, and what degree program tostudy [3]. Institution preference is often affected by proximity to current location and to family,cost and reputation. Student veterans are motivated by career opportunities, self-improvementand personal
, differentstudies have sought to describe the characteristics of an engineer and how these impactidentifying with engineering encompassing not only their mannerisms and modes of thinking butalso their attire and actions [1-5]. This research has also added to the scholarship on the factorscontributing to feelings of alienation experienced by historically marginalized and minoritizedstudents within engineering [4, 6-8]. In engineering, as in other disciplines, learning to becomepart of the group (i.e., becoming an engineer) is intertwined with identity formation because bothare shaped and constructed through interpersonal interactions and the discourses that emergefrom those interactions (i.e., ways of knowing, doing, and being, as well as the attitudes
shape an individual's motivation,such as from colleagues, mentors, and family. Socializers often inform students’ motivation toobtain STEM degrees, yet there is minimal literature that examines the role of socializers amongSTEM undergraduates, particularly at minority serving institutions (MSI). This critical researchgap inequitably disadvantages historically marginalized and non-traditional students. In thiswork-in-progress, we answer the following two research questions: (1) Who are the socializersthat influence student’s motivation to pursue and persist in their STEM education? and (2) Inwhat ways do these socializers influence students' motivation? Using the Expectancy-Valuetheoretical framework, we answer the research questions using
curriculum, and incorporated newtechnologies to enhance the learning experience. We aim to ensure the program remains relevant,engaging, and meaningful to students.Background informationThe Make to Innovate (M:2:I) program began in the fall of 2011. The program aims to providestudents with hands-on experience in solving real-world problems. The Make to Innovateprogram launched with around ninety students working on fifteen projects. The program aimed toinclude projects operating independently in the aerospace engineering department and provide amore structured environment for the students working on those projects. It also helped tofacilitate additional resources that could be earmarked for said projects. As seen in Figure 1,enrollment has grown and
Complete Evidence-Based Practice: Utilizing Informed Design Pedagogy and Teaching Strategies in a Freshman Engineering Design ModuleIntroduction This Complete Evidence-Based Practice paper describes an instructional module createdand taught by the author that introduced freshman engineering students to the use of informeddesign thinking [1] when doing design challenges that aimed to serve K-12 wheelchair users. The10-week module was part of a one-credit, 15-week undergraduate course, Engineering Designoffered at CCNY’s School of Engineering. Students taking this module met in-person with theauthor/instructor once a week for a 110-minute recitation and lab sessions. This was followed onFridays by a 50-minute
laboratory, the first of its kind in the Northeast andSUNY system. The laboratory space and its equipment, including mechanical drives trainers anda nacelle trainer, play a pivotal role in keeping Farmingdale State College, the local community,and other SUNY campuses, like SUNY at Buffalo, up to date of the wind energy field and itsrequirements. This includes staying current with educational and occupational perspectives withinthe industry.Introduction Micro-credentials are certified documents that provide recognized proofs of theachievement of learning outcomes from shorter, less duration, educational or training activities[1]. The interest in micro-credentials has gained momentum once the COVID-19 pandemic began,as a governmental response
engagement [1-3]. There hasalso been some preliminary work exploring how practice-based and other work-based learningcan prepare students for the workplace, but these learning environments offer unique challenges.As stated by Luk and Chan [4], “compared to learning in the classroom, learning in theworkplace is less predictable”, which overall makes it difficult to determine and map what thelearning outcomes truly are for work experiences and how they connect to classroom learning.Various frameworks of learning outcomes and experiences from internship experiences havebeen created [4-7], but none has truly allowed for the complexity and breadth of studentexperiences to be mapped and expanded upon. Therefore, there is value in creating assessmentand
[1, 2]. During that study, 24 faculty from 9institutions were interviewed several times about a range of aspects of their instruction [3]. Weidentified how each instructor’s application of the educational tool interacted uniquely with theirinstructional ecosystem in ways that we termed their trajectory of practice. The study reportedhere extends that work by exploring ways to conceptualize how instructors frame their teaching.For this case study, we contrasted two instructor’s framings in an attempt to establish theviability of applying this analytical lens to the whole data set.Theoretical FrameworkWe used the lens of resources and framing as an analytical tool to understand differences in howinstructors approach their courses. Instructors
. She has a B.S. in mathematics, an M.S. in operations research and a Ph. D. in systems engineering. She currently serves on the East Carolina University Department of Engineering advisory board. She has served as an ABET evaluator since 2011. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Comprehensive Needs Assessment to Enhance Engineering Faculty DevelopmentIntroductionThe notable increase in student enrollment in engineering courses and attendance at engineeringcolleges [1] has led to focused attention on student learning and their outcomes [2]. Nevertheless,the faculty engaged with those students often receive less attention regarding their
theoretical frameworksof engineering identity development [1] and social capital [2] to explore their experiences. In thesecond phase, we will delve into qualitative methodologies in order to gain a deeperunderstanding of the experiences of selected students. The goal of the project is to inform thedesign of a robust program to enhance support for ET students as they progress in theirprograms, utilize their forms of capital, and develop an engineering identity. The data collectedwill also allow an understanding of their development as it relates to demographic informationsuch as first-generation status, race, gender, age and more. Within this paper, we outline ourproject at its current state, in order to draw feedback and support from the ET
students andprofessionals [1], [2], [3]. Learning to program is difficult, and undergraduate engineeringstudents are required to learn it regardless of their initial interest and motivation for it. Theytraditionally take their programming course in the computer science department, a course thatgenerally delivers to a mixed audience of multiple majors and relies on generic problems for theapplication of coding skills.Research suggests that motivation plays a key role in student success in programming courses[4], [5]. Interest in the content and activities, and relevance or usefulness, i.e. the content isuseful for students’ short or long term goals, are among the factors that contribute to academicmotivation [6], [7]. Students perform better in
diverge from the societal norm; neurodivergent people areoften considered to be disabled within current societal structures and systems [1]–[3]. Though‘neurodivergent’ is intentionally not a diagnostic term, diagnoses (whether formal or self-) canstill play an important role in neurodivergent individuals’ paths to finding neurodivergentcommunity [5], yet barriers to diagnosis (especially formal) are numerous (e.g. [31]).Undiagnosed neurodivergent people often experience social isolation without understanding why[4]. Even those with a diagnosis (or multiple) can still face isolation, as diagnoses are notroadmaps to the community, nor instructions on how to build one. With this in mind,, weinitiated our collaboration to fulfill that need for a
(STEM)learning environments or teaching approaches. Gaining insight into the strengths and challengesexperienced by students with ADHD can help us understand how specific classroom teachingpractices either facilitate or obstruct their academic success. This paper presents the researchdesign of a qualitative interview-based study designed to understand the role of classroomteaching practices on the academic success of students with ADHD.IntroductionAccording to the National Institute of Mental Health [1], ADHD is a neurodevelopmentalcondition marked by an ongoing pattern of three specific types of symptoms: “inattention (notbeing able to keep focus), hyperactivity (excess movement that is not fitting to the setting), andimpulsivity (hasty acts
Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: Understanding the Experiences of Neurodivergent Learners in Engineering and Computing MajorsIntroductionIn this Work-in-Progress paper, we present our student-driven research into the experiences ofneurodivergent learners in Engineering and Computing majors at an R1 institution in thesoutheastern United States. Neurodivergent people have differences in the brain’s functionalitythat can affect how their brain works and processes [1]. These differences can impact howneurodivergent individuals experience the world compared to neurotypical behavior and thoughtpatterns. However, more universities have recently become more aware and supportive ofneurodivergent individuals and significantly increased
his experience in the construction industry into the classroom. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 WIP: Mind mapping to improve architecture students’ skills in navigating hand-on and lecture-based pedagogies. Ignacio Guerra P. 1*, Juan Sebastián Andrade21 Professor, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Arquitectura y Diseño de Interiores CADI, Departamento de Arquitectura, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador.2 Undergraduate student, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Arquitectura y Diseño de Interiores CADI, Departamento de Arquitectura, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador
. Through narrative inquiry and a novel,boundary-spanning framework, we explore the career stories of women who have leftengineering after having worked in industry. We make sense of the participants’ career decisionsby considering their career journeys through the lens of the unfolding model of turnover, a theoryfrequently used by organizational psychologists yet not fully applied to the study of women’sengineering career decisions. In this paper, we describe the engineering career journey of Louise,one of three participants from our larger study [1]. We invite you to come alongside us as weexplore Louise’s engineering career story through the shocks (jarring events), scripts (plans ofaction), and image violations (violations of goals and values
) of the students in bothcourses. The EM was assessed with the Engineering and Science Entrepreneurial MindsetAssessment (ESEMA) [1].The findings of this investigation reveal positive effects on students in the statics course, albeitsome changes not reaching statistical significance due to the small sample size (n=13). Similarly,the dynamics class exhibited positive changes in certain ESEMA factors, illustrating the potentialof PBL to shape the entrepreneurial mindset of mechanical engineering students.Problem-Based Learning (PBL)Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is an instructional method that redefines the educationalexperience by placing real-world challenges at its center [2, 3, 4]. In PBL, students actively dealwith realistic problems, promote
journey.Their experiences are influenced by learning to navigate a foreign educational system while alsonegotiating their own cultural backgrounds in the process. Existing studies have indicated thatinternational students grapple with their experiences of adjusting to a new culture, managinglanguage barriers, and challenges with feelings of belonging within their academic environments[1], [2], [3], [4]. However, there remains a notable gap in understanding how the culturalidentities of doctoral students influence their professional development experiences, such asgraduate teaching roles. As such, this collaborative reflection between the first two authors aimsto explore their teaching motivation and identity development through the lens of their
mission of enhancingthe students’ experience.IntroductionThe transition into higher education is a critical period for students and sets the foundation fortheir academic journey. Yet, many are unprepared for this transition. Drawing on currenteducation scholarship, creating engaging and supportive learning environments in which studentsfeel they belong, helps students’ transition, success, and well-being [1]. In line with Maslow’swork, humans want to give and receive love, as well as to feel a part of a community [2]. Asstudents transition to an in-residence university, seeking that belonging is natural. This can beeven more relevant for first-year students as they leave one educational institution to insertthemselves into another. By better
Approach toExploring Health Equity in Biomedical Engineering SolutionsIntroductionMotivation: Health equity entails reducing health disparities to provide all people an equally highstandard of health [1]. Biomedical Engineering (BME), with further emphasis on health equitythroughout the design process, is well-positioned to produce medical innovations that improvehealth and address inequities. Specifically, medical innovators and educators are called to includeconsideration of health care access at all stages of design [2]. As such, BME educators have begunto identify ways to integrate health equity throughout undergraduate curricula ([3], [4]). Outliningbroad integration of health disparity modules within core courses may impel programs to
), Actuation (RBE 2001), Sensing (RBE 2002), Manipulation (RBE 3001), and Navigation(RBE 3002). Each of these courses, characterized by their project-based and lab-heavy nature,demands a robust foundation in programming. This aspect of the curriculum is not merely aboutteaching programming as a skill; it is integrally woven into the fabric of the learning process,enabling students to apply these skills in real-world scenarios, thereby preparing them for thecomplex challenges of the robotics field.Understanding the significance of programming in robotics, the RBE curriculum strategicallyincorporates 1 unit, equivalent to three courses, in computer science, ensuring that students arewell-equipped with the necessary computational tools and techniques
other parts of the world. According to data fromNCES, around 100 higher education institutions in the United States offer constructionmanagement degrees [1]. To maintain the quality of education in this field, each accreditation bodyhas established several student learning outcomes (SLOs). According to the ACCE database, 72bachelor's degrees in construction management programs are accredited by their program [2].Additionally, there are 15 associate degrees and five master's degrees accredited by the ACCE asof 2022. Similarly, ABET data shows that 20 construction management degree programs in theUnited States are accredited by ABET at various levels [3].The CM curricula in most U.S. universities adopt pedagogical approaches with lectures, labs
bedestructive if only because it encourages understanding writing as afterthought rather than place-of-thought” (Irish, 83). This risk may be intensified by a technology that so easily obfuscates thelabor involved in writing.1 While I refer to the concept of engineering “disciplines,” I am also aware of the contingent and dialogical nature ofthis intellectual space as one that is in flux through the dialogical relationships between its practitioners over time.See Prior and Hengst (2010) for a full discussion of disciplinarity as a dialogic and contingent activity that escapesneo-Platonic concepts of the ideal. Considering these tensions that constitute a discipline may well become salient asGenAI pushes the boundaries of convention in education and
, 2024 Quantifying Spatial Skills Across STEM Disciplines: A Systematized Literature Review of Assessment ToolsIntroductionSpatial ability has been broadly defined as an individual’s ability to mentally transform,manipulate, and generate well-structured visual information [1], [2]. Numerous applications ofspatial ability exist in a variety of settings. Although many constructs of spatial ability have beenidentified in the literature, researchers have not agreed upon a set list of defining constructs [3].Constructs of spatial thinking that are commonly discussed in the literature include mentalrotation, spatial visualization, and spatial orientation. This paper refers to spatial ability as aquantification of performance on
hold an MA in history and an MA in education, they are obtaining an EdD from Hamline University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Recentering the User: How an Inclusive Design Class Pushes Students to See Beyond Their Own Experiences Allison K. Murray, Lisa A. Chase Opus College of Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USAAbstractThe purpose of this ECSJ-DEED joint technical session practice paper is to disseminate thesuccesses and challenges of implementing an inclusive design mechanical engineering elective.Grounded in a human centered design framework, the inclusive engineering design coursefocused on (1) the value of a
general higher education in the country. Compared with developedcountries, the number of engineering graduates in China is also dozens of times higher. However,the so-called "strong" not only means an advantage in quantity, but also requires an increase invalue [1]. China's engineering ethics education started relatively later. The "Engineering EthicsResearch" conducted by Southwest Jiaotong University in 1998 represented the first attentionpaid by Chinese universities to engineering ethics, and the research results were ultimatelytransformed into China's first engineering ethics characteristic textbook. The official birth markcan be traced back to 2000, when various universities established elective courses. In 2007,Zhejiang University, a
thisperiod of AI-assisted learning, traditional in-class assessments are conducted, wherein studentsare required to apply the concepts they have learned without the aid of the internet, AI tools, orany form of assisted technology. This approach not only encourages active engagement with thematerial during the learning phase but also ensures that students possess a genuine, unaidedunderstanding of the subject matter. An example problem in signal processing course for filterdesign is shown in Fig.1. The students can ask any design based problem questions and learnfrom the generated solutions on how to design a filter, as part of a homework assignment. Then,the students would be assessed in class on filter design, in the form of a quiz or a test
theories of situated learning [1]and socialization into professional communities [2] to ask what and how students learn during anNSF-funded Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) summer program in materialsscience and engineering. REU program evaluation data can offer valuable insights into student learning, but thesedata are rarely analyzed with regards to research questions. Typically, they are used for theevaluation and then discarded. This is a missed opportunity. The NSF requires REU programs toevaluate how well they achieve their goals [3]. As the evaluators for a three-year REU site at amedium-sized public research university in the United States, we pushed the boundaries oftraditional program evaluation to generate data that