Optimal Capstone Design Experience,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 1, p. 19, 1999. 10. Aristotle. Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Trans. George A. Kennedy. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. 11. Bizzell, P. and Herzberg, B., The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present. Boston: Bedford Books, 1990. 12. Bakhtin, M., Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. U of Texas P., 1986. 13. Toulmin, S., Uses of Argument, Cambridge, 1958. 14. Austin, J.L., "Performative Utterances." Philosophical Papers Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 233, 1979. 15. Fish, S., "How to Do Things with Austin and Searle: Speech Act Theory and Literary Criticism." Is There a Text in this Class
Outlook 2002,” Department of Energy Report, 2002. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/15. “Statistical Review of World Energy” British Petroleum, 2002. http://www.bp.com/home.do16. “World Energy Outlook 2002,” International Energy Agency Report, 2002. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/weo/pubs/weo2002/weo2002.asp17. Markvart, T., “Solar Electricity,” John Wiley & Sons, 2000.18. Manwell, J., McGowan, J., and Rogers, A., “Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Applications,” John Wiley & Sons, 2002.19. S. Appanaboyina, R. Sreenivasa and K. Aung, “Development of Web-Based Tools for Energy Engineering,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Meeting & Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, 2003.20
proceeding ofplanning and design. This paper explores the dilemma of education in participatory designand reveals the contradiction between marketplace values and community values in practice.Also, this paper utilizes the production possibility curve and the choice theory of demand sideto analyze the concept, value judgment, decision-making, and constraints of planning/designbehavior.IntroductionThe ideal of advocacy planning first proposed by Davidoff in the mid 1960’s. Theprofessional planners and designers who support this view vow to make planning for theneeds of the disadvantaged groups and persons their top priority. They jointly opposedurban redevelopment policy propelled by bulldozers, and advocated the development ofparticipatory planning
Session 2586 NASA’s Education and Research Opportunities for Students and Faculty Jianping Yue Essex County CollegeAbstractOne of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)’s missions is “to inspire thenext generation of explorers.” For nearly half a century, NASA has not only made extraordinaryachievements in space exploration and technology advancement, but also developed manyeducation and research programs to inspire young Americans from grades K-12 to collegeundergraduate and graduate students, especially
tools.Bibliography1. Ball, W. W. R. and Coxeter, H. S. M. Mathematical Recreations and Essays, 13th Ed. New York: Dover,pp. 36-38, 1987.2. Bogomolny, A. "The Game of Nim." http://www.cut-the-knot.org/nim_st.shtml.3. Buton, C. L. "Nim, A Game with a Complete Mathematical Theory." Ann. Math. Princeton 3, 35-39,1901-1902.4. Gardner, M. "Mathematical Games: Concerning the Game of Nim and Its Mathematical Analysis."Scientific American 198, 104-111, Feb. 1958.5. Gardner, M. "Nim and Hackenbush." Ch. 14 in Wheels, Life, and other Mathematical Amusements. NewYork: W. H. Freeman, pp. 142-151, 1983.6. Hardy, G. H. and Wright, E. M. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 5th ed. Oxford, England:Oxford University Press, pp. 117-120, 1990.7. Kraitchik, M. "Nim
others and a big-picture understanding of the broader implications their actions mayhave, and lifelong learning, through an increased awareness of the world outside the immediatecontext of the engineering field and an ability to make meaningful connections among the chaosof detail.Bibliography1. S. Manuel-Dupont, “Writing-Across-the-Curriculum in an Engineering Program,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 19962. K. A. Field, “When Good Engineers Are Bad Writers,” Design News, October 20, 2003.3. S. McLoed and E. Maimon, “Clearing the Air: WAC myths and realities,” College English, May 2000.4. J. Morello, “Comparing Speaking Across the Curriculum and Writing Across the Curriculum Programs,” Communication Education, January
digital modes, radio teletype(RTTY) using electromechanical teletypes, began in the late 1940’s. RTTY uses FSKwith a 1 represented by 2125 Hz and a 0 by 2295 Hz. Data is sent at a rate of 45 baud or60 WPM using the 5-bit Baudot code. RTTY is still popular, but now using PCs ratherthan teletypes. Many of the digital modes were developed using Digital SignalProcessing (DSP) development boards that have been replaced by current fast,inexpensive PCs using sound cards. Some modes use a TNC (Terminal NodeController), basically a modem with a built-in protocol, but these also can often bereplaced by a PC with a sound card and appropriate software. Refer to the Appendix forweb sites from which software can be downloaded to support RTTY and the
are those in which the course description explicitly states that computer skills will betaught. These skills may be needed in other courses in the school’s chemical engineeringcurriculum but are not the focus of the courses. Also bear in mind that, while the departments atsome of schools might be considered cross-disciplinary (e.g., Cornell has a department ofChemical and Biomolecular Engineering), the core values of all may be considered to those ofchemical engineering. (Suggested Term) Computer Software Used Taught in Institution Courses Descriptions Comp Sci Gen Eng. Chem Eng. Cornell COM S 100
the changes: a) Moved from Assembly language to C language, b)Selected to teach Microchip PIC Microcontroller(s), c) Doubled the lecture time and labtime; have made a marked improvement in students ability to carry on with confidencethe design work in the area of Embedded System Design. This change has been reflectedthrough the number of projects completed in Senior Design. Many of these projects havesignificantly improved in sophistication and complexity. Page 9.515.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering
criteria. Afterwards, students will beasked to provide feedback on the distance labs by completing a survey. The results will befactored into our plans for the Spring 2005 semester and beyond. Over time, we expect that morecourses and programs will begin to offer distance labs via the ALTE platform.Bibliography1. Esche, S.K. & Chassapis, C. “An Internet-Based Remote Access Approach to Undergraduate Laboratory Education”, Proceedings of the 1998 Fall Regional Conference of the Middle Atlantic Section of ASEE, pp. 108-113.2. Esche, S. K. & Prasad, M. G. & Chassapis, C. “A Remotely Accessible Laboratory Approach to Undergraduate Education”, Proceedings of the 2000 Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 3220.3
. “Grad Schools Preview the Shape of Ph.D.’s to Come,” Science: New Series, Vol. 270, No. 5233 (Oct. 1995), pg. 128-133.10 Ng Kah Hwa and Jessica Ng, “From Rocket Scientists to Financial Engineers,” Engineering Science and Education Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, (February 2002), pg. 25-28.11 Rechtin, E. Systems Architecting: Creating and Building Complex Systems (New Jersey: Prentice Hall), 1991.12 Sheppard, Sheri D. and Silva, M. Kathleen, “Descriptions of Engineering: Student and Engineering Practitioner Perspectives,” Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pg. F3B-12-F3B-18.13 Speier, C., Harvey, M.G., and Palmer, J. “Virtual Management of Global Marketing Relationships,” IEEE
-manufacturing to help companies improve their processes to yieldbenefits such as reduced costs, decreased production delays and less re-work. MTECHpersonnel work closely with the Clark School’s Biotech Program featuring Master ofScience and Doctor of Philosophy degree programs in Bioengineering, as well as thenation’s first Biomolecular Engineering Graduate Certificate program.2.5. MTECH Base Programs SummaryWith nearly 20 years of experience in working with technology companies of all typesand sizes, especially startups, MTECH personnel have gained extensive knowledge of theprocesses and steps needed to start and develop successful companies. In the late 1990’s,MTECH leadership saw an opportunity to have an even greater impact through newactivities
Session 2225 Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study Larry J. McKenzie, Michael S. Trevisan, Denny C. Davis, Steven W. Beyerlein Duke Energy/Washington State University/University of IdahoAbstractABET EC 2000 Criteria 3 and 4 specifically focus on student learning objectives and associatedassessment and evaluation practices that are often integral to capstone design courses. This paperreports findings from a two-phase study conducted to better understand the nature and scope ofassessment practices within capstone design courses across engineering disciplines, and in particular,the extent to
quality of the answer. Step 4: Tutor and student collaboratively improve the quality of the answer. Step 5: Tutor assesses student’s understanding of the answer.Table 1. Five-step dialogue pattern in tutoring, Graesser, et al.2.4. Cognitive Sciences—effect of prior knowledge on new knowledgeFindings in cognitive psychology reinforce the soundness of step 4 in Graesser et al.’s dialoguepattern: collaboratively improving the quality of a student’s answer. Pellegrino, Chudowsky, &Glaser 8 report, “One major tenet of cognitive theory is that learners actively construct theirunderstanding by trying to connect new information with their prior knowledge.” Not only isknowledge constructed, it is individualized. Since each student has
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education" Electricity Consumption 2500 C o n s u m p tio n 2000 E le c tric (k W h ) 1500 1000 kWh 500 0 Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul
S.Kitchener’s Reflective Judgment (RJ) Model [30]. These models measure students’ positionsalong a hierarchical construct of stages representing increasingly more sophisticated ways of un-derstanding knowledge and solving complex, open-ended problems.Perry developed his model from clinical studies of Harvard students in the 1960’s. As he inter-viewed student groups at the end of each academic year, probing their views of their universityexperiences, he observed patterns of thinking that were hierarchical and chronological. He trans-lated these patterns into a nine-stage model of development that he validated by a second, moreextensive, longitudinal study. King and Kitchener developed the Reflective Judgment (RJ)model in the late 1970’s from their
Session 2155 Issues Driving Reform of Faculty Reward Systems to Advance Professional Graduate Engineering Education: Expectations For Core Professional Faculty D. A. Keating,1 T. G. Stanford,1 J. M. Snellenberger,2 D. H. Quick,2 I. T. Davis,3 J. P. Tidwell,4 A. L. McHenry,5 D. R. Depew,6 S. J. Tricamo,7 D. D. Dunlap 8 University of South Carolina 1/ Rolls-Royce Corporation 2 / Raytheon Missile Systems 3 The Boeing Company 4/Arizona State University East 5/ Purdue University 6 New Jersey Institute of
tests. Anincrease in the score from pretest to posttest typically represents new structural and transferknowledge. The pretest (M = 63.07, SD = 16.1) and posttest (M = 71.82, SD = 16.4) results forthe 55 participants indicate an average improvement of 8.75 points. However, this is not auniform improvement across all treatments; the average increase range from 20.5 for the conceptmap-ill-structured treatment combination to a decrease of 1.6 for the summary—well-structuredtreatment combination. Table 4 provides the summary statistics for the population values andtreatment combinations.Table 4. Summary Statistics Paired Data Posttest-Pretest Component Count Mean VarianceScaffold (S) 29
,more than most conferences. The poster section occupied all five floors of a large building and waswell attended by students, faculty, and staff. It was very beneficial in informing the KIT communityabout the Engineering Design program.The largest problem encountered in starting the program was finding faculty with the expertise,and interest, to teach 60 sections. To expose the students to a variety of ideas and different ways ofthinking, the courses were taught not only by Japanese professors, but also by foreign professorswith experience working for U. S. universities. The latter were assisted by teaching assistants whospoke both English and Japanese. Since these professors had varying backgrounds and interests, itwas apparent that standards
task outcomes will determine if the currentproject direction is still appropriate, or if alternate paths have to be followed or solutionssought. In addition, it provides a written record of who has not been completing theirtasks from week to week, and therefore not fully contributing to the project.e. Communication. The administrative leader should send an email shortly after themeeting to ALL team members and the project advisor(s)/course instructor, with thePMW attached. The email should include: 1. A list of present and absent team members. 2. A summary of the current state of the project, indicating successes, challenges and failures
build a vehicle that moves forward for a specificamount of time. By varying the time, students manually collect data and graph the distancetraveled as a function of time. Student use linear regression to determine the “best fit” equation.All experiment design, data collection and graphing is done as homework.In class, a competition is held to see who can make their vehicle get the closest to a prescribeddistance, which is not known to students before class. Students use their graph to determine howlong to turn the motor(s) on. This rather simple exercise can be used to teach interpolation,extrapolation, linear regression, repeatability, resolution, and the concept of calibration [18, 20].Figure 6 shows one of the more creative vehicles built, a
Page 9.667.12 Recording activity Documenting Progress Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright @2004, American Society for Engineering EducationREFERENCESAnderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching andassessing. New York: Longman.Beyerlein, S., Leise, C., Baehr, M., and Apple, D. (2003). Classification of Learning Skills. Lisle,IL: Pacific Crest.Bloom, B.S. (1956). (Ed.). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educationalgoals (Handbook 1: Cognitive domain). New York: McKay.Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R., & Pellegrino, J.W
with a given course.Similarly, Projects that “own” Module, Data, or Design-links will show up with the words“Modules”, “Data”, and/or “Design” on the same line. Clicking on any of these words for agiven project will make the “owned” link(s) show up, e.g., if “Modules” is clicked, Module-linksassociated with the project will appear. Clicking on the same word will make them go away.Clicking on a different word (e.g., “Data” instead of “Module”) will make the module links goaway and the data links show up. This allows a student working on a given project to quicklyfind associated resources. Similarly, Contributors designing projects that depend on the projectsof other contributors can quickly find the latest material.The Administrator can change
. Dimensioning6. Cut 30. Surface Geometry 54. Origin 78. Parametric7. Round (Fillet) 31. Skeleton 55. Pattern(s) 79. Constraint-based8. Draft 32. Modeling Standards 56. Associativity 80. Feature-based9. Shell 33. Manufacturing Proc. 57. Component 81. Threads (Cosmetic)10. Datum Plane 34. IGES 58. PDM 82. Parameter11. Datum Axis 35. Simplified Rep 59. Base Feature 83. Dimension-driven12. Parent/Child Reference 36. Customer Requirements 60. Family Table 84. Feature
combining existing concepts as well as adding novel new portions, etc. Sinceengineering capstone courses tend to be more interdisciplinary in nature and also exist today in avariety of disciplines other than engineering, a large collection of ideas can be gleaned fromvarious other disciplines. Page 9.350.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2004, American Society for Engineering EducationOnce a variety of concepts have been identified, the next step in the design process is to evaluateand select the concept/s that will best meet the
continue to engage the students and instill in them a attitude oflearning, it is paramount that the faculty do not assume that we do not need to do the same.References:[1] Adams, S., Watson, K.L., Malave, C.O. 1996. The Foundation Coalition at Texas A&M University: Utilizing TQM and OD to Manage Curricula Change. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, November 7-9, Salt Lake City, UT.[2] Al-Holou, N., Bilgutay, N.M., Corleto, C.R., Demel, J.T., Felder, R., Frair, K., Froyd, J.E., Hoit, M., Morgan, J.R., Wells, D.L. 1998. First-Year Integrated Curricula Across Engineering Education Coalitions. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference. November 4-7, Tempe, AZ.[3] Besterfield-Sacre, M., C
. Page 9.1292.13 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationReferences1. Halloun, I. and Hestenes, D., “The initial knowledge state of college physics students”, American Journal of Physics, 1985, 53 (11): pp. 1043-1055.2. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., and Swackhamer, G., “Force Concept Inventory”, The Physics Teacher, 1992, 30 (March): pp. 141-158.3. Hake, R., “Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses”, American Journal of Physics, 1998, 6 (1): pp. 64-75.4. Evans, D.L., Gray, G.L., Krause, S
of Whole Body CG (from GRF)to the electromygraphic (EMG) 4signal, its electrical origin, and Acceleration (m/s^ 2) 3its frequency characteristics. A 2spreadsheet is supplied with the 1raw EMG signals gathered in agait lab for five leg muscles: 0 2 2 .5 3gluteus maximus, medial
convincing I try to play around with ideas of my own related to what I am learning in this course I try to relate ideas in this subject to those in other courses whenever possible Whenever I read or hear an assertion or conclusion in this class, I think about possible alternatives I try to apply ideas from course readings in other class activities such as lecture and discussionBibliography[1] Berardi-Coletta, B., Dominowski, R. L., Buyer, L. S., & Rellinger, E. R. (1995). Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 205-223.[2] Borkowski, J. G., Carr, M., Rellinger, E., & Pressley, M. (1990). Self
, M. (2000). Models of Teaching (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.2. Kanter, D. E., Smith, H. D., MeKenna, A., Rieger, C., & Linsenmeier, R. A., “Inquiry-based LaboratoryInstruction Throws Out the “Cookbook” and Improves Learning,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Session 2230, 2003.3. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom.Edina: Interaction Book Company.4. Bean, J. C. (1996). Engaging Ideas. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.5. Hesketh, R. P., Farrell, S., & Slater, C. S., “An Inductive Approach to Teaching Courses in Engineering,”Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering