. In fact, many of the ideas presented by theassociation are extracurricular in nature, which has been found to be ineffective for reachingengineering graduate students, according to meta-synthesis [1]. While librarians are oftenspecialized in the areas engineering graduate students lack and seek personal mentorship in, theyare often stuck in providing that support by ineffective means. The typical engineering curriculum does not have courses on research methods, few havecourses on research integrity or publication ethics, proposing research, writing, peer reviewing,or how your worldview influences your research [4, 5]. Published engineering literature, in fact,often leaves many of these important aspects of research as assumed [5
learned.IntroductionModern industrial processes are not just mechanical or electrical. Instead, any equipment used inindustry nowadays is an electromechanical device with advanced controls. Mechatronics is anvital basis for the anticipated evolution in automation and manufacturing. There is a substantialneed for undergraduate and graduate education in Mechatronics as the approach of engineeringprograms has altered providing stronger connection of the curriculum with skills needed inindustry. Mechatronics degrees are very common in Japan and Europe but just started gainingmomentum in the United States. In 2019, Department of Applied Computing (AC) in the Collegeof Computing at Michigan Tech pioneered Master of Science (MS) degree in mechatronics thatallows pathways
, back to 1879 theAmerican philosopher and educator Jhon Dewey mentioned that The teacher is not in the schoolto impose certain ideas or to form certain habits in the child, but is there as a member of thecommunity to select the influences which shall affect the child and assist him in properlyresponding to these influences [13]. This concept comes in agreement of what colleges anduniversities implement in their curriculum, where the professor/teacher select certain projects thatwill have an influence on the students alongside employing the PBL techniques to achieve the bestresults.1.3.3 Social Constructivism: As students from different engineering disciplines collectively address multifacetedproblems, they initiate social interactions
, 22–261.Uziak, J. (2016). A project-based learning approach in an engineering curriculum. 18, 119–123.Wu, T.-T., & Wu, Y.-T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631Zhou, C. (2012). Integrating creativity training into Problem and Project-Based Learning curriculum in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(5), 488–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.714357
10 1.88 4 10 reliable than the breadboard. The custom PCBA better prepared me for real- 11 7.23 8 10 2.74 2 10 world applications than the breadboard. I would prefer to use the custom PCBA board 12 8 8 10 2.16 4 10 in future lab exercises over the breadboard.In conclusion, the survey data supports the hypothesis that the integration of custom PCBs intothe electrical engineering curriculum enhances the learning environment by streamlining thepractical application of theoretical concepts. The findings suggest that students benefit from theuse of
mitigate the injustice issue.As a result, integrating environmental justice themes into environmental engineering courses hasbecome more prevalent in university programs over the years [3-5], which has helped shift thecurriculum toward a justice-minded framework for the discipline. Even in chemical education,the incorporation of environmental justice themes in chemistry courses has increased and manyarticles describing its inclusion in the curriculum can be found in the chemical educationliterature [6-14]. It is worth noting that environmental justice is an integral part of social justice.Although the two are interconnected and overlap in their impact on marginalized communities,social justice encompasses fair and equal social and economic
forefront of this transformation. STEM students,as future innovators and leaders, need to be well-equipped with knowledge and skills in thisdomain. However, the key to effective learning lies in inclusivity and hands-on experience. Thispaper aims to elucidate strategies for integrating inclusive experiential learning with sustainablerobotic agriculture in STEM education.The student participants from science and engineering explored the potential benefits andchallenges of technologies such as Farmbots (an open-source farming technology that combinesrobotics, automation, and software to facilitate precision farming in small-scale agriculturalsettings) while considering the equitable distribution of resources, the three P’s (People, Planet,and Profit
degree-seeking years [13], to the inseparable impact of the state of the world onto the state of theclassroom (especially students who do not fit the tradition and dominant paradigm of white andmale-presenting) [14]. Microaggressions have been revealed to have an intense net-negativeeffect on people from marginalized communities working and studying in academic spacesperpetuated by systemic social structures that reinforce white-body supremacy [15]. Work tocounter legacy or traditional pedagogical practices where technical course topics are siloed fromhumanitarian efforts include the sociotechnical integration of human-centered design withengineering coursework [16], and discursive “micro-insertions” of ethics into technical coursesfor a
. Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida Kent Crippen is a professor of STEM education in the school of teaching and learning at the University of Florida and a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Towards A Survey Instrument For Use In Proactive Advising This paper focuses on developing a survey instrument to support proactive advisingstrategies based on data analysis. Proactive advising strategies aim to identify at-risk studentsearly, as these students often delay seeking support, and engage them effectively in the supportprocess[1]. An advising curriculum can be created to provide structure for the
integrals, parametric equations and polar coordinates, andinfinite sequences and series. The author taught both linear systems courses in addition tofollow-on control courses before and after these pre-requisite changes were implemented andwas successful in transitioning learning achievement to the new pre-requisite scenario.Both courses are gateway, required courses for the BSEE, often are first courses in the major thatchallenge students theoretically, and either or both may become a barrier to success; as such,they have higher rates of students earning a D or an F or withdrawing from the class with a W(i.e., DFW rates). Many required courses and technical electives in the junior and senior yearsdictate proficiency in foundational linear systems
industrial safety. In some cases, castingsimulation software is presented or demonstrated but the technology is not central to thepedagogy in introduction to Metal Casting. The casting simulation technology is often reservedfor more advanced courses involving solidification, risering and gating design.2 Metal castingprofessionals have always encouraged a hands-on portion to an introductory Metal Castingcourse as being important. The authors of this paper support this idea and encourage a metalcasting curriculum offering both theory and practice where conceivable for a properunderstanding of the subject.In 2020, the COVID-19 outbreak presented society with unprecedented challenges andoperational disruptions. Moreover, industry and academia have been
improve the retentionof all undergraduate students.Several changes were made to improve retention, both in terms of retaining students inengineering and, failing that, at least retaining them as students at the college. These include theimplementation of a math placement exam, a modification of the engineering curriculum basedon best practices used at other engineering programs for improving retention, and the intentionalgrouping of first-year engineering students in a college success course that was led by anEngineering faculty member and a peer mentor who was a returning engineering student.All of these engineering-focused efforts were coupled with college-wide efforts at improvingretention which included an increase in staffing for the
Paper ID #45011Building Interdisciplinarity in Engineering Doctoral Education: Insightsfrom DTAIS Summer IncubatorDr. Erica Cusi Wortham, GW Engineering Erica Cusi Wortham is a cultural anthropologist with an interdisciplinary practice at George Washington University that spans social science, art design and engineering. As Director of the GW Engineering’s Innovation Center | M06, she makes space for studio-based, tactile learning, community-driven innovation that centers creative problem-solving, equity and sustainability, and brings an ethnographic perspective to various AI initiatives at the school.Prof. Zoe
participants' baseline knowledge provides contextnecessary to support scaffolded learning. This study compares pre-intervention and post-intervention knowledge to assess theeducational module’s direct impact, excluding prior knowledge and extraneous influences. Such abefore-and-after comparison is crucial for determining effectiveness in improving learningoutcomes. Additionally, our research includes a retention assessment to evaluate the intervention'slong-term effects on knowledge sustainability and its enduring impact on participants. Thisanalysis provides insights into the lasting benefits and applicability of an educational intervention. One of the tools used in assessing learning and knowledge integration are mental modelsor mind
aspects while mitigating any drawbacks will be pivotal in harnessing the fullpotential of ChatGPT as a transformative tool in higher education.3. Exploring Solutions to Teaching Challenges ChatGPT can be integrated into education as a valuable support tool, contributing to variousfacets such as curriculum design, teaching practices, educational assessment, and the organizationof teaching materials. However, the efficacy of ChatGPT in education is contingent on thejudicious utilization and skills of both instructors and learners. Numerous studies underscore anotable concern regarding the accuracy and credibility of information generated by ChatGPT [14],potentially impinging on its effectiveness in an educational context. Consequently, there is
enhancingteamwork skills among STEM students, underscoring the importance of behavioral theory ineducational strategy development.IntroductionTeamwork in STEM education holds paramount significance as it mirrors the collaborativenature of modern professional workplaces. STEM field involves solving complex problems thatrequire multidisciplinary approaches with effective teamwork [1]. This necessity is reflected inthe curriculum of STEM education, which frequently incorporates project work and groupassignments to simulate real-world challenges. These educational strategies are not just aboutteaching technical skills; they are also about fostering an environment where students learn tocollaborate effectively, share ideas, negotiate solutions, and manage group
B.S. degree from Cal Poly Humboldt was in EnvironmentalResource Engineering with a minor in Native American studies of Culture and Community. Currently Iam finishing a Master's in Engineering and Community practices from the same institution. My passionand focus lies around collaborating and supporting communities' capacity towards energy autonomy,climate resilience, and health and habitat restoration.Our positionalities and who we are is an integral part of this work as the purpose of this WIP paper is toexplore centering Indigenous knowledge and ways of being in a collaborative autoethnographic researchproject. This mirrors the spirit of the program which is among the first of its kind in the United States asan Indigenous-centered graduate
various authors, some of the competencies that a training program must haveare research, management, innovation in engineering pedagogy, time management,effective interaction, improvement of learning interactivity, systems analysis in education,psychology and pedagogical communication, interaction with interested parties, sustainabledevelopment, digital education, problem-based, project-based, and practice-orientedlearning, assessment of learning outcomes, course design, engineering innovationprocesses, and lifelong learning [4], [17].The IGIP Annual Symposium contributes to integration processes in professional trainingand promotes academic mobility. Engineering pedagogy centers are accredited according tointernational IGIP standards. An
Development Studies, Emily utilizes participatory approaches to increase engineering awareness and community agency throughout the design process. Emily integrates feminist and anti-racist methodologies into the classroom as well, finding new ways to engage students’ whole selves into engineering work.Dr. Samantha Lindgren, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Samantha Lindgren is an Assistant Professor of Sustainability Education in the College of Education at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She is affiliated faculty in the Grainger College of Engineering in Agricultural and Biological Engineering and the Technology Entrepreneurship Center, and the Women and Gender in Global Perspectives program.Dr
. Not only do these practices help to support a strong foundation for educational action research studies, they also serve as a foundation for an educational culture within which transformative learning can occur. 2. Experiential design courses should be used to teach integrated skills, and also these courses should be extended throughout the curriculum in a way that allows for maximum scaffolding, possibly beginning as early as the freshman year in some form. 3. More broadly, experiential opportunities should be developed that complement engineering programs and empower students to build integrated practical and professional/interpersonal skills, to participate in an inclusive, supportive engineering
enterprise, and the model outlines how digital technologiescan be applied at each level to enhance efficiency and effectiveness [7]. From an epistemological perspective, the Purdue Model embodies a systems thinkingapproach. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of different components within an enterprise andthe need for holistic solutions that consider the entire system. This approach is aligned withconstructivist theories, which posit that knowledge is constructed through the interaction ofvarious elements within a context. In the case of digital transformation, this means understandinghow different technologies interact and how they can integrate, achieving desired outcomes [3]. The Purdue Model's hierarchical structure supports a
Tissue Engineeringcourse. Our guiding research questions are:(1) How did learners' perceptions of VR labs vary across lab types?(2) To what extent did the perceived utility value and tool efficacy of the VR lab modulespredict learners’ perceived satisfaction with the learning experience across different labtypes?Study Course ContextThe Tissue Engineering course where these labs were integrated is an elective course offeredfor students in Biological and Biochemical Engineering degree programs. The goal of thecourse is to provide a foundational understanding of the areas of science and engineeringinvolved in the design and development of replacement tissues and organs for the body. Thecourse, although primarily taken by undergraduates in the
Paper ID #41826Work in Progress: Transformation Course-Based Undergraduate ResearchExperience (T-CURE)Dr. Heather Dillon, University of Washington Dr. Heather Dillon is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington Tacoma. Her research team is working on energy efficiency, renewable energy, fundamental heat transfer, and engineering education.EC Cline, University of Washington Tacoma Associate Professor in Sciences and Mathematics, and Director of ACCESS in STEM, an NSF S-STEM supported program that supports students in natural science, mathematics, and engineering at UW Tacoma.Dr. Emese
significant number of students fail to maintain crucial mathematical skills,impacting their success in physics. Notably, concerns have arisen from engineering majors whoexpress displeasure in being required to take math classes as part of the engineering curriculum.While math and engineering professors may find this objectionable, it is a reasonable concern,given that mathematics is often taught as an abstract discipline, and students need to grasp itsrelevance to their future roles as engineers.To address this issue, we have initiated the development of an Integrated Curriculum, startingwith two pairs of courses: MATH 140 (Calculus with Analytic Geometry I) paired with PHYS211 (General Physics: Mechanics), and PHYS 212 (General Physics: Electricity
leadership aligns withtraditional, vertical leadership (one leader at the top of an organization), they are less likely toself-identify as a leader or to identify their colleagues as leaders [5]. Furthermore, manyengineering faculty do not feel prepared to teach leadership to engineering students [6]. Yet,Knight & Novoselich [7] found that students believed leadership education more impactful whenit was taught within required curriculum, leaving broad opportunity for integrating leadershipdevelopment concepts into the required courses taken by engineering students. Plus, leadership isbest taught in context, such as in a group setting where the group shares a set of goals [7]. Designcourses provide a prime opportunity for students to integrate
experience varies across majors,the one feature that is consistent across all capstone offerings is the emphasis on a team-basedapproach that mimics the industry work environment. While the intent of these capstone coursesis to provide students with a means of applying and integrating core concepts within theirdiscipline to a complex problem, the importance of using these courses as a “training ground” forintroducing, practicing, and refining team-centric, professional skills that will be critical forstudents’ future career success can not be understated. In fact, the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) specifically identifies the need to emphasize these “soft”skills within the engineering curriculum as part of its Criterion 3.3
Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech, focuses on advancing written, visual, and verbal communication skills. Her research centers on affect theory and its application to technical communication, specifically information design. Jill studies how to enhance the effectiveness of pedagogical documents by incorporating principles from affect theory. Through her work, she aims to empower students, fostering an environment where they actively shape their communication interactions, including teamwork and ethical discussions. By integrating these principles, she goes beyond traditional methods, ensuring that students not only learn but also take an active role in shaping their communication experiences.Christian Sims, Georgia
Paper ID #43999Research on Engineering Ethics Education in China’s Science and EngineeringUniversitiesDr. Huiming Fan, East China University of Science and Technology I am an associate professor from the Institute of Higher Education, East China University of Science and Technology. I got a Ph.D. degree from Zhejiang University in 2014. My research interest includes: engineering eduction research, university-industry collaboration.Xinru Li ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Research on Engineering Ethics Education in China’s Science and Engineering
academically [1], [2]; academic environments can significantly affect students’ sense ofbelonging more broadly [3], [4]. In the past decade, makerspaces have emerged as a criticalspace for informal learning on college campuses, fostering creativity and curiosity inundergraduate students through hands-on projects and activities. The Learning Factory at ThePennsylvania State University has been an active makerspace for students and the communitysince 1995. While the space started as a 3,500 sf building ([5], [6]), it has recently grown to over40,000 sf integrated into the new 105,000 sf Engineering Design and Innovation Building, wheremost cornerstone and capstone courses are taught. These courses have always incorporatedmaking into the curriculum, but
], [12]. Walther et al. [2] presented a model of empathy in theengineering context with three core dimensions of empathy as a skill, practice orientation, and“professional way of being”. In professional engineering contexts empathy and other related softskills are necessary for productive teamwork, communication to funders and investors, beingprofessionally ethical, and generally meeting the requirements for being a licenced professionalengineer [13], [14], [15].A need to build and integrate empathy in a professional context is not unique to engineering,many professions foster and embed empathy instruction within the curriculum, such as socialwork [16], nursing [17], teaching [18], where processes are relatively well established at thecurricular