developed for the program support ESP’s goals to: 1) create a diverse andwelcoming STEM climate on the FCC campus through events and media that encourage broaderparticipation, 2) increase participation in engineering among economically disadvantaged studentsthrough targeted outreach and recruitment, 3) increase persistence of engineering students alongdiscipline specific pathways to transfer and graduation from four-year universities through a seriesof structured support interventions, and, 4) establish on-going collaborative transfer supportprocesses between the FCC engineering program and CSU-F.With these goals in mind, ESP’s success is evaluated based on achieving the following objectives: 1. Increase engineering degree and/or certificate
–findings. In addition, weunderstand that the path to becoming an anti-racist and socially just researcher is not completelylinear; it is complex and nuanced as students challenge their ways of knowing. Regardless ofwhat the path looks like, or how circuitous it is, our goal remains to provide graduate studentswith the skills to become socially just engineering researchers. This paper outlines the process ofcreating a course for graduate students that helps prepare them for engineering research withequity and justice in mind. By outlining the course development, structural components, and theinitial findings from the first offering of the course within our 3-year longitudinal study, we hopeto provide other engineering departments with encouragement
Paper ID #37187Rapid Change to Refined Teaching: Lessons Learned and Lasting Impactsthe COVID-19 Pandemic Had on How We Teach EngineeringMs. Boni Frances Yraguen, Georgia Institute of Technology Boni Yraguen is a PhD student at Georgia Tech. Her dissertation work is in the field of combus- tion/thermo./fluids. She studies a novel diesel injection strategy: Ducted Fuel Injection (DFI), which is used to drastically decrease soot emissions during diesel combustion. In addition to her thesis work, Boni is passionate about engineering education. She has led and participated in various educational stud- ies on the impact of
engineering by assembling metal parts andmotors, and no SW programing. These toolkits were designed and supervised by SITprofessors, and produced by group company SI Tech, Co., Ltd.Figure 5-1: Toolkits before assembly Figure 5-2: Assembled 6 legs boxer robot Its pedagogical philosophy was started initially to nurture engineering mind from childhoodas grass root education. In addition, it is enhanced as societal collaboration and lifelonglearning. Thus, this series is organized with following 4 levels. ・ Primary/secondary level: “Boys & Girls Robot Workshop” which consists of parts assembly, design, and competition ・ Highschool level: Line tracing robot seminar, including basic programming and control ・ Undergraduate/postgraduate level
Paper ID #40008Return to the Teaching Trenches — Lessons Learned, and Lessons RelearnedDr. Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University Christine Masters is the Assistant Dean for Academic Support and Global Programs and a Teaching Professor in the Engineering Science and Mechanics Department at the Pennsylvania State University. In between raising 4 great kids with her husband of 35 years, she taught large enrollment statics and strength of materials courses for 12 years and has been leading the efforts focused on support, global engagement, and academic integrity as Assistant Dean since 2014.Dr. Ibukun Samuel
concise, simple, and easy-to-use aids for helpingengineering students improve their engineering laboratory report writing skills,specifically preparing and presenting the results of engineering experiments. Thecollection of modules was designed and structured with scaffolding in mind. Earlyconcepts in writing lab reports are covered in the fundamental section for students new tolab report writing. More experienced students might skip these sections and be directed totopics in the intermediate or advanced sections. Module content could be used for just-in-time instruction when student questions or early performance indicates the need, or amodule could be incorporated as a whole lesson with progressive instruction in lab reportconduct and writing
emphasized inentrepreneurial programs [2].Entrepreneurially-minded learning (EML) is an emergent pedagogy that emphasizes discovery,opportunity identification, and value creation. As a teaching method, it can be applied to all areasof study and has been developed by hundreds of faculty members at colleges and universitiesacross the country [3], [4]. EML can also be infused to specific fields of engineering at any levelfrom freshmen to capstone courses [5], [6]. EML relies on real-world experiences; opportunitiesto practice information literacy–accessing, analyzing, and synthesizing information; expert-to-novice mentoring in the learning process [7]; and value sensitive design which results in universalvalue creation [8]. Undergraduate research (UGR
Paper ID #38233Work in Progress: Recommendations for Early Career Faculty to Engage inInterdisciplinary STEAM CollaborationsDr. Renee M. Desing, Oregon State University Dr. Renee Desing is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University in the School of Civil and Construc- tion Engineering. Her research interests include diversity, equity, inclusion in the engineering classrooms and workplaces. Dr. Desing graduated from Ohio State with her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, and also holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
by this grant, a comprehensive program to develop an entrepreneurial mindset in all engineering and computer science undergraduate students in the Tagliatela College of En- gineering was implemented. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Statistical Validation of Growth in the Entrepreneurial Mindset of Students Resulting from Four Years of InterventionsIntroduction Integrating entrepreneurship elements into the college classroom and beyond is gainingmomentum across higher education institutions in the U.S. Engineering faculty are adoptingEntrepreneurial Minded Learning (EML) to help students develop entrepreneurial skills. A widerange of approaches are used including
Paper ID #38464Tips for Creating a Functional Personal Knowledge Management System inAcademiaDr. Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Rebecca M. Reck is a Teaching Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign. Her research includes alternative grading, entrepreneurial mindset, instructional laboratories, and equity-focused teaching. She teaches biomedical instrumentation, signal processing, and control systems. She earned a Ph.D. in Systems Engineering from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State
Paper ID #40086Introducing Entrepreneurship in Manufacturing courses: A Hands-onProject approachDr. Anu Osta, Rowan University Dr Anu Osta is a Senior Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering Department at Rowan University. His teaching interests are Mechanics, Materials and Manufacturing and Design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Introducing Entrepreneurship in Manufacturing courses: A Hands-on Project approachIntroductionOne of the driving purpose of entrepreneurship education is to enable the student community tobe able to convert the idea in their minds into a thriving, growing
Paper ID #38758Learning from an Omnidirectional Mentorship Program: Identifying Themesand Outcomes through a Qualitative LensMatthew Lewis CaulfieldDr. Daniel Ivan Castaneda, James Madison University Daniel I. Castaneda is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison Univer- sity. Daniel earned his PhD in 2016 and his Master’s in 2010, both in civil engineering from the Univer- sity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He previously earned his Bachelor’s in 2008 from the University of California, Berkeley. His course development includes civil engineering materials, dynamics, engineering design
Paper ID #36969Create Multi-Part Problems with Random Parameterization on Blackboardand Canvas Similar to ”Mastering” and ”Connect”Dr. Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University Yanjun Yan is an Associate Professor in Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University. Her research interests include engineering education, swarm robotics, statistical signal processing, and swarm intelligence. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Create Multi-Part Problems with Random Parameterization on Blackboard and Canvas Similar to “Mastering” and “Connect”AbstractIn active learning
such as MATLAB and ANSYS in engineering classrooms. In Spring 2022, Soheil joined Colorado State University as an assistant professor of practice in the department of Mechan- ical Engineering. His research is currently focused on the long-term retention of knowledge and skills in engineering education, design theory and philosophy, and computational mechanics.Dr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her engineering education research interests include entrepreneurially minded learning, energy education, interdisciplinary education, and faculty professional development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
Paper ID #37711Preliminary Results from a Work in Progress Assessing StudentPerceptions of the Benefits of Continuing HyFlex Course Format Beyondthe COVID-19 PandemicDr. Nicole Becklinger, University of Southern Indiana ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Preliminary Results from a Work in Progress Assessing Student Perceptions of the Benefits of Continuing HyFlex Course Format Beyond the COVID-19 PandemicAbstractBackground: The COVID-19 pandemic required instructors to quickly alter course formats,with many adopting synchronous online, asynchronous online, or hybrid and HyFlex teachingmodels. As the pandemic abates, it
engineering degrees should be interdisciplinary andmultidisciplinary. Skills related to new technologies, digitalization, and soft skills areessential. Engineering has been stereotyped as weak in soft skills (interpersonal skills,communication), so there should be a change in the tunnel mind of "what I do" tounderstanding what others do and how they relate.Therefore, everyone must understand and participate in how things and technology areevolving in the upcoming workforce. Work in teams and engage with colleagues in thetransition. Still should be resolved challenges among academia, industry, government, andaccreditation bodies. For example, there are ideas that industry and academia are far awayand disconnected when both spaces allow for new
Paper ID #40462Resources and Exercises for STEM Educators and Students Navigating the”Misinformation Age”Ms. Alexis P. Nordin, Mississippi State University Alexis is currently an instructor in the Shackouls Technical Communication Program in Mississippi State University’s James Worth Bagley College of Engineering. She has taught technical writing and various other writing- and communication-based courses at MSU since 2004. She holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in English from Mississippi State University and Louisiana State University and is certified as a Teacher of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL).Mr
engineering habits of mind,and comparisons between science, math, and engineering. Yet both workshops could not beidentical, due to the unique needs of each audience.The paper includes a description of the content of both workshops, observations of theparticipants as they engaged in engineering design challenges, and evaluation results of eachworkshop. Also included is a discussion of the realities of providing professional development asthe K-12 outreach and engagement team at The Engineering Place @ NC State UniversityCollege of Engineering versus the theoretical optimum approach and how to deal with theconstraints of working with fund- and time-limited groups of professionals.IntroductionOur mission at The Engineering Place, a K-12 Engineering
those involved when choosing to return toparticipants for further consent. The research design of the SDA project was presented at theAmerican Indian Science and Engineering Society (AISES) National Conference [2]. Theimportance of positionality of the researchers is further explored in [3].Lessons from the Mini-ProjectsOverall, three significant results have emerged from the work to date: 1. Ethical considerationsNeither original research study was designed with SDA in mind, leading to extendednegotiations with university review boards. Ideally, researchers could plan for SDA prior to datacollection, first carefully considering whether the planned data could and should be available forSDA and, then, as appropriate, defining the project scope
Paper ID #38945Working Adult Students’ Perceptions of Flipped Classroom Videos in anUndergraduate Physics CourseMr. Rodrigo Alonso Vergara, Universidad Andres Bello, Chile Rodrigo Vergara is an electronic engineer who has dedicated his professional life to teaching physics and electronics at the university level in various institutions. He has two master’s degrees, one in electronic engineering and the other in university teaching. He has a particular interest in using and applying new technologies for education.Prof. Genaro Zavala, Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey, Mexico; Universidad Andres Bello, Chile Genaro Zavala is the
Paper ID #38440A New Normal: Pedagogical Implications for Physics and STEM Teachingand Learning in the Post-Pandemic EraDr. Teresa L. Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Director and Faculty Liaison to the Combined Plan Dual-degree Engineering Program at American University. Dr. Larkin conducts educational research and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learning in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work with student writing as a learning and assessment tool in her introductory physics courses for non
], [20]. With this background in mind, this study analyzedhow graduate-level engineering students used metaphor to write for both a specialist and a non-specialist audience. The main research questions were: 1. How do students use metaphor in their journal articles and in their scientific magazine articles? 2. What are the similarities and differences in metaphor use across the two genres?2. Methodology2.1 ParticipantsThe 14 students in this study were taking an interdisciplinary, semester-long, graduate-levelwriting and communication course in an engineering school. The most common major wasChemical and Biomolecular Engineering (8 students) followed by Mechanical Engineering (2students). The remaining four students were studying Earth
education 35, 3: 261–272.21. Anita Krishnamurthi, Ron Ottinger, and Tessie Topol. 2013. STEM learning in afterschool and summer programming: An essential strategy for STEM education reform. Expanding Minds and Opportunities. p.: 31.22. Adam V. Maltese and Robert H. Tai. 2010. Eyeballs in the Fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International journal of science education 32, 5: 669–685.23. Lee Martin. 2015. The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of pre- college engineering education research 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.109924. Martin W. Moakler Jr and Mikyong Minsun Kim. 2014. College major choice in STEM: Revisiting confidence and demographic factors. The Career development
Paper ID #37048Success Framework for a STEAM x S-L PartnershipDr. Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University Dr. Kathryn Schulte Grahame is a Teaching Professor at Northeastern University and the Associate Direc- tor of the First-Year Engineering Team at Northeastern University. The focus of this team is on providing a consistent, comprehensive, and constructive educational experience that endorses the student-centered, professional and practice-oriented mission of Northeastern University. She teaches the Cornerstone of En- gineering courses to first-year students as well as courses within the Civil and Environmental
Paper ID #38901and inclusion of identities, histories, experiences and perspectives historically underrepresented in STEMfields.As an equity-minded strategist, Yazmin is passionate about developing evidence-based programming thatdelivers authentic and sustainable change. Her approach focuses on coalition-building and mentorship.Trained as a mixed methods researcher, she holds a M.A. and B.A. in Latin American Studies from UCLA. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Student-led Program to Improve Equity in PhD Oral Qualifying ExamsAbstractIn this paper, we present a student-developed and led program implemented in our graduatedepartment to help students begin
Paper ID #37816Centering K-8 CS Teachers’ Experiences During a Day of Dialogue forTeachers and Researchers (RTP)Dr. Adrienne Decker, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Adrienne Decker is a faculty member in the newly formed Department of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo. She has been studying computing education and teaching for over 15 years, and is interested in broadening participation, evaluating tDr. Monica McGill, CSEdResearch.org Monica McGill is Founder & CEO of CSEdResearch.org. Her area of scholarship is computer science education research with a current focus on diversity
Assistant Professor of Engineering at Cal State East Bay. I received my doctorate in Architectural Engineering at Penn State with a minor in Educational Psychology. I am strongly focused on my teaching and research. In my teaching, I strive to provide an engaging and active learning experience to my students, by applying innovative technology and researched pedagogi- cal interventions. I translate this passion for pedagogy in my research by evaluating the intersection of innovative technology and learning.Tiffany A. Mathews, Pennsylvania State University Tiffany A. Mathews is the Director of the Office of Science Engagement in the Eberly College of Science at Penn State. Her focus is helping undergraduate find research
Paper ID #36922Graywater Flow: Generating Sustainable EnergyProf. Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University Bala Maheswaran, PhD Northeastern University 367 Snell Engineering Center Boston, MA 02115Sophie RayMatthew RockDilyn McHughKyle PottsDavid Ian Hunter ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Graywater Flow: Generating Sustainable Energy Bala Maheswaran, Matthew Rock, Dilyn McHugh, Sophie Ray, Kyle Potts, and David Hunter College of Engineering Northeastern UniversityAbstractThe
Paper ID #37748Power Generation Using the BayousDr. Mahmud Hasan, University of Houston-Downtown Strong and diverse teaching, research, industry, and service (department, college, university, and commu- nity level) experience in innovative safety environments. Worked in different multinational engineering companies: McDermott International, Inc., Genesis Oil and Gas (Technip USA Inc.), and Shahjibazar Gas Turbine Power Plant. A licensed Certified Safety Professional (CSP) and Professional Engineer (PE) from two states (Texas and Louisiana). Evidence of scholarship as demonstrated by national and/or inter- national
Paper ID #39803Pre-College Robotics: Best Practices for Adapting Research to OutreachDavid Ricardo Medina, Golecki Group David is a rising senior in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Illinois. He has worked with the Golecki Group for two years and has worked on onboarding, outreach, and electrical/computer engineering components of projects.Jaylynn Kim, University of Illinois at Urbana - ChampaignKatelynn OhkDominique KisantearJorge JimenezGavin TianProf. Conor Walsh P.E., Harvard University Conor is Assistant Professor of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering at the Harvard School