Asee peer logo
Displaying results 541 - 552 of 552 in total
Conference Session
Biological and Agricultural Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Heidi Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Anu Singh, University of Nebraska Lincoln
buildingstudents’ abilities to document their work, consider the ethical implications of their work, bereflective practitioners, and enact effective team behaviors. A complete set of learningobjectives was provided to students to use as a reference to guide their learning andreflection. Examples of learning objectives relevant to this study are shown in Table 2. Foreach learning objective, a description of proficiency was provided.Standards-based grading was employed across all elements of the course, meaning studentperformance on assignments was assessed using the learning objectives as items in criterion-referenced rubrics [24]. A five-point scale (i.e., Proficient (100%), Developing (80%),Emerging (50%), Insufficient Evidence (1%-5%) and No Attempt (0
Conference Session
DEED Technical Session 11 Empathy and Human-Centered Design 2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pamela Dickrell, University of Florida; Jeremy Waisome, University of Florida; Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida; Andrea Goncher, University of Florida; Idalis Villanueva, University of Florida
technical skills, economic feasibility, ethical and environmentalconsiderations, and user needs. In the same train of thought, it is unclear whether it is theinstructional strategies or the tools that support students’ understanding of HCD and how thesetools enhanced their perspectives of the roles of engineers in society. The closest study foundaround engineering design, human-centered design, and instructional strategies was a studyconducted by Villanueva and colleagues [18] where they showed that active learning activitiesconnected to service learning in engineering design resulted in higher engagement of students tothe classroom activities. This body of work on ideation and prototyping tools serves as anexploration of these elements within an
Collection
2005 GSW
Authors
Vanessa Svihla; Ronald Barr; Marcus Pandy; Anthony Petrosino
interpersonal skills in engineering contexts. 8. Ability and desire to lay a foundation for continued learning beyond the baccalaureate degree. 9. Awareness of professional issues in engineering practice, including ethical responsibility, safety, the creative enterprise, and loyalty and commitment to the profession. 10. Awareness of contemporary issues in engineering practice, including economic, social, political, and environmental issues and global impact. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationIn an effort to see how the ME354M course was achieving
Collection
2022 ASEE - North Central Section Conference
Authors
Patrick Connolly, Robert Morris University; Madyson Orlando-Jepsen , Robert Morris University
weapons systems that battle against other teams of students. TheBotsIQ competition is commonly referred to as “battle bots,” because the students build robotsthat fight to destroy each other. The competition is held on a geographically local level withwinners advancing to the nationwide competition hosted by the National Robotics League.To ensure the survey was conducted in an ethical manner, all authors of this paper completed theCollaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) as required by Robert Morris University’sInstitutional Review Board (IRB). The IRB then reviewed and approved the survey as outlined inAppendix 1 before it was sent to the BotsIQ program instructors along with the consent formgiven in Appendix 2. Those who received
Conference Session
Technical Session 5 - Paper 5: The Impact of Prior Programming Experience on Computational Thinking in First-Year Engineering Experience.
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Noemi V Mendoza Diaz, Texas A&M University; Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma; Russ Meier, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Janie M Moore, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
of software design through the implementation and debugging of student-written programs; (4) introduction to engineering majors, career exploration, engineering practice within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, ethical, health and safety, and sustainability. Physics: This is the second course in the first-year engineering experience and has Intro as a pre-requisite. Many of the experiments involve rely on Python code to interact with sensors and actuators. Therefore, a solid foundation in the skills from Intro is necessary.From the population of position-of-stress participants, a stratified sampling technique was usedto choose interview candidates in three categories of decreasing
Conference Session
Technical Session 2 - Paper 2: Lessons Learned from Conducting a Diversity-Focused Faculty Cluster Hire at a Predominantly White Institution
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado Boulder; Dana Francesca Stamo, University of Colorado Boulder; Clayton Lewis, University of Colorado Boulder
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
least one candidate who would be offered a faculty position.The Dean and Search Chair reiterated to everyone involved that this was an open-disciplinesearch and that the only limitation was that applicants had to specialize in an area that would fitwithin any tenure-home engineering department. That excluded individuals whose faculty homewould have been in the college’s humanities/society/ethics or engineering education programs.Along with the Search Committee chair (Lewis), the search committee’s equity advisor andlogistics manager (Sandekian) collected and organized relevant research and materials fromcomparable searches nationwide and placed them into a shared Google Drive folder. Thisincluded the rubric and website materials developed by
Conference Session
Intersections of Identity and Student Experiences: Equity, Culture & Social Justice Technical Session 10
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cole Joslyn, University of Texas at El Paso; Amira Williams, University of Texas at El Paso; Angelica Ann Littles
forthe same job and the competition can bring out the worst in some people.I decided to apply to an internship for a civil engineering company. I was worried about gettingthe position because my novice resume and that I was a sophomore in college barely starting mycivil engineering classes. I expressed my concern to one of my Hispanic classmates and was toldnot to worry about it. “You’re a Black woman, you already got it.” I did not get the position, butI was angered that this person limits my abilities to just my gender and race. It didn’t occur tothis person that someone may hire me because of my intellectual capabilities or work ethic, butbecause I possess something I have no control over. It is unfair for someone’s abilities to bediscredited
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego; Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego; Carolyn Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Leah Klement; Marko Lubarda, University of California, San Diego; Minju Kim, University of California, San Diego; Alex Phan, University of California, San Diego; He Liu; Mia Minnes, University of California, San Diego; Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego; Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Maziar Ghazinejad, University of California, San Diego; Josephine Relaford-Doyle, University of California, San Diego; Celeste Pilegard, University of California, San Diego; Xuan Gedney, University of California, San Diego
Conference Session
Unassigned (6 available)
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jill Heemstra, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Luis Rodriguez; Anna-Maria Marshall, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Erin Cortus, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; John Classen, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Jacek Koziel, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Alison Deviney
experiential, methodological, spatial-temporal, technological, institutional, social, and political/ethical as well as consider that transdisciplinary teams evolving through different stages may require changes in their communication processes [115]. Wang et al. (2019) [116] developed a communication framework for transdisciplinary teams that offers topics for communication and indicators of successful communication (subdivided into relationship development and solution development) at each stage of team formation and performance. One feature of the workflow should be regular and ongoing (emphasis added) communication [98]. Transdisciplinary teams are often separated spatially and these
Conference Session
Centering Black Experiences in STEM: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anne McAlister, University of Virginia; Jessica McDermott, University of Virginia; Juan Carlos Garibay, University of Virginia; Lindsay Wheeler
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 14: Introductory Programming Assessment, Plagiarism, Motivation, Engagement, and Textbooks
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
P.K. Imbrie, University of Cincinnati; Jeff Kastner, University of Cincinnati; Dylan Ryman, University of Cincinnati
array of different technologies available for use.Student attempts to modify plagiarized work in an effort to evade detection by similarity engines,which will be known as “mutations” for the remainder of this paper, are of substantial concern toengineering educators as they threaten the ability of the assessment process to accurately identifywhich students behaved ethically and which students engaged in academic misconduct.Therefore, it is essential that similarity engines are as well-equipped as possible for mitigating theimpact of these attempts. The ability of a similarity engine to retain accurate and precise detectionof plagiarized source code files in spite of the application of mutations is an important factor toconsider in an evaluation
Conference Session
LEES Session 8: Care and Commitments
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Mallette, Boise State University
also be used to assess ABET outcomes for communication and teamwork,indicating their use for assessing students’ abilities to apply technical knowledge to solveproblems collaboratively while also communicating those solutions effectively.Based on a 2013 review of engineering education scholarship, when faculty assigned teamprojects, they primarily targeted outcomes based in teamwork, design, and communication, withsome focus on innovation, lifelong learning, ethics, and motivation [8]. In a breakdown of theteamwork outcome, researchers found a focus on global/cultural competence (for both teammembers and clients), project management, and interdisciplinary teamwork, as well as somefocus on societal concerns, distributed teamwork, leadership