solutions 4. Create and explain the value of ideas from a business perspective 5. Utilize the Summer Entrepreneurial Experience as a stepping-stone into other GCSP activities and programming 6. Meet and connect with GCSP students from other institutions who share similar interests 7. Observe and experience sustainability work being done in the private, public, and non- profit sectors 8. Develop transferable skills for academic and professional experiencesThroughout the three-week program, participants collaborated on a team project to research,design, and build a sustainable product or service prototype and business plan. The three weeksof curriculum followed a cyclical structure, which introduced each topic via a mini-lecture
decide on the subject matter to cover inthe PLTL workshops. The two selected subjects were Resume Building and Creation of E-portfolios. They had already received a training on resume building and the creation of e-portfolios, and the goal was to help other LIATS to complete theirs. Two planning sessions wereheld previous to each session to decide on logistics, contents, and practice. Then all the studentsparticipating in the PEARLS Program were equally distributed among the ten peer leaders.Training the leaders was done using a cognitive apprenticeship framework, as it works well withPLTL [13, 14]. PLTL is rooted in Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development [2]. Here the PLTLcoordinator models behaviors for the PLTL leader to follow, providing
airfoil 63 3418. b) A manufactured wing section with a modified CLARK YH airfoil.Also, Univalle faculty members will open a new “hands-on experience” class focused oncomposite materials manufacturing, by the first semester of 2020. The plan is continuing this 6type of learning procedure [11] and to integrate academic undergraduate or graduate studentgroups to force them solving problems under appropriate guidance but also involving them incollaborative multicultural environment to achieve a simple goal. Thomas and McGregor in 2005[12] emphasized the relevance of this type of interaction.Development of a two crew lightweight sailplane (project AVE)The IDEXA team is
services for and meeting space for employees and estimate vulnerable communities volunteers Local non-profit Redesign of a 3000 square foot Drawings of existing and working to empower basement of a 1910s school to serve as a 3 teams of redesigned basement. 1 regional Latino senior center, soup kitchen, and licensed 3 each group did existing, while 2 communities kitchen for entrepreneurial ventures groups did revised plans. Drawings, structural design, New exterior fire-escape staircase design
have little support or encouragement from home to enter into STEM fields.The goal was to partner with the teachers not only to demonstrate the effectiveness of projectwork, but also provide assistance in completing the tasks. The idea was to guide the teachers inthe use of tools and techniques that could be successfully utilized to engage the students inSTEM related topics and to also learn from them in order to develop best practices.Having a class of middle schoolers complete activities in the classroom or lab would requiremore adult to student interaction when conducting some of the planned experiments, so a reliablepool of volunteers was needed. Partnering with Missouri University of Science and Technology(MS &T) students not only
plan for activities. Throughout the academic year, the teacher referred to the arrival ofmaterials that never showed up. There were several reasons for this including a leadershiptransition at the school, lags in procurement and challenges in communication. Toovercome this hurdle, we ‘dusted off’ some older robotics materials from the HS closet towork with throughout the academic year. For the UMD curriculum, the program model was tested. At the service site, 1-2UMD students worked with a team of 3-4 HS students to design, build and program arobot. The course met once per week on Thursdays from 3:30 – 4:45 at the end of theschool day. Following the service visit, UMD students completed an online discussionlog of their activities
used to establish the practice [9]: 1. Situating: Establish the exploratory experimental tasks within the context of the course and discipline, so that students see the relationship to other core concepts and practices 2. Modeling: The instructor models expert practice while describing and explaining each step of the process from planning (selecting materials/tools, organizing work space) through execution 3. Scaffolding: The instructor provides guidelines, steps, and parameters to structure student exploration. The student begins to conceptualize the task and begins planning. 4. Coaching: The instructor provides coaching and feedback while students engage in the exercise themselves. The student engages in the
learningefforts have enhanced or detracted from students’ engineering education as a whole incomparison to their non-service learning peers, and if the practices and outcomes of thesesections create new trajectories and plans for students, specifically whether it enhances futureinvolvement in community outreach efforts.IntroductionNortheastern University is a top fifty university [1] located adjacent to the Roxburyneighborhood of Boston, Massachusetts. Thanks to exponential growth and development overthe last decade, Northeastern has become a landmark within the community. For decades, it hasbeen shaped by its urban backdrop and has recently taken innovative steps to use its status in thecommunity to provide an impactful outreach program. The backbone of
Industry. As she has plans to remain and be an active member in SWE as a Professional Member, upon graduation in May of 2019. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Impact of "Imagineer Day," an Outreach Program, on K-8 girls and Women in EngineeringAbstractThe Society of Women Engineers at California State University, Chico developed an educationaloutreach program to promote Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) to K-8 girlsin 2012. Since then, every year over 200 local K-8th grade students are invited to participate inmultiple hands-on labs that demonstrate basic science and Engineering concepts. The goal of theoutreach program is to get young girls interested in
, IGERT, and I3 grants for the National Science Foun- dation. She is an Extension Services Consultant to the National Center for Women & Information Tech- nology and has helped more than a dozen universities increase recruiting and retention of women in their technology programs with data driven methods and evaluation support. Four of her clients are NCWIT NEXT Award winners for the Extension Services outcomes they achieved. Michelle has an M.A. in Applied Behavioral Sciences with Human Factors specialization. Her research interests include the eval- uation of STEM projects and programs, diversity studies, strategic planning, and data visualization. c American Society for Engineering
lessons of the unit. The main focus of these five lessons was eitherscience or mathematics content. These lessons were chosen since the purpose of this researchwas to examine how engineering language was used in science- and mathematics-focusedlessons during an engineering design-based STEM integration unit. The portions of the lessonsthat contained the teacher using engineering language or implied engineering language whenaddressing the whole class were transcribed, as well as gestures relating to engineering (e.g.,pointing at a step in the design process displayed on the front wall). Curricular materials,including lessons plans, teacher powerpoint slides, and student worksheets, were used assupporting material to help better understand the
Paper ID #21207Developing Improved Methodology for Online Delivery of Coursework Pro-viding a Framework for Quality Online EducationMr. Veto Matthew Ray, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis Mr. Matt Ray is the director for the Facilities Management Technology graduate program as well as a lecturer for the Construction Engineering Management Technology Program offered through the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indian University Purdue University Indianapolis. He currently provides instruction for Facilities Planning and Management, Introduction to Facilities Engineering Sys- tems, Financial
schools as the selected applicants,and a few even participated in the program twice. Forty percent of the participants were NativeAmericans and 56% were females. Since the program, teachers have attended approximately 25conferences, several with their students. Program deliverables included a research poster and twoSTEM lesson plans for their classroom – one with indigenous culture embedded into STEMconcepts, and the other based their university research. Additionally, participants received $1500toward classroom supplies to support the RET lesson plans. Outcomes include increased teacherconfidence in performing research, improved laboratory skills, and greater understanding ofSTEM pedagogical development specifically geared toward Native American
- F2F person help or instruction is sometimes necessary or better Plan to use progress reports or build-as-you-go in PLAN TO the futureResultsSince the students were not required to write the progress reports and did not (per se) have toapply the build-as-you-go strategy to their writing, one of our overarching questions centered onwhether the students in fact viewed the progress reports as stepping-stones and/or used the build-as-you-go strategy. Based on the student interviews, to our great satisfaction, they did. In fact,the very great majority of students (96%) indicated they used the progress reports as a stepping-stone and/or applied
Scholaroutcomes are also presented and discussed as well as future plans for the program.INTRODUCTIONHealth care spending represented 17.8 percent of the United States economy in 2015.1Innovations are needed in the healthcare system to enhance patient care and health, whilereducing costs. Educating quality bioengineers trained to identify and solve healthcare problemswill prepare them to develop cost-effective solutions.Our strategy involves team-based design experiences driven by new projects drawn from unmetclinical needs is the strategy used here to train engineers while simultaneously addressinghealthcare problems. Design experiences are core to engineering education and result in studentshaving a deeper understanding and ability to identify and
ABET student outcomes that are often challenging to assess for EAC andETAC accredited programs [6], [7].Given these goals for the course, the following course learning objectives were established: Atthe successful completion of this course, the student will be able to: • develop a problem statement and a requirements matrix for a relevant industry problem • perform a preliminary design analysis using appropriate computer and mathematical tools • synthesize a technical solution to design specifications utilizing tools and materials • quantitatively analyze multiple alternatives and down select to one approach • develop a Project Plan, including a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and Master Schedule • apply the
, or planning for, monitoring, and evaluating one’s own learning, knowledge,and skills [13, 14]. Metacognition is “thinking about thinking,” or “knowing about knowing,”and a metacognitive student is one who is aware of his/her learning processes and who can adjustthese processes as needed [6, 14]. Pintrich recommends that metacognitive-related instruction beembedded within usual lessons [15]. Tanner has done specific work in teaching biology studentsto use metacognition to plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning – all in the context of usualcourse practices, such as lecture, active learning exercises, homework assignments, and exams[16]. Metacognition is important because it supports the development of lifelong learning skillsneeded to
browsing capabilities via TOR (The Onion Router), LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHPor Python or Perl) server, Virtual Private Network (VPN) server, and protected browsing viaproxy service. The main goal of this educational project is to leverage the total holisticintegration of open source hardware and software to provide an affordable and portable solutionthat could be promptly deployed in case of an emergency, as a part of an incident response plan(IRP), or in case it is needed for testing purposes. Implementing this project provides valuablehands-on security experience and best practices in network architecture and configuration.Additional security features, both in hardware and software, were added to the single-boardcomputers to add additional
reflect onperformance early in the course would improve student outcomes. In particular, we examinedcounterfactual thoughts, thoughts about “what might have been.” These thoughts contribute tocausal reasoning and play an important role in making plans for the future. Additionally, weexamined behavioral intentions, specific plans for future actions in the course, which researchhas also shown improves student outcomes.After the first exam in a large-enrollment class taken by first-year engineering majors, 290students were randomly assigned to either generate counterfactuals about what they personallycould have done differently that would have resulting in doing better on the exam (vs. describetheir actual performance) and to either generate
Academic Programs in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan.Her primary responsibility in that role was to assure the delivery of a curriculum that addressed college-wide educational objectives to prepare students for 21st century careers. In this role Dr. Meadows led the planning, implementation and assessment of the College of Engineering first year program and targeted curriculum development projects. This led to her development as an educational researcher and she now conducts interdisciplinary research at the intersection of social psychology and engineering education, with specific emphasis on the influence of gender stereotypes in student teams.Dr. Laura Kasson Fiss, Michigan Technological
test, which students were asked take before thissurvey. Only 40% of the general population are considered guardians.Some 54% of students said they joined a professional society like ASCE, and 20% of thoseactive in ASCE were members of the concrete canoe or steel bridge teams.Surprisingly few students said high grades were more important than communication andinterpersonal skills and previous work experience when it comes to the job search and earlyjob success.Some 65% of respondents said a master’s degree would help advance their careers, while 58%plan to pursue a master’s degree at some point.The objective of this preliminary study was to improve students’ experiences and outcomes.The information collected here is likely applicable
participants benefit from education participants’ knowledge in developinglesson plans, teaching techniques and classroom management skills. Engineering and education facultywork together to advise the students from both schools. This collaborative environment creates a mutuallearning atmosphere for both students and faculty.7. Provide opportunity to learn about engineering for education studentsThe release of the Next Generation Science Standards in April 2013 has included engineering in K-12curriculum in NYS [15]. However education majors have no education on engineering topics and are notprepared to teach engineering courses. This program provides a unique opportunity for education studentsto learn about engineering and learn how to incorporate
and tested, and are waiting forprocedures to be written followed by classroom trial. The others are in the concept and hardwaredesign stages. The plan is to have all eight ready for fall of 2016.This paper addresses several aspects of the project. First, the guided inquiry approach in generalis discussed. Then, our plan of how to apply this approach in a classroom setting is laid out withsome discussion of lessons learned from using similar but longer exercises in a lab setting.Finally, we give examples of the type of hardware that will be used and the type of worksheetsthat could be used in concert with the hardware.Introduction:This paper reports on the status of work being done to develop classroom exercises to helpstudents better
defined as “the extent towhich one intends to engage in an activity”4. The choice or the decision to continue doing an activity,for example, is the result of someone’s motivation of doing that activity. Motivation has been exploredin relation to academic performance and career plans. Jones et al. studied the relationship amongexpectancies, values, achievement, and career plans for first year engineering students. They found thatstudents’ expectancy and value related beliefs decreased over the first year3 thus negatively influencingstudents’ retention into the second year of an engineering program. Predicting students’ intention tocontinue within engineering is complex, and the factors associated to this decision are not wellunderstood; however
Placed1 I prefer to have others Goal Setting Reverse 0.45 0.99 -0.03 1.24 0.01 plan my learning2 I prefer problems for Adaptable Reverse 0.23 1.06 -0.48 1.09 0.00 which there is only one learning solution strategies3 I can deal with the Adaptable Normal 1.02 0.75 1.03 0.73 0.94 unexpected and solve learning problems as they arise strategies4 I feel uncomfortable Adaptable Reverse 0.32 1.05 -0.12 1.02 0.02 under conditions of learning uncertainty strategies5 I am able to
, fundamental understanding of the characteristics of a successfulprogram is lacking. In addition, longitudinal tracking of participants that evaluate the influenceof the experience on their long-term plans is lacking. In this paper we describe and evaluate our9-year experience with a 10-week summer undergraduate program.MethodsOverall Program Description Page 26.695.5 From 2006 - 2014, a research university in the U.S. Midwest (Illnois Institute ofTechnology) has delivered a 10-week, summer engineering Research Experience forUndergraduate (REU) program. The program focuses on engineering research in theunderstanding and treatment of diabetes and
Paper ID #11309Exploring Military Veteran Students’ Pathways in Engineering EducationDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette Joyce B. Main is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and
reviewed the existing building as a case study. This included review of the building program, building code and zoning requirements and a conceptual review of the structural, HVAC and electrical systems including loads, system type and overall layout of each system. The industrial representative provided the building program, building plans, elevations and some building details that describe the existing building. This information is intended to be general in nature and can be scrubbed of any proprietary information prior to its delivery. The students through this review solidify their understanding of how the current building meets its design requirements. Students divided into small groups to
products. This course also includes elements important to small businessdevelopment such as intellectual property, commercialization plans and how to deliver abusiness pitch. Finally, in the senior level prototyping course, students will actually be given theopportunity to create a physical prototype of their product and work alongside a faculty mentoron the development of their own business model. This course sequence provides a “safe”environment for chemical engineering students to get a real taste of what starting your ownbusiness might be like prior to entering into the marketplace. It is believed that this first-of-its-kind “Product Innovation Sequence” will build not only a culture of entrepreneurship thatpermeates all levels of education
weeks of interaction with a team of (program name) students 400-600 hours of consulting services from the student team Innovative recommendations to an identified organizational challenge Support from (university) faculty and staff included a dedicated process expert for the duration of the project.Key Project Dates Project Start: 01/28/2015 Action Plan: 02/18/2015 Status Update: 03/25/2015 Preliminary Results: 04/22/2015 Final Presentations: 05/07/2015 Page 26.13.10Requests and Notes: Major Requirements: List requested majors Other Requests: List any other requestsAPPROVALSPrepared By